User talk:Aaadddaaammm

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(What the hell, have a cookie: new section)
(What the hell, have a cookie)
 
Line 105: Line 105:
   
 
Thanks for the semi-[[Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:SysRq/Abortion|review]]. {{User:SysRq/sigsubst2|time=@ 19:42 Dec 7}}
 
Thanks for the semi-[[Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:SysRq/Abortion|review]]. {{User:SysRq/sigsubst2|time=@ 19:42 Dec 7}}
  +
  +
==Hi==
  +
Hi. I'm being friendly. Hi. Nice to meet you. I'm Yettie. {{User:YesTimeToEdit/sig13}} <small><small><font color="#B61B10">[22:06 7 August 2010]</font></small></small>

Latest revision as of 22:06, August 7, 2010

edit Welcome

Hello, Aaadddaaammm, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Here are a few good links for n00bs:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or the use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

edit 4004

Because, along time ago we took all of the year pages and moved them to Uncyclopedia:Timeline, and that's the way it's going to stay. Besides, you just copied that out of User:Aaadddaaammm/2004BC, which isn't even the right year. If you really want it in the mainspace, you're going to have to add it to the timeline. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, Biblical Chronology or something similar is fine... Heh, I don't know why you put it under 2004 in the first place... Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll try and remember that... Anyway, thanks for understanding. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Did you know...

...that redirecting to special pages doesn't work? So your article doesn't actually work. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

edit Alot WILL be a word...

..when the Swedishinspired campaign against splitwritings has done it's globecovering work.--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 10:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

edit Some friendly advice

Regarding Forum:Unfair ban?, do yourself a favor and read A few words about personality conflicts, If you get banned and Before you get infinitely banned, read this. This is just for your benefit. It makes no difference to me if you read it or not. It may, however, make a beneficial difference to your experience here at Uncyclopedia.

If you don't want to read it, just keep in mind that referring to admins as retards or similar offensive terms will insure you an infinite ban here eventually. It's just a matter of time.

Right or wrong, the site culture here isn't going to change, and if you don't adapt to the reality that admins can ban you, and there's nothing you can really do about it, you're in for a very short career as an uncyclopedian.

--Hrodulf 00:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

edit Welcome to UnNews

Hello, and welcome to UnNews! I know I don't have any authority whatsoever 'cos I'm still a noob (slave of the house), but whatever.

Anyways, I suggest you take a look at Help:How_to_write_an_UnNews_article before you write your next article. Oh, and if you want to know what it takes to get an article featured, have a look at basically anything I write for UnNews. Oh, and if you actually pay attention to your English teacher (or paid, if you're not a student like me - and yes, it is a hard thing to do) when covering the topic of formal writing or speeches, you'll probably get somewhere really high up.

But seeing as you probably have done that, here are a few pointers for you, based on UnNews:Car_bomb_in_hospital_carpark:

  1. Write longer articles. Twice the length of that will do, but thrice is a very good path to take.
  2. Add in an image. All you need to do to get images is linger around Uncyc, but a couple of times I had to steal some from Wikipedia.
  3. Add some sources (can be bullshit), or just use {{Original}} if you want.

--thematrixeætsyou, the ultimate (talk) (flames) 08:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Handgun is my favourite article, too.

edit Time change article

Thanks for your praise on my time change UnNews article! I'm glad you liked it :) --Composure1 15:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

edit Pedantism

Alot is not a word, my goal in life is to eliminate this word from uncyclopedia.

While you're crusading against 'alot,' you should look into killing some comma splices too, they're just not cool.

Please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes. Commas are generally a matter of personal opinion or style. I, personally, think that commas are pretty much always cool. They make the meaning of writing clearer, IMO, so they must be all good. Aaadddaaammm 04:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

edit Cookie

Newcookie Isra1337 has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Several times today I have come across pages that you've taken time to help fix up. Thanks for your hard work. While I realize that the work I am seeing is from random other times in the past, I saw it now, so please accept my belated thanks.---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

edit Lord Fluffy

I have three things to address:
One- You misspelled the word "genius" on your userpage. This seems a rather gross error for one that complains about the low intelligence of others.
Two- Commas are not a matter of personal opinion or style. They are designed to clarify meaning by separating different elements within a sentence. Following are the ways that the comma may be used in this manner:

  • Introductory phrases (id exemplar, "When I was a child,...")
  • Parenthetical phrases, details not necessary for the overall meaning of the sentence. For example, 'I cut down all the trees, which were over six feet tall' and 'I cut down all the trees which were over six feet tall' have very different meanings.
  • Independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction.
  • Dependent and independent clauses if the dependent clause comes first.
  • Coordinate adjectives, adjectives that equally and directly modify the following noun.
  • Items in lists.
  • In representing large numbers; i.e., 2,645,712.
  • Names that are presented last name first- "Leibewitz, Michael" for example.
  • Between the name of the city and the state, and again after the name of the state.

A comma splice is a punctuation error in which the comma joins two independent clauses. The comma may be changed to a semicolon, the two clauses may be made into two different sentences, or a coordinate conjunction may be added after the comma. Comma splicing is NOT okay.
Three- You are correct in your assertion that "alot" is not a word. Its use should be eliminated, but shouting about it will not help.
Anyway, I find that language itself is a rather intuitive thing. Feel free to respond on my talk page, sir. Please excuse grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors in this- I'm writing at two in the morning. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 06:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah. I interpreted the italics as emphasis on the word rather than an indication of humorous intent. Sorry about that. Now that I see it's a joke, I'm quite amused. You are correct that I used Wikipedia as a resource. The rules are universal, and I knew them, but I did not feel that any explanation I could make would be sufficiently lucid. You are also correct that some sentences are correct with or without commas. In those, it is a matter of personal preference. That'll teach me to speak in absolutes! Ha ha ha.. As to the "alot" thing- that was my point. On this site, when you tell people not to do a thing, they will invariably do it. Whether or not they were all adding them with the intent of irritating you, at least some undoubtedly were. Not everybody's sense of humor is above the fart-joke level. I did not feel that you were rude in your reply. Given my personality, bluntness is essential if you want me to get something. I'm not good with hints.
It's nice to have an intelligent conversation once in a while. Thanks. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 14:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Just a quick to say for returning the irony to that article before I got there. It helped alot. *runs* Wyattj 00:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


edit Species

You have my reply comrade, and my remittance for not seeing that it has only been there a day, especially as I make it a point to throw Vigilance only upon older articles that have little hope of ressurection and are usually full of crap. Give it some more meat though, I'm sure there are more places you can go with it. ;)

-St. Fenix (UserTalk) 16:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

edit ICU

Thanks for helping out with the maintenance stuff here. However, that ICU's been removed, as the template is only for articles less than a week old. Just something to check when you're doing it. Thanks again for helping! —–Sir Heerenveen, KUN UotM RotM VFH (talk), 7/12 17:59

edit What the hell, have a cookie

Newcookie SysRq has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Thanks for the semi-review. sirErr.gifsysrq @ 19:42 Dec 7

edit Hi

Hi. I'm being friendly. Hi. Nice to meet you. I'm Yettie. —JACKASS WHORE MafiaHatBlack Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:06 7 August 2010]

Personal tools
projects