User talk:Gnome

Welcome!

Hello, Gnome, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

F@H

This user joined the Folding@home Team, because he/she gives a damn & so should you.

18:18, 17 October 2006 (PDT)

Fixes on Eternity

Cheers for the input on eternity, made it a lot more readible. I kind of ran out of inspiration to find a way to polish it up. Ta! Dutchy

You're welcome, Dutchy! ;) --Gnome  …MUN F@H

vfd

Do not add articles to VFD that are only hours old. Either tag them with maintainance tags, or if they have no chance of ever being useful, add them to QVFD. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 28/10 00:37

Sure, won't happen again. Thanks for the direction! Gnome  …MUN F@H 00:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey - no problem. We try to keep VFD focused on pages which are old and sucky. The {{NRV}} and {{ICU}} tags do a pretty good job of managing new, crappy articles. Along with QVFD, of course. Thanks for trying to help out - more help is always appreciated. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 28/10 00:47

About QFH

I wouldn't recommend randomly removing the QFH tag from articles if I were you. QFH means the article was nommed for highlighting, got a lot of support but not enough to make the cut, and at least one user enjoyed it enough to feel it deserved at least a QFH. --User:Nintendorulez 23:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Anyone was looking for people on IRC to remove these: "who wants to help me revert an assload of incorrectly placed QFHs?". So I helped him. Unfortunately, some were indeed nommed. Thanks for reverting them. I hope my mistakes will be forgiven, I was just trying to help. --Gnome  …MUN F@H 23:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

There's QFH articles that weren't actually nommed in the past? Ah, didn't realize. I'll have to keep an eye out for improper use of the template in the future when scanning recentchanges... --User:Nintendorulez 23:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

These are the ones we looked at. I'm looking through them if we removed some more mistakenly just now. --Gnome  …MUN F@H 23:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Ugh, it's even worse than that. The few I checked once had the nomination template on them, but can't be found on any VFH archive page....

Yes, I've had a look at all of them now. It seems it's the same: They once had a nomination template, but don't turn up on VFH archive pages. I reverted some (4, to be precise) of them before I started checking, but left the others alone. What do you think, shall we re-revert the other ones again? :P --Gnome  …MUN F@H 00:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

NotM

Braydie has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Thanks for voting me at NotM --—Braydie 00:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Hugs

flyingfeline has awarded you a hug and a biscuit. She would also like to scream hysterically in your ear, but is afraid it would get her desysopped.

You're welcome! After all it was you who helped me when I was a noob. And thanks for not screaming in my ear ;-) -- Gnome  …MUN F@H 13:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

And going and going and going?!

how dare you delete my copying of the and goings. it just kept going. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ONX (talk • contribs)

Simple enough: it does not make the article any funnier, but awfully increases loading time. Readers will either simply skip the section, or get annoyed and go away. Either way, it's not doing anything good. —Gnome  …MUN F@H 15:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Zombie Invasion

I was trying to deuglify it and somehow lost the momentom. Want a joint venture? Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 16:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

You're referring to HowTo:Survive the Impending Zombie Invasion, right? Well, why not? I have to admit I'm not very creative or funny at most times, but killing Zombies will be fun. —Gnome  …MUN F@H 20:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Yep, that's the one. I need someone to give me back the motivation :) Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 23:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Avada

Sorry if I caused any problems, my thinking was merely that a article of such ridiculous brevity could be easily huffed with further thought. Sorry for being over zealous in my efforts to improve the site. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 12:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, I agree with you that there should be a faster way for speedy execution of old, crappy articles such as this one, and VfD'ing it is part of my plan: I decided to post a daily addition to VfD this week, see what happens, and eventually create a forum topic about the matter. The problem is that QVfD, ICU and similar stuff are intended for new articles only (You'll probably have seen the notice on your own user talk by now). —Gnome  …MUN F@H 12:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Comrade

Thank you for supporting me for dictatorship at the VFS. Now my diabolical scheme for domination can commence. You Are A True Comrade. ~

Bloody Pagans

Pagans, the Whole Lot of Yous Premier Tom Mayfair has been a naughty boy this year, but he still deserves a kiss from under the mistletoe. His external organ is fair game.