User talk:Bradaphraser/archive7

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Bradaphraser(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (First I binge...)
 
m (Since I know someone will do this later if I don't)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
{{archive|User talk:Bradaphraser}}
  +
 
Make a separate header for each topic, as always.
 
Make a separate header for each topic, as always.
 
[[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive1|archive1]] [[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive2|archive2]] [[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive3|archive3]] [[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive4|archive4]]
 
[[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive1|archive1]] [[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive2|archive2]] [[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive3|archive3]] [[User_talk:Bradaphraser/archive4|archive4]]

Latest revision as of 22:42, October 13, 2007

Make a separate header for each topic, as always. archive1 archive2 archive3 archive4 archive5 archive6

(If you miss something, it's probably archived)

Watch out!

1154789485883

Talk page

So cool, archived your talk page? Cool. /me steals new archived talk page virginity. —Braydie 15:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Good God! She was only a few MINUTES old, you sicko!<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
She said she was 16! —Braydie 15:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Sloppy Seconds


All yours. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

That UnNews article

Can you unlock it and swap the present pic for this? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

...Ah, much better. An absurdist twist is my favourite kind of twist. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I like it, too.  :)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thought (OMG!)

Hey Brad, wrote this quite awhile ago but thought you might like it --Sirrah Shandon 23:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Ha! As I poured over drawers filled with forgotten lore, you were busy writing something funny. I commend you.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Good Thankuls!!11


About you taking my article off VFH!

My article Everybody Hates Dubya (Television Series) was in Pee Review for a week just transferred the page to a more appealing name so it would get more people to vote on it! So I'm goign to put it back up, I know you didn't know but just wanted to tell you everything was legit on that article, and if 25 articles have already posted I think it's only fair it gets to go back up seeing as it was a mistake to take it down.--Dr. Fenwick 23:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, just so you know, you can move pages, so just tell me which one you want to delete, and I'll get rid of your duplicate. That messed me up, since I couldn't find the pee review of it. Sorry for the confusion, it had to do with procedure, mainly.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey Brad, could you do me a favor and delete Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Everybody Hates Dubya (Television Series)? I added this and took the article off VFH before reading this exchange. I changed VFH back, now that just needs to go away...I guess I could just redirect it, but now I've done all this typing, and... :) --THINKER 01:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

No big deal, just wanted to explain myself sorry for contributing to the confusion.--Dr. Fenwick 02:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

That picture

Are you trying to out adorable Braydie? I have to make an appointment with the dentist now, that's so sweet. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I cannot let him beat me in ANYTHING! I'm the best!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

The "Time for some new adminses" Thing

Hey, I just wanted to put some suggestions towards the "Time for some new adminses" forum topic. I know the voting is closed, but can I just state that the current "Round up as many candidates as possible and then close the voting" system is kinda annoying? Because what people started doing is nominate all the people they could think of before it was too late. A preferable system (In my opinion) would be similar to the old VFS, where there was only one page, and people aren't rushed to nominate people, and people (Such as This person) wouldn't be nominated until they were fully ready. Please reply soon, Small_Pineapple2.png» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The whole idea behind the page was to get people thinking. I'm hoping we can one day get another VFS page going that doesn't rely on people voting quickly, which is what caused the problem this time, methinks.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 11:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

You are damned.

The Last Porchesian (Holla!) 16:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

 :_: I hope this isn't real, that'd suck.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 16:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

UnNews Article

Does it qualify as Quasi-featured? --THINKER 02:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh SNAP! I totally forgot to go back and QFH this batch. Sorry about that, it's fixed now.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Sweetness --THINKER 04:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

We got second lead

I just wanted you to know that that unnews article got second lead.

Here is the portion of my userpage that documents this:

User:Hrodulf#Collaborations

I think I gave appropriate credit to everybody involved.

--Hrodulf 21:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Awesome-sor. Hooray!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Meyersnj the blanker

Thanks for the hand in putting fixing this idiot's "edits" - thought I was fighting solo for a while. Blah --Asahatter (annoy) 14:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

NP. It's actually quite shocking the good that the average user can do around here. Really, all us ops are here for is deleting banning the non-contents.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
And the partying. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Well, OBVIOUSLY that, too.<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Tory poster Congratulations

Thank you for voting on Evolution of an Uncyclopedia editor. You have been awarded a meaningless template which was adapted slightly from an equally meaningless one by another user! You may now feel part of the Evolver Club, even though the writer has no idea who you are and is only giving you this so you vote for his articles again.

VHF

I didn't get a chance to see my child of creation on VHF get butchered and raped. Can you give me a gyst of the complaints? --AmericanBastard 02:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Here is the point in history when it was still "alive". Of course our thoughts and prayers are with your family in this trying time.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Newcookie User:Ljlego has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Forgive the generic template, I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for answering my questions on IRC without sarcasm or "you didn't know that? we must excommunicate you!" Thanks.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, I wanted to let you know in person (is this considered in person? I think so) that I was halfway through "L" at this moment, and that I now plan to go to bed. Hope my efforts have helped.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh you've helped a great deal. Once you're finished with Z, you see, I can go through and sort them by date, then go through and check VFH's history all at once and get the info I need to see what should stay and what should go. This is saving me GOBS of time. Thanks for your efforts. When we're done I'm planning on giving you a ninjastar for this.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Done. Let me know if I can do anything else? QFH has gotten far too clogged. I'm glad I could assist in your efforts.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Ninjastar, it's really an honor *sniff*tear* If there's anything else I can do, please don't hesitate to ask.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

VFH Procedure

I added the following coments to the "Darwin Rule"

Note, however, that Darwin rule also relates to articles that have fewer votes than an article slated for removal that is younger than it. - shouldn't it be "fewer or equal to" since if two articles have the same number of votes, the older one has had more time to accumulate them?

If there is a tie the younger article will die - once you put all the rules together, the article with fewer votes dies anyway (or an even older article with fewer than either). But if they have the same number of votes, the younger article dies, when it should be the older one. Rogpyvbc 06:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I keep having to explain what I'm doing with this to people, and even with the written down procedure, it's apparent people are still misunderstanding what I'm saying. Here's an example of how QFH works. Let's say the articles below are on VFH on December 7, when some articles need to be taken down.
Fishing for Feces Score +4, nommed 12-7 3 PM
Mein Comp Score +7, nommed 12-6 3 PM
Euroipods Score +3, nommed 12-5 3 PM
Super-intelligent pigeons Score +12, nommed 12-4 3 PM
How I did it - I mean would have done it Score +1, nommed 12-3 3 PM
Nobody Understands me Score +3, nommed 12-2, 3 PM
AAAAAAAAA! Score +100, nommed 12-1, 3 PM
Fisher Price Score +17, nommed 11-30, 3 PM
Barns and Nobles +21, nommed 11-29, 3 PM
"Fishing for feces" is safe, because it's less than 24 hours old. Every other article has a chance to be taken down, however. In this example, "Euroipods" and "Fisher Price" have the worst score in relation to the other articles, with a minimum difference of four from both the above and below articles. As Euroipods is newer, and thus has had less time to accumulate votes to make a difference of this size, it is the one slated for removal. There are older articles with lower or equal scores than it has, however. Those articles will be removed first. So in this instance, "Nobody Understands me" would be removed first, followed immediately by "How I did it - I mean would have done it." If only one of these is removed, it would be the older one "Nobody understands me".
I hope this practical example helps you understand how I go about taking things off of VFH. QFH is simply looking at the articles in relation to the most recently featured article and seeing if it had any chance to catch it. If it's accumulated 25% of the score of that recently featurd article, it gets the QFH.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I haven written the same example in a slightly different way at QFH, where I will try to send people with this question in the future.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
So when does the board game come out? I'm picturing it like Family Feud, but with articles "...and your host, Braaaaada....phrazzzzzaaah!". Also, this isn't my talkpage. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Heh, I'm hoping we can avoid that. Incidentally, did you that we had 93 articles on VFH on December 7, 2005? True story.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 18:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
It's a day that will live in infamy. Um, maybe that was a different December 7. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
In me? Not sure I like the sounds of that. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 05/23 21:54

I haven't misunderstood anything - your example does exactly what I've suggested. But your example doesn't follow your rules, since your rules say "fewer than" and the example suggests "fewer or equal to." And if there's a tie in distance from neighbouring articles, the article with fewer votes will always die: the younger article by virtue of the "younger article dies" rule, or the older article by virtue of the fact it has fewer votes and is older (unless there is an even older article with fewer votes). These are the exact points I was making. The only thing you need to do is to clarify the "or equal to." Rogpyvbc 00:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright then. I guess I did that. PROBLEM SOLVED! /me breaks out the champagne to celebrate.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Finger cymbals ting-a-ling for you!

PPCelebatoryPose Prettiestpretty dances for your pleasure!
For voting on Now That You Are Almost a Woman

Now go out and get in touch with your feminine side!

Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

LEGO

OMG THANX!!!
LegoJFK
For voting on my Lego Assassination Image on VFP!

Sliffy thanks you!
I so totally stole this box

Now sing along: “Ebony, Ivory, living in perfect harmony!”

so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? Jambow 12:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

QFH Purge

We did it! Congratulations all around-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Aye.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps you can help this poor, lost puppy

Forum:How can I link an image in my sig to my talk page?. As you can tell from my expertly crafted sig, I'm somewhat of an expert on these matters, but I'll pass this one on to you. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Removing UnBooks: The Diary of Sir Humphrey Watermelon from VFH

Dude why did you remove UnBooks: The Diary of Sir Humphrey Watermelon from VFH. It was a recent nomition, it deseved a chance--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E Snowman throw a snowball Snowman 12:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Each article is only protected at VFH for 24 hours. After that, it is fair game. It wasn't doing well compared to other articles from around the same time of nom. Sorry, but with the high turnover at VFH (no articles there that were there a month ago), and a lot of articles getting nommed, a lot of decent articles are getting taken off VFH pretty quick.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a bajoodle!

The PLS

I could run it, since you brought up to me earlier and I'm probably the guilty party in not getting it done on time. Hit me up with the details. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Hahaha....sucker! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Sweet. Keep in mind that I'll help with any questions you've got. It's really not that bad. Here's what you'll need to do.
  1. Secure the funds for the prizes. (Wikia will usually pony up the cash; sannse is a good contact. You can find her in IRC.)
  2. Promote the competition. Wikia will help with this also. We can actually put out a press release. How cool is that?
  3. Come up with a format for the competition (ie: what will you be awarding? The last couple of competitions awarded best overall, best rewrite, and best by a n00b.) You can decide the categories this time. There have been suggestions on the forum... I've forgotten where exactly. I'm pretty sure they're linked on the PLS page, but I'll have to check.
  4. Choose the judges for each competition. You want people who are responsible (ie: won't skip out on judging), know what funny is, and that want to do it. We've already had a lot of volunteers, so it this seems like it'll be one of the easier tasks you'll have.
  5. Logistics. Have a plan for what will happen when. Having a plan for this will help you later. I had a two week period when people can add articles, followed by a two-week period of judging. It's up to you.
  6. Finally, you are responsible to make sure that the competition is fair. This is by far the hardest part of the competition. I can make suggestions here, if you want, but this is your baby, so you don't have to listen to anything you don't want to.  ;)
Well, that's all I can think of. Feel free to ask any questions. I'll be here to help whenever you need it.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
The last one we added Best Illustrated as an additional category. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Ah. Sorry. I forgot that one.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
You don't need to add a new category, but might I suggest Best Article by a British Admin who's name begins with 'M'? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
I still think the best article written by a user whose name begins with "bra" is a good suggestion...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Fuck The Media - Screw The Truth

Hey buddy, it's LinkTGF - just want to let you know about my new site that I'm working out the kinks on -- http://www.screwthetruth.com

Check out the first issue - the style is a combination of The Onion and Uncyclopedia. Hopefully I can start putting out issues more regularly, but for now here's The Truth.

--LinkTGF

PS. Yes the PDF is large, I'm working on that as well :)

Quasi-Thank You

I actually went on IRC a few days ago to ask you to pull it, but you go to bed early because you're a farmer, or six years old, or something. It's sad seeing your children fail... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. It's gone to a better place now...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
I got home from soccer practice and it was gone. Mom said that it went to retire on the quasi-farm with my hamster, Chuckles. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

24.2.151.9 (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits)

Blanker. Ban him quickly. --General Insineratehymn 03:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I can't. Famine already got him.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Okay. Never mind then. --General Insineratehymn 03:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Mr Admin

Hey there, I was hoping you could help me with summat. The brilliant page Buttsecks was deleted and blocked for some reason, here is the page in its brilliance before it was delete http://mirror.uncyc.org/wiki/Buttsecks . So I was hoping, if you agree that the page really WAS brilliant, that you could unblock it or restore it from that mirror link. This was one of the few pages that actually had me roffling, but now it is gone *sniff* JayKeaton 09:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

You've certainly picked the right Admin to discuss this with. Brad is famed for his love of Buttsecks. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Yes, you should probably bring this up with one of the less puritanical admins, maybe one of the British admins like Mhaille, Codeine, or Olipro. Of the admins you could have brought this up to, I'm probably the least-likely to side with you on this matter, judging from the title. Thus Mhaille's comment.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow, really? And you edit on uncyclopedia? This section on your talk page is funny in itself ^_^ I'll ask one of the admins you suggested, cheers JayKeaton 21:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

The US Government Salutes You!

Thanks so much for your vote Brad. You were the first to show it support, even before it got nommed, and I really appreciate that. :) --THINKER 04:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

np.  :) I likes my funny.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Have I not been paying attention?

"...we've been butting heads of late...". I thought we were getting along fine. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I was just reefering to the commentary at Hoboeroticism. If you didn't even notice, then I feel bad for even mentioning it. (I also had said in the comment section that you were once a filthy whore. I was trying to soften the blow, since I'm such a boyscout and all and wouldn't want your feelings to be hurt.)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Ah. I really haven't been paying attention. You've been viciously attacking me, with my giant doe eyes and dimpled chin, and I haven't noticed at all. I just thought that your comments were amusing. Well, you've found your nemesis, Mister...Guy! Etc. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:14, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
You ought to hear what he was saying about Oli. Meeow!!! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Just masturbating now

I'm 88.115.14.24, or Mr Asd. I got permanently banned for vandalising one [1] time? How lame is that? Ok, now on, I stick to masturbating without vandalising. I just want blocks off so that I can upload my awesomely skillfully edited image.

With love, 88.115.14.24.

OK, but be good, ok? No vandalism.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

VFS

Should be open, eh?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll get around to it on the 11th. Maybe. ...Probably.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

On VFH

You may notice, if you're being vigilant, that I failed a nomination on VFH when it had reached -3. I want you to know that I did this after I asked Olipro and he said it was OK. If this is beyond my bounds, feel free to ban me a little bit for it if you feel the need to. I'd prefer that you just tell me of your distaste, but if you find this utterly unacceptable, I understand. I kinda regret doing it in retrospect, though clicking the link was pretty cool :D. Cheerio.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm perfectly fine with you removing any article as soon as it hits -3.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Squeak

Dr. Skullthumper has awarded this user a ridiculously yellow template because they have learned they must put down their duckie. It's been an emotional journey, I'm sure, but they've managed to—

Stop clawing at the monitor. It's only a picture.

Anyway, thanks for voting.

Rubber duck
 Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 13:10 Oct 25, 2014 05:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Skank you!

The Janitor
Thekillerfroggy would like to thank you for reading and enjoying (most of) his instructional Russian Roulette handbook. It's a pity you had to follow the helpful instructions right there in the bookstore. What a mess you made for the janitor! You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Oh, those Russians...

Thanks!

Thanks again! -- Big_Brother_Sig_Part_1.pngCUN PLS VFH (MiniluvMinitrueUnsoc) 05:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

VFH ???'s

Is it OK to re-nom an already failed article? It's had about 6 Pee Reviews, all high scoring. I went to re-nom it and saw that I couldn't. Am I able to re-nom Holy Cheese? Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

You need to renom it [[Holy Cheese|Holy Cheese, 2nd nomination]]. You may need to ask Spang to get it to work properly, but that's how it is supposed to work.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Happy UnBirthday!

Dammit, I'm late again. Oh well.

Uncake Happy Second Unbirthday!
You have now officially been an uncyclopedia member for two full years.
Must suck to be you!

Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

"Thanks for noticing me." -Eeyore
It's nice to be loved. Or, at the very least, tolerated.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Another year older, another year older..... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

.

sup --Boy Toy bitch at me 05:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, it was terribly exciting to see your period and all, but um... yeah. I've been a-workin', and such, so try not to destroy the site.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 11:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
You know I'd never do such a thing. --Boy Toy bitch at me 19:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

JESUS

They've censored your peeing Jesus.

Such is the world we live in. Ce la vie.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 16:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey!

Two things. One, nice to see you becoming marginally active again. How's the job? Second, I fixed the text on the Sistine Graffiti pic; your thoughts?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh. Trust me, it will remain only marginal. My job sucks 60 hrs/week from my existence, making editing kinda hard. As far as the second goes... um, I dunno. Lemme check.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I like. Much less wordyish and more sensical. Also, grammar is fixorated-style. Me like.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I try my best. Sometimes I have so many ideas for a caption, I want to write a whole three paragraphs. Which, of course, I can't do. So sometimes it comes out all meh.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandals from Wikipedia?

Pubbsm

With potato-based wines, this has been rated one of the finest Wikipubs in the world.

Why did you implement that into the Uncyclopedia:Bureaucrats article? I ask because I really don't like bashing that site. =/ It's how I found this one. Conniving 13:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

It's a joke. Often times, the good fellows at Wikipedia will tell their vandals that their vandalism isn't appreciated and that it'd be "more acceptable at Uncyclopedia." This is sometimes true, and we appreciate them sending folks our way... unless the people are complete jerks who have no social skills or desire to be constructive.
Don't get me wrong, a good percentage of our best contributors come from Wikipedia (well over 50%, more in the 80-90% range), it's just that most of our vandals come from there, too. Plus, it's fun to poke fun at our "bigger cousins."--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I see. Well... mind voting on the Bureaucrats article on VFD? That would be a great help whether it's for a keep or delete (assuming the latter provides a good reason). Conniving 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Done. And it's good to see you've found your way from the Wikiversity to the Wikipub.  ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

hey

k thx bai Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 08:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects