User talk:Gir./The deep down crazies

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Gir.
Revision as of 05:00, April 8, 2007 by Gir. (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Giving this article a good review means you probably have the deep down crazies. (Gir. 23:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC))

I've edited the article to make it more than a list and removed the "anti-list" tag so it can be reviewed. I've not made all the links yet in the main body, but I figure that's pretty tangential for now.

A little help if possible: In the quotation, I tried to make "this article" link to The deep down crazies instead of this article such as in this article. It doesn't work since the pipe signifies another command in the quotation. If anyone knows how to fix this, I'd appreciate it. Cheers. (Gir. 18:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC))

Humour: 6. Not bad...but the others are right, gay jokes aren't really that funny. They are funny when I do it. ... .... Nope not even then... damn.
Concept: 10 We need more psychiatric postings.
Prose and formatting: 8 The format is really standard and professional...good templates...images are about right. Nothing morphed, fotoshopped or moving, though.
Images: 7 7 images. 7 points.
Miscellaneous: 5
Final Score: 36 B Good, not excellent. Keep working on it, its a great concept.
Reviewer: Happy Weasel 21:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


Thanks HappyWeasel. I've thought about the gay jokes a lot. I tried to make the gay pool as enticing and appealing as possible, as if the author is closeted (wait, what am I saying?), but after editing the section over and over, I agree it's not working and is pretty stupid. As for images, I'm on it. I wanted to use something like the vibrating fat kid but I've seen it too often elsewhere (and I'm a noob). I'm not sure where to find moving pictures but I'll figure it out when I'm not supposed to be working. (Gir. 00:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC))

Actually, trying to make the author sounding closeted isn't a half bad idea, you just have to be VERY subtle about it.Happy Weasel 01:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

This is the second time through Pee Review, as evidenced above. A full account is on the discussion page. I think I'm finished, but any suggestions are always welcome. The section "acquiring the deep down crazies is new and any harsh criticism of that section is especially welcome. (Gir. 05:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC))

Personal tools
projects