User talk:Cajek/Archive3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Re:Crap

"Crappy crappy crap!" is just one of the many terms I use when doing template purges, specifically for the {{Crap}} template. Templates are bad, especially bad ones. If you want people to know your article sucks, make them read it first :) --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

edit thanks

Bacon strips
As promised, you are presented with one (1) package of
Kevin Bacon's Bacon Strip BandagesTM for your thorough
Pee Review of that article that had nothing to do with Kevin Bacon.
Please note that Bacon Strip Bandages are not safe for
either contact with skin or internal consumption.

thanks for the review, and it appears someone else beat me to reviewing yours. if you seek another opinion, or you need a review in the future, just pick up the Cheeversphone and dial "30".--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Re:Misogyny

I just saw that he mentioned derogatory to women and assumed misogyny. Sorry to have seemed asinine.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I guess he just didn't get it. It's even in the category childish mysoginistic humor for god's sakes >:( @ you, M4M!!! Please read it for yourself! --  Le Cejak <-> 00:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Irish Road Atlas

Thanks for the pee, appreciate it. Just wondering, why do you need a pee for your UnNews bit, you already have 2?

GoldenShower Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

~Jewriken.GIF 21:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Bible Smoking

Thanks for the review Cajek, can you possibly suggest anything I could add to Bible Smoking. Mccann 08:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

edit If Hard to read fails VFH

I'd do whatever I can to help make Hard to read a better article. It could be, if the article fails VHF, that like some articles, it's just not meant to be the sort of article that goes onto becoming featured. I may believe it's feature-worthy, but in reality, that depends on the feelings of everybody else (hooray for democracy).

That said, all I can say is that I have a number of ideas, some just absurdy ambitious, for the article. Wouldn't it be cool if, as a condition for getting it featured, the entire Main page had to be hard to read? In the meanwhile, maybe smaller details should be attended to.

The first thing that comes to my mind is whether you think the last section should be rewritten to get a stronger punch. I didn't get much of a reaction from myself when I got to the last part. What do you think of having something else a little more original?

By the way, I apologise for this long message, I'm not good at making messages short. --The Dit 12:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

/me lurks into the conversation... You know Cajek, if you like, you could try and make a main page reskin, and fill it up with crazy fonts, colors, and the blink template. It's different from writing an FA, but some of them are a lot of fun. I can see it now: "Uncyclopedia:The Content-Free Encycloedia that makes your eyes bleed". - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 13:44, Oct 13
/me appears from behind a corner... Oh yeah, I doubt this will be featured. The voting page is nearly as old as the page itself! It's never been pee reviewed, and it really does hurts my eyes! Also, if it doesn't get VFH'd, it still could possibly get featured SOMEDAY and I actually have another page up for VFH right now. However, it looks okay as of this morning (+2, right?). Dit, try out your ideas, man, it sounds awesome-slash-kickass: remember, the page as it was before will still exist.
As for editing the main page, I am really scared. I think that it could look pretty awesome if H2R gets featured. How would I, or anybody who is a fan of the page, go about doing that? --  Le Cejak <-> 13:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Actually, you don't actually edit the main page. You can't, as you aren't an admin. However, you can start a page in your userspace, and start by C+Ping the main page's code into it. From there, you can go nuts, and throw fonts and blink templates all over the place. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 14:23, Oct 13

edit Red Light

Sure I will vote for it as long as you support Buster Keaton on VFH.--Dr. Fenwick 21:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

There ya go.   Le Cejak <-> 21:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

edit ...

hey cajek, i just got around to reviewing your machete battle article. sorry it took so long, i lost it on my userpage and i've been out of town. nevertheless, keep up the good work. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 07:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Whoopsy on my part ~ Actually I meant to vote for

Sorry for the whoops. Change the against to a for... i put the number on for.

Thanks. I have a question. Can you re-nom an article for VFH if you do a lot of work on it? Because i think I have made my article Macau almost perfect - but when I was really noobish I nomed it when it wasn't totally finished. --Moneke 12:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Actually, I thought that you did a great job with that review. The page wasn't great, so you told it like it was, but you provided a lot of useful tips to improve it. That's what a great review is. I always try to think about what I want to see in a review. I mention what the funniest parts are, what's not so funny, what can probably be taken out, and I try to explain my reasoning. Some good reviews I got early-on in my uncyc career actually gradually helped to teach me about writing comedy. So good job! You're on the reviewing committee, right? PEEING? If so, you'll be a valuable asset to the team. Heh, I said ass. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:16, Oct 16

Personal tools
projects