User:The Thinker/PLS08
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| Humo(u)r:
| 6
| Not Overly hilarious, but not terrible. Mild, I'd say.
|
| Concept:
| 8
| Pretty down-the-center for an article on a person, but I'm glad we have a Harry Hill article now.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 6
| Also mild.
|
| Images:
| 6
| Appropriate enough.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 7
| Good effort.
|
| Final Score:
| 33
| A nice little article that may need a bit more humor infused.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Disclaimer: I am an American, and as such, my knowledge of Harry Hill is unfortunately limited to Wikipedia's article and as many Youtube clips as I could find. From What I have seen, he basically does what Jon Stewart wishes he could do on TV Burp. I was cracking up, and wish I could find more on him. However, Hill's personal humor does not dictate my voting on this article; I am judging it on it's own merit. --THINKER 02:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
| Humo(u)r:
| 7
| Okay, it took me a few minutes to get what this was about, but once I did, I began the laughterings.
|
| Concept:
| 10
| If it has to be meta-humor, it really should look like this.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 8
| C'mon, it's Mhaille. No worries here, would've liked to have seen a bit more of it.
|
| Images:
| 7
| I like the two that are there, one more might've pushed me over, just knowing Mhaille's choppin' skillz.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 6
| I think there might've been enough repetition site-wide to vary the links a bit in the redundant episode titles. Only slightly cop-outish, but enough for slight reduction.
|
| Final Score:
| 38
| Very good sir.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
| Humo(u)r:
| 8
| Very good. Some wordiness takes away in a few places, but overall, quite funny.
|
| Concept:
| 10
| Excellent.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 7
| See the humor section.
|
| Images:
| 9
| Very funny, add to the article very well.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 9
| Great use of cites.
|
| Final Score:
| 43
| Top notch. Easily FA after PLS.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
| Humo(u)r:
| 6
| I don't know too much about Marty Friedman besides that he was in Megadeth and apparently now is quite interested in Japanese culture. However, I only laughed a few times with that knowledge.
|
| Concept:
| 6
| The humor needs to be like x10 to support this kind of concept.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 6
| Okay I guess, perhaps it supports the concept.
|
| Images:
| 7
| I got a few laughs out of the images.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 7
| I'll go high to give you that benefit of the doubt on this one, because I'm not really getting any great vibe from it.
|
| Final Score:
| 32
| Not particularly swaying either way.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
| Humo(u)r:
| 8
| Some good funny in there.
|
| Concept:
| 8
| I like the concept.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 8
| No problems here.
|
| Images:
| 7
| Got a few good laughs.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 6
| Just seems to be something missing.
|
| Final Score:
| 37
| I'm a tough judge, but I do like this one.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
| Humo(u)r:
| 8
| Oh the misogyny! Quite funny, though slightly one-trick pony-ish.
|
| Concept:
| 9
| A very good person article.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 8
| Jokes are facilitated well here.
|
| Images:
| 8
| The images are very well captioned.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 7
| I like this piece.
|
| Final Score:
| 40
| Again, I like this piece.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
| Humo(u)r:
| 6
| Got a nice little "thats sweet" chuckle. Like a kiddie version of an Uncyc article.
|
| Concept:
| 8
| Good concept, needs more.
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 6
| Not much there, but again, cute.
|
| Images:
| 0
| No images.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 7
| I like the effort.
|
| Final Score:
| 27
| Cute. Continue the efforts.
|
| Reviewer:
| THINKER 02:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
