User talk:Cajek/Archive6

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Socks and stuff

Sorry to sound like such a stuffy asshole here, but you really shouldn't make socks like that, mostly now that Famine is back. While I, and most others here know that it was all a joke in good fun, and you were probably reacting to tension caused by socks and trying to defuse the situation, I myself was recently banned for the exact same thing. I think it's best, with all this drama about, to just try to keep your head down. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:15, Nov 3

Usually, if you want to make a sockpuppet joke, just link to your actual userpage and type in a different name, like so:
"I haet Ljlego, he isnt funneh a tall!-[[User:Ljlego|Not at all Ljlego, seriously guys, why are you looking at me like that?]]" produces:
I haet Ljlego, he isnt funneh a tall!-Not at all Ljlego, seriously guys, why are you looking at me like that?
Which is the same execution, but with better karma.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Shit, I'm really sorry, man. I meant to talk to you earlier, but it looks like you already got blocked. I can see where ZB was coming from, and if you want you can always come on IRC to sort things out. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:35, Nov 3
I'm back, btw --  Le Cejak <-> 00:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I saw, glad to hear it. ZB just told me you were on IRC earlier. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:50, Nov 4
WELCOME BACK!!! It must have been the longest day of your life. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 15:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Thanks!

Thanks for your review of Emo. I was terribly offended.

GoldenShower Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

--Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 04:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Yo!

Congrats on the FA! Welcome to The Hall. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:01, Nov 4

So, I'm, like, famous? --  Le Cejak <-> 05:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Nope, but you get to put your name on a list and pretend like you are. Oh, and you also get to join the Order of Uncyclopedia, did you do that yet? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:20, Nov 4
Do the wiggidy-what to the who-now? --  Le Cejak <-> 05:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
These words you speak... tell me, what language do they come from? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:23, Nov 4
Oh, and it appears that Manforman has already put your name on the Order page. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:24, Nov 4
I think M4M added me... but I dunno! --  Le Cejak <-> 05:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Look at this thing. --  Le Cejak <-> 05:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Thanks again

First, a question: how do I do as you suggested and move the review to the talk page? Now, praise: you give great your feedback on Journalist was constructive and useful. Ya, I know the intro sucks, I left that one line in because it was better than nothing, I guess. I love your ideas for expanding the article, I was struggling to come up with new material. I think I'll be able to work with your suggestions. Can you review all my articles from now on? --YourMotherHasMyUnderwear 16:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

edit OK, here are the stats

  1. You've been very active, and have written almost as many pages as I have already.
  2. You're in the Hall of shame.
  3. You just got a nod for WotM, and I personally think you have a good shot(of course, you are up against So So. Keep in mind that he's one of the site's top writers, despite not being active lately)

You've matured boatloads as a user, and I hope you become a great member of the community. And so, I hereby bestow with this, by the powers vested in me by the AAN, and God, too. Yeah, God. Don't I sound important? Anyways, Congratulations!

- P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:48, Nov 4

COUGH COUGH sputter cough SNORK! aPHLEGUM! --  Le Cejak <-> 20:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, if you really want to stay adopted, it's fine. Technically, you're not supposed to adopt people while adopted, though. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:03, Nov 4
Ah, okay. I'd rather stay adopted to tell you the truth cuz I've had more featured articles under your supervision that I ever had before I was adopted. --  Le Cejak <-> 21:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
OK, but please don't pretend that those were my doing. Forget the ring, it's butkiss, I found it in a crackerjack box. It's in you, Lone Star Cajek!. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:18, Nov 4

edit ¡Gracias por el Pee Review!

Señor Cajek,

Muchísisisimas gracias por su Pee Review. I appreciate the feedback. However,—and please do not think I am trying to excuse a poor article—I must make it clear that my UnPoetry was intended to be awful. It was a parody of pretentious, vapid modern art à la First Gradeism. (No doubt you have read "free-verse" poetry even worse than mine!) From that perspective, is mi artículo any funnier...or does it still basically stink?

¡Gracias once more for taking the time to instruct a newbie! Soy el Morsa 01:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

@-}—

edit I wholeheartedly agree with your pee review

So much so that you get a:

GoldenShower Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

And yes, you did considerably better this time, and I commend you for your retripled efforts at pee review since I yelled and shouted at you. In particular, you have a consistent system for ratings, and you're honest. For that you get another:

GoldenShower Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

And about the article, yeah. I agree. It's a piece of crap, but I wrote it real quick just so that I could write an article and not drift into inactivity. Fortunately, this reminds me that when I do rigorous critiques of my own articles, they usually turn out better. So I'll start doing that again. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 01:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Holocaust Denial

Thanks for the Pee Review. Very refreshing to not wait 2 weeks! Can't say my feelings weren't a lil hurt (sniff sniff), but I think I'll get over it. Personally, I'm surprised at the low rating - yes I could have put a bit more effort into it, but I did research the article some-what, having based my ideas on the wiki holocaust denial article (so not completely random, in fact rarely random at all). I found your review slightly lacking in helpful suggestions (telling me to forget it?). I personally liked the idea and think that some more input would have been useful. Yes, tell me what you don't like, but then tell me how to improve it!!!

So, you asked for my response. There it is. I'd like to add that I am grateful for your diligence and honesty, and am certainly not the type to get worked up about it. I'll be leaving the article there. I think it has potential, and may work on it in the future. Anyway, see me on my page if you wan't to correspond some more. Step13 13:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll get working on it when I have some time. Cheers for the suggestion, and again, thanks for a quick and honest review. Step13 13:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Classy

I do bequeath you, good sir, the following token of my gratitude, for thou didst make me laugh whole-heartedly!


Congratulations
You have been awarded the secret purple nurples for outstanding acts of uselessness!
[[{|]] [[|}]]



 –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 00:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Re:What you said on my talk page

On the contrary, I found your pee review quite helpful. It stimulated me to write a half-assed conclusion, even! Your Humor breakdown really nailed it, though, and I figured though I had one very slightly weak part, the rest of it fared pretty well.

Also, Modusoperandi likes it, and he has a habit of hating everything else I write. So it must be good! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote, too. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I want the opportunity to stand in judgement from YOU this time! *CROSSES FINGERS* --  Le Cejak <-> 03:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects