Comment — I don't think s/he's made enough reasonable edits to justify giving him/her the award. S/he's made two okay-ish pages, six edits in total. I'm not sure if that's enough. Still, if you think s/he deserves the award, that's fine. ?|COMRADE_PONGO_V2|RUN_CMD|RUN_GSLYR 09:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment - TextAdventurer is gone. Just wanted you to know. The sub-pages, however, are another story. Maybe it could be moved to a userspace, and re-create the front article? --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 16:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Nomination (and for) — while he hasn't done a huge amount of implementing recently, he's the master of the art. ?|COMRADE_PONGO_V2|RUN_CMD|RUN_GSLYR 09:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
For! The first person to take an interest in The adventures of a grue. --Naughty Budgie 05:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
For That bastard. Creating Grueslayer PvP and sending attack guards on me. I didn't even do anything to that piece of shit. If I ever see that dickhead in real life, i'll rip his heart out. Maybe i'll get him to be the first Implementor of the Month, bringing him unwanted attention and making vandals FLOCK to him. That'll teach him to do stuff like making final bosses look pretty and putting Pokemon and Oblivion references in, that fucking nerdy FAGGOT! Conniving 18:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment: When does voting end? Conniving 19:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
NF Truly a staple of the Game namespace, if not for entirely the reasons one would hope. However, he's had more contact with said namespace than most this past month, and it's undeniable that "deletion" is a form of "implementation."-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 02:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
For Well, the reason IS out of the box... I really hope that it doesn't set a precedent though. Conniving 12:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Reason accepted. Nobody has contested it, so I guess it goes. However, he does only have nine actual edits in the Gamespace... what the hell. He's someone. He's better than no-one. —ComradePongo(V2)GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 17:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Nomination and For, he's active, helpful, and tottally does whatever this is an award for. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 01:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment, he's a Game Implementor? He's only got less than ten edits. Conniving 02:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Against - you know why --SirManforman 22:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Against - Forgive me. I just can't support this. There's got to be someone else out that that's done a bit more for our games other than reverting twice and using a bot to revert spelling mistakes. Conniving 23:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Conniving's "for" vote struck due to the fact Conniving's already voted. However, under new rules, nomination is still valid. —ComradePongo(V2)GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 09:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment - I just want to point out that Zombiebaron admitted that he only voted for Todd Lyons because he wanted SOMEONE to win the award, and he doesn't care about his own nomination anymore since I pointed out my case and "against" vote. Conniving 15:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)