# User talk:Dr. Skullthumper/Archive 3

 This article was nominated for deletion on April 13, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep, against Zombiebaron's better judgement.
 Nominated Writer of the MonthThis user has been nominated for Writer of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate your favourite users at Uncyclopedia:Writer of the Month.
 Nominated Useless Gobshite of the MonthThis user has been nominated for Useless Gobshite of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate your least favourite users at Uncyclopedia:Useless Gobshite of the Month.

And now for... that place where messages go.

## RED LIGHTS

You win a template Mr. Skull! --   <-> 03:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

## Hi

Thanks for the greeting. I know you'll hate me for this, but I'm starting to rewrite the skateboarding article. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skrayl (talk • contribs)

Hate? Good god, no. Rewrite anything you want (that sucks). That's the purpose of this being a wiki — to tear down everyone else's hard work and start anew if there's no humor in it. Rewrite the article all you want!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 03:58 Oct 20, 2007
Cool. It's done. tell me what you think. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skrayl (talk • contribs)
I'll take a look in a moment. In the meantime, though, sign your posts with four tildes, like this: ~~~~, for future reference.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:14 Oct 20, 2007
It's a start. It needs more content, though. Take a look at HTBFANJS for a whole slew of writing pointers (despite the title, it's not for people who write stupid, it's the general guide for all writers here), it's a helpful read. After you work on an article for a while, and you're stuck or need a real second opinion, pop on over to Pee Review so that another user can give it a numerical score with pretty colors. (I've always liked the pretty colors.) It's midnight here and I'm not going to stick around much longer, but I'm hoping these links'll point you in the right direction to getting your soul sucked out of your body becoming an Uncyclopedian.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:18 Oct 20, 2007
At least it's better than it was before. I'll read the links tommorow.Skrayl 04:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. You're off to a good start already by recognizing utter shite.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:20 Oct 20, 2007

## It's that guy that keeps talking to me

Looky what I found!

{{vfh health|score=,|age={{#expr:({{#time: U}} - {{#time: U | %DATE%}}) / 86400 round 0}}

I think that clears everything up. --   <-> 17:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Lovely! Except by "clear up" you really mean "gunk up the rusty gears in my brain," right? It looks pretty though.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 17:59 Oct 21, 2007
Maybe if I center it and make it pink? --   <-> 18:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
It looks like shit now. It must be modern art!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:05 Oct 21, 2007
Better add a frame. Everything looks more professional with frames around 'em. --   <-> 18:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I like it. It's hypnotizing. A bit nauseating too, but that's probably because of those damn number things. Get the math off me! Off!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:09 Oct 21, 2007
I killed the math for you and something else... --   <-> 18:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Still looks like math on this browser. Oh, thanks for the vote! I see my not-so-subliminal "messaging" works... [insert evil laughter here]  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:25 Oct 21, 2007
I'm using firefox, too, and it looks like webdings... ya' tard! Would you like to repay your debt? --   <-> 18:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, yeah, I will, after lunch. Yum, greasy food, it lubes up the gears in the brain, don't you know. Would you like to click here?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:34 Oct 21, 2007
Thank you! I hope you really did like it, and not just because we're user talk buddies NO! CLICK HERE! HURRY!! --   <-> 19:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hahaha, I liked it, don't worry. I don't ever vote just 'cuz someone asks me to. (Well, that's not true, I usually do vote whenever someone asks if I'm not busy... just not always For.)  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 19:31 Oct 21, 2007

## Thanks for the Aid ;)

It seems that The User:Does it Really Matter? has decided to tear apart all of my work, and you've aided me greatly in getting it reverted to the proper forms before his edits. I was curious if you would by chance know of any such method that we can get the community on him for this? I don't believe he has anything to contribute to These articles and is indeed just tearing them apart on some personal vendetta. I've yet to see him contribute anything major, aside from getting rid of as many of my articles as possible... Either Thanks muchly comrade for the aid, you've helped me out greatly in getting all of this back together properly. ;)

-St. Fenix (UserTalk) 23:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Bam! I think that takes care of that. Oh, and I don't think you'll have to worry about him for a while...  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:58 Oct 21, 2007

## Re:Time Travel

"I stared at that sentence for a good five minutes. Honestly. I'm thinking it's some sort of Simpsons reference. But I still don't get it." What? You mean you've never once heard of A Sound of Thunder, the other definitive time travel story? Just look at how long its "In Popular Culture" section is! --L 09:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

YARGH! No, I haven't. Nor do I get the joke. Nor do I know what else you've added to the article. Which is what I suppose I'm going to go look at now.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 16:55 Oct 23, 2007
You're making my "I didn't write that!" bits itch. Unfortunately your additions are really good. Really, really good. Wouldn't-have-thought-of-them-in-a-million-years type good. So if you'll excuse me, my left brain and my right brain have a good bit of fighting to do. In the meantime, I'll go write another article or something.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 16:57 Oct 23, 2007
Well, I read over your additions entirely, and I'm damn impressed. Usually when people add entire sections to my articles, they kill the flow, or use a different writing style or humor style, and I just have to hack away at it. It's just a shame I've got 22 votes on VFH already before you added things, otherwise half the feature would technically be yours. So thanks a lot for your work on it!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 17:06 Oct 23, 2007

I'm going to travel back in time to 1979... SuperPants. --Rick Davies Supertramp 17:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Are you an admin? Elassint Throw things at me 00:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. Last time I checked, I still have a soul.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:57 Oct 24, 2007

## I was just getting to that!

For scooping my edit, have a minimalist award: *

I call it the too-lazy-to-look-up-code not-very-ninja-ish star. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

OMIGOSH I JUST GOT AN AWARD!!! From a real, live administrator! I feel almost important now! Wait. No. Feeling's gone.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:13 Oct 24, 2007

## oh shit

Are you the author of why cancer is great? If so I'm sorry --Tampa 20:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

No, Cajek is--Sir Manforman 21:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
According to my friends, I am, since they think I wrote every single article on Uncyclopedia. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
No, just the ones on QVFD.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 01:46 Oct 26, 2007
Yeah, what Manforman said. It is a joke anyway, right? Right? Otherwise, you've seriously got some things to learn.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 01:46 Oct 26, 2007
I don't wanna talk to him now. He'll be so mad, man. --Tampa 02:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I doubt it majorly. We all screw up, especially during our first few weeks here. I messed up on ICU's and deleted too many quotes, among other things. It's not like anything happened. He'll understand. Or else he'll get banned for drama.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 02:47 Oct 26, 2007
Water off a duck's back. Besides, I got two more votes out of the deal!! Why didn't I nominate it for deletion?? --   <-> 17:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I guess there is no such thing as bad publicity. Maybe this'll be a new article whoring technique.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:06 Oct 27, 2007

## Templates

Yes, I have read HTBFANJS, and I'm not an idiot, so don't give me that crap. And yes, I am aware that you hate templates, but they are a necessity, and in case you haven't noticed, they're here to stay.

Now let me ask you this: what does that have to do with the article? It's obviously intended to be a humorous template, so why, dare I ask, should we go about using it in a serious way? You're acting like I'm actually violating a written, established rule - the only one I can think of that I'd even be close to is HTBFANJS, but I really fail to see how I've even come close to breaking it. For one thing, I was not the person who added all those templates. Someone else was. But when I saw the page for the first time and saw all the templates, I thought it was really, really funny. For another, the person who removed the templates is obviously controversial, so it was natural of me to assume that the edit probably wasn't right.

Really, what does it matter? The Pig Latin article is written in Pig Latin. It's nearly impossible to read. Does that mean we should change it? No. Why? Because it's funny! I don't need years of experience here to know that. It makes people laugh, and that's what's important. And if eight million cowbell templates on the cowbell article are funny, why not? --<-Captain Random-> ¿Huggle? 23:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

You're illiterate, aren't you? "I was not the person who added all those templates" <-- Remember that? It was me, like two minutes ago. I have been reverted twice - once by someone who I have seen, on numerous occasions, hastily revert things that were not necessarily bad edits; and once by someone who I have never even heard of or spoken to and who I'm assuming didn't get the joke.
The debate here is not whether or not the template really belongs there; it's about whether not not it's funny. So far two people have said that it's not. I thought that it was. And several of my friends saw it with all the templates and thought it was.
And isn't it more ironic to have a disproportionate (read: crapload) of cowbell templates on the cowbell page itself than just to have one, as would be the norm on most pages? Hm? If you don't think that it's funny, fine. But don't tell me it's against the rules or that I don't know what I'm talking about, because that's not true. --<-Captain Random-> ¿Huggle? 23:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Also, Pig Latin is anything but readable. The same goes for 1337, but we're not about to change them. --<-Captain Random-> ¿Huggle? 23:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

## I am now writing a very forceful letter of inquiry

Dear sir,

I am writing you regarding your edits to my userpage recently. How dare you, sir! *FACEPALM!* I cannot stand people who disagree with my opinions, or people who have opinions, or people. That young man was helping me with my page, and brought to light my vagrant gay bashing. I implore you, as one gentleman to "another" that you revert your reversions to the previous version.

Thank you,

Nerd42

You is a funny person, Cajek, I can't deny that. Despite the fact that I disagree with Nerd42's gay-bashing entirely and completely, and it makes me angry inside, I'm afraid that vandalizing userspace is just something you shan't do. Everyone's entitled to their opinions, even if they're stupid enough to be against homosexuality.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 19:43 Oct 31, 2007
Dear sir,

Would you consider reviewing "Classy" for me?

Thank you,

Cajek

Dear sir,

Would you consider considering "Classy" for honors consideration, considering the recent considerations you considered for the betterment of the page itself?

I'm a whore,

Cajek

There's a fine line between good natured whoring and mustachio abuse. You just ate that line. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Ironically, I was just clicking on the VFH link when I got a new message. Sheesh. Ya whore.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 02:56 Nov 01, 2007

## It's the sockpuppet of that guy that won't stop talking to me

U is admin? Why you is rite on user page? I is just noob would you adopt me? --Cajek is a big ol doofus 17:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

## It's a continuation of the most indirect whoring in the history of the universe

I just got back from my SAT II's and you indirectly whore at me? How dare you, sir?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 17:30 Nov 03, 2007

me not know what a whore be I just noob who making lolz on uncyclopedia. --Cajek is a big ol doofus 17:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Why I be on ban patrol? they not like mesa? Why theysa say I be another one? I be righteously indignant wheretofore. --Cajek is a big ol doofus 17:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS, WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS! :D! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! BLAH!! --Cajek is a big ol doofus 17:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Stop spamming my talk page, n00bs!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:05 Nov 03, 2007

## Classy

Here's a handy user template! --   <-> 20:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

## Hey, thanks for voting for Cancer

 Dr. Skullthumper/Archive 3 Has A Lotta Class.And they could beat you up.
 Aaawww...Dr. Skullthumper/Archive 3 has been diagnosed with cancer.artery cancer. Yeah. Incurable.

Have a weird little user template! --   <-> 22:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

## Hey

Thanks for the help with my sig... I didn't ask for it but I clearly needed it, so thanks. Also, that < was meant to be there. Just to say ^^ <.talk.work.?pedia.$A^{waits}_{ward}$

No problem, I tend to be annoying and poke at people's sigs when they break a page or number list or the like. Sorry 'bout the <, I just looked at it and said "Oh no! HTML typo!" but I see it more clearlier now.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 20:31 Nov 16, 2007

## The villains begrudgingly thank you

Thanks for the votes! Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

## hey, w/e man, i came on here to hav some fun, if u want me to leeve then fine, btw, i voted for you

yeh, the headline said it all, and btw, i did read it already (well, most of it, it wuz pritty boring.) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guitarplayer001 (talk • contribs)

Nuh-uh, I don't want you to leave. I'm just saying that your edits are likely to be reverted, and have, by me and Famine and suchlike. I'm just trying to explain why. Besides, just because you've read it, doesn't mean you fully grasp it.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:51 Nov 18, 2007
Okay, sorry for taking it the wrong way, you deserve an award for dealing with this calmly... (know of any that I can give you? I'm a n00b here....). Sorry again. BTW, that WAS me who just said that, I just was not signed in. Guitarplayer001 07:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

## What gives?

I commented out your rambling so Spang's answer to the question could be seen. What's up with you opposite-ing?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

'Twas a joke. I reverted myself. Although personally I think that Spang's answer was more irrelevant than the rest of the stuff, 'cuz the user already had the problem solved. Besides, Spang is boring.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:54 Nov 18, 2007
And there, I just made a serious edit that seems to resolve the problem anyhow.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 04:58 Nov 18, 2007
I think <insert name here> is boring :)-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, yeah, <insert name here> has always been a bit of a pain. I'm thinking of BP'ing him. You with me?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:01 Nov 18, 2007
As long as you also BP his socks, <insert name here> iz a giant doosh and <insert name here> iz teh goatse gai.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 05:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
i COMPLETELY agree, and yes, <insert name here> is boring..... like annoyingly so.

## I'm Really Sorry

Hey, I wanted to apologize, it's been on my mind about why I reacted like I did, and that was messed up for me to do that. I guess my pride was hurt, so I tried to act like your opinion didn't matter and stab you while I was at it. So again, I am REALLY sorry.

Guitarplayer001 23:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Aw, no, don't worry about it. It happens. Like I said, it takes everyone a different amount of time to "get" Uncyclopedia and Uncyclopedia's style of humor. The fact that you've taken the time to apologize is a lot, and separates you from the idiots we tend to get on here. So don't worry if you lashed out a bit — hang around and the spirit of Uncyclopedia will slowly suck your soul from your body, and then you'll be one of us, a part of the community, attached to the website forever. Whoops, wasn't supposed to tell you that last part until it's too late. But yeah. All's forgiven.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:19 Nov 18, 2007
Ok, I'm glad. Thanx for being too kool to get mad. For that, among other things, you get this....

## It's funny! Everyone here is laughing WITH me. What planet are YOU on?!

Maybe it's only funny if you're laughing at how clever YOU are? It's a wiki right? but it's not ANYONE's wiki - only those with the right p.o.v?

come on. relax. it's only the internet. all that tension you'ré carrying with give you cancer. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Badcop666 (talk • contribs)

## alright

alright. yeah, it is vandalism. people keep fucking with it. i'll stop and wait.

Thanks. We're temporarily redirecting the page to Uncyclopedia:CRP to stop the vandals from moving it, et cetera. Don't worry. One of those lazy admin types should show up soon.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:36 Nov 22, 2007

## Thank you for your welcome note!

Thanks! --Son 16:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

## Thanks for the welcome!

Thanks, I just love the great humour Uncyclopedia has. Again, thanks for the welcome! --Luigi128 23:58, 22 November 2007

## Blanking

Dont ever blank a page again like the dead baby jokes. If u dnt find them funny dont read them --82.7.221.235 12:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, I won't. In fact, I've just gone back in time to stop myself from vandalizing. I must've, because mysteriously, if you check my contributions, you'll find I never did that.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 14:45 Nov 24, 2007
Oh wait, found something. See, if you noticed my edit summary, it read: (Holy FLYING FARKLES. Be original, or GTFO.) See, we at Uncyclopedia pride ourselves in originality, not taking old jokes from ages past, making it into a list (we HATE HATE HAT lists, thanks very much), and cluttering up an article. Next time, read HTBFANJS before you revert an edit like that. It's not a "page blanking," it's a "crap removal".  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 14:49 Nov 24, 2007

## I'm not entirely new and also I'm talking to you again. HI SKULL! HI! HI SKULL! OVER HERE, IT'S ME CAJEK! HI! ...HI!

I used to edit Wikipedia so I think I might know how things work. Just give me the basics and i'm off!--Monnitewars (talk) 05:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Good to know! Those links on your userpage should get you started fine. Here at Uncyclopedia, we have two rules. That's about all you need to know to survive.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:23 Nov 25, 2007
/me bursts in unexpectedly Hey wait a minute... How come you didn't welcome me?    <-> Nov 27, 03:38
/me bursts in extreeeemely unexpectedly Holy crap that was awesome. Uh, I felt really special... would you consider welcoming me again? I only got welcomed once by some dude, and I still don't feel wanted. (Also, apparently on IRC, people get raped by Olipro, so...)    <-> Nov 27, 03:55
FU CAJEK >_> Fuckin' fell for that link... -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 12:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
/me bursts in horrendously unexpectedly and ushers Cajek out of the room. ~ 12:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
:D yay! w00t!    <-> Nov 27, 13:03

## Thank you!

 You voted... ...for Francis Winkler! In the name of all state-employed public educators of unstraight persuasion everywhere, thank you!

Thanks! -- 01:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

## YOU

deserve a ninjastar!

Thank you, thank you... maybe now shortpages will be of some use again, next time it updates. Oh, and by the way, if you click "hide minor edits", it'll help you wade through one of my massive fixes and get to the real recent changes.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:00 Dec 05, 2007

I got all dizzy looking at you....~ 23:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit Conflict Serves you right, your sig makes me dizzy.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:00 Dec 05, 2007
Not my fault! I got it from that Craaaazy Brazilian Doctor. ~ 00:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Indeed... and I see you've really been fighting evil with it...  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:13 Dec 05, 2007
Well, if you consider Cajek to be evil, then yes, I did. ~ 00:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Cajek is either evil or possessed by evil demons. No human can write that much within a few months of joining Uncyclopedia. No one!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:19 Dec 05, 2007
Where do you think the writers went after the Hollywood writer's strike started? Duh. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Personally, I think they went to Bollywood, where they will make low-rate Indian movies for top dollar.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

## Hello

Thanks for welcoming me!!

Took me 10 bloody minutes to decipher my way through all them tutorials. i'm not going through them again lol. DBULL 22:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yesh, it does take quite a while. I've found though, if you're aware of the two rules, you're pretty well on your way to becoming a user. The beginner's guide is good when you want to know the technical bits, and it's a great reference; but really, the key is remembering those two rules. (Hard to memorize, I know. Try writin' them on your palm or somethin'.)  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:40 Dec 05, 2007

What, like its an exam lol DBULL 22:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, if "using common sense" is an exam for ya. Which I doubt.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:54 Dec 05, 2007

I'm sorry, were you saying hello to me or Skullthumper?    <-> (Dec 5 @ 23:45)

Hey, it's that guy that keeps popping up on my talk page!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:49 Dec 05, 2007
Jesus didn't HAVE a car. ARCHIVE YOUR TALKPAGE ALREADY    <-> (Dec 5 @ 23:52)
Ah, those were the days... back in November... makes me nostalgic just thinking about them... Maybe once it hits 30 sections. Excuse ME for not being all OCD about my bleedin' talkpage. Meh!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:55 Dec 05, 2007
Jesus didn't HAVE a talkpage. I usually archive every 10 sections, before the monsters do.    <-> (Dec 5 @ 23:58)
No wait, he did. It's called the mutha-fuckin' BIBLE DUDE. Get alive with geesus.    <-> (Dec 5 @ 23:59)
If you're gonna whore, at least format the bleedin' link properly. Hey, also, I have a new toy I was able to mod that allows me to do really monotonous tasks. I just dunno what to use it for.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:00 Dec 06, 2007
You have a bot?? Show!    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:05)
Okay. Lookit my contribs from the 4th. Yeah. That's AWB all right.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:06 Dec 06, 2007
I'd love to give you a live demonstration, but first, you gotta give me a really monotonous task.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:08 Dec 06, 2007
Welcoming new users? Providing a link on every article to the Hungarian Uncyc?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:09)
Well, the first I do with JavaScript... the last... might be perceived as... slightly annoying?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:10 Dec 06, 2007
getting rid of vanity?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:12)
Pah! More JavaScript again. Honestly! I expected better.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:14 Dec 06, 2007
Okay, java boy, how about this one: Going through shortpages and adding that template that removes it from that category?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:16)
That's what you got the ninjastar for, right?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:17)
Correctomundo. Only did it for the disambig's because those are supposed to be short, and I figured it might help make Shortpages a bit more useful again.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:18 Dec 06, 2007
Make your bot self aware and have it write VFH worthy articles, and then take all the credit, therefore ensuring the downfall of mankind thru robot enslavement.    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:20)
Don't I wish... considering I'm too lazy to write anything anymore. I'll be back, though, just not yet.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:23 Dec 06, 2007
Vandalize every article by writing "Skullthumper was here" then take all the credit, therefore ensuring the downfall of mankind thru robot enslavement.    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:25)
Could you replace every page on Uncyc with "Skullthumper was here"?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:26)
Yup. And then I'd get infinibanned. And then who would you have to talk to? Other than 23,942,686 other users.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:28 Dec 06, 2007
You're wrong Skull, I'm far too bashful to just pop onto user pages unannounced.    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:31)
Found something! Here, I'll categorize all the Zork 4 pages.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:35 Dec 06, 2007
LAAAAAME! Why don't you use your bot to vote a thousand times on articles I whore to you on your talk page?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:42)
Because then the page would be too long, take forever to load, and it'd never get featured. Logic to the rescue! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC) I also like talk pages. They're warm an fuzzy.
Can your bot tell what time it is... in my heart?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:49)
`Deleting logic...Logic not foundLogic already deleted. Please try again.Detecting time...Time: For Teletubbies – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:07 Dec 06, 2007`
Waaahhh coo wada?    <-> (Dec 6 @ 01:12)
AGAIN! AGAIN!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 01:19 Dec 06, 2007

## It's the IP address of that guy that won't stop talking to me

Wat is? 68.189.67.167 00:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, my curiosity is getting the better of me. If I was a cat, I'd be on my deathbed.
2. Why are you linking me to that Pee Review, which I only touched to remove {{VFH}} from because it was mucking up the categories?
3. Why does the maximum score in "Pee Review" give a green table? Everyone knows healthy pee is clear. If you're peeing green, you've got problems.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:55 Dec 08, 2007

How you format like that with the numberz? Is you a admin persuhn I confuzed

1. I always be IP address, just one that also haz accunt.
2. Me like that pee review! It make 68.189.67.167 happy!
3. My pee is red. Is you a urologist me need pee check.

68.189.67.167 01:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

No, Mr. IP sir, I'm not an admin. I've still got my soul, see. When you become an admin, you have to put it in a box and ship it to Uncyclopedia. So I hear, at least.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 01:17 Dec 08, 2007
'Tis true. Hi, DrSkullthumper.
Greetings, comrade. How goes soulless existence?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 02:59 Dec 08, 2007
Ah, I know, right. Even more soulless without my meds. I'm a farkin' drone.

## Feed The Welsh

I did receive a Pee Review before I self-nommed. --OliverKnight 22:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

LIES!!!    <-> (Dec 8 / 22:56)
It looked like a Pee review, it smelt like a Pee review ... it tasted like a Pee review.--OliverKnight 23:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Woah. TMI, man. TMI.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:00 Dec 08, 2007
YOU'RE SUCH A DAMN LIAR.    <-> (Dec 8 / 23:01)

## Your mods to the guide

Hello there! Many thanks for fixing that Pee Review table issue in the Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines. I did not know that you could do that to prevent it showing up in category reviewed. Did you also intend to remove the conclusion? That seems a bit radical. Do you not think we need one? MrN  Fork you! 22:28, Dec 9

I'm a moron! Turns out I forgot a slash in the </choose> tag, causing the conclusion to magically disappear. Fixed now.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:30 Dec 09, 2007
No problem. That's a lot better than how I was trying to do it... I also noticed that you deleted the list from the bottom (not a pun honest) of Gay. I have recently given the page an overhaul, and wondered if you had read the message box at the top of the article before you did? I agree that in many cases "Lists Suck" and do not add to the quality of an article, but, I am trying something here... When I took over the page it was in a rather sorry state and had clearly been vandalised many times. I think this was because authors of the page in the past were largely anti-gay or very pro gay, and so a "battle" was going on as to who could vandalise the page in their favour the most. It was close to being deleted I believe. I have attempted to re-write the page in such as way that it not possible to tell if the author is pro-gay or anti gay, and well... That list and the box at the top are (I think) rather important to that. I'm really trying to mock anti gay vandals by making them think that this is an anti-gay page, but when they get to the bottom to add their insult they find themselves lacking in material as most of the usual words have been used before. If the list really bothers you that much then I'm not going to fight you on this, but the box at the top will also need to be removed. I fear that if we do this however, then this page will again become a magnet for pointless nonsense... It's your call. MrN  Fork you! 22:43, Dec 9
Ah, I see what you did there! Why don't we make a subpage, like has been done for Chuck Norris, Ninjas, and the like?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:01 Dec 09, 2007
I've made an attempt at a subpage, now. I fear that the wording needs to be changed on the template, though, as we really discourage cyberbullying, and it sounds a bit like "It's okay if you do it over here". But I see what you're trying to do. Thanks for being so patient with my stupidity today.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:09 Dec 09, 2007
Cool. I really like what you have done there. I think that there is now a bit more of a chance that the vandals will miss the sub-page and vandalise the main page, as they will really want to put something onto the main page. But I guess this is a good compromise which does make the actual article look better. This page (as you know I expect) was protected for quite a while due to it being attacked so often. But has been open to IP edits for a while now (since I re-wrote it). I have actually been using the 'work' of the vandals to help me add to the list! OK, I'm a glutton for punishment with this one, but it's a challenge! There have very few vandal attacks on the page with it as it was, so we can see what happens now.... RE the avoiding cyber bulling, defiantly. That is the point of what I have done here. MrN  Fork you! 23:19, Dec 9
Well, containment policy has worked in the past for the other pages, so I figured a subpage'd do just as well for this one. Maybe we should shorten the template, though, it's a bit of a bother. Later. I'm too lazy right now. But if it turns out worse, it's easy to add it back later. But we'll see I suppose.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:24 Dec 09, 2007
Hea, hope you don't think I'm going on about this one, but check out: [[1]] As you can see, this IP connected a few days ago, and added some crap to the list at the list at the bottom (not a pun again I swear) of Gay. But, now the list has been moved, he connected just now, and added his genius into the actual article. I'm not saying it's wrong how it is now. I'm just interested in your views as your a lot more experienced than me around here... MrN  Fork you! 17:00, Dec 10
Hmm, to be honest, I just don't know. The tricky thing is, we really, really, really want to discourage this sort of thing in the mainspace. It doesn't matter if it's at the bottom or top (heh heh) of a page, the fact is, it's still in the mainspace... and Gay is a tricky subject... I think the best course of action would be to leave the subpage and get the article semi-protected. Then, once it is, remove the giant notice, and either replace it with something smaller or put another giant notice in <!-- comments --> or find that containment policy template I'm too lazy to locate. I'd do this stuff myself, but this is going to be a busy week for me and I'm really only stopping by. Good luck!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:42 Dec 10, 2007
Thanks for your advice. The page was semi protected before I started messing with it... Then Fag (seriously that's his name) got it unprotected, and he and I transformed it into its current state. Even though it was not protected there was almost no vandalism to the actual page other than people adding names to the end list (which I used to make the jokes which are there now (hee hee to me for getting the vandals to help make Uncyc funny)). I think I know what you mean about not letting it happen in the main space though, so I'm not sure what to do either. We could get the page protected again, but that seems a little like giving up. I don't know what to do... Would you fancy taking a look at Gay/GayPeople? I have made some mods to it so that its not a list any more (helps you find if your gay friend is in the list better) do you think that it would be a good idea to move this back to the front page, or just leave it as is? MrN  Fork you! 23:08, Dec 10
RE containment policy, I don't really understand that, but will try to get my head around it... MrN  Fork you! 23:17, Dec 10
Semi-protection = not giving up, just not allowing IPs to edit. Containment policy = subpage for the cliched junk, regular page for the original, humourous stuff. A lot of pages are semi-protected because they're common subjects that other users are pretty sure will attract crap edits from IPs and new users. Of course, you don't see 'em because you're registered so they all look plain and editable. Which is why the subpage would work - leave the subpage unprotected entirely, and IPs can go and vandalize / add to / crap up the subpage while leaving it nice in the surface.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 21:41 Dec 11, 2007
Ahh... Thanks for your time. MrN  Fork you! 21:51, Dec 11
Thanks for your patience. I'm usually not this slow, but yesterday was a busy day for me...  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 21:52 Dec 11, 2007

## Mr winkler is real

Mr Winkler is real he teachs me english and i hate him. I got in trouble because every1 in my school was going on here because of it and then they found out about it and told my parnets about it and but they didnt realy care but the teachers did. but im sick now so i dont go to school rite now so i dont knw what going to happen but i might get in troble for it at school. it kinda sux LotofLOLS 16:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

## It's that guy that's bored and keeps talking to me

Dear Dr. Skullthumper,

Recently, I have become aware that I, the undersigned, have not garnished your talk page in a while. Could you please provide assistance in the furtherance in this endeavor?

Sincerely,

I wish I was bored. As it happens, college apps suck, as well as these three novels I've got to read and musical numbers to memorize. How goes it with you?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 02:04 Dec 15, 2007
Finals just ended for me, but now I have to deal with Christmas, so I'm not so busy.    <-> (Dec 15 / 02:33)

## Merry Xmas!

 Bonner would like to wish you a Merry Christgame And a happy New Game P.S, You just lost the game

## One o'them "New Users"

boo The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grbing (talk • contribs)

Like, hi.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:44 Dec 15, 2007

## Have a not-shitty Christmas!

 Heya, The Led Balloon here, wishing you merry Christmas, or any other holiday you feel like celebrating. Just remember what it's all really about: NO WORK, NO SCHOOL, FREE STUFF!!! Here's to hoping your school(or work) calendar for December doesn't look too much like this...

Merry Christmas, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:18, Dec 17

## Bloody Pagans

 Pagans, the Whole Lot of Yous Premier Tom Mayfair has been a naughty boy this year, but he still deserves a kiss from under the mistletoe. His external organ is fair game.

## XMas

 AE has awarded you a beer in which you help build your own Christmasbeerbottletree (shown right) Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

-- 01:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

## One Of These

 HEY LOSER! Here's another semi-personalized (that's a lie) Merry Christmas template to add to the overwhelming pile you've got building up on your talk page right now. Have a Merry Christmas, or I'll come over there and make you have a Merry Christmas. If you don't already have a pile of these building up, you're a hopeless loser that nobody on Uncyclopedia likes...sorry.Yours truly,

Happy Holidays, or some such. - 03:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

## Merry Christmas soon!

 Uncyclopedian wishes you have a merry Christmas and a happy New Year's!

## Stop fuckin' around with all my fuckin' shit

I noticed that yer fuckin' around in my fuckin' shit.    <-> (Dec 18 / 22:04)

I wore gloves, though. Your shit smells as bad as your pee. Also, did you catch the subtle joke in the edit summaries? Didja? 3,000 bonus points if you did.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:05 Dec 18, 2007

3,000 BONUS POINTS??!??!

1. (Hey jenius, it's back)
2. (You can't run from your past, Cajek!)
3. (Revert; you saw nothing.)
• You misspelled Genius, genius!
• I can't run!
• I can't see!

I WIN.    <-> (Dec 18 / 22:24)

Sorry. Come again.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:40 Dec 18, 2007

## You're no asshat.

Doctor Skullthumper is no asshat.

He's my best friend.

I love him.

=D

~Minitrue Sir GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF  01:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

So, how long have you two known each other? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:24, Dec 20
This gives me an idea for an article! I love you!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 01:26 Dec 20, 2007
This means you might give me something! I love you! ~Minitrue Sir GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF  01:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd repeat myself, but then I'd be asking Dr. S. how long he's known me, too, and things would just get weird, grammar and otherwise. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:29, Dec 20

### So...

'course not. The instant I tell yer, the idea slips out of my head and is no longer pounding at the walls of my skull to be let out. That's the problem, see — when I tell people my ideas, I lose all motivation to write them.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 01:03 Dec 21, 2007
Oh. Well this guy had better have my name all over it. Or the word "asshat" all over it. I technically bought that word a year ago, I just don't get any money when people use it or anything. Worst purchase I've ever made. ~Minitrue Sir GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF  01:33, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

## Hea Dude, cajek's banned.

I wonder if you were aware that cajek has been banned (for two weeks it appears).

```12:32, 21 December 2007 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (contribs) with an expiry
time of 2 weeks (Time out. No backing out of this unless DrS tells me himself it was consensual)
```

I guess cajek was responding to your 'efforts' with his pee page. [2] With [3]

Obviously cajek should not have messed with your user page, but perhaps you could have a word with Thekillerfroggy considering that you appear to have provoked this incident. Thanks. MrN  Fork you! 15:20, Dec 21

I'd like to know as well what happened here, I'm gone for two days and already Cajek is banned for two weeks?! 17:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
maybe what we should do is take away ONE of his nominations for 'rotm' for each BLOCK...Perhaps that will help instruct him. (WTFIGO)

Yikes. If y'all haven't guessed by now, Cajek and I are the bestest of friends. We've been pranking each other since the beginning of time. Or at least the middle of December, if you don't count the stuff on my talk page. Sorry to get him in trouble. I left a note on TKF's talk page to explain the mess.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 19:51 Dec 21, 2007

Oh, and it doesn't matter at all, but Cajek blanked my userpage, then I messed with his pee review template. But before that, I'd messed with his userpage, and before that, he'd messed with mine, and before that, I'd messed with his alternate account's userpage... and etc.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 19:53 Dec 21, 2007
Cheers for having a word with TKF dude... MrN  Fork you! 19:57, Dec 21
Yup, he's unbanned now. TKF is my bestest friend too, you know.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 19:59 Dec 21, 2007

## holiday greetings

 Gerrycheevers wishes you a Happy Solstice!Enjoy the pagan festival of the Northernmost Sunrise!As a special holiday treat, Gerry also is willing to waive theusual offering of blood required in return for this friendly greeting.

## It's that guy that keeps getting banned because he's talking to me

Hey, dood, check it out! I have an idea for a new Uncyc sport: It started here, then went here, and ended up here... what do you think, Mr. Uncyclopedian of the Month?    <-> (Dec 22 / 00:05)

I don't like hourly time limits. They don't work for me. I can't be on the site at a specific time, because I've got a lot of stuff going on. Daily time limits, maybe. But I'm staying out of it while the time limit's less than 24 hours.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:42 Dec 22, 2007
Well okay, but if you hear whisperings of "pansy" being thrown about please don't concern yourself with it.    <-> (Dec 22 / 13:45)
What?! What?! Is that an indirect insult, Cajek?! Good heavens, looks like it's time for another ban for both of us. We're just constantly at each others' throats!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 16:11 Dec 22, 2007