User talk:ChiefjusticeDS

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 547: Line 547:
::It's fine, though; I mostly just like making a big deal out of nothing. As you may have noticed. <Small>And I had to try.</small> And fine. I'll go review something. Happy? {{User:Lyrithya/sig/6}} <font style="color: #c99; font-size:6px;"> -- 20101008 - 16:27 (UTC)</font>
::It's fine, though; I mostly just like making a big deal out of nothing. As you may have noticed. <Small>And I had to try.</small> And fine. I'll go review something. Happy? {{User:Lyrithya/sig/6}} <font style="color: #c99; font-size:6px;"> -- 20101008 - 16:27 (UTC)</font>
:::It means I can put them in the tables and they get a fancy userbox, it's a big incentive scheme and lets me know who to bother if I want reviews doing. Also yes, I'm thrilled. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 16:45, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
:::It means I can put them in the tables and they get a fancy userbox, it's a big incentive scheme and lets me know who to bother if I want reviews doing. Also yes, I'm thrilled. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 16:45, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
::::Don't you usually wind up putting them in tables anyway? <Small>Although the whom to bother bit is a good point, assuming it even works.</small>
::::Well, don't be. I was going to do it anyway, seeing as that I said I would... er... yesterday. I should really get on that, shouldn't I... {{User:Lyrithya/sig/6}} <font style="color: #c99; font-size:6px;"> -- 20101008 - 17:13 (UTC)</font>

Revision as of 17:13, October 8, 2010


Archive #1, Archive #2, Archive #3, Archive #4, Archive #5, Archive #6, Archive #7

Chief's token video of the moment

Hi, you are reading the preamble on the talk page of ChiefjusticeDS. Feel free to leave him comments, views, opinions, cake, and more. Be polite, civil and generally a lovely person and we will get along just fine.

New comments at the bottom where everyone can find them (especially ChiefjusticeDS)

Also if you leave a message and it needs a response it will most likely end up here, although it could wind up on your talk page, it all depends on the alignment of the stars.

I'm just gonna leave this here

And hi. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 08:23, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

New and improved template

How's this?


Is it better, or does it need more work?--Metalguitar666 17:17, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

I made some changes, how do they look? --ChiefjusticePSX 17:27, August 26, 2010 (UTC)


So ChiefjusticeDS, I was wondering if you can popularise my templates that I've made and put it on articles/usernames, please? If you do, I'll write a good article about you. --Metalguitar666 20:27, August 26, 2010 (UTC)Metalguitar666

There's a name for this sort of request ... er ... whaling? No, no, not quite ... whistling? wheeling? It's on the tip of my tongue ... MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[20:32 26 Aug 2010]
Oh, shoot, I know exactly what you mean. You're right, I think it is a "wh" word; it's just not coming to mind. Well, while I think of it, I'm off to go reread my new articles, Brittany Hensel and Bag of dicks. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:42, August 26, 2010 (UTC)


I left a comment on his talk page for that reason. But I guess I can wait for his response... I guess I'm way too impatient. --HM (T) 06:35, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I saw. We hates HELPME, we hates him so much. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:37, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Spam filter

Hey Chief. I was trying to archive Ban Patrol, and the spam filter popped up because one of the account's had Papa's name. Could you revert me and then archive it? Saberwolf116 15:23, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

The same thing happened to me when I tried to archive QVFD- I asked Mordillo about it.--HM (T) 16:48, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
It's because of the spam regex that rejects the term, if a page has that name in it then you will have to request that an administrator does the archiving. --ChiefjusticePSX 17:29, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
It looks like we can't do anything on the page as long as his name is on there. Looks like you're going to have to take over 'chiving for the rest of 39, Chief. Saberwolf116 06:22, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
I've sorted it out, you should be able to archive again now. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:41, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

I thought you should know...

...that I fucked your sister last night, and maybe kinda sorta got her pregnant. Anywho, nice weather huh? —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 04:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Gutted, she has AIDS and all. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:41, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

This may seem like a strange request...

But if I try to do any more pee reviews for awhile, could you please ban me? ~ Pointy (talk) (stalk) -- 20100829 - 15:48 (UTC)

As much as I love banning people, why? --ChiefjusticePSX 15:49, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
Because I keep doing it. I need to stop! And I have no willpower. ~ Pointy (talk) (stalk) -- 20100829 - 18:40 (UTC)
Wow, just wow...--Poiz, ABOUT ME I love uncyclopedia games. I also experiment in the sandbox. I almost never make pages, though (exept if they are my subpages). 22:48, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


this and I won't put my foot up your ass to the point you'll feel like you've been raped 10 times.--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 00:53, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Reset an article's rating?

Hello! I'm wondering if it's possible to reset an article's rating. The Salsa (music) article was previously marked for rewrite. I've since rewritten it completely (and submitted it for Pee Review) but the low article rating reflects the previous version. Thanks! —Tonillero (hecklestalk) 02:08, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

I dont think its possible. You can go on different computers and give it good ratings. Otherwise, theres nothing to be done, that i know of.--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:12, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
You cannot reset an article's rating though I wouldn't suggest you get too worked up about it, I personally have never paid attention to it, and nor should you. Write your best and people will tell you what they think. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:36, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
CJDS, would it reset an article's rating if you copied the content to the Windows clipboard, deleted the article, and re-pasted? (Not that I'm suggesting you do that, because it would delete the edit history, but I'm curious.) Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 16:50, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Yes I suppose it would, but I wouldn't do it, it's a pretty asinine thing to do considering nobody cares about the rating anyway, not even you and you have no life. --ChiefjusticePSX 17:14, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
I have a rich and fulfilling life!! Why, just yesterday, I tried to write a sequel to "Don't Fear the Reaper" and accidentally stuck my finger up a dog's ass! These events were unrelated. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 17:24, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
At least it was only your finger this time... --ChiefjusticePSX 17:27, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Did You Know?

Theodore Roosevelt had a pet bear while President? It was on my Snapple cap so it has to be true. --John Lydon 15:04, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Last time I drank a Snapple, it said "That John Lydon guy is really into you. Don't lead him on; that would be mean." I was surprised. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 16:53, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Oddly specific..... Yet you still led me on for weeks. And it was mean. Snapple is wise indeed. --John Lydon 18:44, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
The articles are Pedobear and Pedobear sidebar. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:07, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Justine Bieber

Hey Chief. I just saw the current Justin Bieber page and I remembered seeing something slightly better at Justine Bieber, which has apparently disappeared. Maybe it was moved or redirected and later deleted, I'm not sure. Could you check the deleted revisions and try to find out what exactly happened? Thanks in advance. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:07, 31 August 2010

It was huffed by TKF on July 28th as Vanity. He is the person to speak to about it if you want to have it restored. --ChiefjusticePSX 18:20, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Tosh

He's a comedian here in the States. Not sure if that makes any difference in regards to that article's quality or not (didn't see it before you huffed it), but maybe the ban should be shortened. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:28, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Bloody yanks... and yeah I suppose it should be. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:29, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sucking balls

Series 7, 8, and that made-for-Dave mini series they're apparently qualifying as series 9 suck monumental amounts of balls. This is an established fact. Example 1: in series 6, the time drive moves them in time but not space, so they drink in the heady air of pre-renaissance deep space. In episode 1 of series 7, they mend the time drive (ignoring the fact this would mend the time line and allow their future selves to continue to exist and so attack and kill them and oh no I've gone crosseyed) and suddenly they can travel back to Dallas. On Earth. And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole fucking point that they're trying to get back to Earth? How many fucking stupid inconsistencies do you want in one episode? and as for Chloe Annette's pain in the fucking arse Kochanski... The best thing to come out of those last series was the "Can't Smeg Won't Smeg" promotional thing they did on BBC2's Red Dwarf night when they pissed Ainsley Harriot right off. Oh, and that Ace Rimmer bit with the princess Bonjela - that was OK. Apart from that, they sucked. You know this to be true. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:36, Sep 1

Series 7 and 8 aren't so bad, I especially like the renewed chemistry between Rimmer and Lister in the eighth series. I agree the plot holes are absolutely massive and make no sense and the only good thing about "Back to Earth" was the bit where Rimmer pushes the female hologram in front of a bus. My love for series 7 and 8 is not for the resolutions they reach at the end, as I couldn't agree more it is exceptionally disappointing and doesn't really finish anything, but the Rimmer song, the tank in Pride and Prejudice world, the bit with Ace Rimmer and princess Bonjela and the illegal hooch drinking in prison are still the sort of thing I always watched Red Dwarf for. Also yes, I would have preferred if Kochanski hadn't come back, as I much prefer the 4 others bumbling their way through deep space, but she was more a mechanism for allowing more jokes. The time drive thing appeared with more potential than I suspect they anticipated when they did the gag about pre-renaissance space. Still funny and worth watching in their own right, but they didn't end well and yes the plot holes are a big sack of smeg. --ChiefjusticePSX 11:47, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
It's not just the plot holes - they lost sight of the characters, for me, and the comedy became a lot more hit and miss. You can basically tell that it passed from writers who created it and cared about the characters and the entity as a whole, to a group of writers who just viewed it as a platform for their own gags. The history, for them, was an inconvenience, and they tried to reference it clumsily to "prove" they understood the series. But honestly, there were times when I felt I was watching a completely different series. Kochanski was a good example of this - to go from Claire Grogan's feisty lass that you could easily believe Lister falling for to Chloe Annette's humourless stuck-up mothering type that Lister wouldn't have touched with a barge pole... I couldn't suspend my disbelief enough to buy any of that. Basically, the moment series 7 started, Red Dwarf jumped the shark, for me, and the occasional glimmer of former glories was nowhere near enough to save it. I hope like hell that series 10 will get back to where it belongs, but I'm not holding my breath. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:06, Sep 1
Since Rob Grant left the writing team I think they've been seriously lacking in the humour department. From reading their solo efforts it seems to me that Doug Naylor is better at coming up with interesting science fiction concepts, while Rob Grant's strength is the comedy. The later episodes, produced without input from Grant, always had decent premises but humour-wise were derivative. Oh, and sorry to barge in like this. --Black Flamingo 17:37, September 1, 2010 (UTC
Oh dear. You're all wrong. Dave explains at the start of series 7 that when they destroyed the time drive they destroyed themselves (and in series 6 they explain that the time drive can catapult them to any point in space as well - with the short jump that they do when they first back in time but still drifting in space.) That put them in an alternate pocket dimension as they created a time-space paradox as the universe could no longer exist. They were also aware of the ramifications of using the time drive hence they could only use it for really responsible things, like going back to earth and purchasing a gigantic load of curries. Series 6 was the peak of the show, without a doubt, although Gunman and Backwards are still the best two episodes. The last scene of series 8 nearly didn't exist. The idea was that they were going to leave Rimmer in the ship as it destroyed and that was the end of the show. The last bit with Death was tacked on as a last minute addition (and I have a feeling it may have been Ed Bye in the Death suit, but I could be wrong.) Series 7 and 8 had some definite highlights - Rimmer world and Pride and prejudice world jump to mind. The biggest issue is Clair Grogan not coming back to do Kochanski - Chloe Annette was good, but the wrong person to fit out that character, and as such they had to lose some of the essential Daveness from Dave. Beyond a joke couldn't have been said to have been written by someone who didn't have the heart of the show - it was written by Robert Llewellyn, who doesn't have enough vowels. Series 9, on the other hand, was a mistake. Couple of cute concepts but Danny just couldn't be the cat that we'd all come to love any more - too many years had passed. But I will defend series 7 and 8 as valid aspects of the Dwarf series - including can't smeg won't smeg, and the mastermind challenge - as definite parts of the continuum. As for plot holes - for a comedy series it still has less plot holes than Star Trek Voyager, which I still think was an idea stolen from Red Dwarf. Hey, even the woman who played the role of the cat in the first ill-fated American Red Dwarf pilot episode was stolen to play Dax in Deep Space Nine!                               Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 21:48, Sep 1 2010 UTC
Hmmm, you must be talking about the Australian version or something, that's the only way to account for all that wrongness. --Black Flamingo 11:44, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
In the words of Kryten in the commentary on the Smeg Ups "We got it wrong. Okay?!"                               Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Friday, 00:14, Sep 3 2010 UTC


That article you just ICU'd? The writer deleted the ICU tag that was put on it beforehand, and I was just trying to find the edit he did it in, only to see that you had put a new ICU tag on it. The funny thing is, they both were the same sub. Anyway, this is just a useless message and stuff.--HM (T) 18:11, September 2, 2010 (UTC)


You should warn people before you ban them. Gomphog 20:27, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Further advice: You should always warn people before you have sex with them. Apparently, there are laws about making it a surprise. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:49, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry Gomphog, perhaps you could advise me on all other aspects of the thing I do that you don't. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:00, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
I think Mowgli was well aware of what he was doing, he incited Chief to give him a ban and that's just what he got, if he wants to be unbanned he can visit IRC and apologise. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:14, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Further advice

Perhaps you should accept the fact that genitalia and kitchen appliances should never mix. On a less flippant note, what has happened to the PEE request queue? I'll admit I've been on semi-hiatus and have neglected it, but that is a significant backlog. Back to other original point, the one exception to ther rule is the ice-cream scoop that I have with what I am assured is a very pleasantly shaped handle.                               Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Friday, 11:36, Sep 3 2010 UTC

Not wanting to pester...

But is there a possibility of considering this guys ban. He has been here quite a while (longer than you and me) and he contributed a pretty good article recently. I looked over the conversation, quite frankly it looked like quite a bit of goading and pissing this guy about was taking place - it's not really surprising he tried to stand up for himself. I'd be pretty pissed of some Brits and a Yank were patronizing me in that way. Quite frankly, it looks 'nasty', if you get my meaning. Peace:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:26, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

I did not patronise him once, I told him to shut up and get a grip, as I would tell anyone behaving poorly. I do not have to put up with someone who refuses to toe the line that everyone else must. I also do not care what his contributions are beyond saying it is a shame he could not behave. I had had a poor day, he had the misfortune to goad me into banning him indefinitely on such a day. I will not reconsider his ban, I regret that this is unacceptable to you. --ChiefjusticePSX 14:19, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I wasn't "grinding" him...I was joking around and he decided to yell at me for it. Hold on. Could you try to find one line I said that insulted him in any way before he was blocked? I'll apologize for anything I said, but he had no right to act like that.--HM (T) 16:55, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Why?:You Should Never Mess with the Space Time Continuum

I made changes to it and take up some of you're advice. It's looking good and is on VFH.

Also, I think it's reasonable to give you this

GoldenShower Rejoice, ChiefjusticeDS! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Once again, thanks--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 17:18, September 4, 2010 (UTC)


why are you deleting my changes? --Md Terigandfati Akhtar 18:57, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

They have generally been of quite a poor standard i.e. old jokes, jokes that do not fit the article, my recommendation is that you read HTBFANJS to find out the sort of humour that is seen a lot here and how to edit in line with existing humour. I hope this makes things clearer. --ChiefjusticePSX 19:01, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
OK. I'll try posting high standard. But please ask me before delete. --Md Terigandfati Akhtar 19:06, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
HTFANS does not say about racist joke that is acceptable. Where can i find policy for that? --Md Terigandfati Akhtar 19:08, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
There really isn't one. All content is judged based on how funny it is, so if you think it will improve the "funny" factor, go for it. The worst that can happen is you being reverted.--HM (T) 19:11, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
racism is a sensitive subject. there should be a guideline for it. i agree with you that "reverting" and "re-reverting" is a good check of something's acceptability (or it's 'funny' factor). but that sounds like meeting the issue half way. what do you do when your images get deleted and you cannot recreate them (no history)? --Md Terigandfati Akhtar 18:41, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Cajek's List

I would like to help out updating Cajek's list, but was told I should ask you first. So here I am!--Some_idiot.png 23:35, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

It's fine by me providing you know what you are doing, be sure to ask if you are unsure about anything. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:11, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Huffing "Hit-Girl"

Can you please put the page back up? I was honestly working on it, and if you have a look at my Talk page, you'll see I did ask for help on it. I saw the page neede creation when I had a look at the Kick-Ass page, and as such created it. I put a lot of work into it, and would be ever so greatful if you were to restore it, or possibly help re-make it. Yours Sincerely, {LoL}[PHS/3Li] FO-SHIZZLE! 03:34, September 6, 2010 (UTC).

Reversion please

Hey. Just got a vandal going through and replacing about 50 odd pages and creating another 20 odd. He's been added to BP and the changes have been either undone or the created pages have been added to qvfd. Are you able to do a reversion so that it doesn't show either the original changes or the undo-ing done as a result of this one?                               Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Monday, 06:31, Sep 6 2010 UTC

I can only delete the pages and only admins can see the deleted revisions of a page. I cannot hide the page history nor can I hide specific parts of the history. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:37, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
sorry, I was under the impression that reverting pages was the same as undoing but erased the history of the change as well. My mistake.                               Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Monday, 08:13, Sep 6 2010 UTC
Technically, Chief, you can delete the page, and then only restore the revisions up to before his changes... --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:57, Sep 6
True, but, I was both having difficulty understanding what POTR was after and I didn't see the point. --ChiefjusticePSX 09:05, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Oh, I wasn't suggesting you actually do it, just showing that occasionally I do know something. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:07, Sep 6
I wasn't suggesting that much effort - the idea was if it was single click to wipe out history of IP being here and being a dick. Otherwise it's a case of him being able to come back and say "see what I did" or setting up external links to his artwork. But no big deal - all's well that ends well. And you are both still wrong about the sucking thing from earlier - I may not be an admin but I know my Dwarfology.                               Puppy's talk page00:40, June 5, 2009 Monday, 12:35, Sep 6 2010 UTC

Battle of the killers

Mind putting to my user space--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 20:02, September 6, 2010 (UTC)


Stop reviving yourself, -_-' --Poiz, ABOUT ME I love uncyclopedia games. I also experiment in the sandbox. I almost never make pages, though (exept if they are my subpages). 22:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


FYI--No conflicts since my original report, but Amillicream, whom you told me you'd keep an eye on, tells Dexter111344 he is now Kremé. The preceding unsigned comment was added by SPIKE (talk • contribs)

What the fuck happened to my watchlist?

It's been replaced by followed pages which doesn't tell me when a page has been edited. What happened to the good old watchlist? --Wilytank 15:06, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

God saw what you were doing and decided to kill your watchlist instead of a kitten. Seriously. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 15:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Alternatively: it's still there, at Special:Watchlist, but Wikia have been changing shit and fucking that shit up. Again. So now you have to keep a link to it somewhere handy instead of having the link there automatically. This is because Wikia suck. See here for associated bitching. --UU - natter UU Manhole 15:10, Sep 8
I go straight to Wikia when I have complaints. Calling them idiots to their faces is so much better than doing it where they won't ever see it. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 15:13, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not telling him where to bitch, I'm telling him where other people, including me and you, have been bitching. So he can read the bitching. Bitch. --UU - natter UU Manhole 15:16, Sep 8
Bitch, I wrote bitch, bitch! And guys, look at what happens when you try hyperlinking... That auto-suggest is crappy! I want the old auto-suggest back!! MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 15:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Dittoes! I preferred the link at the top of every page, though I'm getting fast at typing Special:Watchlist into the search field. And tell 'em to pick "watch" or "follow" and stick with it. Didn't they back off this tinkering a couple months ago? Spıke Ѧ 15:18 8-Sep-10

What I've always done for a watchlist is link the pages to my user page, and then use the Related Changes link on the toolbox (left of us, over there somewhere) Aleister 15:20 8 9

Can we create a simple redirect so we don't have to type Special:Watchlist all the time? --Black Flamingo 17:16, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Is this the bitch fest? Because I can't find my God Damned tooth brush! I have been looking all fucking day and can't find it anywhere! Rabble Rabble Rabble!!! --John Lydon 18:13, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
In related news, I stole so many hamburgers that half of them spoiled before I could eat them! Robble Robble Robble!!! Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:51, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


I guess someone pretending to be me isn't the highest form of flattery but what do I do if someone links to my talk page via a fake user? I don't want to start deleting stuff or is it a matter of just breaking the link? Thanks --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:28, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Tell an admin and they will deal with it for you. If you break the link you will likely just encourage the user in question. --ChiefjusticePSX 09:02, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost - This is definitely not late; you're just drunk

MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 12:56, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Why'd you ban him?

Do you hate fun? Do you?! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:15, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

What is this thing you call fun? Sounds highly suspect to me. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:29, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
It's like having a warm ray of sunshine inside you. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:40, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Doesn't sound healthy either. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:54, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
It is! Fun is nougat for the soul. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:08, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
And shit is the caramel in my belly. I eat my own shit, basically. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:10, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Nonsense, who wants to have fun? It involves doing wasteful things like running about, taking pictures of each other being unproductive and being witty. No no no, observe, here I have created a pie chart dividing up admin time more effectively, this is far more interesting. It is divided into: Hi-jinks, Banning, Writing, Deleting and Tantrums. Here I can further divide hi-jinks into Capers, Japes and just larking about. It's just like fun, but with more maths and less sunlight. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:15, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Personally, I prefer to analyze humour. I get all of the intellectual stimulation of a good joke while completely missing its point. In this manner, it lets me to wallow in the putrid filth of my own superiority. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:23, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Ah, but maths is fun. Therefore, there is a flaw in your logic and you should now... er... something. But seriously, the guy was also fun. Like maths, but with more unexpected stuff. And less weirdness. But I'm not sure anything is as weird as maths... ~ Pointy (talk) (stalk) -- 20100909 - 22:33 (UTC)

Dear ChiefjusticeDS

I want to know what is happening with this Oscars page. Thre seems to be much hatered. Sincerely--LofA14

I am not aware of any underlying tension. I simply believe you disagree with GlobalTourniquet over the way the page should be. I recommend that you leave a message on the article's talk page explaining your point of view and see how he responds, since you both want the article to be amusing I see no reason why you cannot compromise over what each of you would like to see in it. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:53, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Okay then, just two questions:

1. How did you become involved in this "feud"? 2. Why do you undo my changes but not the changes of GlobalTourniquet? --LofA14

I am involved because I am an administrator and it is part of my job. I undo your changes because GlobalTourniquet is a more established user and I trust him to know the rules, you are also the one placing in the material that is causing the problem. All I am doing is reverting the article to how it was before you edited in order that you can pursue a proper discussion about why your material should be included. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:20, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

I may have just created an account, but I have been following Uncyclopedia for a while. It may have been funny in the beginning, but it's gone downhill. There are two reasons I believe for this: it has gotten too personal, and the only people who can contribute are the elites who have been from the start. This is why I made this account, to say that this user above me (LofA14) was trying to break those barriers by being unbiased and using common humor. He/She is both witty and original. Unfortunantly, he cannot so it alone. I am here to say that I believe in LofA14.

Right, so you are actually LofA14, but you think I am being oppressive by trying to encourage you to discuss a change you have made rather than letting you change something someone else feels is better another way. The main reason you think this is that I have reverted it so your changes do not appear and the version of the article that GlobalTourniquet, who initially wrote the article back in 2009 continues to appear. Is this about the sum of it? Also don't sockpuppet, especially as badly as this. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:25, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
It maketh me lol. --Not User:Matfen... honest. I'm merely an avid fangirl who found this page on chance whilst perusing the internets for Judge-Dredd related fanfiction/pr0n. 21:58, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
There must be some way we can get all the self-righteous new users to converge on Croatia. Spıke Ѧ 22:01 12-Sep-10

Pleasing planet

How to please your sense for article which will avoid yours NRV generosity on article Prijepolje? Worried citizen from another part of planet.

--Bx228 13:45, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

I will got suggestion til 19th of September, right ? Ai ? Thanks in forward

--Bx228 22:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

The best advice I can give you is that you read HTBFANJS carefully and use it to identify where you are going wrong. You can also have a look at some of our featured articles for an idea of how you should try and make your article look. --ChiefjusticePSX 22:33, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Danke Deutchland :) I'll try my best but please hold on deletion for a while please. Time is relative and don't pretend it isn't. :) --Bx228 06:42, September 14, 2010 (UTC)


This is the real LofA14. someone jacked my account and destroyed my reputation. any comments before this im sorry cause it wasn't me.

Appreciate Assistance, RE: Graphic Image

Hi, ChiefjusticeDS:

I've been searching for a full resolution image of the radio mic shown on the top of the following page for quite some time, with no luck. I'm hoping that you can alleviate this frustration!

You would make me a very happy camper if you would please give me any information you have in regard to the source of this image so that I can track it down. Any assistance you can provide is greatly appreciated. :O)

Thank you! JaZzCanary

My advice would be to email the original uploader of the image: Todd Lyons. When you are on his user page you should find a link in the left-hand side bar (under toolbox) that says email user and you can ask him directly. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:07, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! :O) Enjoy the rest of your day!


Keeps putting the same shit on three pages about a gun on cod4 and it has nothing to do with the article. Please take care of him (1 week ban might do it)--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 23:55, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Use ban patrol, that is after all what it is there for. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:35, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Tower of Terror

Thanks for the review, sir. I do agree on your comments regarding my article, but one thing that bugs me is HTBFANJS; it's a little hard to implement, although I did try to exert some effort in making an Uncyclopedia article about the Tower. Would you mind if you teach me some techniques on writing Uncyc pages?

I made the article since no one bothered to write it up and stuff, and as a reaction to the film based on it, of which I think of it as a little campy and underrated. Some of the characters in that film became an inside/personal joke to me, especially the little girl named Sally Shine, as well as Dewey the bellhop. Blakegriplingph 03:15, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to help you out. Since it is your article I would need you to tell me what sort of stuff you want written and also have a go at putting some stuff in yourself. I could then look over it and help you out as you ask. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:40, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
Sure. Anything that sounds good or subtly hilarious will be nice. I'll try making some photoshopped images if necessary. Oh, and by the way, you might also consider helping me edit this page, too. Blakegriplingph 06:54, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
Let's sort one before we start with others. The first thing you need to do is look at the Tower of Terror article and decide what you want the concept of the article to be; are we sticking with the present concept (it's a big super powered defence emplacement) or are we parodying the wikipedia article on the same? --ChiefjusticePSX 07:23, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure about it. The idea for the ToT being a powered sentry seems fine, but parodying Wiki's article about it is also a good idea. IDK if a hybrid of the two concepts may work. As for Sally, I'm currently reading some pages about Shirley Temple, as well as a few deceased actors, for inspiration. Oh, and mind if I ask for your MSN or any instant messaging addresses? Blakegriplingph 07:27, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
If you need to talk to me you can use the Uncyclopedia IRC, you can usually find me on there when I am online, just go here and then use one of the options there to connect to the IRC. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:48, September 14, 2010 (UTC)


Thanks for the review, Chief. I'll try and work on the article as soon as possible, but I'll be trying to do some reviews for Pee Week, so it may be a bit hard to fix everything straight away. Thanks again!--Some_idiot.png (CUN) 20:48, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

My review on babies

I just want to know something. I do admit to being confused about the article, but i did still give advise on how to improve whatever it was supposed to be.

Now if you reviewed an article on something that was nearly the EXACT REPLICA of another, how you you do it? I don't mean this as a snoby sentence i mean literally, how the hell are you supposed to do that.

To add on top of that the original article was FEATURED.

So seriously, what the hell did i do... Or more importantly not do?

This is on the artilce. Is it morally acceptable to have babies debate thingy. --Happymonkey39 LAZARWeegeeheadbobinDomo kun dance1 Dah Meme Master 23:53, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

My main problem was not with the content of what you said more the incoherent style of the review and that you weren't particularly constructive, when you say stuff like this: "This is the first time im ever actually able to COUNT the amount of jokes despite my ADD....1....2...3... I counted about 4 jokes. 2 made me giggle. Now I'm not trying to find every folly in your article, as Dr.Phil has said "You can't fix a problem you can't admit to"...actually it may have been "Drink off your worries, screw your liver", eh, tomAto tomato." it's not only hard to understand initially but it can quite upsetting to some writers who have worked very hard on what they have presented and while Socky may not be such a person I can assure you they do exist and I judged your review the way I did to make a point to you. If you truly don't understand what an article is about then there is nothing that says you cannot talk to the author, indeed, many will be quite happy to help if you ask them especially if it means they get more meaningful feedback. I hope this makes things clearer for you. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:26, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
I see... But did i not mention that i do tend to get off track and that I write whats on my mind? I mean i understand it truly isn't an excuse, but the truth is i need my mistakes pointed out to me so i can add on them.
Truth is chief, no matter what you say, i always try to act (or type) naturally to the reader, so he/she don't just think they are some idiot. If i just point out their mistakes and don't put on a smile, it can make them really think that they suck.
That's the way I have, and always will review...although i admit, i went overboard on this one, truthfully, I wanted to make it look longer to be considered In-Deapth for Pee Week... I really just want a damn thingy on my user page, and i wont be able to do that many more reviews.
Now other than that one time, is there anything else that i did that even I would consider "over the top".
And out of curiosity, if you were reviewing an article made by someone like Socky...would you not be a little, i don't know...different? Friendly? Less descriptive even...--Happymonkey39 LAZARWeegeeheadbobinDomo kun dance1 Dah Meme Master 23:55, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
I'm all for people making their reviews their own, my main issue with yours is that the way it was written made it difficult to discern the meaning, as for writing off the top on your head to make people feel better about their work then I would say 'more than one way to skin a cat' you can make the writer feel at ease simply by criticising constructively, you are more likely to annoy people if they can't tell what you are saying. I have reviewed articles for most active users on the site and I have found that while I can take them knowing some things for granted, I still endeavour to explain my point of view to them fully as when you write it isn't knowing how to do things, it's knowing when and why to do them. As for being more friendly, I try to be as friendly as possible in my reviews since anyone who has written an article has the aim of making the site better one way or another. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:02, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
Yes but even though you may have not found it clear at first, was my advise and opinion not clear? I mean again, i am continuing this mainly for the soul purpose of just wanting a point in this competition knowing that i probably wont write any more this week.
And again, other than that one line, what did i do wrong. To tell you the truth i nearly earased that hole thing cause i noticed it was just a rambling, there wasn't a significance in that paticular paragraph. But did i do the same in others? Because usually i say a few things then start the review, most just do a line of a small comment, mine starts half way down the humor section :P. --Happymonkey39 LAZARWeegeeheadbobinDomo kun dance1 Dah Meme Master 00:30, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

n00b Lilly here :)

Just wondered if i have got my Mary Bale entry correct? now edited and pictures added :) Many thanks. Only found this site today, ive had a laugh looking through it :D The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lilly (talk • contribs)

It's looking much better, my recommendation is leave removing the ICU tag for when it comes up as expired, and expand the article a bit more. Take a look through our featured articles and HTBFANJS if you are in need of ideas or inspiration and feel free to ask me if you need any help. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:53, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Ah crap i thought this hadnt posted here so have also posted the same question on another mods page, sorry for the spam! Will work on it :)

Nagorno-Karabakh Republic

But this was the joke. the French version is not more understandable. Ftiercel 21:43, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not laughing since I don't speak Georgian and thus it just looks like swirly gibberish to me, why exactly do you think would anyone would find that funny? --ChiefjusticePSX 22:02, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
I don't speak Georgian too. I don't know where are these weird caracters from too. This article is funny because it is supposed to be written in a language of the country but this language is absolutely not understandable so the article is absolutely useless. It's the single joke of the article, nothing else to understand. Forget the fact that it's a translation. Ftiercel 03:59, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
That still isn't funny, I've seen foreign languages written down before, and they don't make me laugh. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:36, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
Do as you want. This translation is not so important for me. Ftiercel 18:13, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Need of Approval

I made a welcome page to put on new user's talk pages, but beofre I do I want to have your approval first so that I'm not doing something I shouldn't or forgo0tent to add something that would be required for a welcome page. Link is here--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:33, September 17, 2010 (UTC)


Why did you ban me? Can't you just "warn" me on my talkpage. And what's a ICU tag oh and I can't email you BTW. Your a hated and sadistic admin and nobody likes you. And I really injoy uncyclopedia too. 11:31, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Gompy - go to this site. You can ask there. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:45, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
I don't speak for Chief, but technically you were warned. Looking at your ban log, you were blocked for removing an ICU tag, and afterwards you did it again. When you get blocked for doing something you shouldn't, that IS your warning, and you didn't listen, so let that be a lesson to you. You have to learn from your mistakes and avoid repeating them in the future. And when an admin tells you not to do something, you don't do it. I hope you learn something from this.--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 23:55, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
Easy response to that is the ICU tag is allowed to be removed if the author thinks the page has been edited to where the ICU no longer applies. A lot of Uncyclopedians seem to have forgotten this in their quest to "improve the site." Not fully knowing the circumstances, I do believe Chief should have explained to the guy why the ICU is there and possible ways to improve the article rather than just re-adding the ICU and then banning the guy when he removed the ICU again. If Chief did that, then this guy is in the wrong. If Chief didn't, then Chief is in the wrong. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 00:05, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
Gomphog, you constantly removed an ICU tag from an article that you didn't amend or adjust in the interim in any way whatsoever, you were generally rude to other users, you blanked an article and the user page of a problem user, so please don't think it was just for the ICU removal. You also lose any sympathy I may have had for you by ban evading, sockpuppetry and rudeness, none of which encourage me to go out of my way for you. You also have all the ICU information available to you, had you bothered to read it or ask what it meant rather than simply removing it (did you not realise it might have been the wrong thing to do when it kept being replaced and you got banned?) you would not be in your present position. --ChiefjusticePSX 14:58, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
Oh, please, I got lots of really good ideas and I injoy uncyclopedia. Please give me one more chance... okay, I PROMISE not to do anything bad (rudeness, sockpuppetry, etc) and if I break my PROMISE you can ban me.

In case you think I'm slacking off as usual

I'm not featuring anything for tomorrow since we're down to single digits. Also, you're a mean and sadistic admin and I love you for it. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:20, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

I feel I have become everything you always hoped I would be. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:08, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

And while on the subject of VFH

There seems to be a bit of an issue. This was a self-nom without ever having been put on Pee Review. Problem is, it has been on VFH for an entire week and has now acquired 10 votes in the affirmative despite being ineligible. I'd close it (and I'd be in the right to do so), but then I'd be even more hated by everyone than I already am. So do you mind dealing with this? If you decided to let it slide, then the rules should be changed and that clause should be removed. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:45, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Well, in this case I would suggest this over operating like insane robots who must obey the blessed regulations. Since the article is clearly not pants and I suspect most of the reason behind the Pee review requirement is to prevent people nominating their crap one line stub article for VFH and then being utterly shocked when it fails and people vote against with reasons like "Pile of shite" and ultimately leave the site. We prefer to let reviewers say that something is shit in a constructive manner rather than fall back on the reliable critique's of against voters. In this one case we will overlook the nomination's ineligibility, though I will leave a note on the author's talk page saying not to do it again. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:56, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
If that's how you wanna handle it. Oh, it and Saki should be thrown on the queue then. They both got +10. Saki should be first, though. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 22:01, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
Letting one slide, huh? I agree, since it has alot of votes. Never the less, we better not let this be a daily thing for obvious reasons--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 22:21, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the pee!

I just now saw that you reviewed My Daddy Has Two Yachts (even though I've done some editing on it the last couple of days). Thank you! I've never had a Chief review before, and your in-depth analysis is very welcome. I'll try to follow much of your advice, although I'll have to mull over how to make the first read more understandable. I do tend to tie-in the entire article, things at the end relating to data at the start, etc. Was glad you liked it on a second read, that, to me at least, is a sign of a good article but I will have to let it flow a bit more at the beginning. Really appreciate your thoughts and critique. This one is more dark humour than light, and I don't know how well that goes over here but it's fun to write. Thanks again. Aleister 1:23 19 9 MMX

WIP for lower case

I'm sorry I seemingly abandoned lower case, I had to go camping in the Rockies with some friends and they didn't want any technology up there. I didn't get a chance to remove the WIP before I left. I was probably done working on it anyway, but I just didn't remove the WIP. Sorry.

Airhogs777 06:13, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Chief, if I can put in my two cents for reinstating Gomphog or sweathog or whatever he's going by now, I know he's a chronic everything but he is on a learning curve as the weeks go by. Give him another half year and we may have a good writer and user jamming our signals. And on Two Yachts (see above note too), I've added several new paragraphs up front, a new pic as you suggested, and some other tweeks. Your review greatly helped, and if you have a minute please go back and take a look at what you've helped to birth. Thanks! Aleister 12:14 19 9
I will likely remove his ban in the near future, if he had been polite about it then I would be far more receptive to such suggestions and would consider removing it now; as it is if he still wishes to edit then he will be able to do so again shortly. Also I will move a copy to your userspace Airhogs777, then if you are happy with it you can move it back to mainspace. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:03, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
Oh, please, I got lots of really good ideas and I injoy uncyclopedia, you see I did not take you all very seriously so please give me one more chance... okay, I PROMISE not to do anything bad (rudeness, sockpuppetry, etc) and if I break my PROMISE; then you can ban me.

Only a three day block?

Come on! He's been vandalising this place before you had your first account! You're insulting him with that! MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 12:15, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Yup only a three day block. I checked his contributions and couldn't find anything. You so sure he is a sock for someone else? --ChiefjusticePSX 12:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
Most definitely. Just today and yesterday he's been
# 10:24, September 20, 2010 The PS2 Masta (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎ 
# 06:35, September 20, 2010 Linux pwns j00 d00d (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎
# 06:32, September 20, 2010 Niggerlodeon Kicks Ass (Talk | contribs) New user account
# 11:43, September 19, 2010 Bob The Builder Kicks Ass (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎
# 09:14, September 19, 2010 LEBANESE PRIDE (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎
# 09:08, September 19, 2010 Slackware Linux Server 2005 (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎
# 09:03, September 19, 2010 Bill Cosby Vs. Boba Fett (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎
# 07:17, September 19, 2010 So i herd u liek mudkipz ^o^ (Talk | contribs) New user account ‎
# 07:01, September 19, 2010 Mordillo is gonna die of Ass Cancer tonight (Talk | contribs) New user account
You're insulting him with just a three day ban. Why you gotta be so cruel? MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 12:25, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
Amended accordingly, cheers. --ChiefjusticePSX 12:30, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
And while I've got your attention, wanna be the first to chime in on this? I think I've proposed a great alternative. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 12:32, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
I think a far bigger punishment is that the retard has himself stuck in a mindset where he believes that wasting his time to this degree is accomplishing anything other than wasting his time. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)


Can you take a quick look at the additions and changes in UnBooks:My Daddy Has Two Yachts, and see if they "do the trick"? Thanks a nillion. Aleister 17:34 20 9


That me welcoming a perma-banned user, or someone else?--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 21:29, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

It was you. You welcomed several perma-banned socks. Check the block list and contributions of a user before you welcome them. Did it not seem weird that all of those people around them had been welcomed yet they hadn't? You didn't stop and think that there was probably a reason for that? I know you're trying to be helpful, but you gotta pay attention to what you're doing. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:47, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
My bad. It's hard to realize that a new user was perma banned unless you checked their block logs and contributions. I did for a few users, yet I guess I let my guard down. I'll try to be careful from now on--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 23:36, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
I did the same thing many times. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 07:02, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Userpage Restore of Kansas City Royals Requested to my User Space

I am sending a request to restore Kansas City Royals to User:Sawblade5/Kansas City Royals. I want that article back as it is one of my original works and need to fix it and get it peed back into place if possible. If not I'll always have it in my User Space. Can you please Restore both the Kansas City Royals and it's talk page to my userspace please? --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:40, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

I see RAHB got there first, that'll be £20 please. --ChiefjusticePSX 17:32, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

You Suck!

Ah, I miss this place. First I got busy collaborating on a book which took virtually all of my writing time and energy, and then I got in an accident and broke my hand and couldn't type much for a while. I guess it's the Uncyclopedia curse. My hand still isn't working all that great, but I can type again, which means I'm back on the book. Just wanted to stop in and say hi. "Hi!" Plus I might actually be able to get Pee Review 51 done so I can a big award or something. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 07:01, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Good to see you aren't dead, everyone is leaving! HELPME, POTR, Orian57, all the people I used to rape for giggles, gone with nary a backward glance. But yeah, a review would be nice, but then so would a trip to Europe, I'll take one of the above. --ChiefjusticePSX 17:36, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not leaving; but then again I've never been very fun... so it's all a wash I guess.  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  24 Sep 2010 ~ 23:16 (UTC)
I'm waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too busy. I'm going to a new school that will give me better credentials, life skills, and a cooler diploma. It also has given me an extra fuckton of homework. So...yeah. Also, I'm kind of getting bored and annoyed with a lot of people around here. --HM (T) 23:21, September 24, 2010 (UTC)


What has happened? Uncyclopedia has changed? Can you explain why? Mr. Wango 15:40, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is always changing, it is as a leaf borne aloft on Autumn winds. What change is perplexing you exactly? --ChiefjusticePSX 17:38, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Firstly, I don't like change. Secondly some templates don't work anymore. and lastly it dosent look classicly like wikipedia and what happened to the front page are there going to be no more articles fetured? Why did it's... (what do you all it?) err... format change? Is it because the servers were to small? I thought I would ask you because you're a admin. Mr. Wango 18:26, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
The front page was reskinned yesterday, as it is occasionally when we fancy it. As for why it doesn't look like wikipedia anymore that is because wikipedia changed their skin and we are low budget so haven't gotten round to making any changes/deciding whether we want any changes. If any templates no longer work they may have been deleted or moved to new titles. --ChiefjusticePSX 18:31, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
I would donate money if only you would spend it on uncyclopedia and not ps3 games (hah, only joking). Anyways I have injoyed this little talk so have not one but TWO cookies. Mr. Wango 14:23, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Newcookie Mr. Wango has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.
Newcookie Mr. Wango has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.


you were rude when you banned me for being rude--Poiz, ABOUT ME I love uncyclopedia games. I also experiment in the sandbox. I almost never make pages, though (exept if they are my subpages). 23:25, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Was kind of the point. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:11, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
then wouldn't you also be banned?--Poiz, ABOUT ME I love uncyclopedia games. I also experiment in the sandbox. I almost never make pages, though (exept if they are my subpages). 14:45, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
He gets banned all the time, love. Don't worry. He just unbans himself. ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 15:01 (UTC)
i know, i saw those mod fights, they are annoying, though -_-' --Poiz, ABOUT ME I love uncyclopedia games. I also experiment in the sandbox. I almost never make pages, though (exept if they are my subpages). 15:14, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
How is that annoying? It's just each other, no? Not like they go around banning and unbanning regular users for a similar lack of reason. Do they? ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 16:30 (UTC)
yes they sometimes do--Poiz, ABOUT ME I love uncyclopedia games. I also experiment in the sandbox. I almost never make pages, though (exept if they are my subpages). 18:39, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Being obliged to deal with so many charming people, I am liable to be a bit rude occasionally when someone backchats, especially if I see them as not having the noblest intentions towards Uncyclopedia. I am unlikely to be banned for being rude to you especially when you have been rude to someone else, it's terribly unfair but that's life. If you don't break the rules then you will find me infinitely more polite. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:39, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

An exciting investigation

A lot of the new crap stuff that comes up starts exactly the same with a blank 300px image and some random shit. I think that we have a case of someone who makes a new account every time? A bit like that Sycamore4006 who wrote that really funny article about wanking and Albert Camus.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:32, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Possibly, I'm not too fussed about it providing they keep it low level and relatively infrequent. If it develops into anything beyond this, cyberbullying, or general asshattery we can take more action. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:35, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
You used to be cuddlier, now you're just dead inside... you're cold and distant and I'm leaving you for Dr. Colossus /further "womanly hysterics"--Sycamore (Talk) 15:41, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
I'm still cheerful, it's just- I have looked into the abyss and there I saw only darkness and pain spanning thousands of years and as I looked deeper I saw madness, the colours, OH THE COLOURS! I'm just a little busier these days. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:44, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Jack Dempsey

Hail Chief! You're so vigilant. Its awesome how you reverted Dempsey back to real. I have high hopes for him, and it took over two years and multiple apprenticeships to get the nerve (and ability) to tackle the Manassa Mauler. Now Uncyclopedia's Jack Dempsey article will whip its Jean Tunney article any day. BTW: Who's in charge of UnNews? Is Zim coming back? I really miss him. Although Spike is perfectly capable I bet. Stay well. Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 19:54, Sep 26

No problem. As for Zim, I haven't had any news, I daresay he will be back but it could be a lengthy holiday. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Chief. Pray tell who is running UnNews now? If no one, then I suggest Spike might be honored. Otherwise, who else has the keys to the highway?. Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 21:59, Sep 26

I Finished It

Hi Chiefie! I've finished my article but I can't re-size the piccies. I tried altering the 200px to 500px or whateverpx but they still stay the same. Could you help me please? I just need to re-size some of them and then I'd be grateful if you could please give me any advice on it before the next step. What's the next step? Thank you! --(00:37 27/09/2010) (userohnogod--notagaintalk) 00:37, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

The images won't resize because the originally uploaded image is far too small, you cannot resize an image that is 125 × 150 pixels to 900 pixels. My advice would be to search for some larger images, remember to list any images you uploaded and do not use on QVFD. The next step is mainspacing the article (does the title need to be all caps) and getting another review if possible. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:25, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, I'll go look for some bigger pictures. Will you tell me what QVFD means please? (07:30 27/09/2010) (userohnogod--notagaintalk)
QVFD is the process by which users can have an administrator delete an article that is either horrendous (one line long, cyberbullying, vanity etc) or can request that pages they created themselves, that they have decided they do not want any more, be deleted. Go to the QVFD page to find out more. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:36, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Did you mean don't send the little pictures to be deleted on QVFD? Also, could you tell me how to edit the capitals to lower case in the title? Pressing the edit button at the top of the page won't let me in. Thanks for your patience, Chief (07:53 27/09/2010) (userohnogod--notagaintalk)
P.S. Just watched your Nick Griffin token video, ha, ha, what a bastard, thanks for that (08:06 27/09/2010) (userohnogod--notagaintalk)
You simply need to move the page to a new title, this can be accomplished using the move tab found at the top of the page when you are looking at an article. Click on that and then simply type the changed title into the box and follow the instructions. I took the liberty of moving your page for you and amending your userpage link, but you can move it again if you feel the title is not right. --ChiefjusticePSX 08:10, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for moving and amending for me - can you tell me where to find it now please? I can't find it and I still need to put bigger pictures in. Cheers! (08:19 27/09/2010) (userohnogod--notagaintalk)
Link is on your userpage and in the move log. But here is another: User:Ohnogodnotagain/Field of Cloth of Gold. --ChiefjusticePSX 08:26, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Chief (08:52 27/09/2010) (userohnogod--notagaintalk)

Spam, spam, spam, spam, lovely spam!

Kate bush leotard Thank you

from Black flamingo & Sog for joining the Kate Bush fan club.

Now as promised, here is your own personal copy of that image,
to treasure forever.

My page

hey mate,

could I ask why you removed my page, which was under construction? (it says you "huffed" it.(sorry kinda new to this)

Hi, I assume you refer to the Epe page. I deleted it as it was looking particularly poor and at the time I looked at it did not appear to be under construction. The main thing you should try to appreciate is that we have hundreds of pages created every day, some of which simply remain in the state yours was in but indefinitely, for this reason we try to screen out newer pages that do not appear to be going anywhere. I have restored your page and and added a maintenance tag that will protect it from deletion while you work on it. I hope this is ok. Let me know if you have any other questions. Also remember to sign your posts on talk pages with 4 tildes like this: ~~~~. --ChiefjusticePSX 18:38, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Hey chief

I left you a message on Skype. --Matfen 19:22, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Since you're an admin and all...

I don't suppose I could get you to help me move Pursuit of Happiness to Happiness? And by 'help me', I mean do it for me.

BlackFlamingo suggested it'd make a good replacement when he reviewed the thing, and I decided he might be right, but I really don't want to just copy the thing into the current happiness, you know? It's just... not the same. So if you could help, I'd rather appreciate it and possibly even stop spamming your talkpage with random gibber in the future. But probably not; you just attract such fun people. ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100928 - 02:45 (UTC)

A better solution would be to redirect Happiness to Pursuit of Happiness?  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  28 Sep 2010 ~ 04:01 (UTC)
Just... not the same, either. Oh well. Thanks, guys. How in the blazes did MacMania do it, though? This is all his fault. ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100928 - 12:32 (UTC)

Not Finished After All

Chief, when I said to you yesterday that the article was finished, what I actually meant was that it is, in fact, not finished at all, but needs further countless hours of hard work and lots and lots more jokes in it. So I'll get back to you later. Much, much later. Have fun in the meantime (you can start without me)

p.s. ......and now my lovely sig that yetti made for me has dissapeared and I haven't got the faintest clue as to why or what to do about it, either.
You could sign in, that might help. --ChiefjusticePSX 08:13, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
Oh, ah! Things aren't as bad as they seem then, it's not lost at all! The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ohnogodnotagain (talk • contribs)

I did something worth a damn! Now what?

Hey Chief, long time and stuff. Just dropped in to say I made this thing which will display age in years and days. I stole a lot of it from Wikipedia, which makes it extra special. What it does is allows you to put in any date and it will show the time elapsed up to the current day. For instance, you have been an Uncyclopedian for &00000000000000070000007 years, &0000000000000308000000308 days. I know, it's freaking amazing. My question is, where do I move it to in order to make it accessible to all. There are several formulas, (six I think) that all tie in to make it work. So I would have to move all of them. Plus, they would have to be protected because if anyone changes even 1 thing in any of them, the whole thing falls apart. I must share this gift with the world! Help me! --John Lydon 14:30, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Is it not very very similar to this? If not why not? --ChiefjusticePSX 15:11, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
I didn't even know that existed! Mine is a little different because it's not a user box. It's simply a line of code that can be placed anywhere. For instance, if you were writing an article on cheeze whiz or something, and wanted to say that Cheeze whiz has been around for exactly (insert insane knowledge of cheeze whiz here) you could simply use the line of code and it will auto update daily. Anyways, I had no idea Tom Mayfair's clock existed but I think mine might be a little more versatile in the fact that it's not confined to a user box. --John Lydon 15:44, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
Surely the information lies in knowing when something was set up rather than how long it has been since it was set up. For instance if I was saying when World War 2 finished surely I would say "World War 2 finished on the 2nd of September 1945" rather than "World War 2 finished &000000000000007000000070 years, &0000000000000242000000242 days ago". It just seems to me that the use of the template is very specific and I can't actually come up with a practical application on the site. I suppose it could be useful in infoboxes to find out how long a particular group has been active, but even then you can usually just say active from: 2008- which symbolises that something is still going. If you think there is a good application for it on the wiki then I'm happy to tell you what to do, but I'd ask that you consider it beforehand. --ChiefjusticePSX 16:18, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
I went to my room and thought long and hard about what I've done, and I realized it is a rather limited code. It might be good for archival and administrative purposes, but not too pratical for articles. It must have served some purpose, although I forget exactly what, because I needed it and subsequently created it. I'll keep it handy where it's at, because you never know what the future holds. For now, I'll hang my head in shame and slink off into oblivion. --John Lydon 18:24, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
It just needs instructions now. I'm not sure how I'll use it, but I bet I will.  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  29 Sep 2010 ~ 02:49 (UTC)
Instructions and fancy speech added. --John Lydon 11:57, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Nice! Hey Chief, lookatit, it's nice.  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  01 Oct 2010 ~ 01:36 (UTC)

new (POSSIBLE) vandal ip

ip: --Poiz, look in my info? 02:32, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Poiz, use UN:BP to report vandals please. Also, I'm getting really tired with your faulty sig and the fact that you have failed to fix it after several requests and and a lengthy explanation. ~Jewriken.GIF 07:31, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
He speaks the truth praise him, praise him. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:40, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

deleted article and banned ip

Hey dude, I know your an admin and all. but it took me at least an hour to write that thing and make it seem funny. Its not about an article about "my schoolmates and friends". Friends? what friends. its an article for all to read about a school that i'm bagging out. I don't have another copy as i just wrote it. The whole quote at the start makes it funny because it bags the uncyclopedia quote. Farout, can't uncyclopedia bag itself? it also bags wikipedia. If u won't undelete the article at least give me a copy of the text used to create it.

Read our vanity policies and make an account. Then I can help you out. --ChiefjusticePSX 12:28, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

I will. I've read your "how to create an article thing and make it funny not just stupid" a couple months ago. Sorry i already have an account. My account is ExamBusters. Made a funny part of to kill a mocking bird last year. --ExamBusters




-- 23:08, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

What does "WFT" stand for? Welsh Firearms training? --John Lydon 15:05, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
I guess that's how angry he was, and no I won't reply there, I don't want to. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:07, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
missprlled "wtf"--Poiz, look in my info? 15:43, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Am I 51?

After abandoning the Good Ship Uncyclopedia for better pay and then losing it by breaking my hand, I'm finally able to use my hand to Pee. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Anne frank Tree falls on Mosque -Palin says it is a Sign. I'll wait here for my award. (Seriously, it's one of my shorter reviews, but it's a relatively short article and not one of the easiest to review). WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:09, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the award! By the way, I think you're doing a great job here. And I'm not just saying that because I just won an award. I'm saying that because you're an Admin and you could ban me. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:39, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Symbol for vote For.  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  02 Oct 2010 ~ 02:41 (UTC)
Oh, to be banned... you must be a real admin's pet, to even have the luxury of worrying about such things... ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101002 - 02:43 (UTC)

Random awards just lying around

Can I pluck the author of the month award off the page? I've dusted off a section of my awards page for it, and invited the folks and my neighbors in for a party. And there are a couple of others not closed out, the news narrator and that fiasco at Foolitzer where Ape was robbed of at least a tie. October crawls in on little cats feet, or at least is carrying little cat's feet and their bloody stumps. Aleister 20:10 3 10

Thanks, my best friends cried when they saw it, and hugged me, and gave me presents. But what about SPIKE over at narration, or Funnybony (Ape was robbed I tells ya) at Foolitzer? They wait patiently too, in anticipation of the manna. Funnybony's already pawned his, and the boys down at the pawn shop are expecting delivery or else he loses a finger. Thanks again, and now on to bigger and better things. Aleister 12:28 4 10

Breaking Up Uncyclopedia:Templates/In-universe

Would anyone care if I divided that page up into sub-pages (well actually sub-sub-pages). Right now, its takes forever to load and edit and is overwhelming for the reader. --Mn-z 16:13, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

That should be fine, if you can make it easier to find stuff I may even provide you with a big juicy bone. --ChiefjusticePSX 16:16, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
It looks like most of the listing are in relatively good order. I'm probably going to break up some of them too, since they are too long. And if 1 template has a misplaced tag, it fouls up the entire page. --Mn-z 20:48, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Jet speed thanks from tomorrow-land

--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 19:24, Oct 4

re: Molly the Blue Monster

Made improvements, but the ICU re-check date keeps getting pushed back. I'm not sure what else the article needs. Any thoughts? 2 20:30, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

It's looking a lot better than it did. My main advice now is that you take a look at some of our featured articles and see if you can get some more ideas as a couple of bits still feel a bit tired, try to tone the randomness down a bit and it should be fine. The ICU tag will be fine providing you keep working on the article. When you finish up let me know and I'll get rid of the ICU tag. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:44, October 4, 2010 (UTC)


Thank you, thank you, thank you, etc... Can you unblock my userpage> Gomphog 20:53, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Why the fuck my article deleted. It was pure stuff until some jackass edited it with jihad pics. Inb4 return! The preceding unsigned comment was added by Afterlife11 (talk • contribs)

The answer to this - and many other questions - can be found here. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 17:55, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Jack Dempsey thanks you


Uncyclopedia vs. Wikipedia --- and much thanks for making Jack a hit on VFH – from humble servants of the farce, Aleister and Funnybony

--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 22:02, Oct 6

JERK WATCH WHAT YOU HUFF! --Maniac mcpee 01:56, October 7, 2010 (UTC)maniac mcpee


You didn't think I wouldn't notice this?! Okay, I didn't notice, but... still.

According to the PEEING... um... thing that you paste in trying to get decent-looking sorts with potential to join up, joining has the added benefit of making people eligible for the Reviewer of the Month thing.

I never joined.

Doesn't that mean I was ineligible? Or is the thing you like to paste wrong and/or intentionally misleading? Or... what? Maybe I should just stop being so irrationally miffed at you for anything and everything I can think of... naw. ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 02:37 (UTC)

No, anyone can be nominated and thus can win I didn't notice myself until a little while ago. My main reason for putting it in is that people are much more keen to sign up if they know there is an award involved so I left it in the interests of the pee queue length. My feeling was that it doesn't upset anyone since most people don't mind winning or being part of PEEING, and anyone who did notice would be able to see the motive behind it. If it is that important to you, I will make changes before I use it again. Now stop complaining about winning an award and go and do another review! --ChiefjusticePSX 07:22, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
So why does it matter if they sign up, so long as they do decent reviews? Does it actually make a difference?
It's fine, though; I mostly just like making a big deal out of nothing. As you may have noticed. And I had to try. And fine. I'll go review something. Happy? ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 16:27 (UTC)
It means I can put them in the tables and they get a fancy userbox, it's a big incentive scheme and lets me know who to bother if I want reviews doing. Also yes, I'm thrilled. --ChiefjusticePSX 16:45, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Don't you usually wind up putting them in tables anyway? Although the whom to bother bit is a good point, assuming it even works.
Well, don't be. I was going to do it anyway, seeing as that I said I would... er... yesterday. I should really get on that, shouldn't I... ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 17:13 (UTC)
Personal tools