User talk:Isra1337

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 00:44, March 2, 2008 by Necropaxx (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
AdminBadge
Please leave new messages at the top of the page.
  • If you are replying to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there, not here.
  • If you need to reach me quickly, or if you have been banned, I might be reachable on IRC. (open #uncyclopedia here).
  • Archive: #1. #2. #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9
CompassRoseBig

 
Leave a message

Note: Currently I (Isra) am moving and looking for a job, so I may be a bit unresponsive. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

edit Wrong title

Could you delete this article please: Reasons to become an atheist/the funny version/the sensible version. I gave it the wrong title. Weri long wang 22:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

edit Alright.

I'd never even heard of quote-spamming before. I'm new here and I thought what I was saying was more universally funny than it was. Lesson learned.

If you have another problem with me, talk to me first. We could probably talk it out fairly easily.

--Counciltucky

It's a common noob mistake, one which I once made myself on a smaller scale. The important thing is that you learned your lesson. Plus you are no longer a ban-virgin and can truly join the community. Anyhow, good to see you are taking it in stride. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 04:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

edit Holy crap, dude!

Wow, thanks for the UOTY nom, man! I haven't been all that active in the past six months and probably don't have a chance in hell, but the gesture is very much appreciated. --Algorithm 01:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

edit Unused template

I created this template some time ago, but nobody used. Since you are in a template killing frenzy, you may choose to delete it or spare it whatever you think.

Template: Too Big

herr doktor needsAsample Rocket [scream!] 20:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Moved to your userspace at User:NeedABrain/Too Big
Just huff it. It's no use for me as well. herr doktor needsAsample Rocket [scream!] 20:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Does no harm sitting in your userspace. List it on QVFD it you really really want it gone.---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Roger that. -- herr doktor needsAsample Rocket [scream!] 20:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

edit Hey Isra

I'm looking for qualified judges for the next PLS, and I definately think you qualify. Leave me a message on my talk page if you're interested, or not. You could always just respond here, but I probably won't see it, as I often forget important things like who I've asked to judge for me.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

edit PotM

It's about damn time.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

edit Crappy video games

I’ve decided I want to make a single article with a list of crap video games on it. I wrote a separate article about one of these games but it clearly isn’t long enough. Can you delete the AIRCARS article for me? Thanks. Weri long wang 17:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

deletion request completed. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 18:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I’ve uploaded a better version of the image Image:Athepray.PNG. Please can you delete this inferior one? Thanks. Weri long wang 19:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

edit Is this funny?

Can I ask for your critical views on the following section:

The true rulers of Wikipedia, otherwise known as the New Wikipedia Order (NWO), are the Wikipedia bots. These are viscous, evil, power hungry androids which run in the background and when nobody is watching, BAM! They strike with remorseless brutality. All the Wikipedia bots are thugs.

The most notorious Wikipedia bot is the brutal psychopath who goes by the name of OrpahBot. This heartless lunatic purposely targets husband and wife couples in an attempt to orphan an innocent child. He claims to be doing this because the parents don’t have their source and copyright status indicated. On Wikipedia copyright is guarded religiously and therefore the authorities have no legal recourse and OrphanBot always evades prosecution for the murderous actions.

In 2006 the children who had been orphaned finally captured OrphanBot, brought him to the orphanage and hung him using a traditional strangulation hanging. The picture taken from the newspaper Jyllands-Posten is shown to the right.

Is that reasonably funny? What's your view? Weri long wang 02:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

edit Thanks

Thanks for the cookie. It's great to know I'm appreciated. Aaadddaaammm 02:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

edit XMas

Tvcc Bradaphraser was throwing away last year's Christmas cards, and
realised they had purposefully forgotten about you.
This user is completely thoughtless, doesn't care about Multi-culturalism,
and therefore DEMANDS you have yourself a Merry little Christmas... NOW!

Failure to comply with result in disciplinary action up to and including excommunication from the Capitalist Church

May you focus on your successes and forget your failures here at the end of the year. Never forget how we all improve one another's lives. Season's Greetings. (Be sure to pretend the template is talking about the applicable holiday, as necessary)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Snoop Merry Chrizzle, Happy Hanukizzle, and a Kick Ass Kwizzle from Me & Snoop Dizzle!
--Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 02:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

edit PLS !!!

Your judge packet, sir.  :)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

edit It's time!

Well, the time has finally come for judging the best at PLS. Since it'd be extremely hard (if not impossible) to fairly judge all 10 entries in your category in one sitting, it's recommended you start early and take it in stages. You were chosen as a judge because I trust your judgment when it comes to humor at Uncyclopedia, so you may use any method of choosing the winners that you deem fit. I do have space for you on the judging page to rank your top five favorite articles, in order, and give honorable mention to any other articles in your category that you deem "worthy" of being an Uncyclopedia article (which will then be unlocked after PLS is over). I'd prefer to have the entries almost fully judged by the Wednesday, the 7th of February, though the deadline isn't until the 10th. As such, be ready for me to be panicking if there's nothing done on your entry on the judging page by the 7th. Thank you again for judging, and enjoy the read (as many of the entries are quite funny this go around, in my opinion). Please contact me at my talkpage if you have any questions.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response, Isra.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

edit No redeeming value?

The objective, unbiased and politically neutral user Gamespot=666 has decided he doesn’t like this article I wrote, my response to this article. My article was obviously supposed to come from the other side but with a bit more droll and subtle humour (with exceptions of course – apes with big penises for example). Does this really have no redeeming value though? If so, why does the other? Weri long wang 23:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Just about all the "Reasons to" articles are unfunny lists. To date, I've held off on just deleting them all, for some unknown reason. Is the time for purging them now? Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02/10 00:11
Well, the fair, unbiased and neutral user who tagged the page also decided not to follow NRV guidelines. The page is too old for NRV, and the wrong type of page for it anyway. Nevertheless, 1) pages get kept or deleted based on whether they are funny or not. politics is irrelavent. fairness is irrelavent. 2) I didn't see anything remotely approaching a joke there; and no, having a vaguely sarcastic tone to your page doesn't count as a joke. 3) pages are kept or deleted based on whether they are funny or not. 4) pages are kept or deleted based on whether they are funny or not.---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
So, no redeeming value then?Weri long wang 13:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
If you'd read the above comment, you'd find a bit of text which states "The page is too old for NRV...". Although if you missed that, you'll probably miss this as well. No, what I think we're both saying is "admin deletion on the grounds of not being funny". Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02/10 15:08

Same thing in other words? And there's no need to be so hostile, I was only asking. Weri long wang 16:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not deleting it, and I don't see anyone else deleting it. It clearly had a lot more work put into it than a lot of the stuff around here. Still, it doesn't tickle my funnybone. If you want a second opinion, there is always Pee Review.
I apologize for the hostility, but I do get sick of being a political referee on Uncyclopedia. We long ago agreed we weren't going to be fair or balanced, we were just going to let the funny stuff live and the stupid stuff die. Does that tend to bias the sight politicallly? Probably? Is that bias the opposite of my own? Yes. But it is a bias that occurs from which writers on the site are funny. Anyhow, there's no tag on the page now, and if you want comments we have a page for that. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 01:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

edit Potatochoppers' Guild

Pcg logo

RadicalX invites you to join the Potatochoppers' Guild. Please read through our charter and decide whether or not you would like to join. If you would, please contact RadicalX to find out more!

edit Account cleanup

I’ve been just a little bit over zealous with image uploading over the years. Can you please delete the following images I uploaded but no longer (or never) used:

  • Image:Whitehousecartman.jpg
  • Image:GodDelusionBush.jpg
  • Image:BChimp 1.JPG
  • Image:BChimp 2.JPG
  • Image:BChimp 3.JPG
  • Image:BChimp 4.JPG
  • Image:BChimp 5.JPG
  • Image:BChimp 6.JPG
  • Image:Preacher girl.jpg
  • Image:The darks.PNG
  • Image:Selfless gene.PNG
  • Image:1904048382large.jpg
  • Image:Crucify this.PNG
  • Image:Drinkingfountain.JPG
  • Image:Hypocrisy 1.jpg
  • Image:Chemistry Book.jpg
  • Image:800px-Pasdecabale.jpg
  • Image:Magic the pasta.PNG
  • Image:Magics14.jpg
  • Image:Slanderbook.jpg
  • Image:ArmyLogoSmall.PNG
  • Image:Maxwell0926.jpg
  • Image:Equa.PNG
  • Image:Piratechart.PNG
  • Image:Venn diagram ID png.PNG
  • Image:Youngmewithdate.PNG
  • Image:Nuke on eBay png.PNG
  • Image:Legalization-of-marijuana-1.jpg
  • Image:Icantbelieveitsnotbutter.jpg
  • Image:Hitlerbenito.gif
  • Image:InSouthPark.PNG
  • Image:862237~Bob-Roberts-Posters.jpg
  • Image:PNAC.PNG
  • Image:Athe full.PNG
  • Image:RepublicansJ.JPG
  • Image:Farttofinish.PNG
  • Image:Sin1.jpg
  • Image:Statue-Of-Liberty.jpg
  • Image:Happy stick figure with glasses.PNG
  • Image:Factor.jpg
  • Image:Religo-politics.jpg
  • Image:Qwertyuiop-asdfghjkl;zxcvbnm,.JPG
  • Image:Smaller george.JPG
  • Image:Flamethrower copy jpg.JPG
  • Image:She dont wanna hear it.PNG
  • Image:Athe gothic text.PNG

Delete this page too: User talk:Weri long wang/History of conservatism

This user doesn’t seem to done anything useful

Thanks. Weri long wang 20:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

edit Thanks

Newcookie Lenoxus has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

For boosting my esteem by having my semi-original work automatically appear on so many mind-blowingly-lame articles. Lenoxus 03:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

edit Hey Isra

Your deletion method doesn't work. --General Insineratehymn 23:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Huh? < blinks eyes, wakes up, realizes he left things on this website before the real world swallowed him whole > Quite probable. What deletion method? ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 05:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
That template you put on the article Sonny. The article is gone now though. You put the template on a few months ago saying it would be deleted in two weeks. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

edit Thanks

Weasel
Weasel3689 would like to thank you for
Lord of the Flies.

Remember:
Weasels Rule!
Fly01

Weasel Weasel 3689Sucrose b Colombia icon 06:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Heh. Don't thank me. Thank you for nominating it and finally giving it its vindication after it was mercilessly killed in the mass extinction following the great de-alphabetizing of 2005. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on the recent featured image and featured article.....you'll have to create some new stuff now. :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

edit Just found...

This. You're an odd sort of person. Don't ever change. Have you considered changed the crappy existing page so that it matches your audio? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

edit Late Thanks

Bordeaux OUI!

Necropaxx's belated thanks go with you for voting positively on Siege of Bordeaux. Remember, les français ne sont jamais au dessus de dérision!

Translate it yourself, je suis trop de fatigue.

Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects