<center>'''[http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User_talk:Kip_the_Dip Go here]''' to catch me at not-Wikia.</center>
+
<center>'''[http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User_talk:Kip_the_Dip Go here]''' to catch me at the other one.</center>
----
----
{{-}}
{{-}}
+
+
== There can be only one ==
+
+
If that's your perspective then what are you doing editing both sites? At the moment you've taken it on yourself to be a one man revolution on site and just trolling with no value. I'd prefer that you were constructive. If you can't be constructive, why not just be absent? The modicum of respect the remaining users have for you is waning, and you edge closer to a ban. You've gone from being liked to being tolerated over the past few weeks. Are you aiming for being hated? {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 08 Feb}}
+
:First off, thank you for editing my talk page with actual content, rather than tweaking my banner on top.
+
+
:Secondly, while that "Spike can't be more wrong" speech and Highlander reference was meant for humor value, I apologize for falling back into '07esque dickery. It appears that I cannot be within Wikia or around Wikia apologists without resentment, so I shall choose to mostly remain absent, except for constructive purposes. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>00:50, Feb. 8, 2013</small>
+
::If it was for humour value it missed the point. Most of your recent edits have been a direct criticism of current users, which is why I've come to you. Thanks for taking the mature option. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:59 08 Feb}}
+
+
==Pee Review==
+
+
I did a pee review of two of your articles. You may want to withdraw your pee review requests on the other site. Speaking of that, you have a review up for [[Chanupocalypse]], but that article is already featured. Perhaps that one should also be withdrawn.
+
+
Since I reviewed two of your articles, could you please review [[Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/UnScripts:My_Little_Womb_Newt:_Pregnancy_is_Sexy|My Little Womb Newt]] since you like it so much that you think it should be featured. Spike left a few comments, but he is apparently totally ignorant of the show being parodied. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 21:26, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
If that's your perspective then what are you doing editing both sites? At the moment you've taken it on yourself to be a one man revolution on site and just trolling with no value. I'd prefer that you were constructive. If you can't be constructive, why not just be absent? The modicum of respect the remaining users have for you is waning, and you edge closer to a ban. You've gone from being liked to being tolerated over the past few weeks. Are you aiming for being hated? SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM12:37 08 Feb
First off, thank you for editing my talk page with actual content, rather than tweaking my banner on top.
Secondly, while that "Spike can't be more wrong" speech and Highlander reference was meant for humor value, I apologize for falling back into '07esque dickery. It appears that I cannot be within Wikia or around Wikia apologists without resentment, so I shall choose to mostly remain absent, except for constructive purposes. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:50, Feb. 8, 2013
If it was for humour value it missed the point. Most of your recent edits have been a direct criticism of current users, which is why I've come to you. Thanks for taking the mature option. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM12:59 08 Feb
I did a pee review of two of your articles. You may want to withdraw your pee review requests on the other site. Speaking of that, you have a review up for Chanupocalypse, but that article is already featured. Perhaps that one should also be withdrawn.
Since I reviewed two of your articles, could you please review My Little Womb Newt since you like it so much that you think it should be featured. Spike left a few comments, but he is apparently totally ignorant of the show being parodied. --Mn-z 21:26, February 9, 2013 (UTC)