User talk:Cajek/Archive13

Pee Review

Why did you revert? There's only 5 requests, and the same requests will be in both sections, so it seems pointless. Maybe when Pee Review becomes messy again, we can have it that way.--Æ 16:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

We need it the way it is because it won't ALWAYS be this good and short. It's that simple, it's not you.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 16:34)

I say we leave it that way until it's no longer good, at the time, it's not needed--Æ 16:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, we can't just change it cuz it's a short list!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 16:36)

Hea

	Whoops! You have been given the Poison Pee Award
	Have you read the Pee Review Guidelines? ________________________________________________ Hea, someone had to get the first one!

Maybe it needs to say on there which review it was? Maybe a link to the review or the article on the template? MrN  Fork you! 18:48, Dec 9

*GASP* THANK YOU!!! Looks good! Hmmm, I don't think there's a way to link it to the review it's talking about simply because this is a computer, not a mind reader... What would it look like?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 18:49)

	Whoops! You have been given the Poison Pee Award
	Have you read the Pee Review Guidelines? ________________________________________________ Well someone could always link to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/American flag lapel pin or just add a link to the the article, that way the reviewer knows which review it was that was poor

Maybe this could be a second parameter? I'm not sure. If it was a second parameter then we could included it in the box in a sensible place like "You have been awarded the Poison Pee award for your review of *****. That might be making it a bit too complex but then again, people should not be using this template if they don't know what they are doing... I think there might be a problem linking to the review itself as many people will revert a pee review if its really bad so it might not be there any more... Like I said, I'm very new to templates, so I'm not sure. What do ya think? MrN  Fork you! 19:15, Dec 9

what if someone uses this template too much? or uses it at all? This could be a big problem.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 04:33)

Woops

Check out this... Looks like someone has already beaten us too it. This bit about needing to be an administrator is a little concerning.

{{PeeReviewWarning}}

Template:PeeReviewWarning Maybe we should re-think this. Or atleast find out why you need to be an admin to use it... MrN  Fork you! 19:48, Dec 9

It's nothing. It's an unused template created two months ago by a permabanned user. It's nothing and should be deleted.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 20:08)

Hey, look what I've found

Can I borrow 5 bucks?

Does this inspire you at all? It seems like something you'd like to rewrite. Just wondering. Also, it was an excuse to stop by on your ridiculously busy talkpage. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 23:34 Dec 09, 2007

This talk page is busy? MrN  Fork you! 23:48, Dec 9

Booooooop booweep! The number you have dialed is not available. Please try again later. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:54, Dec 9

If you would like to try again, please re-insert your social security number.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 00:31)

So can I assume that you think I'm good enough to rewrite it? I'm trying to think of new stuff right now, so yeah... hmmm gonna have to look at it...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 02:05)

Couldn't you have asked first?

Although it is cute, I am still considering 1 of five three things:

1. Keep 2. Revert 3. Kill you

It was too important to ask you whether it was okay.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 00:30)

you DO realise this carries the same penalty as vandalizing a userpage?

Oooooh, someone's in trooouuuble.... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, Dec 10

Ahh, I'm no snitch...just wanted him to be aware of the fact.

Come on! What did he do? Let's talk about him again when he's not here. :) MrN  Fork you! 00:47, Dec 10

No need for snitching, Cajek's talk page is always an important component on the 'Mordillo's shit list ™. ~ 12:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Mordillo, it's an HONOR to be banned by you because of something somebody said on my talk page!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 14:19)

And now for something completely different

Thanks for the pee! Normally after getting a review like this I'd post in on VFH, but I have a feeling that the Mister Winkler horse is dead and buried....~ 12:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep, I would definitely not nominate it for that one reason. I'm glad you liked it!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 14:19)

Have you seen

Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Help I made a comment about how it used to be in the (it linked to main help) Dump would you have a look at the dump post pls? Looks like AE has taken it upon himself change things without really talking to anyone first... I think we should loose the whole "Help" button altogether. It serves no purpose in my eyes. What do ya rekon? MrN  Fork you! 15:09, Dec 10

Hmmmm... So there's a Pee Review/Help? I didn't know that! /me slaps forehead I'm stupid. We're stupid. WE'RE ALL DUMB. Should we merge? I haven't seen the page, I leave that up to you Mr. next-month-I'm-probably-voting-for-you-for-ROTM.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 15:17)

Read my first post you blind mouse! Look!!! Did you look in the dump??? There was no help page yesterday! Yesterday the "Help" button did linked to Help:Contents. AE created the the new page today. Please look at the dump. I think its actually a lot worse and more confusing now. We need to get the "Help" button deleted I think, and get shot of the whole new page... AE is trying to get noticed for the N00b of the month I think which is fine, but I don't think this helps.MrN  Fork you! 15:25, Dec 10

And I'm asking you!!! MrN  Fork you! 15:26, Dec 10

You're having a conversation with AE right now, right?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 19:59)

Sorry dude, Uncyc has been running really slow for me for a while... I did have a word with AE about his mods. I have come around to the idea that what he did was actually a good idea. I changed the menu bar to say FAQ rather than HELP and I think it works now. Did you see my post on User_talk:Boomer/People_for_the_Evaluation_of_Excrement_and_Influencing_Nominations_for_Greatness#How about a "PANTS" vito? What do you think about taking it out of the guide and only telling people about poison pee when they have bothered to join Boomers gang, and get given permission to use it? Bearing in mind the person who tried something like this last got banned? I know it was not for that, but it's a bit controversial... I made the text in the poison pee a bit less confrontational, but I'm still not sure we want to tell everyone about it. What do you think? MrN  Fork you! 21:33, Dec 10

Or am I just being a pussy? MrN  Fork you! 21:34, Dec 10

Poison Pee scares me. There are a lot of crazy people out there.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 21:38)

Cool. Have a think about taking it out of the guide. We could just keep it as a thing for people who are in Boomers club. I think LED might agree if he was listening??? MrN  Fork you! 21:51, Dec 10

I leave it in your hands. Go ahead and do whatever you want with it.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 21:59)

LED? YOU MEAN THAT GUY WHO ADOPTED ME THAT ONE TIME? You know, sometimes, if you listen veeerrryyy carefully, you can still hear Led telling me that he left his underwear behind...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 21:53)

Led? Never heard of him. And yeah, do that thingy with the whateveritis, MrN. S'all good. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:05, Dec 10

Well that clears that one up. Whatever it was. That thing with the Balloon or something er thinngymagig... Do a what now??? (giggles his balls)MrN  Fork you! 22:07, Dec 10

Well Balls. I'm going to take the poison pee thing out of the guide, and add something to Boomers page about it. It will make him feel all important anyways, and you know he likes that... MrN  Fork you! 22:35, Dec 10

Be careful with that "ball giggling" :\ ...weirdo.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 01:29)

When was i made 'attending urologist'...? OH and TYATU review is done...only took 6 hrs...

Holy fucking god   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 01:33)

Attending Urologists have special privileges you know... Did you check the page and I'm not even one myself! Grrr MrN  Fork you! 01:36, Dec 11

yes i did. I know about the template. As for your induction, be patient, my young paduan. (translation: i wuz here be4 you ! )

Finn, check your score. (press "P" on my sig)   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 01:43)

The main page

Nothing to do with your last post on Boomers page, as that was obviously very relevant, He He... But I'm trying to clean up the main page, and keep general chat to the talk page... Have a whinge at people if they use the main page for stuff which should be on the talk page ok? I think we can improve pee review quite a bit if Boomer page has a bit of sensibleness about it rather than just having people posting all over the place on it. You agree? MrN  Fork you! 01:46, Dec 11

I had an inkling that that was what you were trying to do. On a side-note, I feel sorry that Garfield isn't doing so well (he must be hurting bad to be doing that kind of stuff). On a more MrN9000 related note, I agree with what you're doing on there. I couldn't tell which was the talk page and which was the actual page!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 01:50)

Garfield does not get the idea behind being a dick, but I gave him a good talking to. Hopefully he will start being a bit more cool with things. MrN  Fork you! 01:55, Dec 11

EH

Get that shit off the main page!!! Grr! MrN  Fork you! 02:09, Dec 11

Linking to Reviews

After an article has been reviewed, is there a way to link to it from my userpage? I can't seem to get it to work properly. I want to be able to refer to the reviews, so I know what to work on, and such and such. I know you're involved in a lot of Peeing, so I thought you'd be the person to ask. If not, I can try take this question to a forum. Thanks, -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS06:11, Dec 11

Hey Spillin, take a look-see: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/ is the first part of any pee review. When you have a list of your articles, for example an article called HowTo:Spill Dylan, you would link it like so: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Spill Dylan. Hope I helped! :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 06:13)

Okay, I got'er now. I was adding some kind of "&t=3023498301" gibberish that my browser had in the address bar. I guess I obviously don't need that. Thanks for the help. -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS06:16, Dec 11

No prob!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 06:17)