User talk:Keitei/FINE

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

You heard him.

edit Du hast eine nette Signatur

I like the new signature... Are colored buttons the next trend?? --User:Anidnmeno/sig 03:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes --Splaka 03:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

edit Herzlichen Wilkommen!

So you come back after an extended absence, decide to look at the VFH and fix my asterisk and not vote on the article? Thanks! I tend to dislike bad formatting too, damn asterisks always doing whatever the hell they wan't, wasting server space and eating up resources. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 02:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

If you call "extended" a day and a half, sure. I'm supposed to be gone still. But I don't vote anymore. I go to VFH to remove articles, pretty much. Wait, I'm not supposed to be here... --KATIE!! 02:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh, btw. --KATIE!! 02:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
sigh, I'll shut the fuck up then, Thanks. Let me know what your favorite pie is. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 02:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I think someone gave me a link to it. *shrug* It takes like two seconds to fix formatting, forever to read stuff. --KATIE!! 02:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

edit Mysterious linking

I may be a bit slow, but finally I do discover what you are up to!--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 09:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Dear Sirs, I have been hired by Incorporated Keitei and Associates (NYSE: IKE) to open a line of inquiry as to what the heezee you are referring to. Please respond via facsimile or telephone call to our home office. -- Sincerely: Splaka, of the Law Offices of Splaka, Dawg, and Your Mom (LLC, Inc). 05:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

edit A Dragon or an Indian?

Okay, so while looking around at stuff I noticed the pictures of fire breathing dragons on your userpage. Naturally I had to contribute something, so while I was wasteing time Emulating Xmen vs Street Fighter, I made you this screen capture, of Dhalsim breathing fire on Chun-Li. Dhally represents you, and Chunny represents n00bs. Anywho, hope yah like it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Keitei pwning n00bs

Keitei breaths fire on a stub producing n00b

edit Award

Deletion Award
Mega Deletion Award!

This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many,
many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

Awarded for having the 6th highest deletion count and 2nd highest deletions per day. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 04:47, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Aww, I miss the huge images. --KATIE!! 05:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

edit Women without pants

Have to be honest here and say that had I not recognised your name and checked here, I would have rv'd your -NRV and told on you. So anyway, my question is, why did you -NRV Women without pants? Has my sense of humour failed? If so, what have I missed? Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 11:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

It is a very old article, and as such is not subject to NRV. It has been edited by several editors whom I esteem and who also run this site. It is a joke that is present through several other articles and should be expanded, not deleted. And I do think it has potential. --KATIE!! 12:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
For what it's worth, though, Guinness, I was about to delete it when I read it. But then I noticed that, like Keitei said, it had too much of a history... It's potentialless crap, by my standards too. But it's old potentialless crap and as such should best be left alone by regular users... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 12:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough, thanks for explaining :) Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 14:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

edit Dramamine

I only care because since you deleted it, it's the only red link in one of my articles. Could you possibly show me what was there, so I could create a decent article. I just need a little direction, and I promise something great. You could put it in my userspace (maybe User:SimulacrumCaputosis/notebook). Don't even worry about what's there, just write over it. If I need any of it later, there's always history! Anyhow, thanks in advance, K!

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown19:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

edit Quarter

I award you this award of awarding

edit Shameless Plug


I know you liked it, but with a singular further step you can be part of a bigger purpose (i.e., earning your friend Simmy bigger balls). So please, VOTE NOW on Uncyclopedia:VFP!!

This propaganda brought to you by CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown08:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Thank You Keitie!

Thank you so much for restoring our highschool page... you hav brought joy to the hearts of many who thought that it was lost forever. You are a great admin! - user:Sujacal

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! jk Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Hahahaha

Your wicked laugh picture really suits the article. Thanks!--Rataube 10:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks

- User:Guest/sig 12:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks (he stole my title)

...for your kind words on the front page box. Those can be tough to write.  :) Hugs, etc. ~ T. (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Cthulhu

You have pleased Cthulhu with your support of his column. I have been instructed to give this to you.

--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

mmmm... I was instrcted to do the same, how confusing. But keep this one, the caption is better I think.--Rataube 10:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Abu Ghraib

Hi! Could you explain why you removed the NRV template I placed on this article? I think in this case merely expressing a contrary opinion doesn't cut it. While the premise is good and few institutions deserve satire as much as Abu Ghraib and the peculiar goings-on there, the article itself is of very poor quality, containing numerous errors in spelling and grammar, and it is not particularly funny, given its cut and paste origins. It would be far better to be rewritten from scratch IMHO, this time making humour rather than convenience the object. --Skyring 10:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

NRV is for articles which have No Redeeming Value. Not liking an article does not mean it doesn't have any redeeming value. {{vfd}} would be more suitable in this case. If you object to the spelling and grammar so much, fix it yourself. --KATIE!! 12:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! Could you take another swing at a response, please? --Skyring 12:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
In all fairness, and no offense is intended Keitei, I'm going to have to side with Skyring on this one. Just because you happen to think the article has quality doesn't mean that Skyring was able to find anything he considered redeeming about it. If you weren't an admin and an action like this had taken place, I would not hesitate to block you for a day or few. The burden of using {{vfd}} is on the NRV-remover and while I agree with your view on the article, you still should have followed the standard procedure. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
It wasn't some "unilateral" thing. Whywhy asked the IRC channel if we thought it was fairly placed, and nobody thought it was. I happened to be the one to remove it, but I wasn't the only one who thought it should be. It seemed unfair to NRV such a well establish article. It seems inappropriate, and we are in the process of trying to refine NRVing. We've been having problems with people NRVing things they simply don't like, which have a long history and plenty of humor. So, yes. --KATIE!! 09:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
A well established article? Fair suck, it's been in existence for all of four days, and I whacked an NRV on it less than 25 hours after it was created. I like the premise; I don't like the way it has been developed. Although I think it's fatally flawed, I haven't made a fuss over the unilateral NRV removal. However, I don't see anybody racing to improve on it. Does that mean that those reading this think it's fine as it is? --Skyring 10:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't think that it's fine, I just think that there's humor that has some redeeming value to it. It most definitely still needs work. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks for your vote, KT!

With your blessing, I'm sure to get featured now! The cult of KT will prevail!  :)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Old Man Grumpus

Hey, K, according to the deletion log you killed Good Old Days. Although there may have been a WIP or Construction template on there, the article, such as it was, had reached a completed stage. Ummmm...can I have my article back? It wasn't that bad. Not that bad at all. It had words, and some formatting, and even a picture. Words+formatting+picture = not bad at all. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP 12:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I was very undecided on that one. What made me decide to just delete it was a picture I think, or a template or something. I forget, actually. I'll restore it. --KATIE!! 13:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Oh right, it was the three templates. I hate templates. A lot. So that offended me. =] Just finish it or something, and removed the frigging templates. --KATIE!! 13:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks; I admit I just forgot about the templates. In any case, here, have the inaugural Weasel's Award of Superior Achievement Barring Indictment. Put it on your fridge and impress your pets! — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP 14:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
WASABI Wild Weasel has awarded you the highly non-coveted
Weasel's Award of Superior Achievement Barring Indictment
Go forth and do great things!
(just don't get indicted)

edit 'Marlborough'

Hi, I've come to request that my page 'Marlborough' be replaced. I know it was marked as a WIP and the tag was not subsequently removed, but the principle reason I did this was because I feared unless it was marked incomplete it would be destroyed for being too short. As it is, I do still like the page and want to expand on it. Thanks.

Restored. Please do expand. Cheers! --KATIE!! 09:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Obido

I was purging my Watchlist, and saw that Obido was swimming with the kittens. While it looks like a random crap, Obido was one of the first Words of the Day (Word of the Days? [Word of the Day]s? Like sands through the hourglass, these are the Days of the Word?). Whaddya say about bringing it back? (Note: an answer of "no" will not make me respect you any less. I would have been looking at your chest over your shoulder while talking anyway, 'cause I'm a guy and I'm easily distracted by boobies.) -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 02:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks and shut up

Oops. Forget the shut up part, I thought I was talking to someone else. Anyway, just want to say thanks for helping me and others out. --Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 15:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

edit the Magic of Bears

Keitei, although I can't be entirely sure you voted "for" on bear, have this:

Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP 17:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Hello

Thank you very much for the links to the helpful pages here on Uncyclopedia. I'd seen them before, but it's good to see the management/administration here is very helpful to new users. I hope to contribute to this very hilarious site very much. Thanks for noticing me and giving me some helpful suggestions. --ObliVioNT 21:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

edit ?

If you wonder what I'm doing recently, I have 8 tabs open in Firefox, and a surprisingly neat system. But many tabs, too many... anyway, erm, I'm making new invention templates. They're, well, you can see the explanation here. Should I stop, or what? If I should, then what ho, I will, but anyway... Flameviper12 21:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

edit HELP!

Right, I wrote an article about my friend AGGI or kitty as I call him, but now there is a banner saying "no redeeming value" what does that mean I have to change? how does on complete an article?


It means that you have seven days to improve it in some way, which I am sure you can do. :] Try adding links (like this [[this]]), making it easier to read, and cleaner to the eye. Also it'd help to give a good idea of what the article is going to be about at the beginning. You seem to have plenty of content, so don't worry about that. Just refine it, and I'm sure it'll be great. Cheers! --KATIE!! 08:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Welcome


Hello, Keitei/FINE, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Here are a few good links for n00bs:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automagically produce your name and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)


Ha! I got one of those on my wikipedia talk page recently despite having been registered there for about half a year. Wait a tick, do we have some template that I can subst in to make those? --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, we definately need a Welcome Template......and a Welcome to Hell Template too.... :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

edit Thanks

I got your welcome on Wikipedia Simple. I'm fine over there; I'm a long-time user of Wikipedia - find me Here.

P.S. U Got PWNED by Oscar Wilde

edit New user

Hey, I'm new to this site. Could you help me out? I don't really know what to do here. MasterNinja5261 01:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

edit Hello!

Thanks for the welcome! I feel special.

edit What happens when I stay up too late


Thought you might like this. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 06:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

edit Howdy

I very much appreciated your enthusiastic irc welcomes, and am thankful you didn't slap me for my purely platonic irc kiss in return that one time. It's good to feel loved and missed. Thanks.  :) ~ T. (talk) 12:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey Todd....where's my IRC kiss? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
(LOL) Careful. MoneySign's already suspicious enough.  :) ~ T. (talk) 13:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

edit Here, you can have one too

Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 23:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

edit KEITEI, no doubt about it!

No doubt about it your cool, lots of reasons, and im too lazy to list them! so please be content with the fact!--Alia kenobi 06:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

edit Keitei...

WILL YOU MARRY ME? I LOVE YOU. The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs)

Only if you're gay. After all, there are no girls on teh internets!--Anon32 15:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks...

...for updating the featured article last night. My internet went out in the afternoon and it stayed out until this morning. Honestly I felt like I was suffocating without it. Is that bad? And by the way, I got the shirt and it looks really good! —rc (t) 14:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

edit zh uncyclopedia

hello Keitei, would you do me a favor to unprotected the zh- Main Page? There is no regular users use it, I think unlock the main page would attract more chinese users.Thank you. --KaurJmeb 17:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Done. I left unregistered users unable to edit it, for vandalism warding purposes. If you are convinced that's unnecessary, I can fully unprotect it. --KATIE!! 17:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks!

edit Its all your fault

I blame you....yah, featured article! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

edit !!!

You are the only female person that has ever even gazed at a potato. Thank you. 16:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

edit OH SNAP

Yeah, I realized that later. But then, I realized I didn't care much...=)

Strong Rad 21:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Comment

It seems I involved myself in a conversation that probably should have been left alone. Or more likely shouldn't have happened in the first place. Anyway, I would imagine you really do care but are just frustrated by saying you don't. E-mail me if you'd like to talk about it. As for me, I was offended that an admin would make such comments in the first place. I would like to state my opinion in a constructive manner and appologize for any offending remarks if you'll listen. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Paddington D. Shufflebotham  18:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


Although caged, they are still wild animals and will eat limbs. For breakfast. And drink blood. Actually, I just thought you'd like this. Okay, it's a bit clunky and big, but that just makes it better. --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 03:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

BuddyChrist This user is an ADMIN,
not a shaggy pacifist, robot, or your mom. If you whine at them, they will hurt you.

edit Congrats

Psycho Warrior

This user is completely insane
and is a notable member of the Uncyclopedia Psychobabble Club.

For your psychobabble skillz. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 00:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Draak à la Volte


Run you idiots

Here you go. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 14:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Your STEVE BALLMER-ING draak


You can almost hear the villagers scream her name...

Now leave me alone! :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 13:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

edit It's all your fault!

[[User talk:Kakun#=]|Unforgivable act...]]--⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 08:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Bob Wire

What was wrong with that page?

It was a Non-Notable Person (NNP). See our vanity policies. Cheers. --KATIE!! 22:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

It's a parody on Bob Geldof, the one who gave his kids wierd names?

edit You are such a crazy whore

Don't you agree? --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 20:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

YEESSSSS. --KATIE!! 20:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
I know my crazy whores, and you are definately one of them. I also know my coconuts, you are not a coconut. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Boo.

Did I scare you? Dark_ApostropheThe Memory Hole 16:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, yes you did. *Katie runs away crying.* --KATIE!! 17:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

edit More messages

Why exactly do you need more messages on your talkpage? - User:Guest/sig 19:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

BECAUSE NOBODY LOVES ME!! --KATIE!! 19:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

edit I like 'splodey food.

Beans are the best, but turkeys and ginnantonix are good when they 'splode too. Just thought I'd share with you, so's you don't feel left out. --King In Yellow 19:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Your bear LIES

[19:20] <Keitei> waah. I need more messages.

FINE. Have your stupid message. --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 19:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank ye kindly. --KATIE!! 19:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Turnabout

The paw in Dawg's sig links to your userpage. Isn't it only fair to make the heart in your sig link back to his?

You should watch more Dr. Phil. --T. (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

edit i love you

i love you

-fhqwhgadshgnsdhjsdbkhsdabkfabkveybvf24.92.195.189 22:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Have Another Message

This time with a link. --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 15:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

edit An article in need of your sort of expertise

There's an article that was created out of a theoretically terrible article that came up in a VFD discussion. Namely someone or other commented to the effect of article whatever is so much better than the "Moogawooga the Platypus God is the Most Powerful Being in the Universe and PWNS NOOBS without mercy" crap that pops up everywhere, so I decided that there had to be Moogawooga about the platypus God himself. I've started work on it and I want to turn it into somthing that's so bad it's good and I need some of your MS Paintshop magic. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I will be improving the article past that one sentance at some point in time. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I got my partner in MsPaint crimes Skiddles to make you a platypus god. But it does seem that someone is crapping their own images on the article... --KATIE!! 10:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Original Music Category

Howdy, I was just curious why you deleted the original music category. It seems to make sense to me. Both MC Hammer/Lyrics and Garbage Band belong in that category really, and I'm sure others do as well. Is there a policy against it? It seems that this place can create some pretty funny music, why not collect it all together into one place so not only can people find it easier, but so they are encouraged to create more of it? Triddle 10:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

We recently went through and deleted all the categories with three or fewer articles in them. It wasn't situational, just part of a massive clean-up. If you can add that category to four or more articles, feel free to recreate it. Cheers! --KATIE!! 10:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Yay for you!

And for the pic on my User Page! Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Reality Check NY

Hi, I made an article making fun of the group Reality Check NY, but some of the kids from the organization keep deleting the page to write "REALITY CHECK ROCKS!" or something of that nature. Is there anything I can do to maintain the article aside from monitoring it for when someone does try to edit it? Secondwhiteline 01:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

It is among the admin duties to revert vandalism (and that is vandalism), and there are plenty of users who will revert it too. If it's a huge problem, the vandals can be banned. Just monitor it and we'll try to keep it vandal-free. =] --KATIE!! 03:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!Secondwhiteline 03:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

edit You have no escape

--Rataube 19:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

No escape whatsoever. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
What's so friggin' great about my half-brother??? (Hell, Dereleth woulda named the mythos after me... *sob*) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Your Stalker


Please stop trying to contact me. Any further attempts will be interpreted as your inability to listen to rebuke or respectful requests. I will not respond any longer.

If you have any more trouble with that guy who followed you around, don't hesitate to ask on the IRC Cabal for all your relationship advice, even if that advice is cruel and brutal. --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:07, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
And remember, I can make his face melt by crossing my eyes at him. Through the screen. On another planet. I'm that icky. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks for catching that...

...on the PMS template. I figure forewarned is best. Thank you for being so nice to me before my meltdown last month. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Everyone breaks down sometimes, especially me... =] Good to hear you're doing better. --KATIE!! 16:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Can I ask another favor? Can you take a look at See Dick and add, subtract, multiply it? Its missing something to give it an edge. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

You certainly beat See Dick into his place. You're good. Damn good.Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Drug chart parody

Hello! I hail from Uncyclopedia and I was perusing Wikipedia when I came across your drug chart. It sparked in me a great number of ideas for a parody that could be made. It is clearly apparent that you have put a lot of work into this, and so while we at Uncyc often just steal images, I figured I would ask first. Would it be alright if I sporked your image (and chart) for a parody series of articles? And would you be interested in helping? Uncyclopedia is great for relieving stress. =] Nice job on the chart, by the way! --Keitei

Hi Keitei, I got your message, and am curious what you had in mind ;) Thanks for the compliments --Thoric 21:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I was thinking it could be used to clean up the existing articles and as it's grouped by properties certain non-drug articles could be inserted in for satiric effect, such as religion. I like the way it's organized and I think it could set a framework for future articles. Sorry if that doesn't make much sense, still brainstorming... --KATIE!! 22:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Sounds nifty ;) Have fun, and let me know if you need any help with it, especially with suggestions of how other topics relate to the drugs in question (I actually worked out a house floor-plan according to my drug chart... i.e. where the kitchen {stimulants-coffee}, bedrooms {narcotics-sleep}, livingroom, diningroom, workshop, music/art studios {hallucinogens}, etc should go.) --Thoric 23:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

edit "Are we understand?"

Understood, yes. Understand, not so much. - Nonymous 20:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Whimsy

K- The article Whimsy has a VfD on it. In its original form is wastn't about whimsy, but more along the lines of, well, what goes through ones mind when one ingests too much sugar. Anyway, I attempted to do something with it. In any event Gwax placed the VfD back on which is fair. Anyway I have come to you because, I think that you can appreciate the whimsical (good whimsical, not the bad whimsical). Can you take a look? Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Whoops.

Sorry, didn't notice that articles had to be over a week old before they could be self-nominated. Is it okay to stick Oxford Animal Lab back up once it's all old and crinkly?--Wyattj 10:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Sure, that's fine. --KATIE!! 17:11, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Send you good thoughts...

Katie....Is there anyway to send a hug over Uncyclopedia? Sounds like you've been under a lot of pressure lately and the burdens of the world (not to mention the stuff of life) are getting you down. I can't say that I understand - I haven't walked in shoes that someone your age walks in in a long time - but I do know what its like to get pulled in sixteen different directions and not have a moment to yourself. If I can offer advice - focus on what matters most in the long run. Find a goal, and keep your eyes fixed on it. Don't loose who you are to what other people expect you to be - if they can't accept that they are not the center of your world, screw'um. I don't want you to have go through what I have endured because I lost sight of my dreams. But I understand, sometimes stuff just happens. Hugs, Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Send you good thoughts: The Sequel...

Look, K, I'm sorry I got upset with you, and I'm sorry if I was mean to you on UN:VFP. I've been a little pissed off lately over this ultra-stoopid quotes-pages thing (okay, maybe a lot pissed off - and it's not like the situation is improving, either!), and it just sort of spilled over, I think. I should just take a week off, try to forget what's going on here, and hopefully come back and pretend all of this ever happened. I'll stay away from VFP for a while regardless, maybe forever - I never intended to get involved much there anyway, and precious little good has come of it, really. If I seemed to criticize you, I apologize for that. I promise, no more snarky comments about less-than-serious nominations, no more "policies," no more jibba-jabba. In future I'll reserve those things for those who truly deserve it.

But at the risk of spoiling a perfectly good apology, there is one thing I can't quite let go of. In a discussion entry that has since been deleted, I believe you used the phrase "space on our servers." Please don't take this the wrong way, but I'm very conscientious of disk space and download-time considerations! And if you have a moment, please take a look at the number of bytes used by this image. Then check out the number of bytes used by this one. I believe you'll find that all eight of the Moogawooga faces combined use less disk space than that one screenshot; and while - again - I don't mean to criticize, disk space is cheap, and I hope we both know that. I'm just pointing this out in case you're tempted to use this argument again, on someone who's actually nastier than I am. (Not that such a person could possibly exist, of course!)  c • > • cunwapquc? 20:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

edit Vanity Page?

Hey, I'd just like to know why my article University of Pennsylvania is considered a vanity page? --Zengei 19:41, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Okie dokie artichokie (god I hate myself), let's see... Take a read through the Vanity Policies, particularly the last one. Just because you are a student at the University, doesn't mean that other Uncyclopedians will. So as you can see here, other pages link to it. If people didn't find Uncyclopedia funny, it wouldn't be funny. Comprende? So rewrite please. --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:04, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Well going through the policies...
1) How many google ( hits does it have? The phrase "University of Pennsylvania" receives nearly 40 million hits.
2) Does wikipedia ( have a page for it?
3) Have any of the admins heard of it? I'd be surprised if the admins had never heard of UPenn.
4) Is it funny? Now this one is obviously the most subjective. But if we take "funny" as being "most users find it amusing" then I can say that it's funny. Considering I self-nominated it for feature article and it received more votes for than against as a feature article, then I think we can safely assume more than a mere majority would find it amusing (although perhaps not feature worthy).
Maybe what you're saying is that only Penn students would find it funny. I tried to avoid this, and I believe I was successful as people who have no affliation with the University found it to be worthy of being featured. Of course, to fully appreciate some jokes you will have to be familar with the school. For example, "The singing of 'The Red and Blue' is often accompanied by a repeated salute first popularized during the 1930's by the young Wharton student, Adolf Hilter." This is referencing the fact that when "The Red and Blue" is song, students, alumni, and faculty will place their fist over their heart then salute with an outstretched arm repeatedly. It's thus reminiscent of the Nazi salute. Now, to fully "get" this joke you would have to know about the University but I think anyone else would still "get" it in the sense that it's humorous to imagine hundreds of college students performing the Nazi salute at a football game.
I don't think subtle "in-jokes" like this should be considered "vanity." Especially since a student at Penn looking up Penn's Uncyclopedia entry will expect those types of references. Otherwise the article seems like something written by a complete outsider to the University. --Zengei 20:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC) (Previous edits were me not logged in).
The above policies are more the guidelines for determining if an article's subject is vanity or not. However, even a notworthy subject article can be a vanity article (allowable in some cases, like for a school) if the article is written in a vain way. Eg: If it has sections in it about non-notable students and teachers, that is vanity. Apply the guidelines above to, for example, each person mentioned. As it is currently only 'God' 'Mike Tyson' 'Chuck Norris' and 'George W Bush', it is at first glance not vanity. Chronarion has stated that school can have vain and nonvain websites about themselves, but if they are vain or turn vain, they need {{vanity}} tags to prevent insta-huffination. That make sense? --Splaka 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
I also object to the removal of this page from VFH. I think many colleges are large enough and well enough known to qualify for nomination. Let's not forget that way back when, University of California was a featured article. Granted, the UPenn page seems to have more in-jokes, but people who didn't know much about the school voted for it on VFH, so it must have some widespread appeal. If we're going to tag this a vanity page, then I don't think we should have a blanket ban on vanity page nominations on VFH. --—rc (t) 01:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
I've thought about this a bit and, at this point, I figure if it gets the votes, it's probably feature material. No problem with featuring it here. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 06:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

edit Gay Award

You really saddened me with the gay award. I hope you change it. Because if you don't, I'll be :-(. --Boy Toy bitch at me 23:57, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Broken Link to Reality

Katie, this is ludicrous. I don't care what names you call me, or what ridiculous spin you put on it, the facts are crystal-clear: I was having a conversation on my own talk page, and you folks kept butting in. You could have chosen to ignore it, but you wouldn't. You asked me to join your little IRC party, and I went out of my way and did that for you. There you asked me what it would take to get me to shut up, and I told you. Then you insulted me some more, and I left, because oooh, how weird, I didn't especially feel like being insulted that day. Next thing I know, I'm banned for 24 days (boo hoo), you've broken what little agreement I stupidly thought we had, and when I point that out, the whole thing just gets worse! Well, I guess you get an A-Plus in Conflict Resolution class, Katie! A nice big ninja-star for you!

Lessons learned from this experience? Well, I already knew you people couldn't be trusted, but I've picked up a few new tips all the same. Admins put comments on your talk page? Ignore them at all costs! Admins ask you to "please" join their IRC channel so their abuse won't be seen by the public? DON'T GO!!! And if the word "attitude" is used? Start thinking of clever monikers for your brand-new account.

Codeine, your claim of "censorship" is laughable. This is a "public" site, we don't know who Nerd42 is, and we're not saying who he represents either - even though we actually know that - so nobody can really be held accountable for anything he says, can he? Real protection demands real accountability, Codeine; you can choose to protect him, in defiance of your own (apparently meaningless) quality standards, but that only makes you as bad as he is, and feeds more ammunition to those who would put a stop to anonymous public wikis in general. Everything written on this site stands only because it's either quality material to begin with, or because someone reverts any attempts to make it so. Which of those two things is happening here, Codeine?

Let me ask you this: If someone spray-painted "atheists are gay" on the walls of your public library (or hey, why not "Jews are evil"?), would you stand in the way of the janitor sent in to clean it up? Would you accuse the janitor of "censorship"? And if someone bitched at you for doing that, would you tell that person to "just go to another library"? Don't tell me it isn't the same thing, Codeine; it's exactly the same fucking thing.

Regardless, I believe indiscriminate hatred in the name of Christ is wrong, and I won't stop fighting for what I believe in just because a few right-wing twits with a Ban Button™ call me a "pisstard," or because some snotty teenage sociopath won't stop whinging in some chat room if those same people won't do whatever the fuck he says. That's just going to make me fight all the harder, I'm afraid.

Bye for now, --Pisstard 16:00, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you're one of those GNAA types with nothing better to do with your life.
  1. If you really believe it's so bad, why are you only bothering with the one? Why don't you go vandalize the other three in the series?
  2. In your example of physical vandalism: It's different because it's physical vandalism. We're highly annoyed by vandalism, but for some reason it isn't something we can sue you for since it's just our time we're wasting.
  3. In your example of physical vandalism: It isn't the same thing. Why don't you take your crusade to en.wp? They'd love the 'NPOV' you seem to hold so dear. The stuff you hate they claim to hate. It's a perfect match.
  4. If we bother you so much, just leave. It's really the easiest and most effective option. You don't see us, we don't see you, and you're free to go surf wherever you please. All over our educational pages there are places where it tells you to close your browser or just surf elsewhere. There's a lot more internet than just this one relatively small site. If you really want to fight a holy war against such things, there is a more offensive site where every article is full of this type of stuff. It's easy pickings there.
I recommend you go outside, breathe, then when your anger has subsided, just find somewhere else to spend your time online. Really. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:44, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Dear Pisstard,
What a text... Wowsa... You really feel strongly about this. And I guess I can understand that. I used to feel strongly about internet things too, to be honest. Until I took a step back from it all and realised what I was doing. Getting worked up over online nothings...
Your comparrison to the grafitti on libraries isn't accurate at all. People don't necessarily have a choice of library. I for one don't. We only have one. And I suspect that's the case in most areas. One per region. But this is the internet. There are loads and loads of places that resemble loads and loads of other places. Sure, there's only one, but I'm sure that if this place really doesn't suit you well, you could find something similar.
I'm not as good as writing as you are, clearly. Hell, I'm sure this all is pretty incoherent, not to mention the odd spelling mistake. But nevertheless, what I'm trying to say is: relax, man. I'm glad you hold your beliefs dear and that you will defend them to great extents. But this is only an website. If you really want to fight online spaces of significance, try getting the KKK-website to be shut down or something similar. I don't know... But not this...
Take care,
Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 18:35, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

You talk too much. I don't feel well currently, so I'm going to be brief. Admins manage the site and so of course we see your talk page. You were making a disturbance, so I invited you to IRC to see if we couldn't reason a solution. I thought that maybe giving you what you wanted would be worth the lack of a disturbance, but the other admins disagreed. I don't really care at this point. I suggest you just give up. It's really not worth the effort. And I don't believe I insulted you except for "pisstard", which you are. You're pissy, and retarded in that you have no sense of proportion.
If you were nice, we'd be nice back. But you're flaming all over the place. So you deserve whatever you get.
Cheers. --KATIE!! 18:40, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Kwik Widdle KwarifiKation


How are you! I hope you're well. As for me, I'm enjoying my vacation immensely, catching up on some reading, getting some relaxing spa treatments... But I couldn't help noticing yesterday, as I was browsing the shelves at Wal-Mart, that my prediction regarding the reverting of Nerd42's fave article had, indeed, come true! And in less than 48 hours! Gosh, I must be some sort of psychic, huh?

I understand that you're a busy person and you've never actually had time to read the history of this wonderfully fascinating little conflict, but the lines equating atheism with homosexuality were, and are, the central focus of the problem here, Katie. I don't mind Nerd42 making us Christians look stupid, since this is Uncyclopedia and stupidity is expected here, but I do mind him making us all look like hyper-reactionary hatemongering bigots. A lot of his sort of "Christian" are just that, of course, but that's not the sort of Christian I am, and I hope it's not the sort you are, either. (Assuming you're Christian and not, say, Buddhist, Muslim, etc.)

Again, there are three perfectly viable options here if you want this whole train-wreck to eventually end someday:

  • Take out all lines dealing with atheists being/becoming homosexuals, and keep them out. (Also, it would be nice if the racism could be toned down a bit, too - again, please try reading HTBFANJS - maybe even for comprehension this time.)
  • Or, better yet, put back the POV tag I added last week.
  • Or, what's behind Door Number Three, delete every single article and image I've ever posted here, revert every significant edit, and whack my user pages. Leave no trace.

So... please, Katie? Any one (or more, preferably) of those three things, and we're all done. I'll even be your friend forever if you want me to, if that's any sort of added incentive. It is, surely?

Thanks and hugs! -- Ravensig.jpgRavensigtalk.jpg 06:54, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Option Four: You quieten down and stop trying to enforce your censorship on other people by supressing articles that you find offensive and/or distasteful. How's that one work for you, Johnny? I believe Christians call it "Turning the other cheek". We call it "Closing your browser" or "Navigating away from the page". You do not dictate policy or content management on this site. We do, and I'm damned if I'll let you issue pathetic ultimatums like the above to my fellow administrators. In my opinion you became more trouble than you're worth a long time ago, and if you persist with this nonsense I'll have no qualms about banning you permanently. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:02, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Mmkay, you're not on IRC anymore so there's no real reason to give you what you want. Censorship is retarded. They have a right to say what they want to say. You could ask Nerd42 to remove the line I guess, cause it's his article, but it's not our place to tell people what things they can and can't say.
The gay thing isn't offensive. I know that Nerd goes way over the top with his "humor", but saying that atheists turn gay isn't really indicative of overreacting.
Pretty much the article isn't funny, and nobody really thinks it is so let's just leave it alone. I've given up on it and I hope to not see it anymore. Luckily with my magic browser that lets me choose where I go, I won't see it anymore. Amazing!
You should try it sometime.
Cheers. --KATIE!! 12:05, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Try not to be such a fricking pisstard, mmkay?

edit Thanks

Katie dear, Thank you so much for your encouragement and comments that you left for me on the RCMurphy talk page. You'll never know how much some positive feedback means. Any help you can give me (short of my spelling and grammar problems) would be deeply appreciated and welcome. Its hard when you're hoping to make a positive addition to something, but the things you do get ignored, discounted or trashed. And I get these ideas for things that I find funny - the quirks in the world, but you just can't share them with kids under ten - they don't get it. Can't share them with the husband because if it ain't sports or a trip to Hooters, he doesn't care. So again, thanks, Sugar. Prettiestpretty 16:17, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sweetie - could yall do me a favor and take a look at article Deviled eggs after 5pm EDT today. I'd like your feedback on the article and the images. Hugs, Prettiestpretty 21:33, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Why you great big ole little sugar honey!!! I'm the happiest married woman with three children and a husband on the couch that is on Uncyclopeia! Hugs, Prettiestpretty 22:02, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit User:Swordmaster

I was just about to ask for mercy for the guy you banninated for modifying Uncyclopedia:VFP. I thought his modification was somewhat funny, if not exactly teh funneh. But then I saw that it was a OMGBBQ! 10 minute ban, and I wondered why I was even continuing to type on your talk page. But being a lifelong geek, it's hard to stop talking when you can pretend you have the full attention of a girl with such great looks such a great personality a pulse. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:26, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit But why?...

What's wrong with the article Marines, why did you delete it? I thought this place is more friendly for newcomers. Epi 00:29, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Not to be rude or anything... but it was like 2 lines long, and it wasnt a very good start to an article. Maybe if it was longer, and had some more humor, i wouldn't have told her to she wouldn't have deleted it. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:46, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I was just thinking how to expand it... and it was expandable. Epi 00:50, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Well Maybe you should figure out how to expand it, and then rewrite the entire article including the expansion. And maybe then it won't be huffed. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:54, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I restored it here. You can expand and revise it there. Please create more than one or two lines before saving, and if something is a work-in-progess save it in your user space. We have a policy against one liners, nothing personal. Thanks. --KATIE!! 00:56, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Talk:Reasons to become an Atheist

I'd posted this on your talk page before, but I think you might have archived it without reading it

Please read/respond to teh bottom section on teh above link written by me :) --Nerd42Talk 21:05, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I did read and respond. But not a second time. Think maybe I was too lazy. Hmm. --KATIE!! 18:11, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit I may have been a little unilateral

I recently performed a deletion from QVFD (Special:Undelete/Current_status_of_Stickognoza) and it occurs to me that I might have been a little unilateral in so doing. I'm not entirely clear on our policies here; is this something I should have saved? Should I make sure to come to IRC in the near future so that we can discuss it's merits in great detail? --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:55, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Exagerated

Hi. Don't u think u exagerate by baning me from the channel? Ive seen users kicked hundred of times without being banned. And i wasnt that disturbing was i? And if i was, then accept my apology. Just trying to kill the boredom, and there really was no need for Flam to threat me. Anyway, was it u, dawg or Falmmable? Who should i talk to?--Rataube 19:47, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Dawg kicked and banned you. I was just joking about the ban. Also the kicks. --KATIE!! 19:49, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Award

Congratulations, since you had a user complain about you to another admin, you get the "bastardadmin" award:

{{:Awards/Bastardadmin}} to add it to your user page.

(I know it is intended for a male admin, I will fix that later)

Huh? it is? I always thought a Bastard was any child born out of wedlock... but that's just me. --PantsMacKenzie 18:12, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I made a Bitch Admin award anyway. -- T. (talk) 13:31, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
The current revision of Bastardadmin is fine. Just needed to change "his" to "their". Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 00:03, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Uncyclopedia:VFP

Why did you remove Mono Lisa when every single vote was for? And the Word interface? It had 13 for and 4 against. - Nonymous 22:39, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Why not just delete the newer revisions? Doesn't seem very fair to penalize the original creator for someone else's ripoff. Also, it seems like you forgot to delete Dog Hazard Labels. - Nonymous 22:45, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
The newer revisions are made because the original isn't deemed good enough. So that would be counterproductive. Besides, it's just annoying to have a bajillion of the same image. It's not penalizing either, they can re-nominate if they want. Dog Hazard Labels are the same image. KATIE!! 22:48, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
What if they add their own slightly modified version just to attention-whore, etc? Obviously an image that had 100% for before the second version was added by some random user deserves to retain its votes. Can I restore the two images and delete the ripoffs and for votes that applied with them? - Nonymous 22:50, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Last post here, promise. I've returned the 2 nominations but removed the duplicates. Don't worry, everything is still clean, plus I added a notice to the top alerting people of this new rule. For the record the second Word image had been there for maybe a couple hours and didn't merit a deletion with so many for votes for the original. - Nonymous 00:53, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Why did you remove Fire Fart? You should have given it a chance. -- 100px-Siggy.PNG

Our policy is that unoriginal pictures cannot be featured. No exceptions. --KATIE!! 22:40, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Vote for me

I left you a note. Talk:Nobody cares--Rataube 06:33, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)


--Rataube 22:39, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me, Rataube... Didn't see you there...

Voted against, it's ok, nothing to be sorry about (except from the grue perhaps). Leaving aside my annoying online behavior, do you have any comment on my present articles (Jewish History, Miguel de Cervantes, Faery Kingdom). I would apreciate to know your opinion on them. Thanx :) --Rataube 18:54, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Anyways, uhm... Thanks for the nomination! I appreciate it. Don't fully agree with it, but hey... I'll just take it as an incentive to start writing decent stuff.

Thanks and take care! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 04:39, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks

Thx for fixing my sig!!!! Ta ta!Roachka Lord Karaluch | Talk Roachka 21:08, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit You Blocked My Friend

Hello Keitei, you blocked my friends profile Masterbloo in December for two months, remember? well could you please unblock him, he told me he didn't know that Dawg was an administrator and I think he learnt his lesson. (PLEASE unblock him). If he vandilises any more pages block him again for 2 months or infinite years, thank you. Bloo 17:46, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Have him come talk to me himself on IRC. If I'm not on (but I always am), he can leave me a message or talk to Dawg, whose user page it was. KATIE!! 07:01, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks for the award

I did get the inspiration for it from your sig, ya know? --User:IMBJR/sig 12:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Okay to upload sketchy picture?

I'm doing a rewrite of goatse and am wondering if I can upload this picture (safe to click), edited so that the barely visible picture contains the image. I'm asking so I don't go through the trouble of having to find and look at the damn thing unless I know it will fly. 00:52, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

That sounds fine, just make sure to label it NSFW if it's too apparent. KATIE!! 01:01, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Alright, uploaded. The image is in Goatse. Is it fine?
Looks fine. =] KATIE!! 01:28, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit You deleted my article

im kinda pissed because you deleted my article "Do NOT delete this article" which really i dont think had much reason to be deleted. the reason you put was "Oh The Irony" i didnt save it so i have no way of remaking it and it was actually a nice article i thought. it had pictures and such and definately wasn't a stub. so idk, wtf? --Tompkins 06:34, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Thanks

...for the mercy vote. I'm sorry I wasn't able to perform like usual. My doctor says it's not uncommon for guys my age. I hope we can still see each other. -- T. (talk) 19:56, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm glad you liked The Night After Christmas. I felt sort of chumpish after my previous and mediocre effort. Now that I've reedeemed myself and the holiday wll soon be over, I can quit pimping myself and go back to being a BastardAdmin. (Where it looks like you'll be joining me soon! Good on ya!). -- T. (talk) 02:07, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Praise Goes Here

Your user page is finally starting to take shape. Interesting without being unncessessarily personal or informative. Good show. -- T. (talk) 03:55, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I believe you have succeeded. Your user page is exactly as you wished it to be; neither interesting nor informative. A hearty "Well done". DropArk 05:08, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit We love you too

I think the title speaks for itself. --Wingzerotype 19:00, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Wingie spoke out of turn. I don't love you. But I think you're really very okay. Really. -- T. (talk) 22:17, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Raccoon?

You're not a racoon you lying dirtbag, you're a tanuki and you know it. (They're like racoons, excpet they have larger testicles.) --neoEva88 02:56, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Eat my garbage again, and I'll skin your ass. -- T. (talk) 03:20, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Uhm, I don't think that she has testicles. -- T. (talk) 11:54, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I dunno Todd, what with the advances made in science recently, it isn't uncommon for women to have larger testicles then men. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:38, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Thanks!

Thanks for your vote on the Fecal E.Coli article.  :)

And thanks for staying out of my garbage. It's really a pain to have to clean up, and the city already ticketed me once on it. -- T. (talk) 00:26, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

edit Why thank you

For your kind words and VFH votes. I think we should save raccoons too. --Savethemooses 17:06, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination. I'm glad you liked my article. --FlyingFool 22:06, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Waterproof removed from VFH

Me again. I just wanted to leave you a message about the fact that I'm withdrawing Waterproof from VFH, since you originally submitted it I thought I should inform you. I was happy to know you were such a fan of my article (and I love it too) but I think it's a bit too short to be featured, and the VFH page is getting unwieldly with so many nominations. I wanted to submit my Ninja Pirate page, and since CRLH--another one of my articles--is being voted on, I thought it would be best to remove Waterproof so that nobody thought I was spamming the VFH page to try and get an article featured. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (

edit Complaint

You vote too much. --Splaka 05:14, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

You vote too little. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 06:19, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
C'mon. Let's be realistic. Take voting away from her, and you'd have... well something like her contribution log between April and October.  :) -- T. (talk) 17:25, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

BUT DO YOU LOVE SOPHIA independent of the POPE? We know that in the history of Uncyc... only two non sophia lovers have ever been voted admin... --Chronarion 22:42, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Congratulations!

So there I was, asleep, and at about 15:44 MST I felt a disturbance in the force. Like the power of the adminatti had grown massively. I heard the cries of crap articles as they fell under the sword of this new power.

Congratulations on becoming an admin! Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:04, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Thanks for your help!

Thanks for reverting the vandal on my page. At least they put some effort into it this time. Hopefully I'll get a chance to return the favor someday. It's fun having my user page unprotected -- it helps add more names to Santa's naughty little boys & girls list. By the way, your use of iconography, color, and Javascript in your /sig, now being shamelessly copied by everyone else, is subtle and AAAAH MY EYES!!!!!! -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 17:46, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Bob - I started the very gay colorization of sigs. Keitei started the pastel colorizations and Splaka used/changed my CSS to create her current madness. I agree that the cursor change is really crazy, and she also had the first icon images in her sig (I also believe this was Splaka's work). Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:42, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Thank you -- it's very helpful, when cursing, to know the name of the cursee. Although in the end, it's usually safe to Blame Splaka. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:55, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit You're a Nazi?

If you're taking up Nazism, I don't know if we can still be friends. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:20, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm not a Nazi, I'm a Hitler! And I can't help it if I was born this way. Can we be still be friends? KATIE!! 00:32, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Ok, sure. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 12:50, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Fun Hating

Thanks for the award, you damned whippersnapper; now I'm going back to my rocking chair. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:56, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Man uncyclopedia

Hi. What's wrong with that image? Kakun 18:30, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Kakun, I'm not sure about the appropriateness of that particular image on that particular page, but I'd encourage you to look into requesting images rather than making them yourself. Several people have complimented you on your ideas for images (Rubik's Sudoku, the Blur image Mhaille commented on), but technically/artistically, they haven't been very good. We have several photoshoppers who would probably be happy to make images to your specifications for use in your articles. --—rc (t) 18:36, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I'm no picasso, you're right about that. ---Kakun 18:40, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Template:NoGwax

Oh man, that is so unbelievably teh funny, though I'm not quite sure what I did to deserve such an honor. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:28, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

It's my special template to mark all the articles I don't want you to delete. =] I'm pretty sure most of the IRC channel thinks I hate you. Haha. KATIE!! 23:36, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
A template to keep me from deleting things? You could have at least given me a burninator or equivalent deletzoring award to go with it (not so subtle award fishing). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 06:15, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Holocaust

Hollow Coast

Hollow coast?

  • Hi. Maybe this one can fit there?
    • (I've been delegated from the IRC channel to answer this) The Holocaust article isn't really about the Holocaust, it is about how everything remotely bad gets compared to the Holocause by politicians. Thus the image isn't really relevant, and even if it were a pun that is unrelated to the article would not be beneficial. The aticle in question is KP's baby, so it should be his call. You may ask him yourself, but I suspect he will not want the image. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:42, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • Thanks. Kakun 21:51, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Katie, I made you a Thank you present

The reason for Holocaust

"Those fucking homosexuals, gypsies and Jews!!! They make me so mad!!!"

~ Kakun 13:16, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Seth MacFarlane article deleted

Just wanted to know why exactly you deleted my article. You wrote "Belgium" as a reason. That doesn't mean much to me. I'm from Germany. P.S.: Sorry i don't know how to write this in the right order of the page :/

Haha, it's a joke. But in reality, I deleted it because it's true. True isn't funny. =] Try a nice satire and I'm sure it'll be great. --KATIE!! 23:19, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Its partly true partly emphasized and i think its the way an article is supposed to be according to the HTBFANJS article and i dunno what exactly seperates a satire from that article i wrote. By the way do you know him? And whats the joke about belgium? thanks for responding (in advance)
"Satire is a literary technique of writing or art which principally ridicules its subject (for example, individuals, organizations, or states) often as an intended means of provoking or preventing change." It seemed to be mostly true. It wasn't that funny either. I saw the construction tag, but I figured it wouldn't be funny with that angle. It'd have a greater potential for humor if you changed who he was. Don't be afraid to lie, but do it in a smart way.
Do I know him? No, but I do know of him.
The joke about Belgium is just that it's random and has nothing to do with why I deleted it. Also, here on Uncyclopedia, it's a cuss word. Not sure why.
I hope that helps! Good luck with the article! --KATIE!! 00:26, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Request

Can you unkick me please? I'll be nice. ~ Kakun 05:39, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Talk:Reasons to become an Atheist

Please read/respond to teh bottom section on teh above link written by me :) --Nerd42Talk 21:05, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit You need to archive

I'm hoping that this 28th sub heading will remind you that you need to archive. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:12, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

NEVER!!! --KATIE!! 03:19, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Yeah Keitei.....thats terrible.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Archiving is something to be proud of.  :) My December talk page alone is 54Kb! The joint is jumpin'! -- T. (talk) 11:39, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Pete best.

Didn't quite get why you deleted that one.It had little content , but it's just waiting to be expanded.Do you have to write like eight hundred lines minimum to start a new article ? This is ridiculous.

I believe that one was non-notable/vanity. Read our vanity policies. Cheerio! --KATIE!! 14:28, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
It has an entry on wikipedia.It has 182 000 results on google for "Pete Best".I don't really think it should be marked as vanity :/
Mmkay. I didn't really deeply consider it because it was one line and I had no idea what it was talking about. Go ahead and recreate it, just make sure it's at least a paragraph. =] --KATIE!! 15:29, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools