User talk:Cajek/FunnyVsRules

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Cajek
Revision as of 19:38, June 2, 2009 by Cajek (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

too lazy to sign inA counter argument! NOOOOOOO! Actually I think we agree on many of these points. First things first, your last point is something I never toppled, but can't agree with more. Encyclopedic stuff rules. Agree with your explaination section. Naturally those types of subjects should be explained. When I talk about length, there are some things that should not be forced to be longer. My example I always go back to is most of the "My sojourn" articles. Very, very short, but those do not need to be explained. If you're writing an encyclopedic article that's funny, but is too short (in other words, it needs to be fleshed out) then that's a perfectly good reason to vote against. It's really style of article that dictates whether or not length matters (Penis Joke). I probably should have been more clear on that. Formatting is, of course, important. My point there was that I often see too many every-day users voting against based on formatting that they could easily fix in 5 minutes. If a noob has written a piece that is on VFH and people are voting against it saying something like "learn how to format", I will get a little perturbed. Help the new guy out, don't act like a snob. That doesn't help us keep good new writers. Injokery... I feel that when an injoke can stand on its own two feet, and I laugh, then that should not stop it from being featured. I've shown a few of my friends the site, and I think every single one has laughed at the "My Sojourn" articles. (I know they finally got featured) When people vote against just saying "Injoke" that's not right. Now if you vote against something like that because it's a non-encyclopedic style, I can't really complain about that. I do, but I shouldn't. Man... I think I just realized I can be a little long winded. Sorry about that. Just thought I should clear up some of the spots, also to tell you that my essay saw your essay ifrom across the way, and thought it was a little girly-man in comparison. Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 19:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

THING'S! T-H-I-N-G-APOSTROPHE-S! Dammit! It's a contraction! Fully stated it would be "First thing is first." APOSTROPHES DAMMIT! Also, you're both wrong about everything ever. Everybody's wrong. Everything is false. FALSE, I TELL YOU! -RAHB 17:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I dislike funny and rules! What should I do? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs)
YOU MUST CHOOSE! One must die.   Le Cejak <19:38 Jun 02, 2009>

edit Question!

A wizard did it MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 18:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects