User talk:ChiefjusticeDS/Archive 4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


How is the foetus doing? Has it's heart developed, yet? Are you going to wait till your girlfriend's 8 months pregnant to get that abortion? MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 17:57, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

I would have preferred rape to be honest, it would be less protracted. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:09, December 20, 2009 (UTC)


I recently did 2 pee review, and i was wondering how were they?--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:51, December 20, 2009 (UTC)


Hi, I have just wrote an article that parodies the social phenomenon on Uncyclopedia known as Drama. Seeing as its become a bit of a problem in the past few months (years?) I thought it would be quite cool to make a section at the bottom of the article about other users' opinions of Drama. So I thought I'd invite you to write one, preferably humourous. It's no big deal if you don't want to, but if you are interested, you can come up with a quote and either leave it here on your talk page and I'll add it later, or you can go straight to the article itself and add it there. Any suggestions on improvement are also welcome. Thnx. --Matfen 00:23, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Article link here.

Pee Review

Here. If you got time of course.--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:41, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Certainly, I'll get it at some point tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:00, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Please remove Pee Review request

Could you remove this? Or let me know how to remove these? Puppy requested it be removed after I made a short comment, not a full Pee Review, as you can see here. I made my comments there. Thanks! WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 23:05, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Removed for you. For future reference and in case of vandalism you can easily remove a request from the queue by clicking on review now and just filling the score fields with 0 and the comments sections with N/A, put your reason for removing the review in the final comments section and then sign as you would had you carried out a review, then you just hit save and the review will move off the queue. Equally should you come across a vandalised request in the reviewed list you can move it back to the queue by deleting any text that has been entered into any of the review fields. There you go, it's that simple. Happy Christmas by the way. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:17, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
That's funny, because I just got an edit conflict with you as I was posting a message asking whether in the future you'd prefer I notify you or do it myself just as you suggested above. So you answered my question before I even asked it! Also Merry Chanukah back to you! And by the way, it's weird that in Great Britain people typically say "Happy Christmas," whereas in America they typically use the traditional British form of "Merry Christmas." WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 23:22, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
It is somewhat strange, but then I also devote hours of my free time to rolling around in the gutters of Leicester city centre and standing in the cold and rain for no money, so I am probably not the best measure of crazy. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:26, December 21, 2009 (UTC)


That review was just what the doctor ordered, and you gave me some things to think about as well. Thank you so much.

GoldenShower Rejoice, ChiefjusticeDS! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 14:56, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Next Rank? (Pee Review)

When can I move up from Fresh Stain to Steel Kidney? I'm eager for a promotion--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 09:35, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

The most common means of promotion to Steel Kidney comes from winning the Reviewer of the month award, this grants automatic promotion. The interim rank between the two is Attending Urologist though we have not had any of those in a while. Other promotions are at the discretion of the the Captain. If you really want a promotion don't ask for one, I have learned that doing so rarely yields results around here. If you desperately want a promotion: work on your reviews and try for a reviewer of the month nomination, I keep an eye on all the reviews getting done so I will nominate you myself if I feel you can consistently PEE at a level likely to gain votes. I hope this helps, good luck! --ChiefjusticeDS 21:06, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I see. I'll work harder on my reviews and aim for Reviewer of the Month. Thanks.--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:47, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

I'm in need of some ideas, Can you help

I am currently working or a article on the show Whale Wars (it can be viewed here), but I'm kinda having some trouble of thinking what else to put on there, so I'm asking a few people on ideas, including you. If you have an idea, you can either go to the discussion page on that article or my talk page and tell me your idea. And please, don't suggest anything stupid (something that contradicts the HTBFANJS). If you don't have an idea, then sorry for wasting your time (or am I?). Thanks!--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 08:25, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Eee Review

Well, I did read the rules and I read that all guidlines are jsut guidlines and can be ignored. I also read in your example of review that with an exeption of the first "humor" section, rest are just short, as mine. And I just like the articles so I didn't have to point out evrything what's wrong. Look at my Rwanda review. I pointed section by section what I didn't like. If formating was nice, I wrote it. If prose was ok, I wrote it. If it wasn't OK, I wrote it. But those articles were cool. I had positive attitude to the writers as was written in guidelines. I think you treated me patronizingly, as I was a typical Noob. PoliszSir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj KUN 23:12, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry if you felt I was patronising, my intention was simply to draw your attention to the fact that your reviews were of an unacceptable standard. The PEE guidelines may be ignored but ignoring them is not good for the writers or yourself. I reiterate, please make an attempt to work on your reviews; deliberately ignoring my advice and the guidelines is a good way to draw the ire of both writers and admins. My advice was for your benefit not my own, whether you follow it or not is up to you. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:16, December 26, 2009 (UTC)

If you want another helping of Pee Review

(Just to let you know I posted this or a variation of this on the user talk pages of some users who were recently reviewed in a manner that may have been less than satisfactory)

Yes, you may well already know this. But just a reminder that if a Pee Review by any reviewer, including me, doesn't help you in the way you hoped, you are free to request another one. Happy editing! WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 17:40, December 25, 2009 (UTC)


Why would you have deleted my Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kreator?

  1. 03:05, December 29, 2009 (hist) (diff) m Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kreator ‎ (←Undid revision 4301142 by ChiefjusticeDS (talk) Why would my pee review be DELETED?) (top)

No talk? Must have been an error? L!$@ Lisalisa(Meow!)(Contribs) 03:08, 29 December 2009

I deleted it because the standard was unacceptable and was borderline vandalism, while your intentions may have been good, your review gave no useful feedback to the author and was of a damnably poor standard. Please read the review guidelines before you contribute to PEE review in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:34, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
"Was of a damnably poor standard"? Don't forget the whole "friendly, encouraging" bit, Chief! ;-) --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:45, Dec 29
Yeah, sorry, just in from work, it sounded worse than I meant it to. Need morning Coffee. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:47, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
There was a complete section rewrite? Golly, where did I PUT that? It's customary to dialog with ANY PEE Reviewer, is it not, prior to dasterdly descimation of the undesired review score? Thanks for the fun! L!$@ Lisalisa(Meow!)(Contribs) 12:14, 29 December 2009
It is also advisable to be friendly and encouraging to new editors, but not to vandals. It's like the difference between sunning yourself to get a tan and sticking your head in a microwave. I'm happy for you to go back and do a complete review of the article, Lisa, but make sure that what you are doing is supporting good writing. One sentence reviews can be fed back directly to the writer or can be added onto the review page, but detail and recommendations are essential to a good review. Pup
When I'm attempting to give suggestions or criticisms, I try rereading what I've written to sound as mean and nasty as possible because that's the way the person I'm speaking to may hear it. Then, if necessary, I rewrite it. It's the problem we all know--you can't see the person's face, hear their voice, see what they're wearing, etc. For example, right now I'm dressed in a lovely new for 2010 Clarisse Prom Dress 1301! It's absolutely Adorable for Prom 2010!! This Clarisse 2010 knee-length dress, featured in light pink/silver and light blue/silver, has a crumb catcher neckline and dotted metallic tulle skirt. A center sequined design pulls the whole look together, making you shine on your special night! The perfect dress for prom or your sweet 16! (Actually, I'm wearing a pair of old pants and a T-shirt, but that doesn't sound nearly as exciting). WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:49, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Dunno, context is lost with a good dose of grim awful truth!?$# I love metallic tulle! Go vote me Noob of the month already? L!$@ Lisalisa(Meow!)(Contribs) 06:30, 4 January 2010

UnSignpost Delivery! - December something!

Late deliver courtesy of MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 00:06, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Please review Stewie Grifin

I know I mostly ask you to do one, but you so good at it, and I think this one will be easy. At least it was proofread. Link--Grue JammyDirectorEye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 06:55, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Done for you now. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:14, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Please sign in

Chiefster, don't be ashamed to sign your vote on UotM! Happy editing! WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:40, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

The wiki religion ICU tag

Hi mate I removed the ICU tag after some very serious editing. Not sure why you put it back on. The Wiki Religion

Since we're on the topic of PEEing

There's an article up for review that is umm... maybe you should check it yourself, as I think you'll know best what to do with it. --Matfen 21:54, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/YouTubers

Fixed, thanks for spotting that for me. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:57, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
I think the creator might be a noob. Alternately, a moron. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:32, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Well let's assume a noob, it still shouldn't be reviewed though. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:07, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

UotM thanks

A bouncy thanks!

Unbookwilson Chuck would like to thank you!

Symbol for vote For. finding his Story so firm, so round and so... attractive.

Sir ACROLO KUNFPWAOTMFA •(SPAM) 17:59, January 3, 2010 (UTC)


You didn't even say why in the summary. Did I do something wrong?--Jondel 08:38, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Mostly because the picture was not displaying properly and the caption didn't work with the article. Admittedly it isn't one of our best articles but I decided it was better to err on the side of caution and remove the image code in case you didn't do anything else with the article, no offence meant. Feel free to add it again. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:40, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Please continue your work but do explain in the summary or somewhere. It is indeed always better to be on the safe side of caution even if you have to remove everything. I assume Good faith. Err. what is the image code?--Jondel 09:13, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
No offence taken. The image and text has nothing to do with the article but hilarious (for me). You know this is a 'fun wiki'. I don't think readers will mind and may even be more interested in the images than being (very) consistent.--Jondel 09:17, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
The correct image code is similar to what you had done already, just have a look at the way the other images have been put into the article and copy that, and use the preview button. I suspect the problem you had before was just a single typo, just preview before you save. It's good to see someone making an effort, on one part at least. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:27, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Give me an Idea.

I want to write something but I just can't find an idea, do you have any? Also, hi, I'm back, how are ya, ect...    Orian57    Talk   Union pink 07:27 5 January 2010

Hi Orian, sorry for the delayed response, but I have been as busy as someone who is gainfully employed by the government for no money can be. As for an idea... I would be inclined to say that I am relatively blank on the ideas front, perhaps that sequel you were considering for Daddy there's a zombie in the etc, could be gainfully persued. By the way, on a totally unrelated note, I really like your UnRadio article that is currently on VFH, if the long marriage proposal of a review I gave it didn't give that away already. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:36, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Blingin' Pee Review

I has decided to drive-by your talk page and pop a thanks message in yo ass. Me likes yo suggestions and will implement them some time. Probably not soon, cuz just got a new temp job which is taking up a ridiculous amount of time. Keep easy Big C... --Matfen 11:25, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Word up bro. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:05, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!

For your vigilance to my Fire arbicle, I give you this tasty delicacy!

Newcookie Necropaxx has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Enjoy! Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 23:19, Jan 5 2010

Thanks very much. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:32, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

When did you become the Messiah?

I mean I know that you're great, but having your User page changed to describe you as the Alpha and the Omega is pretty damned special. Pup

I am indeed, totally righteous. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:50, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

And justice was kind of served

Messyhouse7 Thank You For Finally Taking Out The Trash
Unfortunately, the situation in the kitchen has not changed. I made it a point to not create a single dirty dish in this sink for the very purpose of demonstrating to you that the mess in the kitchen is not somehow our problem but is, in fact, your problem. Technically, that makes it my problem as well but said problem is one of inconvenience as opposed to the complete negligence inherent in your failure to clean up after yourself. It's also come to my attention that you and your friends have been urinating in the kitchen sink, despite the fact that it's full of dirty dishes. while your reluctance to touch the dishes is understandable it does not form a basis for me to empathize with you. While I shouldn't be bargaining with you again, I'll agree to clear a path to the bathroom sink so that everyone will have a place to urinate. All you need to do is simply dispose of the dirty dishes. We'll buy more at the flea market.

Trash is dish best served cold and covered in urine.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  13:06, January 6, 2010 (UTC)


hey Chiefjustice, i am a noob and need help with putting images on my user page.

I have tryed and failed.

Partly because i dont know howt to use the image link thing shown in the editing tips sidebar

thanks, -Jesus-

OK, which image are you wanting to use? If you can link me to it I will put it on your page for you and then you can see how to do it. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:00, January 6, 2010 (UTC)


i was trying to use an image from my files, but yeah ile give you a link. [1]


And also

You have been awarded the secret purple nurples for outstanding acts of uselessness!
[[{|]] [[|}]]


That image is here.

 –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 06:43, 8 January 2010

To make your life more comfortable

You don't need to list broken redirects under QVFD, they all appear here. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:49, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

That was the list I was using to find them, I was listing them on QVFD simply because it seemed the most expedient way to get them deleted, but I understand, I'll just leave them there or redirect them in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:54, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
OK, it's just that when most admins do their daily maintenance run, this is one of the places we check, so I'm just saving you some work on this one. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:05, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
Okay then, thanks for letting me know. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:11, January 12, 2010 (UTC)


Heya Chief. I feel real bad. I was planning my full force return to uncyclopedia in November, then shortly after that I got accepted to work on a project that could really speed things up for me. I've been very busy and horribly ignored my uncyclopedian duties. Just wanna say that I am still a member and I will write again as soon as I get time. I still have a soccer 2010 guide I would like to do.

Yes. Guess I just needed someone to talk to. That and it is fun to write meaningless stuff on your talk page.-- 17:34, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

See that. I'm not even auto logged in on my home PC. It's worse than I thought.--BlueSpiritGuy 17:37, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Hi again, not to worry, the real lives we all have are part of the reason we have so few regular contributors, I have been less active than I would like recently too. But it is good to see that you are still in the land of the living and it will be good to see you editing again. Oh and nobody writes stuff on my talk page any more, they are all too busy writing great articles and winning awards these days. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:53, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
Well that just makes me feel a lot better. Hearing of all the great articles. Still, I'll try to be around more often now, just to be kept in the loop...--BlueSpiritGuy 17:59, January 12, 2010 (UTC)


Sorry, my bad. first time contributing to uncyclicopedia, so please forgive the ignorance if I crashed your Pee Review. Thanks for being patient!

Sakai4eva 08:43, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

It's no problem, we all learn at some stage, I'm still learning myself. It's better to see someone new contributing to the wiki, there are also plenty of other articles in the list for me to do. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:35, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

That was a very in-depth and helpful review. I struggled all along with trying to make the article about "Hollywood" rather than a discursive rant about a terrible actor, and I think the line you suggested (or something like it) would be a great addition in helping bring the story back towards the subject at hand.

If you would permit me to explain the Keyser Söze reference: the film The Usual Suspects, in which Baldwin got his "big break", involved a mythical crime lord named Keyser Söze as the main protagonist. Eventually, he is revealed to be Kevin Spacey -- the narrator of the movie who is spinning a tall tale to police all along. Anyway, much of the intrigue in that movie involves the true identity of Söze, and many viewers somehow still come away perplexed despite the character clearly being Spacey. Come to think of it, it would be funnier if Baldwin answered "yes" rather than no. I've added a wikipedia link to assist others who are confused.

I also wanted to add that the break in the question/answer flow of the article is intentional: I was trying to indicate that the story was taking a rough turn. IronLung 00:12, January 15, 2010 (UTC)


Personal tools