User talk:Hawthorn Peebles

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 16:21, December 10, 2009 by DrStrange (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is Hawthorn Peebles's talk page, where you can send messages, comments, and pie to Hawthorn Peebles.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

edit User Talk Archive

If you have any bets to resolve, go to the above link(s) -- as if I'll ever get around to doing that again. Whatever that meant, you figure it out, I'd rather be stoned...H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 06:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

edit HP!

Where the hell have you been in the last two years! Are you back? Can we rejoice? ~Jewriken.GIF 20:43, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

  • Yeah, just got fired from NASA again, apparently sending a bomb to the moon is a 'bad' idea. — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi


xxxx — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 10:27, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

edit PEE

Hi Hawthorn Peebles and thanks for helping out over at PEE review. However it has come to my attention that your reviews are repeatedly failing to meet the standards that we feel are appropriate to help out writers. If you are to continue to contribute to the PEE queue then you should read this which details the what we do expect from you as a reviewer. We do appreciate your contributions but it would really help you and the authors of the articles you review if you would take a look at those guidelines before contributing again. Thanks. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:05, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Oh sure thing, Chiefster, what PEE review are you talking about? — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 19:52, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Just the ones you have done in general. I respect you as a good user from what I have seen of your work and just suspect that you aren't entirely up to speed with the guidelines for PEE at the moment. I'm pretty sure everyone could benefit from your feedback, I'd just be really grateful if you could take a look at the guidelines. Thanks, and thanks even more for the nickname Chiefster, I kinda like it. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:00, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
I'm butting in where I don't belong, but that's just me. I noticed you started here December 9, 2005 and also won an early Footlizer Prize, so you obviously know something about Uncyclopedia. I think you're probably caught in a time warp, where things are done much differently than they were back in the day. I had that happen to me one time, where someone made fun of me because I was so new to the Internet (i.e. stupid) I didn't know anything about it, and all because I didn't recognize some online slang term. As it ended up, I was using the Internet when my insulter was learning how to write his name (I remember being concerned when my RocketMail account was taken over by Yahoo!). So just to catch up with the times (gosh, 2005 was just ages ago!) I'd recommend checking out what Chiefster suggested, and also looking at some recent Pee Reviews done by those who are, ahem, listed as doing in-depth reviews. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 19:14, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

edit Question

Is your review of my article deliberately non-constructive? Your 'review' amounted to a general swipe across my article with no examples, and no suggestions other than to 'read other articles'. I have wrote 3 features in the past, so I don't need reminding of what is good and what is not. Either way, don't waste your time in future. --Knucmo2 19:10, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Is your article deliberately non-humorous? And please list those that have been featured so I may review those also! — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 19:53, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
How's about you write a funny article, or rather, sentence first, then you might qualify to comment! --Knucmo2 20:01, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Muahahahaha, ok yeah, now I know you're pulling my leg! OK, kiddo, now that's humor! — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 20:24, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
All right Knucmo2, knock it off. The man won FP three years ago already and wrote numerous Unnews. I read his review and while it's not up to speed with the current way of peeing, it doesn't seem to me that it was written in bad faith. Now both of you kiss and shake hands. Or kiss me and shake hands. Or don't shake hands. As long as someone is being kissed. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:28, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Me?in rememberanz of all teh siggies 09:34 November 4
Me who? — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 17:32, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

edit Review

Wowsers... Thats one helluva score! I am glad you liked it! Thanks for the review of UnTunes:Ur So Phat and you don't even like food I am glad that at least I know somebody likes it enough to score it that high. Have this refreshing beer to refresh your piss stocks...

Beerpint Acrolo has bought you a beer for reviewing his UnTune!! Kudos!
Drink up, you are gonna need the piss .

Sir ACROLO KUNFPWAOTMFA •(SPAM) 21:23, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Yay!! Two things I love, beer and music!! — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 08:52, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

edit Monty Python and Saturday Night Live

I saw the recent additions to your user page, and see we're fans of a number of the same things. Some of the Monty Python troupe of course appeared on Saturday Night Live, but one time I didn't think it worked. I saw the dead parrot sketch performed by the masters John Cleese and Michael Palin. I don't know if they slowed down the timing for the producers or for the American audience, but their pacing was too slow. To me it was a mediocre performance. I cried for three days after that, then went to my local pet shop and strangled three parakeets, two cockatiels, and a rare Yellow-backed Chattering Lory. I felt much better. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:37, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Well I doubt they were expecting the Spanish Inquisition. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:39, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps I should add I've never strangled a live bird in my life. I've molested a few dead ones, though. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:05, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Hey?? Were you the little blind kid on Dumb and Dumber..."...pretty bird, pretty bird..."... — H. Peebles - D - HS KUN Foolitzer Icons-flag-pi 11:52, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Nah, that was my cousin. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:06, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

edit Full of crap

You have received Smuggler's "Full of Crap" award for your article, because the article which you wrote was in fact, full of crap. 'Keep 'em coming!  :) Smuggler. 11/11/9

This article is full of crap

edit Bullsheet!

You have received Smuggler's "Bullshit Bandito" award for your article, because the artick which you wrote was in fact, full of Bullsheet!

The bullshit bandito

The Bullshit Bandito sez, "Dees arteecle, ees Bullsheet Senor!"

edit VORTEX 102

AnimatedSpiral2 WELCOME TO VORTEX 102

The first semester will cover the entire spectrum of human biological vortices, with the first quarter focusing exclusively on the colonic vortex. In this animated simulation, the event horizon (colon) can be clearly distinguished. Unlike the hydraulic, atmospheric and gravitational vortex, the biological vortices aren't open ended systems with dubious conclusions as to where the crap goes in and comes out. Since biological systems are easily identifiable and make for an easy study, we'll be spending a lot of time on them. By understanding the biological vortices, we may glean insight into the larger picture. The foundation of all knowledge starts with the colonic vortex so study this animated gif for no less than an hour a day for the next week.
Thank You!
Dr S

BTW, you will also need a speculum for this class.-- DRStrangesig5   Sherman   Fingertalk   16:21, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects