User talk:Bradaphraser/archive2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Make a separate header for each topic, as always.

“Shidush yaj te hai ' corpus nai' tenyu sumi Shidush yaj te hai ' corpus nai' tenyu sumi”
~ God on confusing Vandalism


(If you miss something, check the archives. It's probably there.)


Hey, we've been talking aboot a NewsCast, I'll drop you a memo on IRC about where our little "wiki-workbench is", Cheers! --Olipro Icons-flag-gb Co-Anc (Harass) 05:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


A week ago or so, I had a go at that Do Not Click Links article on its talk page.

Your reply was sufficiently well-mannered that I'm now wracked with guilt for having been such an arse in the first place :)

As such I'd like to apologise. Seems I temporarily forgot people on the internet are real... Smowton 18:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Heh, here you are worrying about it and I didn't even care.  ;) I just took it as a vote against. The VFH page is pretty brutal, and I'd already taken some pretty nasty shots, so you stuff was tame, really. Heck, I've DEALT worse stuff than you did. I appreciate the apology, but it's really not necessary. Just keep enjoying Uncyclopedia, and any criticism (constructive or otherwise ;) ) is welcome. Cheers.--> Correspondent Brad Frasier (Jesusland) Icons-flag-us CUN [talk]   20:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


That, and the article was pretty amusing, I'm actually torn between WoH and Cancer_Porn, so I voted for both, it's a friendly compromise :P --Olipro 15:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

You're Write Good!

Good job! Now get back to work! >_< --LinkTGF 06:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


LOL... maybe this'll solve all my computer-problems. Thanks!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 10:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

New site!

User:Acid Ammo/Bios Improval. Point it to someone you think would like to help us out. --Boy Toy bitch at me 20:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Cool. I think I may have King in Yellow interested, as well.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Busy for a week and a half

I've actually got work, and a major test, then my wife's vacation from the 15th to the 25th, so if you want to talk to me, I probably will be unavailable until the 26th. Just an FYI. Leave stuff for me here, and I'll try to get to it then.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

When you come back, you can get started on the Wild Weasel thru Mhaille's bios. I am doing Bradaphraser thru Bob3's, just so you know. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm done with mine, now hurry up with yours!  ;p--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

VFP and you

Hiya, Brad. Long time so see. Uhm... I see you just couldn't bloody well wait to vote for KKK whilst I was updating the Featured Image stuff. Well, tough cookie, your vote got deleted. Please vote again. Thanks! :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|VFP|+S 04:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

P.S.: Love you! Never mind!! Love you even more!! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|VFP|+S 04:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

W00t! I'm loved!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 05:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vote

Hey, no problem. I thought it was hilarious. In return, all I ask is that you check out quarterback for me. It's my first real article, and I wanted to know what I can do to make it funnier/more memorable. --Eggman n3 22:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


As I said before, it was a good idea. Congrats on getting a following.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Pastor of Muppets

That pic is beautiful. Thanks for the addition to my article! Pics MAKE articles.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Good U like em, did myself today after reading Ur article :) I be making more pics.. --Troll:talk 21:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Peyton Manning

Hey I saw what you added with the "Great Mannings in History". I had been adding to some other articles about how Peyton did all those things. Think it works better if I change those to the Manning family, or go with the 500-year-old quarterback? --Teapot 20:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I've found that logical misinformation is more the tone of Uncyclopedia, as opposed to straight non-sense (like a QB that's 500+ years old), so I'd personally prefer it being his family. Especially given how "famous" his family is (what with the QB dad and brother). That's just my two cents.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I see what you're shooting for and that sounds like it works better. I didn't think of the whole thing with his family. I'll clean all that up later. Thanks. --Teapot 22:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


Yeah... The 'PC Thumbs up' was meant to be 'PG Tips Two Thumbs Up' after an old advert campaign by the tea company PG tips. Obviously, I fell asleep at the keyboard... I'll go fix it now. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 08:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

UnNews Audio

Just listened to the ED story. You have a great radio voice! - David Gerard 00:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Only just got the chance to hear your reading of my story (damn uni computers with no speakers), and wow, I'm impressed. Your voice is indeed great for radio. The others were great as well, looking forward to hearing more from all the team! --Spang 03:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Holy Crap

Brad, I almost choked to death on my own laughter at your reading of my 17 Iraqis found alive UnNews bit. Dead-on reading, and bonus points for the voices! May we meet again somewhere in this, how do you say, Uncyclopedia. — 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp 01:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Heh, cool. Thanks, man. I love getting positive feedback for my readings.  :) Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.  :) It was a great piece to work with. If you write any more stories you want me to read, please let me know.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey man

I actually just stopped back to see if my requests have been obliged and saw your comment for me in "n00b o' the month". I'm glad you voted against me, but I was upset to hear you thought that I thought you weren't important enough for me to talk to, which really wasn't the case. I've just had a rather tumultous short time here, filled with some drama (which clearly seems out of place to me) and only really went in IRC to try to clear up this crappy situation. But I am a fan of your work and would have welcomed the oppurtunity to speak with you if conditions had been better. I will really only be back to check on the status of some of the stuff I've done here, but didn't want to walk away from this place with you thinking what you thought, but I am sorry to have given that impression. Keep up the great work! --Imrealized 06:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok. Well, I don't vote politically on the VF pages, I just really felt snubbed that you wanted to talk to someone, I offered, and you just kinda ignored me. Made me feel really insignificant, you know? I'm sorry if things are really going lousy for you. I just like to help people, and get really upset when I'm brushed off (yeah, I'm vain. Aren't we all?  ;) ) So, I've taken the against vote off. I DID like your two articles you wrote that made VFH (and I got to read), and would be happy to welcome you if you returned in the future.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 06:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Hey, for someone who said he wasn't going to be around, right? I just came back to check on those things again (to be honest I'll obsess until it's all taken care of) and figured I'd check if you replied. I really do appreciate your candor and your compliments on my stuff and coming from you the compliments are doubley cockle-warming (god, did I really just type cockle-warming?) and I also appreciate the invitation back. To be honest I didn't even see you in that chatroom- I hold my own as a writer off-line but this is a brand new foray for me and trying to read everything and type, I got really confused (do I sound like a total twit now?); but now that I know that I wish I would have talked to you instead- you probably would have been more help. I would honestly looooove to come back, as I enjoy this medium and its pretty exciting to me. And key people really extended a hand and made me feel welcome; unfortunately, others went out of their way to let me know I was not, quite aggressively I feel. I thought about fighting it out and staking a little claim to this site, but its so new and I could see it taking some time to gain acceptance with this "cabal" that was mentioned in comments on that "n00b" thing. Anyway, before I take up all your space, thanks again for your kind words and keep doing the commendable job that you are. --Imrealized 07:02, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks For the Vote

Hey, I know I usually don't thank people for votes.. but this is an exception I guess. I'd like to thank you for voting on Vote Fish Penis, I was surprised because there is definitely some political content in the article, and because you said on IRC that you weren't gonna vote for it for the Main Page. Well, I'm glad you changed your mind, thanks. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Reasons to become an Atheist

Thank you for taking time to explain the page's history. Tompson didn't actually revert the edits, though from what you've said about the person who seems to think he owns the page, it seems as if he undoubtedly will. While it is definitely anti-Atheism, that isn't necessarily my main problem with it; it's written incredibly poorly, as if a nine-year-old with average intelligence wrote it. It really isn't very funny... you can make fun of Atheists in a way that is fun for all, but this is just plain stupid, as I see it. A lot of it doesn't really even make sense. Painting Atheism to be nihilistic and cynical works well, but trying to make it out as if they're wrong is just plain stupid... since they're right :D XGodx 22:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Heh, I agree with you on every point except the "they're right" one. I'd personally rather not get into who's right and who's wrong, as human understanding has such profound limits. (I think therefore I am. ... That's about all I know). This is very liberating in a comedic sense, because I can point and laugh at Christians for being self-important, point and laugh at Muslims for being self-important, point and laugh at scientists for being self-important, and point and laugh at atheists... for - some reason.  ;) It's all in good fun and all, anyway. We point at everyone and laugh here. I actually think the fact that the article is implying Christianity is accurate and true, then completely disregards all the teachings of it in its cruelty and lack of empathy is hilarious. But, then again, the "owner" of the article isn't quite as much funnier than everyone else as he thinks he is ( all), and that article is probably the most racist and homophobic on the site. So there are good qualities and bad qualities. I'm probably going to add something else to it for old time's sake to see if he'll let it stay, myself.
Several of your edits were terrific and I hope they stay. I look forward to talking with you again in the future.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


Brad, as part of my effort to thank everyone who voted for bear, here's a marvelously non-necessary award:

You hath earned of it deeply. — 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp 13:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

W00t! Just what I always wanted! Rock, rock on!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

What else can I do

Respecting your opinion as I do, what can I do to improve Christo? I'm all ears. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Primarily, it gets a weak vote because so much of it went over my head. I don't really know what you can do to fix that. I just felt like, "Man, that doesn't make sense... I'm sure it's supposed to be funny" ... very often. It's partly because the subject matter you're dealing with is so heavy (and kinda requires your audience is very well-educated). That's why it got the weak for from me... I feared the subject would go over so many people's heads. I really think you did a good job with a tough subject. I can't really think of how you would do better, other than to choose a different subject. Sorry if that doesn't help much.  :(--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Wow, a mother of three living in a trailer with a high school education, and I'm deep? I'm flattered ;-) Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, all I'm sayin is that you're better educated than me.  :) I hope that means you're really well-educated but... well, it is what it is.  ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Hugs and big kisses for you!

I'm sending big hugs and kisses your way honey buns for your vote for the Little Boy article. Can you ask some friends to vote for it as well? Dame PPsigPPlips.gifCUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 22:47, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Heh, I try to keep hands off on the "asking others to vote for/against" stuff. I don't like using my influence, when I can help it, aside from the vote comment itself. But if I WERE to, I'd certainly recommend yours. :)--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk]   22:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Dearest Bradley

May I call you Bradley? Brad doesn't seem to really hit the nail on the head.

I just wanted to pop in and tell you how I adored your article entitled Leporiphobia. HAZZAH to you! Much better then a lot of the lot of rot nonsense that seems to abound around here. Keep up the good work, and all that kind of motovational stuff. Who does Kitty love? Bradaphraser, of course. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. I did indeed enjoy writing this one, and had some help from some other good writers and photoshoppers, as well. Thanks for the huzzah, and may all your writing endeavors be hilarious.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 16:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Something is jelling, an article could be coming soon, or it could be an attack of gas. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


Well......I have the first draft of Holocaust Tycoon uploaded. Still needs a bit of work, but as it was your throwaway title I thought I'd let you know. Whatcha think then? :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Heh heh heh heh... keep up the good work, and I'll actually vote FOR that when it makes VFH... unless I'm moody at the time ;p.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools