From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 04:21, September 30, 2012 by RAHB (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
This user is on vacation, holiday, sabbatical, administrative leave, or is otherwise goofing off with the knowledge and/or consent of the Admins. Or, more likely, they've buggered off without saying boo to anyone. Their expected date of return is unknown. If you're lonely, or you miss them, leave a message.

48px-Face-surprise.svg This user is happy to help n00bs. Leave a message here.
Writer of the month BePrepared Noobaward Pee reviewer of the month award
Clock This user has been on Uncyclopedia for
8 years, 3 months and 4 days.

“Your self-importance is obvious at first glance”
~ Aleister in Chains on MrN9000

Mohandas Gandhi with Aleister in Chains December 21, 2012 with Funnybony Lord Christopher Monckton DENIAL, Pants Bomber, Neighborhood Watch (with MadMax, Multiliteralist, and Electrified mocha chinchilla), UnScripts:Who built the moon‎, Fish Puns‎ (with Under user), Clementine Attlee (with Mhaille}, The Pun Invasion of Uncyclopedia, Eric Clapton, HowTo:Turn Your Terminator On (with Cajek), Battle of the Sexes, Why?:Do a Pee Review (with Cajek), The Color Problem, Pointless_Paradox,Project Manager, Moving the goal posts.

UnNews:Porn star Nora Batty dies, UnNews:Toilets refuse to take any more shit‎, UnNews:Paedophiles Rejoice Over New Child Database‎

In a desperate attempt to increase my own level of self importance I have awarded this to: Composure1, Hyperbole, Optimuschris, Sycamore, Gerrycheevers, Sycamore, Roman Dog Bird, SysRq, Mnbvcxz, Siddhartha-Wolf, SPIKE, Funnybony,Aleister in Chains, Bizzeebeever and Mattsnow as well as his most prestigious award to Prettiestpretty , Modusoperandi, Cajek, Under user, Dr. Skullthumper, Heerenveen, Gerrycheevers, MadMax, Hyperbole and Aleister. You will notice that Gerrycheevers, Hyperbole and Aleister won both. That is because they are better than you.


Don't watch! You! denier!

What I'm doing now

Sorting out some of our articles which are badly in need of attention. I looks for articles which have lots of potential, but are badly executed. Sometimes from Category:Articles to fix but others as I find them. I normally prefer to edit "vital" type articles. Generally I quickly read through the whole article to get a feel for what's there and then have a look in the page history to try to find some good stuff which may have been lost in the past somehow. When I'm happy that I have what I can from the history I start editing out the carp, fixing any obvious formatting problems and maybe adding a few new ideas here and there if I get them.

If I have picked a the right article in the first place it is sometimes possible to produce a good article out of a bad one quickly.

Personal tools