User talk:75.86.140.247

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Romanus Ite Domum

Vandalism is not pretty.

One thing that Uncyclopedia is absolutely full of is vandals, who think that making a mess is just hilarious and stuff. And the fact that you were referred to this page means that you are certainly one of them, which means you have not yet gotten one simple thing through your head:

VANDALISM IS 100% POINTLESS.

Vandalism includes typing your own hack opinion into the text of an article, especially your opinion about the other editors. Also, changing words into random other words, or adding "000,000" to all the numbers. Copy-and-pasting text from other wikis into the mainspace is vandalism, and is certainly unoriginal — like most vandalism, for that matter.

However, for the beginning vandal, it usually means just erasing text. For example, you're probably feeling proud for having blanked a section or an entire article, because there's no way for us to know what it contained before or to put it back. Well, unfortunately for you, that's just totally wrong.

edit Detecting vandalism

Any Uncyclopedian checking Recent Changes can see what you did. If you are a new or anonymous editor, it jumps out at us. If you blank part or all of an article, it jumps out and stands on our heads:

! (cur | prev) 11:28, 2014 January 21‎ 198.163.212.17 (talk | block)‎ . . (4 bytes) (-11,098) . . (←Replaced page with 'poop') (undo) (Anon edited userspace or made big deletion) [rollback]

What happens then is that one mouse click undoes your "work" and puts things back the way they were before:

Vandalism is stupid

This report shows what a blanker blanked — including the prior text, which is restored in the time it takes to click on "Undo."

Well, that's just about it, really. It only takes 2 minutes (at most) before someone will notice that you've vandalized something, and 2 seconds to change it back. Whilst it might have taken you 20 minutes to dream up your essay and click that Save button with glee, all your hard work can be undone in a fraction of that time. Bottom line: You lose. You are wasting your time.

edit The next stage

If you continue to hack at this article, you should know that the process for undoing twenty of your edits is not just as easy as undoing one, it's the same thing. Or perhaps you are thinking it will be especially fun to hit another article. The problem (for you) is that we are starting to see that the problem is not one edit but one editor.

At that point, Admins or Rollbackers get called in. They have an extra button that doesn't even ask us for a Change Summary, and a magic Rollback all button that can undo every change you ever made — and, get ready, without even reading your rant. Epic fail.

Hilton chauffeur

Chicks who are more impressed with deleting than writing a funny article are chicks you don't want. (Although they do put out.)

The next step would be to block you from editing. Not everyone can do it, but everyone can request it, by adding you to Ban Patrol, and all Uncyclopedians want to keep the wiki clear of bad edits. Ultimately, your username will end up on the Block List and everyone will laugh at you for being the latest to think you could get away with it.

You don't have a user name but just an IP address? It doesn't matter that we don't know who you are. (After all, you don't know who we are). We can still shut you down. Change your IP address? We will still know it's you — the one making horrible edits.

edit Turning away from the dark side

It turns out that it is more rewarding to write funny stuff than either to write crappy stuff or to make funny stuff go away. You can show a chick a funny page that you've written and make her laugh (and not just go "Ew!"), as opposed to showing her a blank page that you claim used to be funny until you arrived. You might get lucky. In fact, if you decide you want to write funny stuff, we will actually help you rather than work on automated ways to detect you and shut you down. The experts call that "a win-win situation."

Scotty and the bloody knife
Writing funny articles
Understanding Uncyclopedia:About usBeginner's GuideOur projectsGetting ideasHelp menu
Understanding Funny:How To Be Funny And Not Just StupidFunny and not just stupid imagesChoosing words creatively
What to avoid:VandalismCyberbullyingWriting about yourself or your palsOveruse of initial quotationsOveruse of lists
What people have asked for:ArticlesPictures
Additional help:Get spelling/grammar helpFind or become a co-authorHow to write an UnNewsAsk an AdminGet feedback on your work

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
Personal tools
projects