User talk:Joefoxon

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Welcome!

Hello, Joefoxon, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:

If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Joefoxon/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you want to write and don't know where to begin, consider contributing to Uncyclopedia's current colonization of the week, a group writing project to improve a single popular article. Anyone is welcome to contribute, so come help out!

If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome! --Sycamore (Talk) 16:41, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Thanks for the review, even if it became outdated before it was posted! Sorry about that, by the way. Thanks again. :) - --Brayds2006 09:10, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

edit Awww

You based your userpage off of mine! Luv u! —Pelozurian (talk) 09:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I had to put something, I just thought it was a good template, looks neat Joefoxon 09:13, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

edit Pee of Boyd's Law

Thanks for taking the time to review my article. I have to be honest though, when I said not to worry about being too in-depth, I was still hoping for an in-depth review. One thing authors look for when they ask to have their articles reviewed in pointed advice, the score is really a secondary feature that enhances suggestions for improving the article. I suggest that you take a look at the pee review guidelines before doing more reviews, they have a lot of helpful suggestions for being helpful in your reviews. So along those lines, are there any specific suggestions you may have in terms of how to expand or improve Boyd's Law? -- Sir SF13 (Talk) Upsilonsigmasigmacrest GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 12:34 EST 11 April, 2010

edit Award from UN:REQ

Thumbs up2

This user created Referee, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)

Personal tools