User talk:Heerenveen/archive4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Welly Wanging

I will be very interested to know, sir or madam, if you happen to live in the obviously-sexually-repressed-and-unfunny United States of America. If so, then some excuse can be afforded to you for completely and utterly missing the point of the article which you reviewed 31st March 2008. Yes, whilst formatting might be improved (I am an amateur in that field), I think you wholly fail to grasp the concept and hidden meaning of the article. Shame really, as I am a sixteen-year old young man in an English private school, and I had my peers in stitches over this. Welcome, my honourable friend, to the world of INNUENDO. If you don't know what that means, you got lost on the way there. And if you do happen to be English, I pray God you don't advertise the fact. Maybe read again, more open-minded and open-fisted next time. Oops, there I go again! I thank you for your time, but seriously, you need to use it better than reviewing countless articles cynically.

'If you can't see the joke; the joke is probably you'

Good-day to you.Jackharrison 09:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Way to make friends and influence people Jack. Stupid generalisations about entire countries are not a great way to go. And if you think about it for a second, his username should give you a slight clue as to which continent he can be found on... I am as English as they come, and have been for more time than you, and I'm familiar with innuendo and the noble art of welly wanging. And I didn't find your article particularly hilarious either. I may have been a tad more generous with my scoring, but it's not brilliant by any stretch. The thing about reviews is you're asking for other people's opinions - and not everyone's opinion is the same as yours. If you disagree with a review, request a second one. If the second opinion concurs with the first, you may like to entertain the possibility that the article isn't as gut-bustingly funny as you think. There's potential there, but you need to work on it a bit more to bring it out. Think about it, and don't go getting upset by an honest attempt to be honest and helpful. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:23, Apr 4
Yes, my average score when I'm doing Pee Review is a few points below the average. However, that generally is because I like to take the IP stuff from the bottom of the barrel to see if there are any hidden gems and whatnot. If you want proof that I don't review cynically, try here, here, or here. I stand by my review that the article is currently too subtle, poorly formatted and too small, and that it still needs a lot of work to be a good article. Oh, and I'm Scottish. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 13:28
I hate humour. It sucks balls. Also, Heerenveen does a great job skimming the crap off the Pee Review que. Obey him. Toughest reviewer around, according to my sources.   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [13:38]>
CAJEK!!! Not technically true by the way, AE has a worse average of PEEING memebers (though he's inactive, so does he count? I don't know). Also, thanks UU for saying what I would of had I been active at quarter past...yawn...nine in the morning. Also also, anyone reading this, vote MDL for RotM! –—Hv (talk) 4/04 13:54
Heerenveen, hey! I think you're the toughest reviewer of all the cream of the crop reviewers. I'm sorry that guy voted against you! Makes me want to change back... I don't know. Maybe I'll just not vote. I hate democracy.   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [13:56]>
It's OK, MDL deserves it much more than I do! Hell, even next month (assuming MDL goes ahead and wins) I think Javascap deserves it more. But crikey MDL's great. Democracy does suck though. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 13:59
I never said it was brilliant, but I think it's better than 10. By a little. I commend this chap, even if he does think England and Scotland are somehow the same, and my attempt at trans-atlantic banter was, in meaning,light-hearted, and requited by definition. Please do not think I am moaning because I thought it was amazing, I just didn't think it was that bad. The IP comment is very valid, but given the volume of work you do, maybe you should score a little more mainstream? Anyway, good to hear from you. Apologies, I will certainly look at your other reviews, but mine was certainly cynical. Believe me, I am terribly so myself, I can spot it. But that's not always a good thing.Jackharrison 14:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Having looked through it again, yes, I will admit that was a bit cycnical of me. Apologies about that. Right now, I would score it about a 24-ish, as its length still hurts it, but I would now score it higher than a ten. I don't see how anyone thinks England and Scotland are the same though (UU said he was English, I said I was Scottish). I probably should be more mainstream, but I'm comfortable with how I'm working, but I will try to change. Thanks for bringing this up. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 14:29
Whoa Heerenveen, you gave him a 10? Jesus christ, that's... wow. Now I can see why he was upset, whether it was a justified score or not! This is nobody's fault, I think.   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [14:32]>
Nah, it is mine, I remember now, this was a couple of days ago when I was...a bit pissed off with Uncyc, to the point where I was about to go back on hiatus. I really shouldn't have done that review, but I thought that since I'd PRIP'd it it'd be common courtesy. That's why I had a couple of days off afterwards. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 14:35
Sorry about the English/Scottish thing, I must have misread. Consider the situation fully sorted, and I would like to apologise for my rashness also. Having read this comment (I actually rated it lower than that!) and your other reviews, you might just get my vote actually, which just goes to show research is everything. It's you or Javascap...Good luck! The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jackharrison (talk • contribs)
No problem, consider the apology accepted. Personally, I would vote Javascap, but that's because I personally don't think I should win either award I'm nominated for - I really just don't deserve it, and I like to see good improvers like him get recognition, but that's just me. P.S. That's a solid review you did earlier, kudos to you. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 19:05


Heerenveen, do you want to update the list? We've got a back up right now, and I think both I and UU trust you. You know how to update it all, right?   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [19:14]>
I think I understand it with the averages and whatnot... Yeah, I'll do it. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 19:16
Cool, update the maintenance list with your name, too. Thanks, man.   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [19:22]>
Good on Fist of Judgement. Update the maintenance list by striking out <s>blah blah</s> the review and say if you gave it a + or - in your opinion, then sign your name.   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [19:26]>
Oh, on Fist of Judgement (and everybody else) update the notes section with their latest review, the date of their latest review, and their percentage. Good.   Le Cejak <Apr 04, 2008 [19:29]>
Like that? –—Hv (talk) 4/04 19:46
Cool. I did say I was going to get round to it, and with a mug o' tea beside me I'm already to do it, and it's already done. I like it when that happens! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:06, Apr 4
Definitely. Not many feelings better than going in for some kind of work and not having to do it, which I wish would happen more often. No problems table wise once Cajek had explained it to me, so that should be fine. Unrelated fact: This is the longest talk page heading I've ever had in 14 months at Uncyc by quite a bit. –—Hv (talk) 4/04 20:11

Thank you for the update, Hv!   Le Cejak <Apr 05, 2008 [22:28]>

It's nothing. I was a bit iffy on Roger's (can't type his name without looking, can't be arsed to look), but I decided to give him benefit of the doubt on it. And yeah, we needed the header, you could barely read it without getting confused beforehand, so thanks! –—Hv (talk) 5/04 22:32
Yes, I too hate his name. Feel free to update the list whenever you get the gumption slash have nothing better to do (and remember to update the {{%|x|x}} thingies, too.) Cajek out! that sounded cool. note to self: do that more often   Le Cejak <Apr 05, 2008 [22:37]>

Yet more Pee related criticisms

Why did you steal my pee review of not-so-awesome-land?--NecroBlade 23:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Your review was reverted by an admin. When I got there, it didn't say anything about you there, so I just did it. –—Hv (talk) 9/04 14:49
I reverted it because you admitted in your review that you didn't even read the whole page. The review wasn't very useful, either. Try to write a bit more into them--a good pee review can be the difference between a good article and a great article. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:16, Apr 9
What Led said, basically. Also - TLB - how on earth did you know to come here now? –—Hv (talk) 10/04 14:38
I'm everywhere! Big Brother is watching you! (Actually your userpage was somehow on my watchlist, presumably because I was talking here some time before this one, and I had forgotten to unwatch.) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:25, Apr 10
Oh, crap, I completely forgot about watchlists. I haven't looked at mine since...oh, about May-ish. /me goes to look. Whoops, 4,000 articles, that big clear link looks rather inviting... –—Hv (talk) 10/04 20:54


For the great Pee Review. The article is now in VFH. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

No problemo, great article. –—Hv (talk) 9/04 14:49

Ta for review

I'll try my best with it, Thanks again:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

It's disgusting...

Heinous Dan Movie Poster

Hey, Punk!

You voted to get the UnScript featuring the most violent detective in the world to the front page to blow some heads clean off a few newbie shoulders. I'll keep this brief considering that I've been sitting on my ass for the last minute talking to you instead of carving holes into that punk Dexter.

So thanks for the vote.

~ Tophatsig 17/04/2008 @ 03:12
No problems. ~~Hv 17:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

"whore received"

Ha!   Le Cejak <Apr 22, 2008 [21:11]>

Yup, it came, it went. 'Twas very nice indeed while it stayed, but now that it's gone again, it's left me very sleepy, strangely... –—Hv (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh? Lame! Receive my second whore: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Cajek/Mordor Jalapenos   Le Cejak <Apr 22, 2008 [21:21]>
Oooh, this one's staying with me, I like it! Sorry for the late reply, I was actually shattered last night, which is what I meant there. I'm writing today (or at trying to, anyway!), but if I get time later I'll do it. –—Hv (talk) 23/04 15:39
Cool, glad you like. I'll expect your report later today, Mr. H!   Le Cejak <Apr 23, 2008 [15:45]>
/me looks at Sycamore, then at the pee queue. Or maybe not. Damn procrastination. –—Hv (talk) 23/04 15:55
I assume Sycamore did a good enough job, no need for me to do a third opine? —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 15:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Sycamore didn't really "get it", although he did a thorough job. (I just finished reading User talk:Famine, and I got distracted. It's not worth reading, btw). If you understand what a JALAPENO is, I would appreciate a "third" review.   Le Cejak <Apr 24, 2008 [15:57]>
It's a chili, and it's bloody hot, and that's all I can remember from Food Tech. Again, if I get time (what with writing (which I forgot again, dammit), RC and having another pee queued) I'll do it. I read Famine's talk page a couple of days ago (from the block log, no less), and it sounds to me like he thinks we may as well pack up, which I really don't see the reason for. –—Hv (talk) 24/04 16:55

Heerenveen needs some laughter in his life


Look at him go!   Le Cejak <Apr 24, 2008 [22:51]>

Whee! Contraptions! /me gets heavily distracted.
Seventeen hours later...
OK, that seems enough. God knows I needed it, school's grating with me even more than usual right now. Also, first time I've ever seen an established user get a one for P&F, which shocked me a bit, I expected more from Improver really. Also also, why is this semi-protected? –—Hv (talk) 25/04 13:09
Why is what semi-protected? You mean my flying machine? Well, first of all, I don't want anyone stealing the patent: those Write brothers (not Wright brothers) are always stealing my inventions!   Le Cejak <Apr 25, 2008 [13:11]>
Yup, those pesky brothers, always stealing everything of any use, and leaving their pesky lines all over the place, it's lot of mopping up. Got a legal case going against 'em soon, hopefully that'll be good protection I meant this talk page, talking to myself, it's a really bad habit, you know? As is using bad HTML, like so. –—Hv (talk) 25/04 13:52

A quick thanks

Hey mate, thanks a lot for that Review you did of my UnScript-didn't think anyone would ever get round to that. It was very helpful, very tolerant. Looking back, I probably did overdo the name-dropping. I must say, Uncyclopedia's a lot more welcoming to newcomers than I'd expected.

Anyway, that's, uh...about it. You'll probably want to...delete this comment, or something. Anyway, thanks again. Cheers. BlueYonder 18:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

It's nothing. Yeah, we're quite a bit better with newbies than we were (despite the current NotM controversy). Happy writing! –—Hv (talk) 27/04 18:08

very special thanks

Thanks for the vote with Tony Visconti and also your first class review whcih got it feature worthy. Big thanks and hugs from:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

A large white expanse

There is a "whoosh!" noise, and brightly scrawled crayon colours are left across the middle. In the distance, a manhole cover clinks back into place. And like that... He's gone. (De-virginising - my way). --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:35, Apr 28

(diff) (hist) . . User talk:Heerenveen‎; 16:38 . . (-443) . . Heerenveen (Talk | contribs) (Reverted edit(s) of Under user (talk) to last version by Heerenveen - I like my virginity!) [rollback] –—Hv (talk) 28/04 16:16
lol wat ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 16:39 Apr 28
I work in strange new ways... –—Hv (talk) 28/04 20:07


And thank you for your support! Mightydandylion Icons-flag-us (talk) Fk 16:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

It's nothing, like I said on RotM this month, you should have won that. And thanks again. Good luck! —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 16:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Gratz on RotM thar, HV! You've certainly earned it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 18:28 May 1

Good Lord man!

You really are a tank! I think you've beaten me to QVFD every time this morning. Awesome job! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN19:04, 1 May

That's where insane recent changes refreshing gets you, plus the QVFD script. Awesome, that is. I'd probably not be at Uncyc without it. Thanks for the compliment! –—Hv (talk) 1/05 19:10

JS help.

Alright, so I just went and stole a huge chunk of code from your .js page and I've been trying to make it work. The cool stuff shows up on talk pages and other places I don't really need it, but when I go to try to use that cool VFD script, I get nothing. Would you mind taking a look for me? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 19:39 May 1

Sure. –—Hv (talk) 1/05 19:42
I'm not the best with js, but I reckon it's because you have the welcome js at the top (especially before the nowiki). I got it from SbU, and that's what I noticed when I first played around with it, but I'm not entirely sure. –—Hv (talk) 1/05 19:48
Thanks, I'll try moving some stuff around. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 19:52 May 1

NotM - Thanks


Heerenveen, you there? Come out where I can see you, I come bearing gifts! There you are! You are a VERY clever person. Why? Because you voted for me and helped me become NotM! Well done. Give yourself a pat on the back.

To reward you, I'm giving you a YTTE goodie-bag. It is a collection of YTTE memorabilia I've just pulled out of my pocket...That's one scrumpled piece of paper, a dead slug, three unidentified hairs, a strain of the bird flu virus, a morally ambiguous Olympic torch, two cows and various assorted, unexpected items. Enjoy!

YTTE would also remind you that he's still got a few miracle toothbrushes left. Toothbrushes have so many uses, and these miracles ones are great! Buy one now for a massively reduced price and enjoy their increased ease-of-use feel. 98% of the people studied said their teeth were saved by these total protection tooth brushes! Get your hands on one now!

P.S. Sorry that was so long and rambling, sorry there's no picture. You'll just have to imagine that this is a short, concise, beautiful thank you template. Also I'm hoping I'm not breaking any unspoken rule or etiquette of Uncyclopedia by giving you this thank you template!

from YTTE.

Thanks for voting and thanks again for that audio! - 16:17 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

No probs. That was my first Uncyc audio, glad you're OK with it. –—Hv (talk) 2/05 19:32
Oh, good for you! - 19:36 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!


Do not delete! Blame it on the exit. Try try math! File:JimboWales.jpg The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rhonda (talk • contribs)

What? —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 4/05 18:25
Plez wasnt nice or to delete Volebb! Rhonda 19:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Mhaille deleted it, not me. I'm not an admin (nor will I ever be) - I can't delete pages. By the way, it was deleted because it appeared to be cyberbullying. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 4/05 19:30
it wasn't! Trying to be funny with the Volebb! Rhonda 22:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Whoa. This guy's brilliant. HV, you have been visited by greatness. A new LOLZORZ, perhaps? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 23:09 May 4
God, I hope not. The first one did my nut in too much. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 5/05 13:25
Still...try try math! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 00:28 May 6
I did, but that bloody algebra laughed at my tries! —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 6/05 14:58

Whoring your own article to you? Unheard of!

But the meaning is still the same: vote. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 01:41 May 6

A very late Symbol for vote done. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 7/05 20:31

Heerenveen's Edit History

Plays all the greatest hits!

  • That's, what, six projects I have now? Might be a good idea to actually finish one...
  • Note to self: I need to write a new article now.

Actually, that's all I got. Hi HV!   Le Cejak <May 09, 2008 [15:25]>

And there was me thinking no-one actually read these things...Hi! Although I really do need to finish an article really (what with the VFH tanking and all), but meh. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 9/05 15:28
Also, looking through - you can now buy special summaries, including:
Now for just £666.16! —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 9/05 17:17

on the UnNews audio file you're planning

i couldn't help but notice that you are planning to do an audio for my recent UnNews article, while i'd be more than happy for you to do this (i've listened to your others and they're really good!), could it wait a while? it's just i got a really good pee from SysRq and i wouldn't mind playing with the article for a while and make it better. he even hinted at VFH'ing it if i make it better, and i think it'd be good to have an audio with it but one that matches the text so if you could just hold your toung for a while that'd be cool. let me know either way. Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog|Icons-flag-gbOrian57 00:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Sure! I'd actually ran into a few problems with it anyway, but I'more than happy to wait for you to finish it. Just let me know when you're done. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 12/05 06:00
Hey, I think I've pretty much finished it now, there is at least nothing else I feel I can do to it with out making it sound awkward. so if you still want you can go ahaead with the auidio. Also if there's anything you want to put in there feel free. and my spelling may need looked over. Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog|Icons-flag-gbOrian57 07:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Rightio, I think it looks rather good myself (except for that one ewww picture). My Audacity's stopped being broke (good grammar, me), and I should have it done by the end of the week. Nice UnNews. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 14/05 15:05
Why does everyone hate that picture? Anyway i'm looking forward to hearing it and i'm glad you like the article!Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog|Icons-flag-gbOrian57 15:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey! Just listened to the audio and it's very good! I'm just happy that someone took an interest in my article and also, should any one descide to nominate it, makes the article more complete. So yeah, thanks. Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog|Icons-flag-gbOrian57 16:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

It's nothing. Thanks for the opportunity! ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 18/05 17:51

UnSignpost: May 15th, 2008

User:Fnoodle/UnSignpost/05-15-08 ~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Woot! A newspaper that I've already read in Fnoodle's userspace! Go Skullthumper! (Seriously, I appreciate this a lot, nice to know what I've missed in the VD and whatnot). —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 15/05 17:14
They're onto us, Fnoodle! We must flee!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 17:28 May 15, 2008
Do I have ta'? Mah iron legs 'r tired. Fnoodle 18:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Yup, or I'll chase you down with pitchforks and torches! TORCHES! —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 15/05 18:47
At least we won't be running because we're being chased down!   Le Cejak <May 15, 2008 [18:51]>
...30 hours later...
Where the fuck is that goddamn robot and his op? I've been chasing him for hours! <panting> —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 16/05 21:16


Pyotr Kuznetsov Pyotr Kuznetsov Says: "Thank You For Voting!"
Pyotr Kuznetsov would be here himself, but what with his psychiatric treatment and all, he sent Dora to convey this message.
Oh wait, Dora's dead! Oh well. Anyway, thanks for voting for this!

Please accept the preceding generic template as a sign of my gratitude, Heerenveen. - 08:14 17 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!


Thanks for signing my guest book Mr. Heerenveen! Thank you kindly! /me does a handstand and then juggles some balls for your entertainment - 17:53 18 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

That sounds weirdly formal, something I'm completely unused to here! No probs /me applauds. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), signature has gone wrong, Mr. Heerenveen! - 18:12 18 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
Yup, prefs mistake I think, I don't need the nosubst| in. /me hopes it works this time. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 18/05 18:17
Oh very well done, Mr. Heerenveen, your signature is now functioning beautifully. I bid your farewell and sincerely wish and hope that the rest of your day passes entirely to your satisfaction. Good day, deer sir. - 18:35 18 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Thanks for Vote

Thanks for voteing for my article, big thankies--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Ohh, riiight

That's how to do it. Duly noted (mind you, I don't tend to spend much time creating awards and categories, so I'll certainly forget again long before I ever actually need to use it!) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:41, May 19

True, true. I've never actually created one myself, but its like the people who fix sigs – once you get the knack of how to do it, you always remember. On the award itself, thanks! Might actually be enough to get me reviewing again. Might; depends on how lazy I am later. Ta! ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 19/05 14:53

On The Review + Stuff

Hey, HV, thanks alot for reviewing my article. I see exactly what's wrong with it now and I completly agree. I'll do my best to sort it out and then just leave it alone as, like you say, it isn't VFH material but it is a vast improvement on what was there. Though I think sentecing seems to be an issue in everything I write so I'll try and keep that in check in future. Meanwhile, between reviews, I am working on something a little bit original (even though I stole the style directly from this) which I think may, when its finished, be VFH-able so if you have any preliminary thoughts just dump them on the talk page. And as for reviewing i'm shooting for the Top Five (two more good ones and I've beaten MrN!) to make sure I get RotM next month (MDL totaly deserves it this month, even though i'm not a huge fan of his style 100% good reviews is hard to argue with). Oh and your article (the unpronouncable one) it's good, voted For just now, Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog|Icons-flag-gbOrian57 01:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk archives

Personal tools