User talk:Famine

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Darth Destruction: you win!)
m (Reverted edit(s) of 88.109.26.27 (talk) to last version by RAHB)
 
(936 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== To Do ==
+
<h2 style="padding:22px; background: #769CB5; color: #FFFFFF; font-family: courier new, courier; font-size: 229%; text-align: center">Join The CMC! Make Your Inner Cow Happy!</h2>{{User:YesTimeToEdit/cmc/signupsilly}}
  +
::<span style="font-size: 119%;">'''Double moos from your cowy friend,<br>Tayor'''</span>
  +
</div>
   
I plan on fixing up the articles [[User:Famine/To Do|here]]. Don't delete them, if you can help it. {{User:Famine/sig}} 01:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 
   
==Gratuitous bans==
+
Remember that time you completely huffed my one try at an article (fine, it sucked) well, nows the time to make up for it. Join your inner cow! woo! {{User:Tayor/sig}} 17:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Have you read this about 4chan: "For 1 April 2005 (a Friday), the moderators created a fake furry board as an April Fools joke and left it up until April 3rd. Every person who posted to the joke board was then banned from 4chan for an extended period of time. This incident is referred to as April Furs Day."
+
== On My Absence: A Reflection and Conclusion ==
A ban trap, has this been tried here? I thought you were the man to ask. Worth a thought - if you could think of a decent honey-pot, you could ban all the users who... well, ban all the users. [[User:FreeMorpheme|FreeMorpheme]] 20:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:Indeed, there are numerous honeypots. One of my favorites is [[Uncyclopedia:Complaints Department]]. There are others, but I'd have to infini-ban you if I told you where they were. {{User:Famine/sig}} 00:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
== [[Random Instanity/name]] ==
+
My contribution list notes that my last edit was 6 Dec, and my last substantial bit of editing was in mid November. That makes it around 5 months since I've really poked my head in here, and I figured it was about time for me to answer the questions that some of you might have about this long absence.
   
It was me who put it on QVFD, sorry. I thought it was just a one liner, until I went to look back at QVFD and saw that you would ban the person who listed it. I'm not a noob anymore, but I still have tendencies I guess. I looked at the page again and it kept changing, hence the Randomness. I'll be more careful. --{{User:Severian/sig}} 16:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
+
To begin, I had a damn good run. I think I'm about the only admin to be able to string together something like 2.5 years of straight action. Just about everyone else has taken a few breaks in between for sanity's sake.
:More importantly, check "what links here" - that might make its importance a little more clear. {{User:Famine/sig}} 17:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 
*Will do. --{{User:Severian/sig}} 18:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
== Forgive me father, for I have sinned ==
+
I initially took a break from Uncyclopedia because I was knee-deep in applying to graduate schools. My masters degree wasn't enough higher ed for me, and so I'm now gunning for a PhD. When that massive run of full-time work, part-time searching for a program, writing essays, getting transcripts and test scores sent, etc. wrapped up in the middle of January, I realized something very important: I did not miss Uncyclopedia.
   
Just letting you know that [[User:Rcmurphy|Rc]] unblocked me. I apologize for not tagging that article, I slipped, as last night I put maintainence tags on an unprecedented amount of crap. Actually, Hinoa promoted me to 2nd LT last night for my work in getting rid of crap last night ([[User talk:Sir Cornbread|See my talk page]]). Anyway, just letting you know that I'm sorry, and I'll do my best to make sure I don't do that again. Also, good luck on winning UOTM. --{{User:Sir Cornbread/sig}} 23:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
+
When I first started writing here, early in 2005, I fucked around a lot, made a mess, and created a bunch of crappy articles and stubs. Most of them got deleted, for good reason. But that was fun. When I became an admin, I mixed my time doing admin work, and fucking around a lot. But the longer I was an admin, the more admin work I did. And that, by [[User:Keitei/NMJ|all]] [[User:Famine/Why|accounts]] '''is..not..fun'''.
:Wow, that was nice of RC. Now let me dig up the weird ass double-redirect pile of crap you made the other day and determine a ban length for '''that'''. It's not that you're on my bad list - I just have lots of ban reasons listed under your name already. Don't worry - you're just replacing some other users who either shaped up or left. Someone's got to fill in the "OMG Famine hates me" hole. {{User:Famine/sig}} 14:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 
::Aaaah...I see...it was you redirecting both [[How to be a russian]] and [[How to be a Russian]] to [[HowTo: Be a Russian]]. Not a double redirect - just somewhat unecessary ones. But since I deleted all the articles in question, I guess I'll have to scratch that off my "Ban Sir Cornbread For..." list. Don't worry - I'll find some other reasons. {{User:Famine/sig}} 14:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:::Yeah, actually when I moved that page, I listed those redirects on QVFD to no avail...I tried though. OMG YOU HATE ME!!! --{{User:Sir Cornbread/sig}} 22:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
== Oh noes plz ==
+
Since mid January, I've been involved in a few other projects on the web. And not as an admin. And guess what? They are fun. In one I'm a very low man on the totem pole, kowtowing to just about everyone else. And that's actually fun. I don't get pissed off, I don't get frustrated - I have fun. And that's what I was missing here.
   
Sorry about not tagging that VFD article...and my first offence was due to technical difficulties (AKA Wireless Internet), just letting you know [[User:Codeine|Codeine]] unblocked me. --{{User:SonicChao/sig}} 13:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
+
In this time off, I've learned two very important things:
:Thanks for being so viligant on VFD - but be warned about it. We've already had one admin burnout due to it, and it tends to make whoever is babysitting it pretty grouchy. The smoother it runs, the happier I am. You've made up a pretty good excuse for ban #1, so I'll let that one go....now tag articles so people watching them know to come vote. Nothing as sad as to lose an article and find out three months later that it got deleted and you never knew to vote on it. {{User:Famine/sig}} 14:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 
::Alright I will, *goes to put that article back up the right way* --{{User:SonicChao/sig}} 18:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
==Poor Edits==
+
:'''1)''' No collaborative projects work well without an absolute dictator involved and at the helm.
I notice that you RV'd the crappy edits on [[Jebus]]. I'd messaged [[User:Algorithm|Algorithm]] and [[User:Chronarion|Chronarion]] earlier, but perhaps you could take a look at a similar set of, in my opinion, poor edits on [[Original Jesus]] that were/are by the same user.
+
::Examples: Linux kernel, early days of Uncyclopedia, the stupid shit here now and at Wikipedia as both lack this.
   
Algorithm thinks that the edits clean up a messed up page and Chronarion hasn't replied yet. Al thinks I shouldn't let it bother me (tho' it does) so, as of yet, I've left the edits alone (as it would result just in a revert war, which wouldn't help the page). I find the "His Birth" section is particularly vile, as jokes about pendulous tits and abortion are difficult to make funny (as the text proves).
+
:'''2)''' I hate stupid people.
  +
::Examples: Something Awful forums and memes, 4chan and related crap, most people under 20, you personally.
   
I would like your opinion, as so far it would appear that I'm alone in despising the recent butchery (although it decrufts somewhat, it recrufts in other area, incidently ''defunnying'' wherever it crufts), and as such would simply result in a revert war which, again, doesn't help the page.
+
Now, I wasn't planning on coming back ever, but [[User:Mordillo|someone here]] decided to send me a bit of email for some reason. I did some thinking, and I think I can firmly say:
   
Obviously I prefered the page before, although it was unfocused and varied wildly in quality. The ''unfocussedness'' meant it had something for everyone (like that Jesus guy) and the wildly varying quality encouraged edits.
 
   
Eerily, it appears that the editor just pushed the good stuff out of Original Jesus and pushed the "old" text from Jebus to Original Jesus. Cheesy.
+
{{cquote|Adios, everyone. It was fun at the beginning, but Uncyclopedia now sucks, and nobody can save it.|4=[[User:Famine|Famine]]}}
   
Anyway, I'm on a self-imposed Uncyc-limiting vacation at the moment, so take your time to consider whatever it was that I said. I, meanwhile, will grab a beer and return to the book that's waiting for me on my patio.
 
   
Also, as you may have surmised, I like commas. I believe that they, the humble bastion of the pause, are by far the most underrated pi character. Of course I'm biased somewhat, as I type as I speak. If I don't pause every five words or so, my cursed childhood stutter makes an unwelcome appearance. But enough about me...
+
What I've realized is that without constant, extreme, and unquestioned asskicking, any place on the internet fills up with jackasses. One of the places I play around at now has a tyrannical asshole at the helm, and people get banned for breathing wrong. The end result is that it's an amazing place to hang out. All the jackasses are gone. The people there are intelligent, friendly, and funny. It's like night and day from Uncyclopedia.
   
Carry on.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 06:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+
There was a time when Uncyclopedia started to transition from random stubs to well-thought-out and very intelligent satire. Sure, there was still a fair bit of stupid shit, but some of the stuff being produced was exceptionally mature, and required a fair bit of literary study to truly understand. Those articles, while still here in some form, have generally been trashed by stupid assholes who think stupid = funny. That makes me sad.
:I'm trying to care, but the more I try, the more I'm tempted to just delete both articles. In fact, There's a good chance of that happening to at least one of them the longer I look at the two. Because they both suck ass now, and have sucked for quite some time. {{User:Famine/sig}} 13:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
::Ah. Just make sure to commit the "Bend it Like Bethlehem" part to memory first. I'm sure that'll make it into that book that the guys on Sunday morning TV someday. --{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 14:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+
My vision of Uncyclopedia was always that of a place which could mix a bit of stupid with some really good literary satire and some decidedly intelligent humor. Unfortunately, I always shied away from perma-banning people for simply being stupid, as I had some naive belief that they would "figure out how Uncyclopedia worked". This unfortunate belief allowed a tremendous amount of stupid people to set up shop here, leading to the disaster area of stupid we have today.
:::Acually, that's the only thing stopping me from deleting the article. That is priceless. {{User:Famine/sig}} 15:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 
::::You do know that your RV got RV'd, so there's only a mention of it, rather than a para, right?--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 18:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
OK, I'm officially not caring any more. Because I may end up deleting half this website. And banning a metric fuckload of users. Including Sir Cornbread, for no apparent reason. Well, after reverting a bunch of pages, protecting them, and then deleting them. Just to be sure that the funny versions were the ones which got deleted. But really - these two pages, I feel, are beyond saving. So here's my offer:
+
You see, to come back here would require that I be able to do two important things: Delete the stupid shit, and ban the stupid people. Unfortunately, you are most of the people here, and that's most of the content here. And that would mean lots of bitching and complaining, and then I'd have to ban those people. Essentially, I'd have to repeat the time I banned the entire internet, and I don't know that I'm allowed to do that more than once.
   
:If someone rewrites them, and they are actually of modest length, funny, illustrated, and not filled with stupid shit, I'll protect them with my life. If not, I'll not care.
+
My major issue with Uncyclopedia is that its a self-governing organization of people. Had we, in the early days, decided to be tyrannical assholes and permaban people for being stupid, we wouldn't be in the place we are now. The sad fact is that Uncyclopedia is filled with idiots, and thus, as a self-governing organization, will never accept that to go from being a collection of all the stupidest shit on the internet to being a real humor powerhouse we'd have to permaban the very users which would need to decide that that is the proper direction.
   
Case closed. {{User:Famine/sig}} 19:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+
If there was significant percentage of users here who were saying, "Famine, come back and ban us, and ban anyone who complains about it." I might consider coming back. However, since that would result in me coming back and banning you, I'm guessing that such a united community voice will not be heard.
   
::I think the reason it got my bp up was the editor was a jerk about it (I've put messages on his userpage requesting sanity. He hasn't replied, instead leaving snarky comments in the comments section of OJ, ala "It looks like all of the blood is going to Dick's head).
+
Alas, Uncyclopedia no longer belongs to me, it belongs to you. And frankly, your sty smells way too much for me to want to hang around near it. To all those who I've shared some laughs with, thanks. And to all those who keep trying to keep this place decent, so long, suckers. You might want to go and start bailing out the Titanic while you're at it. I had a good time here at the beginning, but that was a long time ago. Hell, I don't think I could even contribute anonymously now without getting pissed off.
::As for your comments; Deal. If suitably inspired (doubtful) I'll try my hand at a rewrite. If not, then it'll be time to move on. Aw, fuck it...there are way better articles to write; it's off my watchlist.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 20:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 
   
:Excuse me? ''Butcher''?! I'll have you know I rather object to that label! Personally, I didn't really like the "Bend It Like Bethlehem" section, just like I didn't like the "Chibi Jesus" section; they seemed rather childish.
+
{{User:Famine/sig|04/21 22:18}}
   
I'm actually a little pissed that you reverted the "His Birth" section, and completely removed "His Name". The only reason I started hacking away at those parts was because there was an obscure "L.A. Law" reference that irked me. As for the bit about Mary, I slipped that in basically to see if anyone would catch and get it. I mean, really, we're all adults here, aren't we? I had typed the Mary bit out, then actually went to the "Mary" article to see if it compared. Not even close. Hence, the Virgin Rewrite. I'm surprised you found it vile, as this isn't a religious site. It's for jokes, jokes of ''all'' kinds; no seriousness allowed.
+
:Mister, I don't like your attitude.... -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
  +
:Firstly, I'd be the first person you'd ban, per [[Forum:So%2C_should_we_unban_Nintendorulez%3F|this forum]], which was more of an attempt to get your attention than anything else. I'm sad you're not coming back. It's certainly your perogative. I'm sorry you think we're a pile of irredeemable crap. If you are gone for long enough that you can enjoy returning, we'd love to have you back. And not solely as "the bastard that nobody can mess with," either (though if you want that post, it may still be open at that time). Fun is the main reason we are here, and if you're not having any, you really SHOULD take a break. But you're always welcome back here, even as an idiot IP. :) Take care and God bless.--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 00:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  +
::I've been an op for a couple months now. I'm having a fucking blast. Enjoy your life elsewhere--you aren't the first to leave like this, and God knows you won't be the last. Cheers, - {{User:TheLedBalloon/sig}} <small><small>01:32, Apr 22</small></small>
  +
:Good bye, good luck and good riddance. I'm kidding about that last part. The first two parts, too. I'm a muddle. {{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 03:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  +
:::Doctor Famine does have a decidedly hawt ring to it. Or even ''Professor'' Famine. Mmm. On another note I'm all for you banning the internet again. I completely agree. Hell if you came back and banned everyone I could probably come back too. Til I got banned too, thus completing the paradox. However I think the decision you reached sounds like the healthiest one for you so good luck and so long. :D {{User:Ceridwyn/oldsig}} <span style="color:#FF3399"><small>03:14, 22 April 2008</small></span>
  +
:Bye. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 03:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  +
::Aw man.--{{User:Witt E,/sig}} 00:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
   
I'm glad you kept "Jebus" the way it was, as I enjoyed working on it. I spent many a night attempting to fix pictures, sentence tense, and finally adding the "Death" section.
+
I've always been a strong advocate of banning everybody. If you came back, we could ban everybody ''together''. It would be fun. Like a picnic. Or an Easter egg hunt! Yeah! The plastic Easter eggs with jellybeans and fun size candy bars inside! And we could find them all, and put 'em in our brightly colored pastel baskets, and then run back home to climb into our treehouse where we'd count out our stash and I'd trade for all of your Reese's Cups because you hate mixing chocolate and peanut butter, which I never understood, but hey, more Reese's for me, and then everybody else from the Easter egg hunt would show up at the base of the tree all mad because we found ALL the eggs, and they'd be standing there with their pathetic empty baskets, yelling at us to share, and we'd yell back "NO WAY, LOSERS! THE CANDY'S ALL OURS!" And a few of them would try to climb the tree, but luckily we'd have our supply of water balloons at the ready, and we'd drop them on all the climbers, and they'd get really upset because it's their nice church clothes, and they'd say that their moms are gonna kill them because that blazer costs like a hundred dollars at JC Penny's, but we wouldn't care and we'd laugh and laugh and laugh as they ran home boiling mad, and we'd sit there eating candy and reading comic books until it got dark out, and then our parents would come out and tell us it's time for dinner, but we'd be so full that we could barely move, so we'd stumble down the tree and into the house, where pa would say "looks like you boys had a long day" and we'd say "we sure did", and then we'd forgo the ham dinner for bed where we'd lie in our respective bunks, looking at the dinosaur posters on the ceiling until we drifted into sleep, where we'd dream about how we just had the best Easter ever... --{{User:Savethemooses/sig}} 06:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  +
:Wait a minute... that was YOU?--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 11:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
   
But, really, Famine, could you put the bit about the shepherds, angels, and "MacArthur Park" back in the "Original Jesus" article? I don't think I can replicate it as well as could be.
+
You don't know me and I don't really know you but your view of Uncyc now is very correct. I'm sad to see the site the way it is and I don't think there is a way to correct it until someone acts individually. I admire you for how you kind of held the site in some form of sanity and you have more than earned a break... we should give you some chocolates or something. Uncyc has become a too soft somewhat and those people who could write well are going unchallenged. Good luck whatever you do. --{{User:DJ Irreverent/sig}} 08:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
   
With all due respect...
+
*Well, I'm glad you're happy Famine. I can only hope that someday you will return, riding a black horse, carrying this really huge fucking sword, and like totally ban everyone and huff everything. Then, you'd laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh. That's the part where I wake up. Good luck with the PhD. -- {{User:Zombiebaron/sig}} 18:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
   
:Master Betty applauds you! Nyah! [[User:Master Pain (also known as Betty)|Master Pain (also known as Betty)]] 01:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
+
I'm very sure you have no fucking idea who i am, but if ANY uncyclopedian leaves that is not [[User:Kip the Dip|Total shit]] i feel the responsibility to see them off. Bye.{{User:Raiespio/sig}}
  +
:Let's not call other users shit, shall we? {{User:Dr. Skullthumper/sig|20:13 May 07, 2008}}
   
== Re: Vacation? ==
+
You don't know me, nor do I ever think you'll ever read this. But if you ever do. I'd just like to say I totally agree with EVERYTHING you had to say. I came to this site in 2010, and quite recently I have stopped writting altogether and have been focusing on reverting vandals and making sure every last one of them is banned by an admin. The only problem is, what is 1 day of ban gonna teach any of them? 1 day later they'll just come back and vandalise it again and write more worthless shit. If I ever became an admin, I would make sure every last dumb arse wasn't given a third or fourth chance, 1st time warning. Second time permaban and tell them to fuck off and die. Goodbye [[User:Frosty|The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman]] 04:29, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  +
:1 day will hopefully knock a little sense in to them. If that doesn't work, a longer ban will keep them away long enough for them to forget about us. If that doesn't work, then permaban. Granted, I am quite a mushy liberal (''and'' a foreigner), but I see little point in turning a site that thrives on being anti-authoritarian (one of the pillars of comedy/satire is making fun of your betters) unnecessarily authoritarian. It defeats the purpose, really ("What's that purpose?", you ask? It's to stink up the internet with poorly engrammar'd pages about how dumb and smelly your friend is).
  +
:Lastly, Famine sucks and he's stupid and I hate him and I miss him terribly. {{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 04:57, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
   
I just went a while without being on here. I don't know if I'll be very active, though. --[[User:Evice|Evice]] 20:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+
== Could you help me? ==
   
== The Anti-Vandal Tool ==
+
Hi, I seem to have picked up a persistent IP vandal on my [[Hippies]] article. His/her/it's IP is 71.222.179.226. Could you ban him? He keeps adding a stupid Russian Reversal quote to my article every other day. Thanks. {{User:Necropaxx/sig}} <small><small>02:11, Jun 5</small></small>
Greetings, I see you added the anti-vandal tool to your namespace. Judging by your comment when you added it, I surmise you are not fully aware of what it is. If you do know, ignore my rambling and eat some fudge. :P
+
:Err... perhaps you should read the above... - {{User:TheLedBalloon/mobsig}} <small><small>02:46, Jun 5</small></small>
   
When you add the anti-vandal code, new options will appear in your left menu. These are live monitoring tools that monitor the recent changes. "Filter Recent Changes" filters the recent changes for a list of 'bad words' that's listed on a separate page. You can do an easy rollback using this tool. All Recent Changes is self explanatory, along with Recent IP edits. It's not that hard to use and it's extremely popular on [[Wikipedia]] (*insert scream*). Hope this helps! - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Enzo Aquarius]] 22:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
+
:You'd be better off either; reporting it to [[Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol|Ban Patrol]] or going on IRC and looking for an admin. Famine is gone, man. {{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 02:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
  +
:Right. Anyways, I've semi-protected the page. No more IP problems. - {{User:TheLedBalloon/mobsig}} <small><small>02:49, Jun 5</small></small>
  +
::Kudos to you for making the world a fractionally better place. You're like Batman. But without the gadgets. Or the Batmobile. Or the money. Or the kung foolery. Or the... {{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 15:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
  +
:::Yes... I am "like" batman...yes. - {{User:TheLedBalloon/mobsig}} <small><small>15:46, Jun 5</small></small>
   
:You forgot to mention the "makes firefox use 98% of my CPU requiring me to kill -9 it" feature. I've been debating trying to code up something like this for awhile, but I am far too lazy to do it. I will steal from other people without hesistation tho. Thanks for the info. --{{User:Famine/sig}} 22:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
+
== Why am I blocked? ==
   
Heh, seems to work fine for me, but to each his own. It's not the most perfect code :-P - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Enzo Aquarius]] 22:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
+
I've never edited Uncyclopedia, so why am I blocked? [[Special:Contributions/75.39.15.195|75.39.15.195]] 00:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
+
Or is it a general block of IPs?
You sure went about adding this thing in quite a complicated way. You do only need those 3 lines at the top to make it work... And maybe the link box function for adding your own to the side too. That'd give several hundred less lines of code in the script. {{User:Spang/Sig}} 19:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
+
:You [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:75.39.15.195 aren't blocked.] Also, Famine is gone. - {{User:TheLedBalloon/sig}} <small><small>01:12, Oct 14</small></small>
+
::He probably got confused by the feature. I know I did. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 02:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I have some grand plan to mess around with it, customize it, and make it do amazing things...if I was a betting man, I'd put 20 pounds on me not ever getting around to it. The problem is that I'm moving back into my "busy as hell" time of year, and will probably never get around to actually hacking on this. Perhaps next june or something...but for now, I might as well trim it down, as I have an easy-to-find copy in the history.
+
:::Heh, I didn't even notice that. - {{User:TheLedBalloon/sig}} <small><small>02:10, Oct 14</small></small>
 
The question is, do functions in my uncyclopedia.js override the ones in recent2.js? If so, then I can just keep the toolbox function. I'd wait for an answer, but I can try it myself in less time, I'd guess. --{{User:Famine/sig}} 19:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
:If they do it'd either give an error or just use the first one. Or both. I'm not sure. Why not just use a different toolbox function? {{User:Spang/Sig}} 19:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:Or rename your function and have it run after the original. Both do exactly the same thing, and no conflicts. Easy peasy. {{User:Spang/Sig}} 19:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
== Thanks for the mammaries, erm, vote ==
 
 
Thanks for supporting me as a potential admin. Coming from you, it's a real treat. {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 20:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:I think I'm sick. I don't remember the last time I supported someone for admin. But I do retain the right to revoke my support if you suddenly decide that admin tasks are more important than what you've been doing around here.
 
 
:Let me be very clear: For the longest time, I never bothered with UnNews, because it sucked. Now I check in often, because it's been funner than hell for the last few months. I'd hate to see that go downhill, as I feel that it is '''at least''', if not '''more''' important than getting general admin duties done a little more quickly. We can always hire another admin to delete expired NRV articles - we can't necessarily get someone to jump into UnNews and do the sort of job you've been doing. That sort of shit takes talent. {{User:Famine/sig}} 20:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
== Ligature articles ==
 
 
Why did you delete all of the ligature articles?!? Was there some sort of vote on it I didn't notice? I thought they were one of the most hilarious series of articles on Uncyclopedia. --[[User:LOLMOLE|LOLMOLE]] 22:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:As I noted at [[Talk:Ligature]], many of the articles barely counted as stubs. A good number were 1-3 lines and a template. They were in no way strong enough to stand on their own. Feel free to recreate them in paragraphs in the main [[Ligature]] article, as it's a far more fitting place than on individual pages. There was a vote on [[VFD]] regarding the fate of the Ligature series around the end of June. In the two months they have been gone, you are the second person to notice and complain. That will give you an idea of the appeal of the series. {{User:Famine/sig}} 22:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 
::Huh. I thought they were funny. Oh well... --[[User:LOLMOLE|LOLMOLE]] 08:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
== Ninjastar? ==
 
 
I... don't get it {{User:Spang/Sig}} 06:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:Try here: [[User_talk:Rcmurphy#Can.....]] {{User:Famine/sig}} 21:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 
::And [[User_talk:Spang#That_move_summary|here]]. {{User:Famine/sig}} 22:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
== Block query ==
 
 
Hello, I am speaking on kenmcfa's behalf on this ban:
 
 
Your user name or IP address has been blocked by The Right Honourable Famine.
 
You were banninated due to the following reasons:
 
If you are offended, self-blinding is the answer, not blanking.
 
You may contact Famine or one (1) of the other administrators to discuss the block. It will give them a good laugh.*
 
Your IP address is 62.252.128.25. If all you have is an IP address, you're not coming back any time
 
 
This user has taken no part in blanking and/or vandalism, as somehow someone managed to attain the same IP and use it as a vector for damage. The user asks if you may reinstate his IP as he means no harm, he will take better care of his network options.
 
 
Yours
 
 
<small>'''[[User:ununbilium|<span style="color:#0038F7;">Neo Zidane</span>]]''' [[Image:Icons-flag-gb.png]] '''[[Zinedine Zidane|<span style="color:#993300;">'''''Headbutt extraordinaire'''''</span>]]''' <span style="color:#2C5D3F;"></span></small> 20:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
:[[User:kenmcfa]] must share an IP with the anon individual who blanked a couple of pages. Let me see....how long was that ban? Two weeks? Well, [[:Template:SPL-08]] is definitely worth a short ban....say three days? We really try to discourage excessive use of templates, and templates filled with red links are the worst.
 
 
:So the sentence has been reduced, not commuted. When kenmcfa shows back up, he can remove his crappy template from the articles it's in and submit it to [[QVFD]]. By all means, keep a link to the main SPL article in the related articles - it just doesn't need a massive template filled with red links to get people there. A short, useful paragraph is much prefered.
 
 
:And [[User:ununbilium]] - for gods sake fix your sig. It looks like you have the stuff you need at [[User:ununbilium/sig]], but you need to place <nowiki>{{SUBST:nosubst|User:ununbilium/sig}}</nowiki> in your preferences under "nickname" and check the "Raw Signatures" box. TY. {{User:Famine/sig}} 22:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 
 
== Regarding SU182 ==
 
 
At this point, it's at your discretion. Special rules say what they will, but there's no mention of "whining." However, th fact that he's been so disruptive despite his short leash leaves me little recourse but to agree. If you feel the need to be merciful, so be it, but I heretofore wash my hands of this matter.--{{User:Flammable/sig}} 01:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 
:Damn, I guess he's fucked if we both wash our hands of the matter. Oh, well. I'm sure we won't want for disruptive users if he stays banned forever. {{User:Famine/sig}} 01:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 
::I guess that's what happens when you run afoul of the Tyrant-Admins--{{User:Flammable/sig}} 02:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 
 
==Thanks for your vote==
 
{{User:Zim ulator/SupportForAdmin}}
 
:Eh, I was just hoping you could keep UnNews spiffy, and stop bothering us about those who mess with it. I'm pretty damn lazy. That or it was an accident. Not sure which. {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">19:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 
 
== Darth Destruction ==
 
The vote for both of these was rewrite. I rewrote them both, I posted in AFD that they had been rewritten and you still huffed them? I would have deleted the votes up to that point, but I did not know it was allowed, perhaps you should have as an administrator? Did you even read the AFDs before you huffed? --[[User:Darkfred|Darkfred]] 04:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 
 
Err...Famine, you huffed [[D'arthangnan]] without any VFD or notice...Now I know it wasn't great but still, I think it deserved to live. So why the huffing without the VFD? --{{User:Mordillo/sig}} 19:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 
 
:I went Darth hunting. We had lots and lots of them. In fact, we even had [[:Template:Darth]], which listed more than a dozen Darths. About half the articles in that template got dropped into VFD. Most of them got solid delete votes. Riding the wave of public distaste, I went through and deleted anything Darth related that wasn't haliarous and long.
 
 
:[[D'arthangnan]] got my axe due to a 2 to 1 ratio of red links to blue links, along with references to Chuck Norris, a left testicle, Death By Stinky Cheese, and a tatoo of "I love Darth" on some buttocks. Overall, juvinile randomness at it's worst. Although an article could be ''written around'' the phrase "Battle of the bulge (also known as: "the battle of are you happy to see me or is there an armored division in your pocket?")". That was good. Very good.
 
 
:[[Darth Cow]] and [[Darth Hitler]] were both rewritten. And they probably should have had their votes blanked and been revoted on. I thought that they hadn't substantially improved. Spang agreed on one of the two. So that's like +10 votes for deletion. If you really want, I'll revive them and repost them on VFD. My bet is that the Darth purge will continue, but if you can stand watching some potentially soul-crushing votes, I'll let them happen. {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">15:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 
:: You are lying. Neither Darth Cow or Darth Hitler even met the 6 vote limit for deletion. Darth Cow was a tie and Darth Hitler had an overwhelming keep vote 6:3 with only 1 rewrite vote. +10 delete votes? What are you smoking? Since you admit to being on a Darth Hunt" my guess is that you simply didn't care what the VFD was, you didn't bother to count. The stupidest thing is that your hunt only affected mediocre articles. The vast majority of the site remains simply bad and unfunny. On the whole your hunt netted a step backwards in funniness. Yay progress.
 
 
:: In synopsis, You violated uncyclopedia deletion policy, you deleted an article with an overwhelming 6:3 keep vote, and you have sofar mistated the totals 3 times trying to justify yourself. --[[User:Darkfred|Darkfred]] 17:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 
 
:::What? Huh? [[Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive43#Darth_Hitler|Darth Hitler]] had 3 Keep votes, 4 delete votes (including mine via deltion) and 3 "Rewrite" votes. I disregard all "Rewrite" votes everywhere, everytime because nobody (except you) ever rewrites anything. So using my modified counting strategy I count 4 to 3 delete.
 
 
:::And there is a 6 vote limit for deletion? When did the king of VFD make that ruling? I must have missed it. Sorry.
 
 
:::So anyway, now that [[User:Rcmurphy|Rcmurphy]] was nice enough to restore Darth Hitler to your userspace for continued improvement, what seems to be the major issue? {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">17:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 
 
::::Do me a favour and revive [[D'arthangnan]] into my namespace so I can rewrite. And I'd say that next time you might consider putting a rewrite tag or some kind of notice before killing...Thanks. --{{User:Mordillo/sig}} 19:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 
:::::I don't think I've '''ever''' put a rewrite tag on any article. Either it's good enough to stay, or I kill it. Or I kill it, lots of people bitch about me killing it, and then I [[User:Mordillo/D'arthangnan|restore it to userspace]] and it sits there and rots till the end of time. Aaah, such is the life of a cold-hearted admin. {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">19:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 
 
Let's agree that if I ever recreate it as a reasonable article you buy me a beer. If not, I get lashing in the town's square! --{{User:Mordillo/sig}} 19:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 
:That's a deal. Makes you like the sixth person here I either owe or potentially owe drinks to. Good thing I live in a cave. If I ever come out, it's going to be really expensive. {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">20:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 
 
 
I am Starting again down here since the ident is crazy.
 
 
As for the 6 vote minimum please see this note by Hinoa [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia%3AVotes_for_deletion&diff=1055965&oldid=1055947]. Hinoa also reads the comments in VFD boxes and writes the resolution when he has made a decision. Perhaps you should ask for admin mentoring.
 
 
The problem now with Darth Hitler is this. The article is fine, with a few edits it could be perfect and even as it is it won the vote. If I put it back up later, some asshole, meaning you, is gonna delete it without any thought. I doubt you even read the article, so what good would doing anything now do? The only way this article or any similar to it will ever live again is if you admit you were wrong. --[[User:Darkfred|Darkfred]] 22:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 
 
:I'm terribly sorry...I did not know that you had been here for '''TWO WEEKS''' and therefore know everything. I will strive to do everything the way you tell me to, oh great one. {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">23:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 
:: Uhh ohh I'm a newbie, you've won the argument now! I am relatively new, I am an being an asshole about it. But I am right. good bye. --[[User:Darkfred|Darkfred]] 14:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 
 
On a (slightly) different subject, both Darth Hogan and Darth Dickens ''didn't even'' receive six votes in total, much less six votes to delete, and yet you deleted them in your ''[[darth holocaust]]''! What are you, some kind of horseman of the apocalypse? ''[[Darth H8er]]''. [[User:Mr. Briggs Inc.|Mr. Briggs Inc.]] 22:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
 
:Yes. {{User:Famine/sig}} <small><span STYLE="font-family: Garamond;color:#757575;">23:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)</span></small>
 

Latest revision as of 19:06, April 5, 2012

Join The CMC! Make Your Inner Cow Happy!

Moo, Famine!

Cmc
What is it about cows that gets us all hot and bothered? Where do cows come from? What are cows?

These are the questions that drive the Cow Moo Cult and its brethren, who are very, VERY interested in cows and cow by-products.

The CMC is devoted not only to cows, but to helping Uncyclopedia through general acts of goodness and through motivating people with cow-treats and the like.

So, Famine, why not join the CMC? It's free (unless you count virginity as money) and it's fun (and it's full of clichés)! You'll get a pretty template for your userpage and a nice title for your signature! What could be better? Sign Up Now!
Double moos from your cowy friend,
Tayor

</div>


Remember that time you completely huffed my one try at an article (fine, it sucked) well, nows the time to make up for it. Join your inner cow! woo! The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!) 17:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

edit On My Absence: A Reflection and Conclusion

My contribution list notes that my last edit was 6 Dec, and my last substantial bit of editing was in mid November. That makes it around 5 months since I've really poked my head in here, and I figured it was about time for me to answer the questions that some of you might have about this long absence.

To begin, I had a damn good run. I think I'm about the only admin to be able to string together something like 2.5 years of straight action. Just about everyone else has taken a few breaks in between for sanity's sake.

I initially took a break from Uncyclopedia because I was knee-deep in applying to graduate schools. My masters degree wasn't enough higher ed for me, and so I'm now gunning for a PhD. When that massive run of full-time work, part-time searching for a program, writing essays, getting transcripts and test scores sent, etc. wrapped up in the middle of January, I realized something very important: I did not miss Uncyclopedia.

When I first started writing here, early in 2005, I fucked around a lot, made a mess, and created a bunch of crappy articles and stubs. Most of them got deleted, for good reason. But that was fun. When I became an admin, I mixed my time doing admin work, and fucking around a lot. But the longer I was an admin, the more admin work I did. And that, by all accounts is..not..fun.

Since mid January, I've been involved in a few other projects on the web. And not as an admin. And guess what? They are fun. In one I'm a very low man on the totem pole, kowtowing to just about everyone else. And that's actually fun. I don't get pissed off, I don't get frustrated - I have fun. And that's what I was missing here.

In this time off, I've learned two very important things:

1) No collaborative projects work well without an absolute dictator involved and at the helm.
Examples: Linux kernel, early days of Uncyclopedia, the stupid shit here now and at Wikipedia as both lack this.
2) I hate stupid people.
Examples: Something Awful forums and memes, 4chan and related crap, most people under 20, you personally.

Now, I wasn't planning on coming back ever, but someone here decided to send me a bit of email for some reason. I did some thinking, and I think I can firmly say:


Cquote1 Adios, everyone. It was fun at the beginning, but Uncyclopedia now sucks, and nobody can save it. Cquote2

Famine


What I've realized is that without constant, extreme, and unquestioned asskicking, any place on the internet fills up with jackasses. One of the places I play around at now has a tyrannical asshole at the helm, and people get banned for breathing wrong. The end result is that it's an amazing place to hang out. All the jackasses are gone. The people there are intelligent, friendly, and funny. It's like night and day from Uncyclopedia.

There was a time when Uncyclopedia started to transition from random stubs to well-thought-out and very intelligent satire. Sure, there was still a fair bit of stupid shit, but some of the stuff being produced was exceptionally mature, and required a fair bit of literary study to truly understand. Those articles, while still here in some form, have generally been trashed by stupid assholes who think stupid = funny. That makes me sad.

My vision of Uncyclopedia was always that of a place which could mix a bit of stupid with some really good literary satire and some decidedly intelligent humor. Unfortunately, I always shied away from perma-banning people for simply being stupid, as I had some naive belief that they would "figure out how Uncyclopedia worked". This unfortunate belief allowed a tremendous amount of stupid people to set up shop here, leading to the disaster area of stupid we have today.

You see, to come back here would require that I be able to do two important things: Delete the stupid shit, and ban the stupid people. Unfortunately, you are most of the people here, and that's most of the content here. And that would mean lots of bitching and complaining, and then I'd have to ban those people. Essentially, I'd have to repeat the time I banned the entire internet, and I don't know that I'm allowed to do that more than once.

My major issue with Uncyclopedia is that its a self-governing organization of people. Had we, in the early days, decided to be tyrannical assholes and permaban people for being stupid, we wouldn't be in the place we are now. The sad fact is that Uncyclopedia is filled with idiots, and thus, as a self-governing organization, will never accept that to go from being a collection of all the stupidest shit on the internet to being a real humor powerhouse we'd have to permaban the very users which would need to decide that that is the proper direction.

If there was significant percentage of users here who were saying, "Famine, come back and ban us, and ban anyone who complains about it." I might consider coming back. However, since that would result in me coming back and banning you, I'm guessing that such a united community voice will not be heard.

Alas, Uncyclopedia no longer belongs to me, it belongs to you. And frankly, your sty smells way too much for me to want to hang around near it. To all those who I've shared some laughs with, thanks. And to all those who keep trying to keep this place decent, so long, suckers. You might want to go and start bailing out the Titanic while you're at it. I had a good time here at the beginning, but that was a long time ago. Hell, I don't think I could even contribute anonymously now without getting pissed off.

Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 04/21 22:18

Mister, I don't like your attitude.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Firstly, I'd be the first person you'd ban, per this forum, which was more of an attempt to get your attention than anything else. I'm sad you're not coming back. It's certainly your perogative. I'm sorry you think we're a pile of irredeemable crap. If you are gone for long enough that you can enjoy returning, we'd love to have you back. And not solely as "the bastard that nobody can mess with," either (though if you want that post, it may still be open at that time). Fun is the main reason we are here, and if you're not having any, you really SHOULD take a break. But you're always welcome back here, even as an idiot IP.  :) Take care and God bless.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
I've been an op for a couple months now. I'm having a fucking blast. Enjoy your life elsewhere--you aren't the first to leave like this, and God knows you won't be the last. Cheers, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:32, Apr 22
Good bye, good luck and good riddance. I'm kidding about that last part. The first two parts, too. I'm a muddle. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Doctor Famine does have a decidedly hawt ring to it. Or even Professor Famine. Mmm. On another note I'm all for you banning the internet again. I completely agree. Hell if you came back and banned everyone I could probably come back too. Til I got banned too, thus completing the paradox. However I think the decision you reached sounds like the healthiest one for you so good luck and so long. :D ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:14, 22 April 2008
Bye. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Aw man.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 00:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I've always been a strong advocate of banning everybody. If you came back, we could ban everybody together. It would be fun. Like a picnic. Or an Easter egg hunt! Yeah! The plastic Easter eggs with jellybeans and fun size candy bars inside! And we could find them all, and put 'em in our brightly colored pastel baskets, and then run back home to climb into our treehouse where we'd count out our stash and I'd trade for all of your Reese's Cups because you hate mixing chocolate and peanut butter, which I never understood, but hey, more Reese's for me, and then everybody else from the Easter egg hunt would show up at the base of the tree all mad because we found ALL the eggs, and they'd be standing there with their pathetic empty baskets, yelling at us to share, and we'd yell back "NO WAY, LOSERS! THE CANDY'S ALL OURS!" And a few of them would try to climb the tree, but luckily we'd have our supply of water balloons at the ready, and we'd drop them on all the climbers, and they'd get really upset because it's their nice church clothes, and they'd say that their moms are gonna kill them because that blazer costs like a hundred dollars at JC Penny's, but we wouldn't care and we'd laugh and laugh and laugh as they ran home boiling mad, and we'd sit there eating candy and reading comic books until it got dark out, and then our parents would come out and tell us it's time for dinner, but we'd be so full that we could barely move, so we'd stumble down the tree and into the house, where pa would say "looks like you boys had a long day" and we'd say "we sure did", and then we'd forgo the ham dinner for bed where we'd lie in our respective bunks, looking at the dinosaur posters on the ceiling until we drifted into sleep, where we'd dream about how we just had the best Easter ever... -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 06:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Wait a minute... that was YOU?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 11:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

You don't know me and I don't really know you but your view of Uncyc now is very correct. I'm sad to see the site the way it is and I don't think there is a way to correct it until someone acts individually. I admire you for how you kind of held the site in some form of sanity and you have more than earned a break... we should give you some chocolates or something. Uncyc has become a too soft somewhat and those people who could write well are going unchallenged. Good luck whatever you do. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 08:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Well, I'm glad you're happy Famine. I can only hope that someday you will return, riding a black horse, carrying this really huge fucking sword, and like totally ban everyone and huff everything. Then, you'd laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh. That's the part where I wake up. Good luck with the PhD. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm very sure you have no fucking idea who i am, but if ANY uncyclopedian leaves that is not Total shit i feel the responsibility to see them off. Bye. The One and Only... NecroBlade [STFU] Live And Learn...

Let's not call other users shit, shall we?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  formspring) 20:13 May 07, 2008

You don't know me, nor do I ever think you'll ever read this. But if you ever do. I'd just like to say I totally agree with EVERYTHING you had to say. I came to this site in 2010, and quite recently I have stopped writting altogether and have been focusing on reverting vandals and making sure every last one of them is banned by an admin. The only problem is, what is 1 day of ban gonna teach any of them? 1 day later they'll just come back and vandalise it again and write more worthless shit. If I ever became an admin, I would make sure every last dumb arse wasn't given a third or fourth chance, 1st time warning. Second time permaban and tell them to fuck off and die. Goodbye The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 04:29, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

1 day will hopefully knock a little sense in to them. If that doesn't work, a longer ban will keep them away long enough for them to forget about us. If that doesn't work, then permaban. Granted, I am quite a mushy liberal (and a foreigner), but I see little point in turning a site that thrives on being anti-authoritarian (one of the pillars of comedy/satire is making fun of your betters) unnecessarily authoritarian. It defeats the purpose, really ("What's that purpose?", you ask? It's to stink up the internet with poorly engrammar'd pages about how dumb and smelly your friend is).
Lastly, Famine sucks and he's stupid and I hate him and I miss him terribly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:57, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

edit Could you help me?

Hi, I seem to have picked up a persistent IP vandal on my Hippies article. His/her/it's IP is 71.222.179.226. Could you ban him? He keeps adding a stupid Russian Reversal quote to my article every other day. Thanks. Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:11, Jun 5

Err... perhaps you should read the above... - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 02:46, Jun 5
You'd be better off either; reporting it to Ban Patrol or going on IRC and looking for an admin. Famine is gone, man. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Right. Anyways, I've semi-protected the page. No more IP problems. - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 02:49, Jun 5
Kudos to you for making the world a fractionally better place. You're like Batman. But without the gadgets. Or the Batmobile. Or the money. Or the kung foolery. Or the... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes... I am "like" batman...yes. - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 15:46, Jun 5

edit Why am I blocked?

I've never edited Uncyclopedia, so why am I blocked? 75.39.15.195 00:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC) Or is it a general block of IPs?

You aren't blocked. Also, Famine is gone. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:12, Oct 14
He probably got confused by the feature. I know I did. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Heh, I didn't even notice that. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:10, Oct 14
Personal tools
projects