User talk:Jarble1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Welcome!

Uncyclopediamagic
Witness the magic of Uncyclopedia!

Hello Jarble1, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... Yes. You seem to have a sense of humor, but to be sure that it corresponds to the kind of humor that is accepted on this site, I suggest checking out the following links:

  • Beginner's Guide - A massive guide about how to be the best you can be at Uncyclopedia. I've honestly never read the whole thing in one sitting myself, but it is very useful if you're looking for help on a specific issue.
  • How to be funny and not just stupid - Our flagship link. This will tell you how to not get booed off the metaphorical stage that is Uncyclopedia. I STRONGLY suggest reading the entire thing through, perhaps more than once.
  • Our Vanity Policies - This page details why we don't care about your friends, your school, your gay fourth period math teacher, or the homework he has you do, and in-jokes. DO NOT violate these rules.
  • Uncyclopedia:Best of - For a bit of inspiration. These are our featured articles. This is the kind of stuff we like to read around here.

Now that that's out of the way, just continue reading and you'll notice some more links. These ones are about help in general:

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but I do recommend it, it can be quite enjoyable, and it's a good chance to let others take notice of your writing. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Jarble1/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you want to write and don't know where to begin, consider contributing to Uncyclopedia's current colonization of the week, a group writing project to improve a single popular article. Anyone is welcome to contribute, so come help out! If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!

If you need help, ask me on my talkpage, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talkpage. Additionally, the Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian, and remember: Have fun with it. We're all here to have a good time and a good laugh. Please sign your name on talkpages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button_sig.png) above the edit box. Again, welcome!

Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:28, 22 November 2009


edit Double redirects

Don't create double redirects, aka a redirect that links to another redirect. The reader will be taken the 2nd redirect, but with no automatic redirecting to the final target page. This looks sloppy, as the reader needs to click on multiple links to reach the final destination page. --Mn-z 02:11, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Will those double redirects be fixed by a bot (as on Wikipedia), or will they need to be fixed manually by users? 71.127.37.102 02:41, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
Sir or madam, we do not have the funds that Wikipedia is bursting with to pay those bots. (I can only assume they come from Bothnia, but even there the foreign labor is not as cheap as it was in the Good Old Days.) Mr. Jarble, in whom you have taken a sudden interest, created a redirect to a page that was itself a redirect--a page he had created himself--and we depend on our editors to keep the site tidier than that. Cheers! Spıke ¬ 04:27 4-Feb-13
It would be possible, in theory, to fix double redirects with a bot. However, I would be hesitant to fix to use that method, in case it would redirect Alexander Hamilton to Mama Luigi or something like that. --Mn-z 10:08, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
Yup, there has always been one big problem with such "artificial intelligence," and it's not that it's not artificial. Spıke ¬ 12:51 4-Feb-13

edit Hello

I just felt like saying hello. I've done that now, so I'm satisfied.                               Puppy's talk page01:47 11 Mar 2013

edit Fixing pointers

— the interest you stated on your user page — is valuable work that lets us better maintain our superficial resemblance to an encyclopedia, so thank you!

On the previous subject of double redirects, there is a maintenance page, Special:DoubleRedirects, that lists them. (A 'bot is able to do this but somehow not fix them.) Right now there are no double redirects. A companion page is Special:BrokenRedirects. Links get broken mostly by pages getting deleted, most frequently at Votes for deletion. The right answer to these is usually to list the redirect on QVFD so that we delete it too. Spıke ¬ 15:00 5-Nov-13

edit Pointless redirects

As we discussed above in Section 2, do not address a red link by creating an unnecessary redirect. Instead, remove the double brackets on the source page so that it is not a link at all. Your new pages will be instant Special:DoubleRedirects that someone else will have to fix. Spıke ¬ 18:49 21-Jun-14

Personal tools
projects