User talk:Anton199

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 11:35, July 16, 2013 by Anton199 (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Archives of this page

Poop throwing monkeys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You tried to delete Poop Throwing Monkeys????????????????????????????????????????? (takes a breath) ??????????????????????????????????? You, sir, are no Russian, as Russians like myself love Poop throwing monkeys. What are you really, a Canadian? Or worse, a Finlander???? If I could throw poop through a computer screen you, sir, would be covered.

Then again, let me explain the article to you. As you can see if you read it, a learned antropolgist is lecturing at the zoo, and they come upon the chimps. This learned man is hit with poop from the chimps, a couple of times, and within a matter of seconds he reverts to being an ape and throws his own poop. This is a satiric look at the importance of self-important people, and the fact that we are all apes. That's it in short. It should be featured imnho. I am but a humble servant of the poop throwing monkeys 15:55 11-7-'13 Sir!

p.s. As for your assertion that it's author is "long gone", hello, I'm right here!!!!???
Dear Al, you can spend your whole life explaining the concept of your articles to me, which may be good, as you manage to convince me somehow, but I will still be against the articles which I find gross, vulgar or obscene. Sorry. Even though some people say that toilet humor should exist and can be funny, I am the one who will always be for its extinction. Sorry again, but I really think that the reader will appreciate only ethical humor. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:29, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
If I could put in here, an article that requires the author to explain the concept (and this is not the first time) has a problem that transcends poop. Nevertheless, it survived VFD, so let's move on. Spıke ¬ 16:44 11-Jul-13
MoveOn.orgpoop Aleister 16:53 same day
In fact, I don't want to move on without having a longer last word (which assumes you two don't want to have the last word even more than I). I would not use the term "ethical humor" because, if it means anything, it means we impose an ethic on the reader. This article uses poop to make a conceptual point. The problem is that there are many times the authors that use poop not to make any point at all, to revel in writing about poop to unwilling strangers, and because some of them, at the age of 11, are still in the anal stage of development. And there are millions of Americans between the coasts who would just as soon write letters to get the school library to use filters to block access to Uncyclopedia so they never have to tell the difference. I am not as categorically against obscenity as Anton is, and the last time we discussed it, gave him examples of cases where I used obscenity and thought it worked great. In this article, poop is prominent, and the message for the reader is comparatively subtle. Aleister may pat himself on the back for this subtlety, but all that leaves for a lot of readers is, gratuitous poop. Spıke ¬ 18:49 11-Jul-13
Spike, concerning school filters... me chuckles... My friend, it is the very filters themselves that let me edit from school! I do pay attention in class, but only when I'm not being taught something I can learn in khanacademy or wikipedia infinitely faster. Anyways, lightspeed systems filter, is set up, to whitelist any wikimedia site. I tried getting on the fork from the school, but it was blocked. Yet this, with all the stuff gets through. So school filters work towards us, in some cases. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 08:53, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
In fact, this is not "concerning school filters" but obscenity. My focus is not Anton's "ethical humor" but suitability of the product to the audience; to-wit, to give even the hayseed Kansas farm-wife such a fit of chuckles that, when she encounters the inevitable spate of Feces Humor, she abandons her notion to write a letter to the Superintendent of Schools. Separately, a hundred bucks says you don't pay attention in class, and it is only by feeding your Ritalin to your parrot that you are able to operate a keyboard at all. Spıke ¬ 15:09 12-Jul-13

Okay, you have Teh Rollbackz

I saw you painstakingly Undoing four Anon changes, one at a time, and asked the Chief to give you Rollback, which he has now done. Read my instructions to Denza for the implications of this. I hope it makes your job easier (and induces you to do more patrolling)! Spıke ¬ 18:37 11-Jul-13

Thanks! In past, I heard you asking Scott to mark edits as patrolled but I do not notice any flags or exclamation marks near the edits. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:42, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
Oh, sorry, I saw one. That just means that almost all of them got patrolled. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:43, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

I let this task go, over the weekend. Currently, the Boston baseball team is playing on the US West Coast (that is, until after midnight my time) and I have been working down the backlog while listening to the games. There are only about a dozen left, on which I can't decide. One of these, Feminism, I have asked Simsilikesims to look at. However, I've worked on most of today's edits needing patrolling. Spıke ¬ 18:53 11-Jul-13

I will also try to finish this work. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Patrol of Columbo

I have marked an edit of Columbo as patrolled as it is not vandalism and the anon tried to make a joke. I don't think it changes anything, as the humour of the article was already a bit random and anon just pursued it with the idea of Sonic the murderer. If anyone thinks that it is not funny, he can revert it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 06:52, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

You should mark all edits (which you can) patrolled, and then go back if you need to undo/rollback. That way, the mark isn't left for others to worry over. Hope that helps! --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 08:55, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
Anton, you are correct that a patroller's options include not only marking an edit patrolled or reverting it, but post-editing it, as you did here. In fact, if Anon had any sense of humor at all (and if the article is not a Featured Article that should be preserved against latter-day attempts to move it in new comedy directions), this is the best alternative of all, though the most time-consuming.
As above, one motivation for this additional stripe on your epaulette was to induce you to do more of the patrol work. It doesn't help if you notify us of individual Patrol decisions. If there is a reason for me to review your edit at Columbo, I'll do so. Otherwise, we trust that you did it right. Spıke ¬ 13:34 12-Jul-13
I am glad that I have rollbacks and I am trying to help you with your work. I was not going to notify you about everything I did (as otherwise I don't reduce but increase the amount of your tasks) but I was not sure about that particular one. However, you don't have to look thorugh it as I am prettu sure it does not make the article worse. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:48, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
There is nothing surer than the form, "I certified an edit although I am not certain," to make me feel compelled to look at it. If you are not sure, feel free to ask me or others--as, again, I asked Simsie, who just now has attacked her task at Feminism with zeal. Setting out to help patrol edits should not be a commitment to pass judgement on each one! Indeed, the editor of Columbo has a playful mind, and the only thing going against this edit is that it adds an item to an aimless list--but a solution to that waits for the day that the article has an actual owner/steward. Spıke ¬ 16:44 12-Jul-13
That's what I thought and thanks for looking at it anyway! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:46, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

Russia?

So I read through the new USP and noticed you were the biopic? You're russian? WOW! That means we're neighbours, in a way! :) I'm finnish, nice to know this about you. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Sleeping Cat 14:08, 14 July, 2013 (UTC)

Anton's not Russian, he's a true Russian, a Ukranian, you fool! And all ways will be. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:15, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
PS - Nice to know you're Finnish. Never been there though. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:16, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
This is why we really need the biopic contributions from different users! Don't the Finnish and the Russians have good opinion about each other? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:44, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
Is it the right time and place to mention one of the bravest actions of the Second World War, the Russo-Finish War? Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:51, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
PS - Nice to know someone apart from the editors reads the USP. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:52, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
Yes. This is what I wanted to say. But the Russo-Finnish war stuff was not very significant, we always had good relations apart from that. Well, almost always. Thanks for the UnSignpost and well done! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:48, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
It may not have been significant in the story of Russo-Finnish relations (I'm sure Finland was just passed between the Russian and Swedish empires for ages) however it was significant in WW2 and is one of the most pride-filling, great stories of WW2 for the allies (Russia not being counted as an ally in this part of the war because of Hitler and Stalin's pact). Of course that aside the Russians made a huge, pride-filling, great contribution to WW2 when fighting on the allies side and in the Napoleonic Wars so I love both nations. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:21, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
Somehow, Scottpat, you made me more proud of my country than I were before :) thank you :) Also, nice to know you're ukrainan Anton, nothing wrong with them neither. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Sleeping Cat 05:54, 15 July, 2013 (UTC)
No probs, makes me want to be Finnish too. I was joking about Anton's nationality though. He is Russian, it's just if you want to wind a Russian up you call him Ukranian. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:24, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
I personally have nothing against the Ukrainians. It is just rather strange that the two countries that were together for a long time become separated but it is fine with me, as Ukraine has almost a completely different culture. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 08:41, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Oh ok so you ARE a russian? Damnit, this is so confusing :) Well, Russia did have quite a lot of countries under it, like Estonia, for example. I really love Estonia as well, very similar weather like on Finland, and the language is similar too, with few exceptions. Like, Pete, which is a common name in Finland, means 'gay' in Estonia :D Just a random fact I wanted to share. But yes, many countries were under Russia at some point, altough Russia wasn't called as Russia back then. But that's really cool man. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Sleeping Cat 09:29, 15 July, 2013 (UTC)
What I meant is that Ukraine and Russia were like one country since the beginning. Kiev was the capital was the first capital of Russia, for instance (but the country was called Kievan Rus' and not Russia at that time). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:33, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
I think that when Cat refers to "back then" he/she means USSR and Cold War rather Anton and I are refering to the Russian Empire from Medieval Times to 1917 (which was called Russia so not sure about Cat's point). During this period many countries swapped under Russian rule and Swedish rule in the Baltic including Estonia and Finland (even St. Petersburg was once a Swedish city). Russia extended from Finland down to Poland and across to Dagestan and then up to Mongolia (even bigger than it is today!). However I too like Sweden, especially their heroic leader Charles XII. So to be honest Russia, Ukraine, Finland, Sweden and Estonia are all wonderful countries in their own rights. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:45, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Scott, sorry but Saint Petersburg was founded in the 18th century and before that there were only swamps there. After that the city was the capital of Russia and Sweden has never invaded it. So it has never belonged to Sweden. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:50, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
I agree Scott. I'd like to visit every single place on Planet Earth. I just meant that Russia was called Soviet Union or Soviet Russia at some point. Russia is 'Venäjä' at finnish, but Soviet Russia/Union was 'Neuvostolitto', which is whole different name. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Sleeping Cat 09:58, 15 July, 2013 (UTC)
Sorry Anton, slight historical inacurracy there. I should have said that Sweden once possesed the territory which St. Petersburg now stands in and St. Petersburg was actually built once the Swedish were forced off it. But to save my skin part of St. Petersburg was given to Sweden later on because of the huge influx in Swedish workers however this territory was ceeded back to Russia when the Finnish and Swedish occupants had a row. So technically Sweden ruled over part of St. Petersburg for a bit. On a side note St. Petersburg was primarily built by Swedish workers and based on a Swedish city. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:38, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Actually, I did not the fact about the Swedish workers! But I know that the majority of them died because of the climate in the swap area and so people say that St. Petersburg was built on bones. By the way, do you remember that you said that I should ask someone to revive the Reviewer of the Month competition? I created a forum about it and it is called "RotM". Could you, please, visit it as the only person who noticed it was Romartus? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:01, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Sure, I will. You may know about the Swedish workers but you didn't seem to know that Sweden did actually rule part of St. Petersburg after it was built, that was my point. Anyway, I have never been, but St. Petersburg is meant to be one of those great cities of Europe. It was part of Peter the Great's dream of modernising Russia and turning it into the superpower it became. I need visit it one day (I need to visit Russia one day and I will take a detour through Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark on my way). Suprisingly I've never travelled much and have only visited countries in North America and Western Europe. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:12, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Well, since the formation of Moscow many foreign workers there had their parts of the town almost to themselves only, but that's cool that you know a lot about Russia (don't tell me you don't, not everyone now knows about Cossacks, for example). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:15, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
I know of Cossacks from my love of Napoleonic War history, I know of St. Petersburg from my broad knowledge of 17th-18th Century Europe covering the Great Northern War. I know of Russia herself through means of three Russian friends (apart from you), a broad knowledge of the rest of history, a love of geography, a relative's frequent trips to Moscow and a Brit's above-average general knowledge basis. Apart from that, to quote Manuel, "I know nothing, I know nothing" (but I'm not from Barcelona!). Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:00, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Well, you have a very full knowledge about it! This is something I certainly appreciate (not concerning Russia in particular, but history, geography, the world itself in general). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:53, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
Well thanks but I think you're knowledge of British culture is much more amazing. You need to visit Britain. Have you been? (Have I asked this question before? (It happens sometimes!)) Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:38, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
No. Shame on me. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 07:52, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
No don't feel sorry about it, it's fine. If you do visit don't go to far North. You might bump into the Cossacks of England - Northerners. They'll bombard you with crazy accents. Stick in the civilised South. Just travel guidance. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:13, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice! I will surely remember about this when I visit Britain. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:35, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

PLS edition of UnSignpost with extra poo

Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:00, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

RotM

Lord ScottPat has brought the House to your favour. On your command the contest may be re-opened (well actually on an admin's command). Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:23, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:10, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Long time no C

Hey Anton! Are you still in Paris or your motherland? LaurelsV V I P ® 22:17, July 15, 2013 (UTC)V V I P

Paris. Motherland will be tomorrow. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 07:52, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects