User talk:Ace Attacker
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Hello, Ace Attacker, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Here are a few good links for n00bs:
- About Uncyclopedia
- Beginner's Guide
- The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to be funny and not just stupid
- Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
- Help Pages (Yeah, there's more.)
I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or the use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome! --
edit Harry Potter spoiler
Hi. I taught that you were the one who was for the spoiler "DUMBLEDORE KILLS SNAPE IN BOOK SIX". That's the funniest thing i saw on Uncyclopedia. But the one with the "SOVIET RUSSIA" isn't funny at all. Sorry. It's pointless unless it's the real thing that happens in the book. Cheers. Loshmi 09:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
But this is not about to find the truth or something. Ok, it goes like this. Spoilers generally serve to warn the reader about the things he might not want to find out before he read the book, watch movie, etc. The catch with this spoiler is that it do totally opposite, and that's what's so funny with it. It's so cruel, and that's funny. As someone said, true HP fan was probably red the book before he saw the article on Uncyclopedia. This is a joke for fans. And its charm is in its simplicity and cruelty. I hope you watched the movie Sixth Sense. If you didn't don't read italic text that follows. My friend was thinking about watching it. He asked his mate to tell him something about the plot. And his mate told him: "Ah, that's that movie with the ghosts in which Bruce Willis on the end finds out that he also is a ghost. I would kill him for that, and that was unintentional. That's what's so funny with HP spoiler. Someone will probably be angry, but the others will die laughing. I've just notice that Dumbledore and Snape are switched. So everything I said was about the spoiler " SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE IN BOOK SIX" Loshmi 19:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
You miss the point. It's not about to spoil someone reading the book. Btw, i doubt that most of visitors will actually do the research to get what you wanted to say. It's not effective as the original. That should be a joke for Harry Potter fans who know what happened in the book. It's just about that how you should feel if you didn't read the book and read "SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE IN BOOK SIX". You would probably piss off. That's what is funny. Please leave it in original way. That was the funniest thing on Encyclopedia. Loshmi 03:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
edit Merry PirateNinjamas!
The Dread Space Pirate Ninja Orion Blastar wishes you a Merry PirateNinjamas and a Happy New Year. Even to Christians, Jewish people, Pagans, Atheists, Agnostics, Communists, Nihilists, Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, and everyone else. Orion promises to lay off the looting and plundering and maiming and killing, at least until next year. For those who are not offended by Christmas, Merry Blessed Christmas!
edit Happy Hanukkah
Here is the deal with you editing of the Thailand article. It's obvious that you hate the place and the people who come from there. That's fine with me. What I do have a problem with is you using this article as a way of expressing your hate if that means you reduce the quality of the article. This article was saved from VFD (by me) because I removed much of what was in it which was just un-funny hate speech which added nothing whatsoever to the humour. The section on rape, or cows you just re-added for example. I see no humour there (just hate) whatsoever and it does not fit with the rest of the article. Your vote at VFD giving the reason "It's horrid because the land is horrible." was very concerning to me. Are you suggesting that this article should be horrible? I will not tolerate that.
I notice that you appear to be re-adding most of the previously removed content... I'm going to ask you nicely (once) to seriously think about if what you are currently doing with this article is actually making it better for others to read, or if it just making you feel better by doing it. Think about it, and reconsider your edits. MrN 14:49, Mar 29