User talk:Cajek/Archive5

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Thanks for your help!

Really, man. I appreciate it. You, pee reviewing my Class of 3000 article.

Your advice gives me some good pointers on what I can do to fix the horrid thing up. I'll try and see what I can do to make it better with what you told me when I find the time.

I must remember to look into thinking on how I can improve a couple other articles of mine I did... like one on a favorite fighting series of mine. It's hard to come up with clever material, but I try anyway.

Again, mucho thanks. -- Hanyouman 14:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

edit British The South

Why are you blanking this section of the Article? ninebucks 14:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Dude, just make a separate article on it: The South (World). That article is mine now. --  Le Cejak <-> 14:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I've made The South a disambiguation page, as neither the American South, nor the British South is more deserving of the page 'The South'. I trust you will find this a reasonable compromise. ninebucks 14:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

edit [[Talk:Why?:Cancer is Great|Why?:Cancer is Great]]

Per my chat page:

I've posted my list of suggestions for Why?:Cancer is Great, as you requested.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   02:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)  

edit Thanks

Thanks for the help on Pee Review. I'll keep working on my article.

GoldenShower Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

--333pet 15:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

edit What did I do?

What did I do? What ARTICLE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, Emperor Palpatine? What do you mean I'm trying to be funny, I thought Uncyclopedia was supposed to be funnny. And what's that name nomination, is it because there's User:I need a name at Wookieepedia? P.S. Congrats on rewriting the Emperor Palpatine article, much better than that pope BS that got old and died. (now we need a Pope Benedict XVI article.) -- Ineedaname 16:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Wait, I never touched your user page!! As for you, you sir have a name, not like me!! (I was too lazy to actually come up with one so I took that!) Anyways, what's that thing you posted on my user page? -- Ineedaname 18:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

edit From Jehovah's Wittiness

Thanks. I am not a Jehovah's Witness though. I just came up with the name.

15:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC) User:Jehovah's Wittiness

Here's the test to see if he's lying. If he hates this article, then you know he is one, because only a true JW could care about so truthful an article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I thought the test was to see if the accused could float. --  Le Cejak <-> 19:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Only a noob or a Protestant would say that. Since I believe you have rather quickly shed your cloak as a noob (remember when you used to make all those templates?), I am forced to believe you're a Protestant, and thus an enemy of the Catholic Church. Observe as I force down the urge to scream "KILL THE INFIDEL" while brandishing an AK-47 and instead "pants" you in the name of God.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I think the test is that if the person is more of a noob than Manforman, they're a protestant and will therefore float. --  Le Cejak <-> 19:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

High talk for someone who became active after Manforman. You sure find your way around quickly, you hussie. Then again, I already knew that.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

:D --  Le Cejak <-> 19:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

edit On Journalism

Oops, posted this in the review, here's a repost for your convenience:

Thanks for the feedback! The reason I wrote about Journalism in the article is that Journalism redirects there. Should we change that? I'm a newb so I don't know how, unfortunately.

What if I were to change the first topic to "How to be a journalist," get rid of the list, and write a paragraph for whatever there has funny potential? I think we need an overview of what a journalist is, at least, don't you?

I'll get rid of the lists. How can I make the russian and chinese jokes easier to understand without stepping on the jokes. Any ideas?

Thanks again, that was great advice.--YourMotherHasMyUnderwear 20:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Platoon

Hey, Did you think about maybe creating a true hybrid called - "YOU GOT PLATOON!" or something like that? The idea is good, but the actual build up is a bit awkward. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Golden Shower

GoldenShower Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Thanks for the review. I'll take most of the suggestions (mainly to polish it out). I'm leaving it as an UnNews story instead of moving it to UnBooks because it is making fun of an actual event that happened (see the source at the end), anyways, thanks--Sir Manforman CUN 23:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Re:Your latest piece of... article.

I'll do it if you review 1-2 of my own pieces of article already on pee review. Either that or wait around a bit longer until I finish my latest WiP. Or both. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah definitely! Are there any you want me to review that take precedence, or should I just review whatever looks interesting? --  Le Cejak <-> 04:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects