User talk:Cremationist

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Welcome!

Hello, Cremationist, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. Again, welcome!  -- Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 14:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Tanks Cremationist 14:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

edit Welcome back Beezwax

Way to work around the ban lol. Why are you so uptight man, the Conservapedia page is only a joke. How old are you anyways? You take this site way too seriously.

I am (cough) over a hundred years old sonny and I've (cough) lost my sense of (cough) humor. Heeheeheeheee! If the page is just a (cough) joke, then why make such a (cough) deal about my changes (cough)?? Cremationist 15:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

You're not 100, more like 14. I'm not making a big deal about your changes but the original was funnier, thats why I had to revert it.

Older than 14 sonny. Lot older. And why is the "conservative rant" version funnier than the liberal rant version? Because it's so accurate? Cremationist 16:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, so you are 15, i was off by a year. The "conservative rant" is just funnier because it is more well written. Conservapedia is extremely biased and Uncyclopedia's article on Conservapedia makes light of it.

So is Wikipedia, but are we going to make light of that? NOOO! Only go after conservative rednecks for being biased; nevermind the liberals!! Cremationist 20:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
And no, I'm not fifteen. You're still way off. Cremationist 20:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I make fun of liberals too, such as feminists, pacifists, and bleeding hearts who think criminals should be coddled. They are fair game the same way conservatives and creationists are. I'm an equal opportunity offender. I might be considered left of center but i'm not a rigid ideologue with no sense of humour, lighten up dude.

Yah, and I like to make fun of bleeding hearts who think Mexicans should be treated like babies (amnesty), which sadly includes Bush now. If you notice, I'm not so rigid myself (I uploaded an image of Igor and put, "President Bush in his true form" underneath). Hee hee! Cremationist 01:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
And I love making fun of Godzilla...I can't think of how to satirize Rodan, but I'm pretty sure you could give me some ideas...I know I could say "Rodan is a rubber chicken with wires inside, that likes to masquerade as a giant pteradactyl." And I wrote that whole article on Zilla, making fun of Toho's narrowmindedness. Cremationist 01:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't have a problem with giving most illegals amnesty, (except criminals, they don't get it). I mean who can blame Mexicans for wanting to live in America, Mexico sucks, if America won't take them, tell them to come up to Canada :P

That's the problem with most of the Mexicans who come up to America, a lot of them are criminals and drug smugglers. Yeah, I wish they'd skip the U.S. and go to Canada, don't know why they aren't already doing that. Maybe America is more appealing to them

So why do you have it out for liberals anyways? They're not so bad, we all aren't atheists who practise sodomy.

I'm aware of that. SO why do so many on here have it out for conservatives? We're not all redneck uneducated bumpkins! Cremationist 04:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Are you really conservative or do you just think you are? Politics are so much more complicated than liberal and conservative. There isn't really too much difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. They are both controlled by corporations and do not help the common man. I think the entire political system is corrupt to the core. Liberal vs. Conservative is a false dicotomy set up by both parties to keep people fighting each other and to allow them to get away with all their crimes. Like the old saying goes Divide and Conqour. Americans have more in common with one another then what is different. I think if people knew what the Bush administration was up to then they would be outraged. He betrays conservatism by running up a huge deficit and going to war with Iraq on false pretenses. Even conservatives oppose Bush's regime.

They're not false pretenses. Remember the 2001 terrorist attacks? We're trying to get rid of terrorism. Now, what I do oppose about the Bush Administration is the fact that they're trying to get a "super-highway" from Mexico into the U.S., which would open up the door for loads of drugs and crap to come in. Not to mention Dragons Cremationist 18:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

He never went to Afghanistan under false pretenses but Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Yes, Saddam was a bastard but it is the Iraqis job to overthrow him, not the west. American shouldn't have supported him in the first place (remember the 80s). There are plenty of things to oppose Bush about including; record deficits, no health coverage for 44 million Americans, no border security, the war on Iraq, vetoing the bill on stem cells, teaching creationism, phone tapping, and the Patriot Act.

You can take "teaching creationism" off your list. Creationism has just as much right to be taught as evolution, whether or not some people think it's true. As for vetoeing stem cells, just what kind? I'm pretty sure he was vetoing the embryonic stem cells, which would save the lives of hundreds of young innocents. Cremationist 13:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Creationism isn't science but we won't get into that right now, there are much more pressing issues going on in the Bush regime. Invasion of Iraq and invading people's privacy are two pressing issues. As well as putting America deeper in debt. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are three dangerous individuals.

And I suppose you think Hillary will solve all our problems and then everyone will be happy, like the Littlest Elf! Cremationist 17:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

No, I don't think the Democrats will solve all our problems but they are a hell of a lot better than what we have in their now. I'd prefer Al Gore or Obama to Hilary. Hilary is too authoritarian. She wants to ban Grand Theft Auto.

Personal tools