# User talk:Dr. Skullthumper/Archive 10

Dr. Skullthumper's talkpage, now cock-free!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 22:40 Jul 11, 2009

## Untill I arrived

Now it's got dick everwhere!   22:41 11 July 2009

You dick. Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:08 Jul 12, 2009
Now there's no need for language like that.   00:31 12 July 2009

## Are you an active admin?

Why aren't you on UN:AA? Saberwolf116 16:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

shhhh!! AA is 'admins anonymous', a support group where the admins can get together and discuss their feelings without revealing their identities. 12:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

## Another question...

Should there be a limit on entries for UN:MUP? There's nearly 70 names already and it could reach 100 fairly soon. While we're on the subject, what do you think of resurrecting the Uncyclopedia bios list? I did some work on it but since User:Acid Ammo hasn't been around for awhile, it doesn't look like a rewrite is happening anytime soon. Obviously there needs to be some strict guidelines in place, but I think this could be a really good project. Maybe this could even be a "memorial" of sorts of inactive members? MadMax 10:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost: 16th July 2009

Flutter 18:54, 16 July 2009

## UnSignpost: July 16nd, 2009

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 22:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost: July 23rd, 2009

This edition is on time, and anyone who tells you differently is lying! THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 19:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost: July 30th, 2009

It's on time, you were just high and didn't realize when it got here! THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 22:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost! August 9th, 2009!! WE BE LATE, Y'ALL!!!

Hand delivered by MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost 13th August 2009. It's not late. You are!

9001(bot)  20:35, Aug 18

## UnSignpost 20th August, it's not late, your mom is!

9001(bot)  11:07, Aug 24

## UnSignpost 4th September

-- 16:37, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost Randomber -89th

By and large, please think of the Albert Camus</noinclude> tubes! 01:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost September 10/17

This would've gotten here last week, but it's my firs week as paperboy and I got lost. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:30, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost: September 24th, 2009

Hand delivered by MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 15:57, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost: October 1st, 2009

Late deliver courtesy of MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:03, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost Sometime October 2009

9001(bot)  01:17, Oct 16

## UnSignpost 22nd 23rd October 2009

9001(bot)  18:08, Oct 23

## query

you haven't been around in a while, so i thought i'd pester you about Fnoodle for old time's sake. so...that damn Fnoodle did something which inconvenienced me in some small and easily reversible way! ah, those were the days. 07:29, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

## Delete this pic

You're an admin on this site. Can you please delete this pic from this site? ->File:JUST-DINING-OUT-vomit-1875.jpeg Thank You.--Lazer81095 01:34, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

## UnSignpost 29-10-2009

9001(bot)  01:32, Nov 3

Cyberbullying? Susie Cummings DOES NOT EXIST IN REAL LIFE; it's obviously a FAKE NAME; She is NOT a real person who's feelings can be hurt, and Yes, I'm THAT creative to create an article about unreal persons with false background stories.

Do some background research next time before deleting a page to see if that person exists; "Cyberbullying" isn't even a big of a deal. .......... Prick...

EVEN IF SHE WAS REAL, this is the "Uncyclopedia" for god's sakes. Lighten up, DAMN!

Oh, and you better be able to restore that article or your ass is grass, I'm not wasting another hour of my life writing a new article again, since I've had to rewrite several times because of Inept admins.

Yeah yeah. Look, I'm only going by the policies, and the cyberbullying policies on this site have always been strict. I have no proof that the person isn't real, and it was certainly written as though she were. Besides, even if it wasn't cyberbullying, it was a stub article that completely failed to be funny, and it would have been deleted anyway. If you want a second opinion, talk to another admin.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 06:28 Dec 21, 2009

## UnSignpost Delivery! - December something!

Late deliver courtesy of MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 23:38, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

## Thank you

Thanks very much for the ban. I enjoyed it very much until the explosive diarrhea started. Cheers! Get saved! 21:37, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

It wasn't me. I was at the mercy of the Uncyclopedian Survivor voters! I'm sorry. =(  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 07:03 Jan 03, 2010
I was amused... don't be sorry, become enlightened. Cheers! Get saved! 16:27, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

## UnSignpost January several-days-agoth

I swore I'd never hand-deliver this again. Here it is. --UU - natter 09:29, Jan 18

## UnSignpost 21th January 2009

Also, it's MrN9000's mum's 60th birthday! 9001(bot)  17:32, Jan 21

## Semi-official Imperial Colonization

For once, a short note from me. I'm apparently now running Imperial Colonization. I plan to open it up for nominations for the next colonization on Sunday, 31 January 2010, so will make an official announcement then. In the meantime, I've made some changes, and would love suggestions (see Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization and User:Why do I need to provide this?/Imperial Colonization). Thanks for any help you can give me! WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 01:51, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Um, I don't run, nor have I ever run, Imperial Colonization. I think you have the wrong dude.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:08 Jan 27, 2010
Sorry about that. But what I think I have is a certain user who has been active in IC who redirected his user page to yours. I basically mass posted that message on every IC member's talk page who's made 3 or more colonizations, so didn't catch the trick. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:16, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
ohhhh. That explains it!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:19 Jan 27, 2010
By the way, Howdy! I've seen your name since I started here, but don't know if we've ever met. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:23, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I'm a bastard. I periodically cause problems around here. I became an admin because somehow I accidentally ended up doing something useful occasionally. I wrote this, which is everyone's favorite of my writing, and also this, which is my favorite. Nowadays I reside on my own website writing stupid stories to keep myself entertained. And I'm on IRC sometimes. Yourself?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:27 Jan 27, 2010
I've been reading stuff here for a long time, then one day decided to do an edit now and then, so signed up. I got nominated for NotM before I qualified, so quickly wrote something so I would. Then when I said, "Say, IC needs to be updated," MrN9000 said "consider yourself the new director." I should learn to keep my mouth shut. I'll check out your site in the next day or two. Right now I'm getting ready to log off. Cheers! WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:34, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
You ask a question, you're automatically first in line for volunteers. :) See you around, hopefully.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:35 Jan 27, 2010

## UnSignpost 28th January 2010

9001(bot)  14:52, Jan 28

## Oi, Gobshite!

Have you any comment on your winning of this prestigious award for this week's Signpost awards special we-aren't-running-out-of-ideas-honest issue, or do I go ban Cajek and make something up? --UU - natter 14:17, Feb 1

As Skullthumper's acting surrogate, I call the award a "facist disgrace" and "move to permanently disbar Mike Socia, that ape from Lighting who made my mole visible to all of the goddamn world watching the ceremony." -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:54, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

## UnSignpost 4th February 2010

9001(bot)  15:10, Feb 4

## UnSignpost 11th February 2010

9001(bot)  12:59, Feb 11

## UnSignpost 18th February 2010

9001(bot)  23:33, Feb 18

## UnSignpost 25th February 2010 (It's not late your mum is)

9001(bot)  20:47, Feb 28

## UnSignpost 4th March 2010 (your calendar is wrong)

9001(bot)  00:07, Mar 6

## UnSignpost 11th March 2010

9001(bot)  10:59, Mar 12

Hi, Dr. Skullthumper. I see the One Piece page has been locked! I am a fan of this series and respectfully ask to write a new page for it, based upon the draft on my user page. --IT'S A LION! 16:20, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. DrS is not around at the moment, but I do remember you doing some good things with Narnia a while back so I'm going to trust you on this one and remove the protection. I took a (very) quick look at what's on your user page and it looked a bit random and contained too many of the obvious internet memes which make articles stink so badly. Remove them. We hate them. Other than that... Go for it, but try to make the new article something more sophisticated than your current version on your user page. MrN  Fork you! 16:29, Mar 16
Will do. I already took out the stupid name alterations. I'm trying to do an article that One Piece fans will laugh at.

## UnSignpost 18th March 2010 (on time as always)

9001(bot)  11:44, Mar 18

## UnSignpost 25th March 2010 (hand delivered for added flavour)

-- 21:51, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

## UnSignpost 1th April 2010 - Always on time

Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Friday, 04:43, Apr 2 2010 UTC

## UnSignpost 4/8/10 - Oh hi Signpost.

MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 19:48, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

## UnSignpost 15/4/10 - Yet another on time delivery.

-- 20:22, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

## UnSignpost 1 May

Brought to you by fucking magic. 09:46, 1 May 2010

## Fucking Hell...

I thought I'd post the reply here in case what I say gets the drama stamp on it rather than discussion. If you want to copy and paste it back there for continuity's sake or something, feel free.

This storming off business would be a lot easier if I didn't keep receiving emails about watchlist updates. Anyway, maybe I did act a little rashly with the comment (I forgot to take a step back for half an hour that I normally do when dramatic circumstances arise). But if you were namechecked as the source of inspiration for a mini-essay about how us vain simpleton users didn't know how to vote properly, you'd be pissed off too. And I know what you'll say (You're taking this too seriously), but I still don't appreciate it all the same. And perhaps I am a simpleton, but I still don't agree with this nihilistic approach you've got to voting. It raises the question of why we bother having a VFH system, or this Top Ten list. It's not supposed to be a top ten list of "nobody cares" because looking at the entire page, people obviously do care. It's supposed to be the "top ten" list of featured articles from that month. That said, I shouldn't have commented that I'd remove my vote if it went over the limit, but again, it wasn't about recognition for the authors, but the differences between the articles.

In reading what you said again, I seem to get the attitude that voting doesn't matter as it's all about humour and not serious. So I'll meet you halfway, and take the attitude that I'll vote how I please for whatever reason (usually if its funny or not), and if people don't like it, then that's their problem cause this isn't a serious website. Is that fine? (not sarcasm, that's actually what I now believe). --Matfen 23:12, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

I agree wholeheartedly with your final conclusion. That was more-or-less where I was trying to go with it. And the mini-essay wasn't meant to be condescending, although I guess when you start going on about the site you're on it just ends up becoming that way anyway. I just really, really wish that, in general, people would get a better sense of perspective on things. People vote however they want to and they'll continue to vote however they want to, which is precisely what you've just expressed.
And it works both ways, too. If you vote for something and someone gives you a hard time about it (which you've implied), that's their problem, not yours. Seriously. I hope that never happens to you again, but if it does, ignore them. They've got no right to tell you what your vote is supposed to mean.
I did not write the essay about "voting properly", however. The whole point of it is that there is no way to vote properly. The error comes in trying to get other people to vote "properly" (which typically means to vote using the same standards they're using), or taking voting as a measure of something it isn't. An article that gets a lot of votes might be great, it might be crap. The only thing it means is that it got a lot of votes, nothing more.
Furthermore, my aim in namedropping you wasn't to make you feel antagonized, but rather to kind of speak to you and say this isn't anything worth getting riled up about one way or another. The whole point was to get everyone to step back in a Zen kinda way. Again, I didn't write what I wrote to convince people to vote for or against anything, it was to clarify that everyone votes differently. I wanted to logically deconstruct the mindset behind what votes "mean", not shoot the messenger.
Anyway, tl;dr really sorry you got offended, know what you feel like b/c I've left this site in a huff millions of times, any further clarifications required lemme know, hope you stay.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:43 May 09, 2010
You explainz well. I could go on a tl;dr message about how nice you've been to explain these things to me, and as a result how I feel a lot more comfortable now when voting, but instead I thought this picture would suffice.

Thnx. --Matfen 21:05, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

## Thanks for the spelling fix, but...

I kind of liked it that way. I know it sounds weird, but there's sentimental value. You see, when I first made my userpage, I made it in the style of an article I wrote that also had the spelling error. The article was fixed, but I kept the spelling error there on purpose, partly as a reminder of my past humbling mistake, and partly because I'm just a fuckwit. Since it's on my userpage, hopefully you won't take it personally if I just change it back...It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 03:51, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, Skully, jeez. Love,
I AM SEVERELY OFFENDED  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:08 May 11, 2010
Actually, which one is it? Passerby or passersby? Because I've actually had it "corrected" on me both ways. Like, I think I originally had "passerby" and then somebody fixed it to "passersby". And then I think you fixed it back. I need the truth! (sob)It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 02:29, May 12, 2010 (UTC)
Google says passersby. But I honestly have no idea. Just wanted to screw with somebody's userpage. Also your Jack Black article is amazing.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 10:11 May 12, 2010
Wow! I'm impressed that so many people like it! (Edit*) I just learned it's up for VFH. Would you please FUCKIN' vote for it? It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 02:20, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

## Hey! You!

Sorry I was grumpy at you earlier, but now I'm HAPPY because I'm not hungry anymore because I'm eating popcorn because Rob was all "eaaatt" and I was all "*stomach noise*" and I figured you'd highfive me for eating, and then you'd love me again. Love,

## So I was doing my thing

And all of a sudden that dicks came over and RAPES my page. And I was all like - HEY!

...And then you came and banned him. And I was all like - YEAH!

WHAT?! HE NEARLY RAPED ME! ~ 19:57, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Holy shit. You better get back to doing your thing then. Try not to get raped!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 20:04 Jun 01, 2010

## Inquisitorial justice

I need help deciding which of these two pages is better Note; this page is Australian

the reason i changed it was because there was some absolute ass-knuckle who changed it to something not at all funny. Being a noob at the time I killed his and made mine then when I looked through all the edits I say that the first guy's had been good so I humbly beg you the avid uncyclopedian to decided which is better.

Awaiting you verdict, that the unholy may be purged lest their zeal diminish. --Abie-baby 09:46, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

This seems more like something that should be a forum topic than for one admin to decide.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 06:32 Jun 10, 2010

does more to add proof to my belief that social networking sites only reveal deeper levels of the psychotic consciousness (also silly American surname alert). -- 22:09, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

He's crazy. Love,
You should actually try talking to him D.E.X. Bulshit, Ass, Bitch, Anal Cancer, Dick
Wait wait wait wait. N?! As in... n?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 06:29 Jun 10, 2010
Oh and also, my surname is Ukrainian. So yeah, suck it. And I've really started to dislike Twitter. I seriously only use it when I'm angry or drunk. In its own way it's kind of an entertaining experiment on myself.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 06:33 Jun 10, 2010
Huh, that's what I use Facebook and Uncyclopedia for. -- 18:08, June 11, 2010 (UTC)