User talk:Aleister in Chains

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 17:31, January 3, 2014 by Anton199 (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Walk into a bar collab
Charles Dickens 3
Thanks for visiting, please sign in:


<insert name here>



Perpetuum mobile
Now, Blast off!
Apecat1

I'm so glad you could stop by.

Aleister & Mimo


Special:DoubleRedirects

Your recent renaming has put two pages on this list! Please fix them. Spıke ¬ 23:15 18-Dec-13

Don't worry, I fixed them for you. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:31, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks SPIKE and Simsilikesims. After I changed the name I looked immediately at the Double Redirect log and it said there were no D.R., so I didn't check again (didn't know there was a time lag). Aleister 10:48 19-12-13

Yup, those reports only run once a day. Spıke ¬ 11:05 19-Dec-13

Aleister you psychopath...no more excuses. Excuses are for Psychopaths. And your name is Aleister. Okay? --ShabiDOO 23:09, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
/ gets new message alert, look at talk page, scratches head, tiptoes out of the room (but thinking "watched half of the movie 'Seven Psychopaths' yesterday and really looking forward to the second half", tiptoes down the hall quietly. And Shabidoo, check your emails. Aleister 12:40 20-12-13

Forum:Anon objects to various photos and topics‎‎

Please consider removing that rant. Anon's mind will not be changed (even if he was authentically offended by the photo and not another Darthpedian trying to exploit differences of opinion here), and your invective is unwarranted (and distasteful when wrapped in a Christmas message). Anon didn't make a rule but only called my attention to an existing rule (apart from his other grievances that weren't legitimate). You handled the situation successfully, just don't heap blame on him for making the situation arise. Spıke ¬ 23:57 24-Dec-13

Fine. In the spirit of Saint Nick I'll edit it. But why put up a forum if we can't forum, didn't the Roman Senate itself accuse and rattle when an injustice has been rendered. If someone can justify why a photo of a guy eating a hamburger can stay while a guy eating an arm can't, I say they think they know the difference. Aleister 00:05 25-12-13

This is a wiki and anyone can edit anything. I am only suggesting that this particular edit is at best ineffective. And the topic of meat-eating versus flesh-eating is totally separate from this Anon. It would be nice if you toned it down. Spıke ¬ 00:08 25-Dec-13

It's pretty mid-ground about now, but he objected to a meat-eater and obviously doesn't realize that he's only seeing himself in that picture. I love the picture, as it made a perfect statement, so it wasn't nice of him to come in and try to censor nudes and pictures of his alter-ego. If he was just horrified by the arm-eater, fine, but he lumped it in with naked pictures of people, so he obviously stumbled into the wrong outpost. I have to sign off soon, so Merry Christmas once again. Aleister 00:14 25-12-13
A perfect statement, yikes! But thanks. Stipulated that he was swinging at anything that moved. Enjoy Christmas eve! I should be on-site for four more hours. Spıke ¬ 00:17 25-Dec-13

Much later: I especially appreciated your reason for voting for Paraguay at VFH — in which case you might enjoy the follow-on job, Chile. Spıke ¬ 01:00 1-Jan-14

Shooting albatrosses

As you are an expert on swearing in humourous articles, could you, please, say whether my edits of the article Why?:Shoot the albatross made it worse or better? Someone disagreed with my statement that cursing at the end of the article did not make it better. Thank you! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:09, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

In fact, swearing in humorous articles was my minor in college, so I'll reply. Your edit at the end made it no worse, though one might indeed be tempted to swear on seeing a crossbow pointed at him. The swears were gratuitous but understandable. Above, though, "You had to go and do exactly the opposite!" is harder for me to work through than would be, "You had to go and do it anyway!" Spıke ¬ 17:15 3-Jan-14
Ok, thanks! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:16, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
I'm an expert at swearing in articles? What the fuck are you talking about, or are you just blowing your uncle's cum out your ass? OK, just kidding. You have to do it where it works and at no other time. My Second Conquest of the Moon article worked, imnho, when Selene marches. But swearing, like any other use of letter-combinations to create an image, an emotion, or a memory and meme connection in the readers mind and nervous systems, can be used to twist those things a little in a different direction, towards the satirical in most cases. Aleister 17:25 3-1-14
Ok, well, maybe I will restore something. Thanks to everyone! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects