User talk:DJ Mixerr/Archive 2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Total edits

See all my Total edits: 4,273 DJ Mixerr 18:39, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Use curly braces instead of brackets and I won't have to click. Spıke ¬ 19:05 2-Jan-11
I thought I was supposed to use brackets instead of braces? DJ Mixerr 19:12, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
You are "supposed" to do what works. Brackets get translated into a link or a category or sometimes an image or audio. Brackets starting with an extra ":" mean that you want to refer to it rather than have it take effect, such as naming it in QVFD or referring to a category on VFD, and not registering the VFD page itself into the category.
Braces usually include the contents of a template into your page. Depending on how the template is coded, it can have side-effects. So you can refer to Editcount or actually incorporate your edit count into any page. Spıke ¬ 19:18 2-Jan-11
Now I see what you mean. I understand. Thank you! DJ Mixerr 19:21, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Now that you've agreed, let me take it back! The link you coded takes you to a page with a table. The template substitutes a numerical result into the position where you use it: 4,273. I put mine on my userpage, as no one will read this a month from now. Spıke ¬ 19:23 2-Jan-11
Once again, thanks! DJ Mixerr 19:26, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Everyone knows how to get to my contributions. DJ Mixerr 19:28, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Yup, the way I'd do it is to come here or to your talk page and use Contributions in the left margin. But seriously, no one looks for enduring-and-permanent stuff in the transcript on your talk page; if you want to tout Total Edits, it's more likely to be seen on your user page. Spıke ¬ 19:33 2-Jan-11
I'll add that later. Kinda busy. DJ Mixerr 19:43, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
I know that everyone can see this now. DJ Mixerr 22:32, January 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)


Hey there

As a tip it is better to spend time (generally speaking) with one article than to add categories/templates. Much of what you have been doing has not been too helpful. If you add a template make sure it does not muck up the formatting, similarly adding the category, 'Honourary Jews' to the Anne Frank page is not really appropriate. Hope this helps, and see you about:-) --Sycamore (Talk) 19:55, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

M'kay then? DJ Mixerr 19:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Me adding Categories.

This is about me adding categories and templates to articles. Why? User:Pelargonium and User:Paizuri encouraged me to doing so. DJ Mixerr 03:36, January 11, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

How many articles I created

I created 5 articles total. 2 of which got huffed by VFD, ICU, and NRV. The 2 that were huffed were ATX, and Eloise. You can visit those old articles at Uncyclopedia Mirror Site. They let me keep Meta Knight, Cornholio and Classical. Remember, I am more of a contributer and an editor. DJ Mixerr 02:37, January 20, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

UPDATE!!!!!: The ACTUAL TOTAL is 40 articles! Including my self-created articles (not any of the redirects) & my signature. DJ Mixerr 02:37, January 20, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Pee Review

Thank you for your pee review. While I disagree with you on the score (there must be a way to push the total past 50, there must be) I must say I agree with your conclusions. I will send over the money and whores we discussed earlier, they will love you long time and give you money. But seriously, wondering if you were serious, I'm very glad you liked the page. I do too. It started out as an UnBooks, but hey, there was no page named "Snow Angels" so I just moved it over. Thanks very much again. Aleister 00:38 26-1-'11

You're welcome. I was more than glad to give it a Pee Review. I'm very glad also!! DJ Mixerr 00:41, January 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Hey... it's good that you have come around to reviewing, but please, could you try to be more in depth in the future? Neither of the two you did so far really were, and as such I must ask you to please, reread the guidelines. Just saying an article could use more work is usually of little use - if the person didn't think their article could use more work, they probably would not have requested a review, unless they're trying to get past the self-nom regulation on VFH, but even then the articles could still use work. What they want to/might as well know is what needs more work, what parts, what overall, and why. If possible, suggestions as to how tend to be quite useful as well... if you can do that, it tends to make reviews much more useful, especially when giving low scores. Usually the lower the score, the more that should be said in that particular section, for that matter.

On the other hand, your review of Aleister's article was quite the opposite - which it is lovely that you liked his article, and it is indeed a rather good one, but even if you do like an article, there is still usually something to be said. Even the best usually still have some ways in which they can be improved. If you cannot think of enough to say, however, then why review it at all? You can just take it to VFH, or leave it in case someone else might have more to say...

Mind, I'm not trying to scare you away or anything, but perhaps you can say more in the future? You may also want to look at reviews other users have done for examples - the steel kidneys are supposedly good reviewers, and some of them keep lists, so perhaps reading some of those might help, too. Good luck, and cheers. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 02:00, 26 January 2011

OK. I know what you're saying I'll read this. DJ Mixerr 02:02, January 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
OK. I'll read this. DJ Mixerr 02:04, January 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
While Lyrithya gives good advice here, some of it is based on Lyrith's disbelief that there could be a perfect article, with nothing to say about it. If Lyrithya had reviewed the page the review would have probably looked something like yours. Maybe word for word, score for score. Did you enjoy the whores, and the money they gave you? I hope so. Good. Thanks again. Aleister 2:14 26-1-'11

You both are right. I enjoyed the whores and the money you gave me. We all love $!!! I had an incredibly swell time. It was the adomination of swell. DJ Mixerr 23:47, January 27, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Socky was kind enough to nom Snow Angels on vfh (the code is broken on the normal nom method, seems nobody knows when it will be fixed. Socky knows some secret back-door) and, of course, I highlighted your kind pee review, which was fun. Thanks again. Aleister 00:17 28-1-'11
p.s. The whores told me they had a great time, and I see that the check was cashed. Glad you had fun. You should use that expression "adomination of swell" somewhere, it's an interesting phrase (I just googled it, you are the first to use it, at least in net-recorded history).
You're welcome. I did because I felt as if I needed to give back to the Uncyclopedia Community after all the years. Anyway, I had fun. I wish I could make it go over 50 also. Glad it made it to VFH. DJ Mixerr 00:23, January 28, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Really? I didn't know that. That's odd. I thought some user would have said before on the net. DJ Mixerr 00:29, January 28, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)


Side Note

OK. I know what you're saying I'll read this. DJ Mixerr 02:02, January 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
OK. I'll read this. DJ Mixerr 02:04, January 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
While Lyrithya gives good advice here, some of it is based on Lyrith's disbelief that there could be a perfect article, with nothing to say about it. If Lyrithya had reviewed the page the review would have probably looked something like yours. Maybe word for word, score for score. Did you enjoy the whores, and the money they gave you? I hope so. Good. Thanks again. Aleister 2:14 26-1-'11
You both are right. I enjoyed the whores and the money you gave me. We all love $!!! I had an incredibly swell time. It was the adomination of swell. DJ Mixerr 23:47, January 27, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Socky was kind enough to nom Snow Angels on vfh (the code is broken on the normal nom method, seems nobody knows when it will be fixed. Socky knows some secret back-door) and, of course, I highlighted your kind pee review, which was fun. Thanks again. Aleister 00:17 28-1-'11
p.s. The whores told me they had a great time, and I see that the check was cashed. Glad you had fun. You should use that expression "adomination of swell" somewhere, it's an interesting phrase (I just googled it, you are the first to use it, at least in net-recorded history).
You're welcome. I did because I felt as if I needed to give back to the Uncyclopedia Community after all the years. Anyway, I had fun. I wish I could make it go over 50 also. Glad it made it to VFH. DJ Mixerr 00:23, January 28, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Really? I didn't know that. That's odd. I thought some user would have said before on the net. DJ Mixerr 00:29, January 28, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

2,000

Woohoo! I made over 2,000 edits here on Uncyclopedia! DJ Mixerr 01:48, January 29, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Counter-strike

Would you care to explain why you restored, in its entirety, an article that went through VFD and was subsequently deleted as a result of that vote -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 04:11, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Because I felt as if were an article that needed to be restored. It was that epic. I promise not to restore a VFD article again. DJ Mixerr 04:35, February 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Well, if you ever feel that way again, you can restore it to your userspace -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:07, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
You're right!! I forgot about that. Thx!! DJ Mixerr 22:45, February 2, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Review

Care to explain why you added this to QVFD? --ChiefjusticePS2 11:05, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

Well, the article was deleted so I thought the Pee Review had to be deleted along with it. DJ Mixerr 17:30, February 5, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
No, since the review is done by someone completely different, the review stays even if the article is gone simply to recognise the fact someone made the effort to do a review, it would be unfair just to delete that as well. --ChiefjusticePS2 17:53, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
Ah, I now understand what you're trying to say. I wouldn't want all my efforts, edits, and contributions to go to waste. It would be very unfair to delete any Pee Review as well. Thank you, DJ Mixerr 17:58, February 5, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions) .

Bermuda

Can you explain to me why you created Bermuda with the contents of I Fucking Hate the Bermuda Triangle? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:30, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

I felt it should stay up because it was listed in the Top 10 of 2005. It was Cream of The Crap, I know. That's why. DJ Mixerr 02:41, February 27, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
No, I Fucking Hate the Bermuda Triangle was in the Top 10 of 2005. Bermuda was not. Nobody is going to delete I Fucking Hate the Bermuda Triangle don't worry. There was absolutely no reason to copy the contents of one page to a different page. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:46, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
I thought there would be a reason to copy it on to another article and create one. OK! I understand. I made an unnecessary article creation. No, I will not put it into my userpages because the article, Bermuda, is not worthy of existence to move to any userpage I would have created. DJ Mixerr 02:55, February 27, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
This won't happen again. 02:58, February 27, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Alright. I'm glad we were able to work this out. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:59, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
I'm also glad, too, that we could work this out together. DJ Mixerr 03:03, February 27, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Award(s) from UN:REQ

Thumbs up2

This user created Warner Music Group, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Thumbs up2

This user created Konami, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Thumbs up2

This user created Emma Goldman, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Thumbs up2

This user created Fisher-Price (company), an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Thumbs up2

This user created Shinji Ikari, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Awards...wait no, not awards

Urinating fountain

I just peed on something you wrote. I apologize profusely for that.

I'll attempt to control my bladder in the future. No promises though

This should be able to at least get that ICU off of your article. Jackofspades (talk) 00:10, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I hope this Pee Review will be able to get that ICU off of my article. DJ Mixerr 03:55, March 11, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Really. I hope it does. DJ Mixerr 23:05, March 11, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

About Jonathan Huang's image

This image is not a real image, it's because what I know about the real image. 189.81.8.152 03:18, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

And... I can put the real image of Jonathan?? 189.81.8.152 03:24, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

If you have the real image, you have to sign up to upload images. Remember, you agree to license submissions under CCSAL. DJ Mixerr 03:34, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
But I have the real image of Jonathan, I had searched about the image of Jonathan on his Twitter account... But... He had deleted the his image (sorry of my english, it's because what I'm brazilian). =D 189.81.8.152 03:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
I'll tell you again. As I said before, make an account and upload it if you want to. Remember, you have to sign up and have an account to upload images. Also remember, You agree to license submissions under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0. Please note that all contributions to Uncyclopedia are considered to be released under the Creative Commons SA License. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION! This is very important information. DJ Mixerr 02:16, March 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

If you have the real image, good for you! DJ Mixerr 03:34, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
189.81.8.152, I am glad to see you've joined us here on Uncyclopedia. BTW I saw your image. DJ Mixerr 17:58, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

WoW!!

I can't believe I made over 2,000 edits in a 2 year (2 1/2) time span. DJ Mixerr 03:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Those votes

Are long over dude. You aren't changing anything. Jackofspades (talk) 06:55, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

My bad. I've been up since 7:00 (CST) and I feel stupid. Really I have. DJ Mixerr 07:07, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Funny that you mention that those votes are long over because User:Roman Dog Bird had voted after March 1. DJ Mixerr 07:07, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
It ended on the fourth. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 20:10, 12 March 2011
Thank you very much, Lyrithya. DJ Mixerr 21:58, March 13, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
M'kay. Thanx. DJ Mixerr 02:18, March 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Those votes are long over.

Those votes are long over dude. You aren't changing anything. Jackofspades (talk) 06:55, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

My bad. I've been up since 7:00 (CST) and I feel stupid. Really I have. /facepalm DJ Mixerr 07:07, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
It ended on the fourth. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 20:10, 12 March 2011
Thank you very much, Lyrithya. DJ Mixerr 21:58, March 13, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Thanx.

M'kay. Thanx. DJ Mixerr 02:18, March 26, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Worst 100 Lists

I know that the Worst 100 is in a shit state. The Worst 100 list has 91 entries and we need 9 more entries. So overall, That's why I said what I said. (I wish people would add their Worst 100 lists to the template. Mine aren't that good.)

Anyway, Here is list of my Worst 100 that I've thought up with myself and tedious contributions.

DJ Mixerr 00:40, March 28, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Deadline

When is the deadline for this? DJ Mixerr 03:55, March 8, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
The death of Uncyclopedia. —DCCLXXVII (complaintsresumeMUNPcg logoUC-Army-OF1dWPUMFGoogHelpAWAWA) 14:08, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Seriously? When is the deadline? DJ Mixerr 07:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
I'm serious, the "competition" goes to the end of Uncyclopedia's existence, whenby whichever article has the most votes will be the user-decided winner. —DCCLXXVII (complaintsresumeMUNPcg logoUC-Army-OF1dWPUMFGoogHelpAWAWA) 04:47, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
I think it's fair to say we've reached a census. I think that the Don't some work article has 10 votes, so it might win. Also I think it's time to nominate The Best Article of All Time on Forum:Best Article of All Time. DJ Mixerr 01:17, April 7, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
I think it's about time. DJ Mixerr 01:26, April 7, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
Closing the competition before the end of Uncyclopedia would be breaking the rules, I'm TRYING TO GET THIS THROUGH YOUR 3m-THICK SKULLBONE, THE COMPETION NEVER ENDS DESPITE CONSENSUS!!!!!!!!! —DCCLXXVII (complaintsresumeMUNPcg logoUC-Army-OF1dWPUMFGoogHelpAWAWA) 13:22, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
OK THAT'S ALL I NEEDED TO KNOW!!!!! /facepalm DJ Mixerr 01:19, April 8, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
/facepalm DJ Mixerr 17:51, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

/facepalm

/facepalm DJ Mixerr 17:51, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

This means I asked a really stupid question and/or I messed up badly on editing an article. DJ Mixerr 17:54, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)
It can also mean just edits too. DJ Mixerr 17:59, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

What I do.

I am just a contributer and an editor. Similar to a janitor. That's all and nothing more. DJ Mixerr 22:30, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Requested Articles

Requested Articles I have made are the following:

DJ Mixerr 22:37, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Thanks and...

more thanks for voting for Tombstone. Been a long time on the VFH list, and it's getting cobwebs just sitting there. Appreciated. And I forgot about your Emma Goldman page! Gonna have to read that one again very soon. Emma! Thanks again, and it's good to see you around. Aleister 23:21 9-4-'11

You are definitely welcome! Been a long time since I casted a vote on VFH. Please read my Emma Goldman article. It's getting cobwebs just sitting there as well. Emma Goldman is waiting for an award to be given toward her article. It's great to see you also, Aleister. DJ Mixerr 23:30, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

you're welcome!

You are definitely welcome, Aleister! I was glad to have been of aiding help. It has been a long time since I casted a vote on VFH. Tombstone article is marvelously great for the VFH. It's good to see you around also. DJ Mixerr 23:30, April 9, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

2,500

Whoo hoo!. Yay! I made over 2,500 edits. DJ Mixerr 01:41, April 10, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Chan

I don't see any reason why not to have it. Just saying. --Tophat headless 02:58, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

OK. Thanx. DJ Mixerr 17:46, April 16, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Slowness

I apologize for the slowness of my edits and responses. For some odd reason, Uncyclopedia is taking 2 minutes to load instead of 20 seconds. I am trying to get that fixed. WHAT A PAIN IN THE ASS! DJ Mixerr 19:29, April 17, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Patience plz

I will try to respond to you if I can. I won't be quick about responding and editing articles because Uncyclopedia is taking 2 minutes to load instead of 20 seconds. I am trying to get that fixed. I know. This really SUCKS!!! WHAT A PAIN IN THE ASS! DJ Mixerr 21:36, April 17, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Archive

Today, I will be making my second archive. So don't freak out if everything is gone. I will try to respond to you if I can. I won't be quick about responding and editing articles because Uncyclopedia is taking 2 minutes to load instead of 20 seconds. I am trying to get that fixed. This really SUCKS!!! Again, I know. WHAT A PAIN IN THE ASS! DJ Mixerr 21:36, April 17, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)


This sucks!

This really SUCKS!!! Again, I know. WHAT A PAIN IN THE ASS! DJ Mixerr 21:38, April 17, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

Personal tools
projects