User:Sannse
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
|
Uncyclopedian of the Month February 2009
Scary!?
Stuff what I have done:
- Milton Keynes
- UnBooks:Choose Your Own Adventure - Featured.
- The British Class System - Featured.
- TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL - Featured
- Some images. my favourites are below, the rest are in my gallery.
*semi featured: used to illustrate a front page article
[edit] Image:'re winner! trophy.JPG
In response to the comment you left on mah talk page, go ahead and delete it. --GAMESPOT=666 21:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Done. :) --
sannse
esnnas
11:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
User_talk:sannse/Archive cards & stuff
[edit] Ta-da!
Iz me. --207.55.41.249 20:56, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
NOW iz me. --Sir Andorin K. (Silence! I vape you!) 20:58, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Moar boobies on uncyc
So, whats it goonna take to get ads like these.[1][2][3][4]
They all fit gloriously below the search bar on a wiki that shall not be named using a monobook theme.--CharitwoTalk 02:49, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
- Given some of the content on Uncyc, it would actually be surprisingly easy to get ads like that. But somehow, I think your fellow Uncyclopedians may have a different view on the desirability of such adverts -- sannse
(talk) 00:37, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
- I would leave forever.
PlebKUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 00:55, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
- I would leave forever.
[edit] This spam filter is greatly irrating me...
I'm having to say "cock" instead of "penis" in my edit summaries. I don't like that. People may think I'm referring to roosters. This will lead to confusion. Are you sure there isn't a way to remove it from Uncyclopedia? Maybe by moving our domain to something like (and this is just off the top of my head) Uncyclopedia.org or something. That'd probably work. Think about it. Or we could just be moved to fuck.wikia.com. That'd be nice. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 22:36, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- I've removed the "penis" block. And I have to say, there aren't many jobs where that is a perfectly valid thing to say. I have an interesting life. -- sannse
(talk) 23:22, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Sannse! :)
PlebKUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 00:18, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Sannse! :)
[edit] penis
Somehow it's still blocked, as I've noticed I can't categorize images using HotCat when the category in question contains the word "penis". 01:34, 11 November 2009
- HotCat? wassat? -- sannse
(talk) 01:51, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- WP:HOTCAT should explain it. Though this link is probably more helpful. 19:52, 12 November 2009
- It looks like something is wrong with the filter. I think Uncyc used to have a separate filter, and I think that's been semi-lost. It doesn't show, but might still be active. And that's the one with "penis" in it. We are investigating -- sannse
(talk) 20:51, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know if this is the right place to put this, but I need to report a vandal. She's been blocked a few times but always manages to get out of it somehow, and now she's back and blanking pages. You know what to do. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 21:01, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like something is wrong with the filter. I think Uncyc used to have a separate filter, and I think that's been semi-lost. It doesn't show, but might still be active. And that's the one with "penis" in it. We are investigating -- sannse
- WP:HOTCAT should explain it. Though this link is probably more helpful. 19:52, 12 November 2009
[edit] UnSignpost 29-10-2009
The Newspaper Whose Mom Said It Was Cool!
October 29th, 2009 • Issue 69 • Hehehe, 69
|
Better than ED, of course After having hit the 25,000 articles mark, it's worth knowing what other people think of this wiki as it's walking down the sidewalk in its high heels and short skirt. So here are some Google searches for hits on Uncyclopedia in the last week and what it came up with: A Star Control II forum or something-rather found here remarks on Uncyclopedia's SC2 article and other entries. Lauding such as "Uncyclopedia rocks..." overshadowed the naysaying remarks about the wiki being immature and for poopfaced doo-doo heads. The most insightful comment, by a user dubbed "Son of Atares", says, "It definitely beats Enyclopedia Dramatica in terms of funny, but that really isn't saying anything at all." Agreed. On a Polish forum for Polish things, Polish people, and Polish things that Polish people do, some Poles or something have a great laugh at Uncyclopedia making fun of their homecountry. One ED fangirl attempts to advertise her nonsense, only to be ignored over the lulz and tears shed from reading Uncyclopedia. Finally, a forum for progressive rock fans also enjoys some laughs at the prog rock article and the article about their own forum. That guy from There Will Be Blood blatantly lies in an attempt to seem better than thou by boldly claiming, "Uncyclopedia is not funny." Our official response to this criticism? He likes Miley Cyrus. Been there, done that, got the genital warts. The last post to the forum by the gender-confused dinosaur Littlefoot from The Land Before Time reads, " I actually think the prog articles and ProgArchives pages on Uncyclopedia are generally embarrassing attempts at funny by people who do not understand subtlety or delivery in comedy." And then a smiley face, because I guess he pwnt us or something. Fantasy Football Midseason Meanderings In real sports, midseason is typically when “experts” make “predictions” about how “the rest of the season” will “play out,” and the UFFL is no exception. Here are this author’s predictions for the rest of the season, by team: 1. Sternensteinenstine (6-1): Already a game ahead and looking forward to a soft schedule in the coming weeks, Sternensteinenstine’s dominance of the UFFL will continue for the foreseeable future. In all likelihood, the Nazi Juggernaut will sweep the rest of the season with relative ease, become overconfident, take on the world’s largest nation by land area, and eventually be defeated by an international alliance in mankind’s most destructive conflict ever. Finish 13-1 (#1 seed), at the cost of 3.7 million casualties. 2. The Dudes (5-2): Facing a similarly weak series of opponents in weeks hence, The Dudes look to continue their winning ways. At about Week 11, though, they’ll run into trouble, and spend the rest of their season getting high. Finish 8-6 (#4 seed). 3. Domestic Team Name (5-2): A solid team built around consistent players, the team of housewives and aprons does relatively well the rest of the year, but gets screwed Week 8 for not having the foresight to draft a quarterback that doesn’t have a bye in Week 8. Finish 10-4 (#2 seed). 4. John Curry All-Stars (5-2): Another solid team, the All-Stars will play well for the rest of the season, but wane down the stretch when their manager loses interest in favor of watching hockey. They still make the playoffs, however. Finish 5. Oklahoma City Storm (3-4): OCS is a hard seed to crack. Despite possessing one of the league’s most devoted managers, too much depends on inconsistent and disappointing players at key positions, not to mention the team’s susceptibility to tornadoes. Finish 6-8. 6. Dibiase’s Millions (2-5): The victim of not one, but two running back busts, Dibiase’s Millions have been struggling to find their stride all year, and given the production of Matt Forte and Steven Jackson, will continue to do so. Finish 4-10. 7. Cheddar’s Doritians (2-5): Though they have won two of their last three games, Cheddar’s Doritans will more than likely miss the playoffs due to their slow start. Putting too much faith in one team probably doesn’t help, either. Finish 6-8. 8. The Winnerz (0-7): Ironically enough, the Winnerz can't win. Even more ironically, if the Winnerz could figure out how to select their starting roster, they wouldn’t be half-bad. Unfortunately, signs point to the team not being able to figure that out, at least for this and possibly next season. Finish 0-14.
|
| |||||||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||||||||
[edit] I would have gotten that Wilde impersonation even without the caption. HONEST!
To be more serious, though... isn't this actually in the same category as those nekkid girlie pr0n pics the guys with their super secret girlie pages were hoarding. UnCool? O_o I just noticed it and honestly didn't realise what I reverted before there was a big pic of a hairy faced guy licking a male reproductive organ. The how and why that user removed it is not perhaps the right one, but... what's your opinion? -- DameViktoria 17:45, 10 Nov
- /me breaks into the room/ Even for the less-than-undevout Muslim, that pic would be considered as the most offending thing on earth. /me leaves/ • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 •
•
• 17:52, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Um, Sannse? When you deleted that, were you aware of the current VFD vote that was leaning towards keep? And the vote before that one? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 22:29, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
- This was with my staff hat on. The image was obscene, so I deleted it - it's a staff task that I've done many times in the past 4 years on Uncyclopedia. Move along, nothing to see... -- sannse
(talk) 23:01, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
- This was with my staff hat on. The image was obscene, so I deleted it - it's a staff task that I've done many times in the past 4 years on Uncyclopedia. Move along, nothing to see... -- sannse
- Sannse, I don't think we've talked before; I'm a new kid. Howdy. I got blocked for an hour for gloating because I had said I thought the image should be deleted because it violated Wikia policy, and apparently you agreed. I'm not gloating right now (please don't block me, even though I did deserve to be blocked the first time). But I do want to thank you for removing the image and for the work in general you do around here. It's fun getting your work featured; it's tedious trying to clean up the Uncyclopedia sewer with a mop. Thanks for cleaning up. Father WHY??? (confessions) 19:47, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Honey, I've been trying to think of a gentle way to say this... have you any idea how much of a suck-up you sound here? There. That was pretty gentle... considering the several more anatomical versions I considered.
sannse
esnnas
20:56, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- Honey, I've been trying to think of a gentle way to say this... have you any idea how much of a suck-up you sound here? There. That was pretty gentle... considering the several more anatomical versions I considered.
- Sannse, I don't think we've talked before; I'm a new kid. Howdy. I got blocked for an hour for gloating because I had said I thought the image should be deleted because it violated Wikia policy, and apparently you agreed. I'm not gloating right now (please don't block me, even though I did deserve to be blocked the first time). But I do want to thank you for removing the image and for the work in general you do around here. It's fun getting your work featured; it's tedious trying to clean up the Uncyclopedia sewer with a mop. Thanks for cleaning up. Father WHY??? (confessions) 19:47, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- So I both sound like a suck up who tells people in authority how great they are and at the same time challenge people in authority and say I think things should be changed? Interesting. As it happens, I really am one of those people who compliments people when I think they're doing a good job (I do not give compliments I don't mean) and who tells people ways I think things could be improved. Just be glad you don't have to put up with me in real life. Happy editing! Father WHY??? (confessions) 04:50, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Name Change
Please change my Uncyclopedia name from Ajr to Ajraddatz, as per the IRC conversation. Thanks, (Do I even have a sig here?) Ajr 03:43, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
- Have you read and understood User:Sannse/Name change lecture no. 3b ? --CharitwoTalk 03:46, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't apply to matching up accounts between Uncyc and the rest of Wikia :) Done Ajraddatz --
sannse
esnnas
- Doesn't apply to matching up accounts between Uncyc and the rest of Wikia :) Done Ajraddatz --
[edit] Did you see this?
After all that look what's here User talk:Optimuschris. This is the same user who when I got all pissed because of something else apologized as if he really meant it then right away tried to start the whole problem over again. He tried to get me so mad I'd leave but it didn't work. Now he's trying things again! Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 06:39, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh no, not things. I tried things once. Now I get paid to tour schools and tell kids not to try things or they'll end up like me. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 20:04, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Possible Tech Issue
It appears that User:127.0.0.1 has been banned since October 24, 2008. --Mn-z 16:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- yeah, it doesn't matter the way it used to :) blocking it used to affect some of our maintenance, but all's good now -- sannse
(talk) 00:21, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Can't log in to Uncyclopedia
I noticed the log in screen changed very recently, maybe yesterday or the day before. I had to try logging in twice today before I could, then it suddenly logged me out. When I tried logging in again, it gave me a message saying I was now logged out. I did that about four times before I could post this message. Also another user hasn't been able to log in at all (I forgot to ask what browser they're using; I had a problem using Internet Explorer 8, but I'll try another browser and see if it does the same thing). Could you fix it or know someone who could? Thanks. Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:51, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to post this for Mordillo too so that whichever one of you is on first can check this out. Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:55, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
I just tried Firefox and ran into the same problem, got suddenly logged out then had a hard time logging back in. I think there's something wrong with the new sign in screen. You may have other users who can't log in at all; I know of at least one. Father WHY??? (confessions) 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Have you cleared your cookies and cache? It may be something strange there... If you've done that, and still have a problem, please can you mail as many details as possible to us via Special:Contact? We'll try and hunt down the bug. Thanks -- sannse
(talk) 00:24, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, cleared all. I was able to log in OK this time, but as far as I know the other user hasn't been able to log in at all. I'll see what details I can get. Father WHY??? (confessions) 08:16, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
- If I got this right, the user who can't log in gets Internet service though their school. I suspect it's a secure server, and it seems that now Uncyclopedia won't respond to most secure services. When they type in their name and password and then try to log in, nothing happens. I suggested they try it with different browsers, clearing cache, cookies, etc., and they have the same problem.
- I thought maybe they could sign up for a free Internet service (which typically has very limited time online or a zillion ads), then connecting through that. The problem is they'd apparently need a separate line to do that (I may be wrong; my computer expertise is limited). They might be able to log in from a different location, but not being able to log in to Uncyclopedia at home, school or work (which is at school) really, really sucks. Any ideas? We may be losing a very productive user here. Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:17, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, cleared all. I was able to log in OK this time, but as far as I know the other user hasn't been able to log in at all. I'll see what details I can get. Father WHY??? (confessions) 08:16, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
- It sounds as though he needs to contact his provider (or his school's). If they are blocking the site (or aspects of it) then there is nothing I can do. At the moment, it sounds like an isolated problem with his provider. Sorry --
sannse
esnnas
22:58, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I doubt it has anything to do with the school blocking it. The user had been able to sign in here without any problems until the first time they tried using Uncyclopedia's new sign in page. The server doesn't seem to be blocking anything else they could find, and they can read Uncyclopedia without problem, just can't sign in. I had problems signing in myself, and based on my admittedly limited watchlist, activity on this site dropped significantly right after the new sign in page went up. I suspect other users aren't able to sign in either. Father WHY??? (confessions) 23:29, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, I don't know if this helps any but here's a bug that Wikia should address: If you click logout in the corner and then click login at the corner (apparently this bug doesn't occur if you click "login again" from the logout screen), you can log in and you will be immediately returned to Special:UserLogout, immediately logging you out. I'd try duplicating this in different browsers/environments but frankly I'm not the one getting paid to do that. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 05:41, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Syndrome, I can't reproduce that... can you tell me what browser/OS you are using, and what page you are on when you click "log in". Thanks
- Why.., I'm not getting other reports, and can't reproduce... I need a lot more info. Please can you ask the person concerned to email us via Special:Contact with as much information as possible. For example, what is their OS and browser? What is their username. What exactly happens when they try to log in? Any error messages? Can they log in on other wikia sites (if they have an account), What is the full URL of the log in page they are using? Can they log in with a new account? Any information they can give may help -- ~sannse
(talk) 21:34, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, I don't know if this helps any but here's a bug that Wikia should address: If you click logout in the corner and then click login at the corner (apparently this bug doesn't occur if you click "login again" from the logout screen), you can log in and you will be immediately returned to Special:UserLogout, immediately logging you out. I'd try duplicating this in different browsers/environments but frankly I'm not the one getting paid to do that. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 05:41, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I doubt it has anything to do with the school blocking it. The user had been able to sign in here without any problems until the first time they tried using Uncyclopedia's new sign in page. The server doesn't seem to be blocking anything else they could find, and they can read Uncyclopedia without problem, just can't sign in. I had problems signing in myself, and based on my admittedly limited watchlist, activity on this site dropped significantly right after the new sign in page went up. I suspect other users aren't able to sign in either. Father WHY??? (confessions) 23:29, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- The user was finally able to log in, with the help of (quote) "a computer
hackergeek." Apparently logging in whatever way it is something of a pain, but it worked. Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:47, November 25, 2009 (UTC)- I can't think of any way that you could log in that needs a computer geek.... sounds more and more to me as though it was some sort of blocking his end. -- sannse
(talk) 00:24, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- I can't think of any way that you could log in that needs a computer geek.... sounds more and more to me as though it was some sort of blocking his end. -- sannse
- The user was finally able to log in, with the help of (quote) "a computer
[edit] I need to know!
If I put my airplane on a treadmill and the treadmill matches the forward airspeed of the airplane exactly, will the airplane take off? Also, hi sannse. I hope you haven't been taken hostage by filthy hippies or something. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN16:56, 20 Nov
- "Speed" is relative. If the treadmill and the airplane have the same velocity relative to the earth, then no. If the airplane's speed relative to the treadmill is the same as the treadmill's relative speed to the earth, then it's possible. How long is this treadmill, and how fast is everything going relative to everything else? Also what type of plane is this, and how experienced is the pilot? If it's a pilot who's experienced at landing on aircraft carriers, it's more likely to happen than if it's a pilot who's used to flying commercial jets and landing on big city runways. Father WHY??? (confessions) 19:17, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Protip: The treadmill makes no difference at all as the airplane doesn't rely on the wheels for forward momentum. Also, I was talking to sannse. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN20:02, 20 Nov
- If a plane on a treadmill is moving at the same velocity as the treadmill's tread, then it isn't moving relative to the treadmill and won't get off the ground (unless the treadmill does). Also, I was talking to Sannse. Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:33, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
- You need to go watch some MythBusters dear. Optimuschris is right --
sannse
esnnas
00:27, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
- I just watched the Mythbusters on YouTube. No offense, but in that case they're talking about a plane moving against a treadmill--there's movement in opposite directions. The pilot on the program said "If I match my speed the exact same speed going forward as it's going backwards...." that he thought the plane wouldn't take off. The statement above by OptyC refers to a treadmill that matches the forward airspeed of an airplane (same velocity), not opposite to it (opposite velocity), which is a completely different scenario. Father WHY??? (confessions) 08:31, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
- You need to go watch some MythBusters dear. Optimuschris is right --
- If a plane on a treadmill is moving at the same velocity as the treadmill's tread, then it isn't moving relative to the treadmill and won't get off the ground (unless the treadmill does). Also, I was talking to Sannse. Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:33, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Protip: The treadmill makes no difference at all as the airplane doesn't rely on the wheels for forward momentum. Also, I was talking to sannse. -OptyC Sucks!
[edit] Renaming of a user name.....
Hi, sannse. Could you please rename the user account "RAN1" to something else. I want to register RAN1, but it says that it's been taken. I've already read User:Sannse/Name change lecture no. 3b, so I understand well what I'm asking for. I'm the same user RAN1 as here, and if you need any confirmation, you can contact me on the IRC. Thanks, 96.233.100.136 02:36, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- You understand well what you're asking for, but does anyone else? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 02:47, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like he's asking for another user's account to be renamed, which I do believe Sannse can't do. --Mn-z 05:07, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's like, "Doctor, I need a new kidney, so take one from the patient next to me and give it to me. I well understand the risks. If you need any confirmation, I'll sign any forms that you ask me to." --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 06:27, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- But absurdity is one thing. What I really don't get is that there's no registered user called "RAN1". Seriously, go to User:RAN1 and try to create the userpage and it will tell you that no one is registered with that name. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 06:29, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, never mind. It says that it's an invalid user name, for whatever reason I don't understand. Now I'd like to ask why RAN1 is an invalid user name. Why is it giving me that, sannse? On a minor side note, why the curt welcoming? Wut96.233.100.136 06:43, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- You're an IP and IPs don't have feelings. You'll get a big ol' {{Welcome}} when you register, but until then, you're just something else to revert. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 06:46, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Really? See here. I've registered, but Uncyclopedia has yet to actually have the Wikia usernames right, you know. (This user is a rollbacker on SmashWiki, and rollbackers have feelings, last I checked) 96.233.100.136 07:00, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Sigh. Rollback's a tool, not an award. Also, this is not my talk page. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 07:37, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Sigh. Rollbacker => User ≠ IP; and I don't believe that discussions should go all over the wiki. Best to have it in one place…Anyways, I've decided not to join Uncyclopedia; I have too many other things to deal with like SmashWiki and the VSTF. 96.233.100.136 20:46, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Sigh. Rollback's a tool, not an award. Also, this is not my talk page. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 07:37, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, never mind. It says that it's an invalid user name, for whatever reason I don't understand. Now I'd like to ask why RAN1 is an invalid user name. Why is it giving me that, sannse? On a minor side note, why the curt welcoming? Wut96.233.100.136 06:43, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like he's asking for another user's account to be renamed, which I do believe Sannse can't do. --Mn-z 05:07, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
Do you mind?... T'was a perfectly understandable request an all - as far as me and RAN1 are concerned. Consider this a spanking by Auntie Sannse for biting the newbie (and not the fun kind either.)
So, anyways, RAN1. If you still want this:
- Create an account as RAN2 (or similar) on Uncyc.
- Post here (logged in to the new account) to say you are RAN1.
- Post on my Wikia talk page (logged in as RAN1) to tell me the account name you made here.
- I can then change the name here to match your wikia one.
- ??
- Profit!
Thanks -- sannse
(talk) 22:38, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, you would say that it's not the fun kind. People might think you're batting for the other team. I hear from a very reliable source that they don't take too kindly to that in San Fransicso. To RAN1: when I said that isn't my talk page, I wasn't suggesting that you take the discussion to my talk page. I was just clarifying that this is indeed not my talk page even though I'm commenting excessively here on what is frankly none of my business. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 01:34, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Wait, which team am I batting for now? Are you female, or do you think I'm male? or... wait...worse... are you accusing me of being heterosexual?? Eep!! You are right, they don't aprove of that here --
sannse
esnnas
07:47, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Say, I have a question. Suppose a gay guy won't date straight females, and a gay gal won't date straight guys. So could the gay guy date the gay gal? Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:05, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- No, because you wouldn't be gay if you dated people of your sex who were straight, thus, you would be heterosexual if you were dating someone who happened to be homosexual but was a different sex to your own, also, tomatoes are fruit, aerosol sprays can set off fire alarms, mellifluous means pleasant or soothing to listen to, it is impossible to lick your elbow, you should do a PEE review, and yes, I really should go to work. Any other questions? --ChiefjusticeDS 00:06, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- OK, so you got at least three people in the Wikia office to try licking their elbows.... impressive! -- sannse
(talk) 01:31, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- You think Gene Simmons can't lick his own elbow? But if you want proof it's possible, this and that. I rest my case, your honor. Father WHY??? (confessions) 02:01, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- He said it was impossible for me to lick my own elbow. I promise you, that's 100% correct. --
sannse
esnnas
02:06, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Wait! no! he said it's impossible to lick my elbow. And I know that at least one person has definitely done that... so we are back to him being wrong. --
sannse
esnnas
02:08, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Wait! no! he said it's impossible to lick my elbow. And I know that at least one person has definitely done that... so we are back to him being wrong. --
- He said it was impossible for me to lick my own elbow. I promise you, that's 100% correct. --
- You think Gene Simmons can't lick his own elbow? But if you want proof it's possible, this and that. I rest my case, your honor. Father WHY??? (confessions) 02:01, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- OK, so you got at least three people in the Wikia office to try licking their elbows.... impressive! -- sannse
- No, because you wouldn't be gay if you dated people of your sex who were straight, thus, you would be heterosexual if you were dating someone who happened to be homosexual but was a different sex to your own, also, tomatoes are fruit, aerosol sprays can set off fire alarms, mellifluous means pleasant or soothing to listen to, it is impossible to lick your elbow, you should do a PEE review, and yes, I really should go to work. Any other questions? --ChiefjusticeDS 00:06, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Say, I have a question. Suppose a gay guy won't date straight females, and a gay gal won't date straight guys. So could the gay guy date the gay gal? Father WHY??? (confessions) 22:05, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Wait, which team am I batting for now? Are you female, or do you think I'm male? or... wait...worse... are you accusing me of being heterosexual?? Eep!! You are right, they don't aprove of that here --
K, so I created the account. I'll leave a message on your talk page briefly so you can change my username. RAN2 01:06, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, and done sannse
(talk) 01:31, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
Could I get my account name here change to the one I have on Wikipedia? There I'm known as Jimbo Wales. Why Not Jimbo Wales 06:50, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm joking, of course. :-D Father WHY??? (confessions) 06:52, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- Once you're done with that, could you change my name here too? On the rest of Wikia I'm known as WIKIA SUCKS. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 06:52, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not joking. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 06:55, November 26, 2009 (UTC)











