User talk:Ferric AlFerrous

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

editWelcome!

Hello, Ferric AlFerrous, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:

If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Ferric AlFerrous/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome!  ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:51, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

editHey man

Could you put the [itex] stuff in your sig in between "[[User:Ferric AlFerrous|" and "]]"? That way it'll link to your userpage so people can tell who posted the message (which is kinda what a sig is for). 00:33, 3 December 2011

editSo um...

Why did you QVFD this disambiguation page? QuickVFD is only meant for newly created crappy pages and old thingies that no longer serve a purpose (like unused categories or templates). 20:03, 4 December 2011

• Sorry it late and I was sniffing out articles to put up for deletion. At the time it seemed as if it had no redeeming value and thus was appropriate for QVFD rather than the usual VFD. Again I apologize. --$Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 20:23, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

edit Thanks

By the way Ferric, thanks for the work you've done so far. It seems you're writing, and patrolling, but even better, you've written a fairly decent pee review as well. Anyways, I encourage you to keep writing and patroling and writing those reviews! And dont forget to vote on the VFH pages. The more users there are helping decide what our feature content is, the more diverse views there will be to help chose the best of the best. And by the way, I farted on that sandwhich you ate while you went to the bathroom, you're stomache is now digesting my own gastric juices. You're pretty gross for eating that! Sick. Ewe! -- 13:36, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the support. I'm trying to get more involved in the realm of misinformation doing whatever I can to help out. This is a site that's really fun to do any type of upkeep on. So what about my sandwich now- oh God! oh, oh God oh- *throws up*

A couple things:

1. Please read UN:SIG. Once you do that, the rest of these should be fairly redundant, but I may as well point them out just to save some trouble, or something.
2. Your signature is too tall - please make the image a maximum of 15px tall; currently it's 24px tall.
3. To get the template to go on pages as a template instead of putting the contents on the page, use this in your preferences: {{subst:nosubst|User:Ferric AlFerrous/sig1}} (you probably have something like {{subst:User:Ferric AlFerrous/sig1}} in there at present; the nosubst is the important bit).
4. Generally using [itex] in a signature is frowned upon - it can have somewhat, shall we say, unexpected results, such as in extreme cases causing the links to just not work. In the case of your signature you should be able to get the same effect fairly easily with a specified font family and <sup> tags, though, so it's not too hard to get around. Feel free to ask me or anyone else who looks like they might know if you need a hand.

Thanks. 02:13, 19 February 2012

Additional to the above, using <sup> is frowned upon as it can also break the height thingy. I'd suggest using these (⁰ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ ⁷ ⁸ ⁹ ⁺ ⁻ ⁼ ⁽ ⁾ ₀ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄ ₅ ₆ ₇ ₈ ₉) instead. They have a similar effect for what you're after, less code required, but are technically standard UTF-8 characters, so they are okay to use.                               Puppy's talk page04:20 24 Mar

editThanks for the review Ferric!

I was about to pull 1984 off Pee Review since I just put it on VFH, but you beat me to it. I'll sure take the "Minipeace ----> edit war" suggestion, it's great! WAR IS PEACE! Mattsnow 11:41, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

edit Mathematics

If that offer of a proof read is still open I'd appreciate it. I've kept the "mathematicians don't get any" references to a minimum in the later sections, but I have kept many of them in - I like running threads in articles. Thanks.                               Puppy's talk page01:47 24 Mar

edit Peeing member

Well, according to the Ancient Rules Of Pee Review you actually need one more. Given how impressed we all are with you, I am all in favour of having you in now, but I think if it guarantees one more great review from you then we may as well stick with the old rule ;) -- 13:20, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oh goody my reviews don't suck after all! Hmmmm... I guess I'm going to have to take another piss. - Fe+3 AlFe+2

edit Thanks for doing all the reviews

They were great. I really appreciate it. You're now on the PEEING members list if you're interested. Your whole world changes as of RIGHT NOW. -- 21:12, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

edit ROTM!

I'm not an admin and have no authority over this sort of thing, but since you got the most votes last month...

Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:06, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Not to rain on the parade, but I'm totally raining on the parade. Your nomination did not pass the minimum +5 votes necessary for a quorum. Better luck this month, though! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:30, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
Aww man. :( Oh well. I shall nominate him again! Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:41, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

YAY!- Awwww... I got all excited about this and then the rug[1] was pulled out from under me :'( Oh well I guess I'll just have to do some more reviewing. - Fe+3 AlFe+2

editReferences

1. Obviously the proverbial rug although my brother did literally pull the rug out from under me one time...

editPee Review?

 We need your PEE! Good day loyal PEEING member.The management was wondering if you had noticed the state of the toilet recently. We appear to have developed something of a blockage, and wondered if you might have a plunger handy.Possibly you are one of the rare PEEING members who does actually do regular reviews, in which case please flush this message immediately, otherwise... It's time you reviewed something you lazy bum!

-- 18:17, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

With college starting, the stream of my peeing capabilities has become somewhat weak. Still I shall do what I can to remedy the situation. - Fe+3 AlFe+2 05:31, August 22, 2012 (UTC)