User talk:Eggs6131

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Welcome!

Hello, Eggs6131, and thanks for joining Uncyclopedia! Before editing further, please take a gander at our Beginner's Guide. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, check out the following pages:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, ask at the community forum or in the chatroom, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, our Adopt-a-Noob program can bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian!  ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 08:33, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

edit Hi.

You can't "bulldoze" articles in other user's userspaces. It's sorta against the rules. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 10:40, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

edit hello there

Would you be interested in writing in Uncyclopedia's first ever writing competition just for noobs? If so read this and submit your name! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 11:29, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

edit Tescos

Thank you for finally joining the conversation (in your Change Summary). You can come to VFD and comment and/or vote on the survival of the article itself. However, as well as me, you are reverting an Admin who bans people just for looking at him funny. More importantly, Uncyclopedia (as laid out in our charming How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid) tends to like paragraphs of prose and not lists of one-liners. One reason for this is that the latter invites every Anon on Earth to visit briefly and make the list even longer. I agree that speculation on what a Tesco's in Chicago etc. might sell (deriving from a stereotype of the residents) is an attempt at humor. But it isn't good writing. Spıke Ѧ 17:17 19-Dec-12

Hello there, thanks for posting your message (I haven't had a message for ages!).
If you like I can take out the foreign ones, just have the UK ones, which I think its quite funny tbh, the list has been there for a while now so I think it stood up quite well to the test of time.
I will take out the chicago/other foreign ones, see if that's any better maybe? - Eggs6131

(I moved your comment here to unify the conversation for the benefit of any third parties who wander by later, and indented your post as is usually done.) Removing the supposed U.S. Tescos would be good, given that there is no explanation of how Tesco supposedly decided to come to the U.S. It will also show that you are doing something more thoughtful than just overturning the edits of other users. But now onto the larger point that I make at VFD: Is Tescos doing anything that could not be done by the much better article at Tesco? Spıke Ѧ 17:30 19-Dec-12

Maybe you could consider merging the two articles, then? - Eggs6131

Having disclosed my nationality (by the use of "come to the U.S." above, I am hardly the one to polish an article on Tesco's. (But I know who might).

Typing on talk pages is indeed the way users communicate, as on Wikipedia. But type FOUR tildes at the end so that you append not just a signature but the time of day. I assume you have a signature file on Wikipedia (in which case THREE tildes works) but you don't have one in effect here. And please, I prefer that we continue a conversation on the same page that it started. Spıke Ѧ 17:39 19-Dec-12

edit EastEnders

If you say Tesco is relevant, I'll concede. How did you know I would see your Change Summary?! No, people working Special:RecentChanges don't get to watch any television. Spıke Ѧ 11:48 19-Mar-13

"We are very much amused." doesn't look encyclopedic. Please maintain the superficial resemblance to an encyclopedia rather than use the first person to savor your own role as humor tour-guide, thanks. Spıke Ѧ 12:02 25-Mar-13

edit Uranus

I have undone your change here. Obviously an article on Uranus is going to have some anus jokes, but yours, here in the Intro, is too blunt. Are you Beavis or Butthead? And the reference to Futurama makes me think it's not even original. Spıke Ѧ 14:04 1-May-13

edit You have Autopatrolled

Welcome back! During one of your vacations from the website, the "patrolling" feature was installed, with which we analyze all edits from untrusted and anonymous users. All your recent edits have been excellent, so I am giving you Autopatrolled so this won't happen to you. As it affects what we see, and not what you see, there is no reason to even tell you this except that the average user, when informed of this, skips away whistling as though his next Uncyclopedia paycheck will be a little fatter. Happy editing! Spıke Ѧ 13:49 11-Jul-13

edit RUSerious

With a name like Eggs6131 you are naturally funny, so please don't claim nonfunnieness when it's a lie, a big lie!!! you are funny, and a good writer. Aleister 16:51 6-8-'13

edit Doctor Who

I saw your edit message. The article is a feature and is usually immune from extra editing unless it is to make a grammar check or update if a biography (for example the person has since died). Adding the new Doctor Who to this list falls between the two stools but since you have done it, I will check your edits. Thanks. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:21, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

I will let the edit stand. That article was featured in 2005. Looks a bit of a mess but I will let it stand as that version was featured. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:42, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools