User talk:Kamek98

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Your signature (4)

You are now exactly where Aimsplode was a week ago. Go to UN:SIG. Read Section 1.2. Do what it says. That is, put the fancy signature code in a file, not on every user page that you sign, forever. Spıke Ѧ 20:51 23-Nov-12

I did. It is a file.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 21:13, November 23, 2012 (UTC)

Then do what it says EXACTLY. The contents of the file (rather than its name) is being copied into every file that you sign. Spıke Ѧ 21:17 23-Nov-12

Oh, I guess I don't really know how.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 21:19, November 23, 2012 (UTC)

edit Winner

Noobaward Noob of the Moment November 2012 ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 05:43, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

I am honored!--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 16:39, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

edit Hull City AFC

New user Daboywood has written a team article. It is not outstanding, as its themes are mostly the generic ones of bad finances and bad play, but it illustrates what I was saying about a team article written from the standpoint of a fan who has obviously lived through, or studied, multiple eras of hope and despair, as opposed to just trying to pun around with the local terms. Spıke Ѧ 15:30 2-Dec-12

Okay, thanks. I'll look into it later and read.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 16:44, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

edit HowTo:Upset the Gods on VFH

Thank you for retracting that nomination. As for the semantic quibble: I don't doubt that the article is your best. Nominating it on VFH is what was an assertion that it is the website's best. Spıke Ѧ 13:09 3-Dec-12

Okay, thanks. SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 20:52, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

edit I torched your signed football

Also there's this ^^. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSat, Dec 8 '12 11:43 (UTC)

edit Nutella

I know you are anxious to claim partial credit for this, but I claim we are done. Spıke Ѧ 00:08 14-Dec-12

I have uploaded two images. One is on there, one more?--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:10, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

Where you getting these pix? We have a lot of rationalizations for stealing illustrations, but we ought not to steal humor. Spıke Ѧ 00:25 14-Dec-12

Google images. The people who make these images can't claim copyright on them because of the makers of Nutella. I believe. Most images I post here are memes anyway, I don't think these ones are memes, just free use.

Th' fuck, Eric--The ink isn't dry and already you're putting the fricking trophy on your userpage? Spıke Ѧ 00:27 14-Dec-12

I'll take it down :(--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:29, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

edit "Propaganda"

Regarding your professed love of propaganda: If you didn't see propaganda this year in the US election campaign, you weren't paying attention. Republicans vilified Obama, reading too much into everything from his birthplace to his "57 states" gaffe (not to mention all of Biden's). Obama ran a personality cult and his people vilified the pretenders, from Michele Bachmann to Herman Cain, and finally Romney. The "99%" and the "47%" were propaganda ploys, as was morphing Mourdoch's comment that even a baby conceived by rape was God's creation into a supposed endorsement of rape. There is propaganda everywhere.

I suspect what you are saying is that what you love is Nazi/Soviet/Fascist propaganda such as the World War II posters (throw in Rosie the Riveter). They look cheesy now and everyone sees through them. Be careful with this, though. Uncyclopedia went through a phase where many governments were presented as a People's Republic. I cleaned up Massachusetts, Michigan, and Mexico, and was permitted to add text to UN:HTBFANJS stating that comparing something to Sovietism is officially trite. That is, no matter how funny you think this is, it's been tried once too often here. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 15-Dec-12

So you mean to say that Uncyclopedia was almost into legal trouble for accused propaganda?--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 03:01, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
Oh, and I see you've also added the mispronounciation (or however it is spelled) for Massachusetts as MassiveTwoShits, that's what I always liked to call it!--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 03:02, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

I meant to say nothing of the sort. I said "trite," not "sued." It just isn't funny--not even for a state like Massachusetts that so richly merits it (and where a little of the "Soviet" analogy remains). Spıke Ѧ 03:04 15-Dec-12

Okay I understand, sorry for misusing the term.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 03:07, December 15, 2012 (UTC)--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 03:07, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

edit Nice

Hahaha your userpage made my day bro. --POP!GoesTheWeasel Evil-clown 11:03, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Haha, thanks PGTW! I guess it is what I do. I'm gonna start calling you Papa Weasel.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 17:00, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
And I'll call you Pancake, because why the hell not? --POP!GoesTheWeasel Evil-clown 05:17, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I mean why not?--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 12:43, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

edit Red Sockies

The bit I meant was the paragraph that starts "With the completion of the Green Monster to begin the 2004 season," - that to me is recent history. I think moving the Yankees stuff there is ok. looking like a good start--Leverage (talk) 21:08, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, recent history so I don't think I should move it there just yet. Thanks.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 21:20, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

edit Thankis

Thanks for your vote on the HowTo:Beet off page, appreciated. Claudette Colvin is sad you voted against her, but she just sat down on the floor and won't move, so I dunno when she's going to get up and leave. And your Yellow Turban spork, it's pretty good! Sporks are fun to do (I've done three, one on Todd Palin, one of the Chicago Seven, and with Funnybony on Jack Dempsey). I find that it's good to keep working on them until the original fades almost into the background, and the page is almost all yours. I gave Yellow Turban Reb. a quick read and will read it again, as well as the wikipedia page, it's a historical occurance I know nothing about. Thanks again, and keep on the keeping on thing. Aleister 22:08 16Decembe12

Thanks! I'll look over my vote on the Claudette Colvin page because I wasn't sure. It was weird because before you gave me this message I was reading over the Yellow Turban Rebellion so haha. If you like it then maybe could you... eh? See, I'm starting to feel ashamed for self nominations. But I really like this one and at first I didn't think it was gonna be good but then I went overboard and pushed a quality article. --SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 22:13, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
Oh fuck, I wasn't trying to change your vote. Your vote is like a sacred thing. I'd be happy to discuss it though (Colvin is one of the unsung things to be sung about in movement history). What happened was I just was reading the Yellow Turban page with low expectation because I've been seeing your troubles with other articles, so I was happily surprised it was so good (can't judge a book by its cover, unless it portn and then you pretty much get the same stuff everytime) and wanted to tell you. I'd suggest more polishing only because polishing is soooooo good for a page. People like myself and Funnybony work on some pages for years (literally), and I like to do lots of polishing on mine although once in awhile one comes very quickly (Peacock, and HowTo:Blow a dog come to mind). Got to run to Subway now! Yummmmmmm. Aleister minutes later

Well if it is good, then I guess I'll give it a try. Because I feel like I'm the only one who should. (Because it is like something that only I know, so everyone else can judge). Cheers!--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 22:34, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Mother Monkeys, thanks for the Claudette Colvin vote, totally unexpected. The ghost of Claudette Colvin blesses you (even though she's still alive as far as I know). I saw you put The Turban up for vote, I'll read it again later and likely vote for it (on first semi-read and all it was good). You can still keep writing and polishing it even if it's on VFH, so maybe people will give constructive criticism and/or hate notes on the nom. Thanks again! Aleister signing off and going to Subway for sure now

Okay, I'm work on it sometime soon.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 22:50, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

edit Template:Weapons list

Must you create a new template? In mainspace? And with a note on your user page that no one else had better muck with it because it's yours? Spıke Ѧ 23:18 17-Dec-12

No, you have the wrong idea. People can edit it freely. What I meant was that so much is there that probably anything someone would consider putting on there is probably already there. And I said that if it is something they wish that is nonsense (to put on there), I suggested thinking it over on whether it would actually be a good addition to add there. Why for that? Because there is already much nonsense on there like "Bieber fever", "Swag", and "Mondays".--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 23:21, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I have the wrong idea because you gave me the wrong idea. If you want to maintain its quality, or the quality of any page, against drive-by edit by Mr. I.P. Anon, just do it and we will all be grateful to you. But no song-and-dance, please, about what the rest of the world should value before they edit it. As though I.P. read your userpage before proceeding.... Spıke Ѧ 23:27 17-Dec-12

Wait... what? You worded that in a weird way. I don't understand what you mean.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 23:31, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

edit Watch your step! It's a steaming-hot pile of UnSignpost

 ~ Capt. Sock Monkey ~ (berate) Beeverpedia ~ Wed, Dec 19 '12 17:27 (UTC)

edit User:Kamek98/Fluff (spread)

I took the liberty of tweaking your intro, with two other recommendations in the Change Summary.

I suppose you don't know about the Massachusetts Fluffernutter War. Serious news, and seriously funny. Use it. Spıke Ѧ 00:05 20-Dec-12

Thanks, man!--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 02:14, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

edit Car

Automobile LOL --POP!GoesTheWeasel Evil-clown 05:21, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

But honestly, good article on your car thing. I luv it. You're an awesome writer. --POP!GoesTheWeasel Evil-clown 05:22, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 12:18, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

edit Fluff

That is what the article taking shape in your userspace is. I gave you some facts to base it on, and Wikipedia could give you more, but instead you give us a meandering, cockamamie story of the Crusades. How much patience do you think the reader has for yet another demonstration of your ability to do free-association and spew forth random ideas?

Look at Grand Rapids, Michigan. I have a thesis--that the city is an economic basket case--and most of the contents are designed either to flog this thesis or to knead in actual facts. (Wikipedia and Google offered up gems, such as that the "Dutch weather babe" works at a TV stations whose call letters are WOOD, or that Newsweek called GR a dying city a year before its print edition died.)

Jim Morrison on VFH you abstained on (and unlike some notorious whores here, I am not calling on you to change your vote) because of its focus on sex and drugs. I don't fault you for not realizing that Morrison was one of the pioneers of "acid rock" when its name was literal. But what you are complaining about, therefore, is the article's attachment to the truth--the exact thing that makes it funny--the exact thing whose absence means that Fluff isn't, yet. As I say on my user page, the best humor "has a seed of truth" (Limbaugh), though the stems and leaves might be total crap. Your reader wants to laugh, to relate to the written product, not to you. So make every sentence serve a purpose. I found one just now, in Sheep, that didn't: The fact that a one-word (Baa) language has no past tense wasn't going anywhere. The following sentence, that the language also had no negatives, fed the joke that sheep are easy lays, which after all is the thesis of the article. So the fluff is gone. Spıke Ѧ 23:19 20-Dec-12

Dude. Relax. I get what you mean. I'm working on it. I am writing with what you gave me. A small bit takes place in the Crusades. --SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:07, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
Well we all have our own approaches to writing Spike. I had this issue awhile back with the Battle of Hastings with two writers who created an article with more random than you could shake a stick at. As a historian, the nonsense in that piece got to me and I complained to the authors. They ignored me and then left some testy messages on my talk page. And then they were gone. Lesson I learnt was that there is a fine line between encouraging a writer in a certain direction and trying to push them there instead. I would rather let the nonsense on that Hastings article stand for now until someone else (or me) comes up with a way to improve it. These are early days and if you are young as I think you are Eric, then I understand what you are doing. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:49, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
I'm fourteen.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 12:24, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
Same age as Frosty in Kangaroo Years. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:29, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
It's my fourteenth birthday today (well I live in the East coast, so actually in like a couple hours), though. I was rounding.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:25, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

edit VFH

We used to have a policy that no writer could self-nominate an article unless it was Pee Reviewed. This didn't stop another contributor nominating your work. But things changed awhile back as fewer people did Pee Reviews (me included) so in the end we have allowed anyone to nominate their words of wisdom. Since I have no knowledge of the Boston Red Sox, I couldn't judge the quality of the article without some research. So what we now have is I think an informal process where one writer asks another for his opinion about their article. That is why some new users request adoption so they can ask questions and advice about how the site works. It will also give any new contributor a 'champion' who can defend them from a ban which may have been more to do with a misunderstanding than disruptive intent. have a birthday a few days before Christmas. Well that's tough! All is forgiven!! Merry Christmas. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:02, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Could you remove the VFH nomination for the Red Sox? I don't think I made a good choice nominating it.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 14:26, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
Happy Birthday! I see your enthusiasm is running wild on the docks. Nice work, yet like I mentioned it sometimes is better to polish, polish, polish. Some people work for years on a page (years, seriously). It took me almost four months before I got my first feature. So patience is a good thing especially if you really care about your pages and want to make them the best possible. Again, Happy Birthday!!! Aleister 15:06 Festivus
Thanks Al!--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 15:10, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
I love old baseball information. Check out Boston Red Sox pitcher Smoky Joe Wood. He had one of the greatest years in pitching history in 1912. Lots of old Red Sox are hall of famers. I hate that they've put up ads on the green monster, ads are the scourge of sports fields and stadiums. Al minutes later
Thanks for the link. I think I read about him once.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 15:36, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
Can you cut back nominating your own articles Eric? A lot of them are distinctly undercooked and need more work. I appreciate your enthusiasm but this isn't a race to feature something as soon as you have finished it. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:47, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I'm sorry. I will work on Boston Red Sox and the such soon. But I do have a comment on your against vote and Matt's against vote on my new article. I guess I could elaborate on some parts but the thing is, it isn't suppose to be at one place. They are examples in each sections and that is why it is all over the place.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 18:02, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

edit Hello

I've noted that you have been asking other users about their opinions on your article. I don't see any harm in doing it, except that it's probably really tedious for you.

So you could try pee review. It's an awesome place where other Uncyclopedia users will rate your article and talk about the pros and cons about it. I think pee review still exists, and it helped me a ton. --POP!GoesTheWeasel Evil-clown 08:07, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

I've tried it, but it is about as dead as the local cemetery.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 17:22, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
What? You say you want to see the local cemetery? Well, here it is! Al I am unsafe for work
Ahhaha.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 23:07, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
Looks like everyone forgot about it with the sheer number of brilliant noobs on the rise. No matter, carry on with what you do best. --POP!GoesTheWeasel Evil-clown 08:50, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

edit Templates

I noticed you have created a template for a couple of your articles. That template should be in the main space rather than as a subpage so that others can locate it. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:46, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

I've already moved the Three Kingdoms one, which other ones do you mean?--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 22:28, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
@Romartus: we already have plenty of templates. If it's a single-use template, it works fine as a subpage—or better yet, none at all. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usWed, Dec 26 '12 23:01 (UTC)

edit One night stand

Hi, I put a comment on the above VFH nomination regarding improvements; suggesting you put it in for pee review to see if that gives you any ideas for improving the article. I'm fairly busy these days and have been neglecting my reviewing duties but if you stick it on Pee Review over the next few days and drop me a message to say that you have done I'll find time to do one for you. --Chiefjustice32X 10:00, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

edit Shane Victorino

Now please list it on QVFD. We don't need an entry for Shane Victorino, much less one that redirects to a team he may have been on before he was acquired by the Boston Red Sox. The link to Victorino in Red Sox used to be red, and its redness was exactly the point. Spıke Ѧ 00:58 28-Dec-12

Oh, what? Sorry, yes I will. Please forgive me. I do recall now he was signed by the Red Sox. And... Philadelphia has no article? That's weird. I never looked over that. I'm sorry.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:59, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if I did that right...--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 01:02, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

edit Slit his wrists

I've taken this to QVFD. No one is going to type "Slit his wrists" and expect to get taken to Emo. If you're writing an article and this is what you want to happen, just use a piped link: [[Emo|Slit his wrists]]. Spıke Ѧ 22:31 28-Dec-12

Okay, thanks. I'm sorry, I should have thought of that.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 22:32, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

The Chief Justice granted my request toute de suite. His Change Summary: "Meh." Spıke Ѧ 22:39 28-Dec-12

Weird, I just saw that. Huff log was the last page I visited before I received my fancy new message.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 22:40, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

He also huffed the total output of the capital-letter vandal we've been following. Spıke Ѧ 22:44 28-Dec-12

Did you see the stuff he put on User:Frosty's talk page? That was assloads off the "pointless category" I had to delete.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 22:46, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

edit So you've got Rollbackz

Please use this with unprecedented care. I have it too, and I only use it against Mr. I.P. Anon. I find that anyone with a username almost always deserves an explanation of a revert, unless he responds with an edit-war. Spıke Ѧ 13:14 29-Dec-12

It is when I can rollback multiple edits right?--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 16:50, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

That is it exactly. See above. Spıke Ѧ 17:15 29-Dec-12

Okie-dokey then.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 18:17, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

edit User:Lost ESheep/Norwegian Forest Cat

Your nomination on VFD is invalid, as this article is brand new, and it is not bad enough for QVFD. Your suggested outcome on VFD is to userspace the article. If you wanted this done without creation of a redirect, just ask someone. Oh, wait, you have the Rollbackz, you could have done it yourself. With a note to the author--see above--such as the one I have now supplied. If instead what you really wanted was more personal attention, then nominate away. Spıke Ѧ 21:37 29-Dec-12

Calm down, dude. I didn't know I could do that.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 22:31, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

At any rate, author has ignored my userspacing and has moved or re-uploaded his article to mainspace, where he is continuing it. As I should have ignored your invalid nomination. Now, don't tell me to "calm down, dude." When you fuck up, the problem is not the other guy's attitude--I don't care what your School Psychologist tells you. Spıke Ѧ 22:40 29-Dec-12

I don't see a school psychologist, nor do I plan on making arrangements to see one. I admit I messed up on the invalid nomination, but I didn't mean to do it invalidly. I do not seek personal attention, I could care less if someone easily knows my works or not. Sorry, I guess I used calm down a little loosely.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:12, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Shown: SPIKE on a good day.

Kamek98, let me translate for SPIKE, as he's having a hard time talking with your head in his mouth: don't list new works on VFD. If they're spam or two crappy sentences, list 'em on QVFD; if the user seems to be working on 'em, stick a {{Construction}} tag on 'em. I've never moved anyone's page to userspace, and I would ask them on their user page before doing so myself. Pages with expired construction tags on 'em get huffed. I'm not really sure what to do when someone builds a crappy article and then removes the construction tag; I believe we're supposed to stick {{Fix}} tags on 'em because {{ICU}} scares people off, or something. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSun, Dec 30 '12 2:13 (UTC)

edit Thank ya

Good scissors Murder Frog has awarded you a pair of scissors!
Now go run around with them.

Thanks for voting for Jim Morrison on VFH! Have a pair of scissors. --Murder Frog Dull interest wanes. 00:13, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

YAY!--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 00:17, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

edit Panic at the disco

Okay, to start the collab I did a few minor edits earlier in the article and then added a new section about the actual panic. I hope you think it's good; I like a lot if the stuff you have before, but I just tweaked a few things that I think give it more lulz. Really starting to like the concept! Oh, and please feel free to tweak the section I added as much as you want, if you felt like having it to in a different direction than I thought up. --Murder Frog Dull interest wanes. 15:32, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it real quick! You can change as much as you want to, we're coworkers for this. lulz.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 16:08, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
So I did a few more edits on Panic at the disco, and if you really think its ready for VFH, I would gladly put it up. I was wondering, though, if there would be a better way to format the conversation between narrator and Johnny so that it's easier to read and not one big block of text. Any ideas? I was thinking to make it like a book/story format and separate the lines for each person. --Murder Frog Dull interest wanes. 03:43, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
We could try.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:49, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

edit UOTY

Sadly you can not vote for multiple people on this one, so I am afraid you are going to have strike one of your votes here. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 08:06, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

edit Year Awards

I'm using your warm, nooby body for the sake of my own amusement. Hope you don't mind. It's nothing personal. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 08:08, Jan. 1, 2013

Ha.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 01:54, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

edit Dude! as well as Dude!WTF

Two things. One, thank you your nomination, that was nice of you. I had to strike it out, and explained on the notes, you could only win it once (at least that's how I see it), and I was gone for seven months except for popping in a few hours from time to time. Thanks again. Now, the second thing, WTF are you doing? Voting multiple times on the yearly awards pages after being told that you could only vote once per award. So pick your horse in each category. Lucky you weren't banned, I'd ban you for a few hours for just putting my name up. Thanks again. Aleister 18:45 1-1-'13

I thought it was 1 vote for UOTY?--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 19:23, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Ah! An honest mistake and my apology. We've had lots of enthusiastic noobies, and some of them made very good. Others crashed and burned. Fly, sparrow, fly. Now go play in traffic (hahahahahahheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehahahahahahha huh? --- I don't know why I like writing that, it's fun each time) Aleister 19:37 1-1-'13
Okay. VFH and Vote for Top 3 articles of Dec are horny and ready to be touched.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 19:38, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

edit You're very good!

You're very good at making pages! I wish I could be like you. Jk. MagicBus (talk) 01:46, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Is that a compliment or an insult? I can't tell, really. --Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 01:49, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
Compliment. MagicBus (talk) 01:49, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
Yay. Thanks dude.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 01:50, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
Yup! MagicBus (talk) 01:51, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

edit Drop your pants and grab the eggnog! It's the UnSignpost.

 ~ Capt. Sock Monkey ~ (berate) Beeverpedia ~ Wed, Jan 2 '13 13:18 (UTC)

edit Help.

Can you help my edit my Ohio State University page? It needs help. Thanks. MagicBus (talk) 22:55, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Sure if I can nominate it on VFH when it is done and get all the credit for it., sure I will.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 22:57, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, you can get partial some credit. MagicBus (talk) 22:59, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
I kidnapped your family. You come from a family of geniuses... you're welcome?--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:04, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
I'm not even college! MagicBus (talk) 23:06, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
No offense intended, but is English your first language?--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:09, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I was born in New York. MagicBus (talk) 23:10, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
Me too! Do you live in New York? I do. If you do, where?--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:14, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
Up near Rochester. MagicBus (talk) 23:16, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
Me too! I'm in Steuben in a small ass town named Arkport. 200 students really.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:22, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
I'm in Pavilion, a very small town. I have 77 students in my grade! MagicBus (talk) 23:24, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
I've been there! How far away is that from Arkport or Rochester? I might have played you once or twice. How old are you? I'm fourteen.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:41, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
17... and I'm not sure how far away is it. MagicBus (talk) 23:42, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

edit Hi there, you awesome person you!

You should come on IRC sometime and let us have a look at you. We've resolved that we need to make our newer members feel like part of the family, and that won't be possible until you come into our deep dark Internet cave and let us devour you whol.... um, get to know you! Yes, that's what I meant to say. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usFri, Jan 4 '13 8:16 (UTC)

Maybe tonight. Maybe.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 12:27, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

edit Nutella bis

Thank you for reverting the voluminous addition to this article. The fact that the original Nutella was not spreadable was suitable as a drive-by slap, but did not help once extended to the length of a Saturday-morning cartoon. Now please consider also reverting your change to the Intro. I don't care what Nutella actually tastes like; your change simply made the Intro harder to read, and detracted from its purpose of inducing the reader to jump past the Table of Contents. Cheers. Spıke Ѧ 23:39 4-Jan-13

You're welcome. I could tell you were pissed but I was just trying to fix my failure to help with the article. Do you still want the full point towards the Hall of Shame?--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:42, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

I don't think you were trying to rectify a failure but to parlay an emerging funny article into personal renown. Given that your two illustrations plus one Italian quote had to be integrated into the theme of the article, I would claim the full point on this one. Spıke Ѧ 23:53 4-Jan-13

Okay, I'm fine with that. I also have a comment on your against vote on PANIC! at the Disco. You see, the joke is to not tell about the band, but rather tell a story on the name of the band. A play of words, actually. Maybe would you consider looking over some aspects of the article? --Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:56, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

I looked over the entire article. An English essay, unhinged from the subject matter, is not main-page material. To the majority of readers who do not realize that the article title is the name of a band, there is no joke at all; its presence on the Uncyclopedia main page would simply be inscrutable. Spıke Ѧ 00:03 5-Jan-13

I wouldn't say it isn't main-page material and/or the majority of readers wouldn't realize it is the name of a band. The band is quite famous actually. Are you saying that My Chemical Romance was a one time joke? --Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 00:05, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 15:18, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

edit Express not available today (just normal delivery)

Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose UnS CUN VFH and Bar (talk) 05:40 22, October 2016

edit If you ever visit this page again...

...I just wanted to say that I looked at the other site and saw your autocratic rule over it. You've been an Uncyclopedian since November 2012 and you are practically right-hand man to Zombiebaron. Shows how desperate you guys are. Glad we've got people who still write articles and admins who keep the site funny over here. See you're running UnSignpost too, like I am here. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:49, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Because what you guys do here is just sooo goddamn funny! Haha, I'm not looking to get in a feud between the two sites. I've been here since March 2011, actually. Desperate? My ass. I got vandalized by either you or SPIKE on the other site. Not funny. Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 20:42, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
This is trolling on the part of both of you and needs to stop now. Eric, I did not vandalize you. False accusations are just as unfunny. Spıke Ѧ 20:56 7-May-13
Okay, I'm sorry. Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 21:09, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
I did not vandalise anyone on the other site. I will stop the trolling here Spike and I am glad to know that Kamek owns a donkey (ass). Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:36, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

Personal tools