User talk:Un-Barbara Shack

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Un-Barbara Shack, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, ask an administrator on their talk page or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. Again, welcome!  -- Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 14:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

So, welcome again

And let's hope that this time around we will get along better. Good luck. ~Jewriken.GIF 11:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Help me to fight the cyberbullies and we will get on better.Barbara Shack 11:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


I admitted on my user page that I edited Uncyclopedia without reading what had been recommended to me first. I broke several policies which I did not know. I did not intentionally cyberbully.

Phyllis Schlafly

Things I had read on the Internet about Phyllis Schlafly upset me. Here’s an example of what I mean. “By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don’t think you can call it rape,” she said. The Schlafly family include at least one lawyer. Since this material stays on the Internet and those responsible are not sued I believe it is true. I was also upset because of what I had read about the harm that marital rape causes. Here is what I read. Marital Rape. I was angry that Phyllis Schlafly and her family may encourage that abuse and certainly add to the confusion of victims. Victims of marital rape who know what Phyllis Schlafly says and believe her are less likely to protect themselves.

I tried to use Uncyclopedia as a platform to express my anger and concern without first finding out Uncyclopedia’s policies. What I wrote was not funny. If I had got a chance to finish writing it people would have seen that it was not stupid either. Perhaps I would also have seen the need to add a reference for anything as extreme as what I wrote.Barbara Shack 12:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

More Schlafly nasties

You don’t like the Schlaflys . Do you feel like having a peek at this really cool take on Conservapedia which Andrew Schlafly son of Phyllis Schlafly runs. It’s also a take on Liberty University Proxima Centauri 07:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools