Delete. - If it were on the article 19, that'd be one thing. But it's not. It's on Nation of Islam. Let's get rid of it. pillow talk 23:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I copied this into the only article which was using it New Brunswick so it can go now... Also I have removed all the links that matter from everything above. MrNFork you! 23:02, Nov 7
Delete. - More "this article was written by" shit. As a bonus, there are one or two German editors claiming that this template actually may make Uncyclopedia literally illegal for Germans to edit and/or read. I'm not sure that's a drawback, but either way, the template sucks and should go. pillow talk 23:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
My view on this kind of thing is that if a template is appropriate only for one or two pages, we should subst it into them and delete the template so people aren't tempted to put it on, say, Dog the Bounty Hunter. pillow talk 23:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - If we can get rid of the fucking Megaman templates, I will be so thrilled. Not funny, not related to the articles they're in, and just irritating clutter. pillow talk 21:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - If we can get rid of the fucking Megaman templates, I will be so thrilled. Not funny, not related to the articles they're in, and just irritating clutter. pillow talk 21:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - In theory, this could be useful. In practice, it's only cluttering articles where it doesn't belong. pillow talk 21:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Not clear on what happened here. Did the author just cut-and-paste in the Wikipedia page and then lightly vandalize it? pillow talk 21:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - What is this, an attempt to whore the Aztec article? I could envision the "Intentionally Offensive" template having a <choice> option where it pointed you to other offensive articles, but this ain't that. pillow talk 20:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - This is just weird. Is this even supposed to be a joke? pillow talk 20:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
This was a parody of a Wikipedia template, which was in active use around the time of Hurricane Rita (2005). The WP original said not to rely on info in an encyclopedia when deciding whether to abandon one's home, vehicle or shelter. The parody (except for the last line, and the mention of Uncyclopedia) is verbatim. --Carlb 00:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - It's like a fake maintenance tag that adds the article to no maintenance categories. If an article really isn't funny, we should be using {{rewrite}}. pillow talk 20:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - I might be able to see a use for this template, but instead it litters articles like Zombies. Besides, it's not funny. pillow talk 20:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - This template looks like it was created not as part of an article-writing process, but as an easier way to vandalize articles. Let's get rid of it. pillow talk 20:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Random "Did you know" factoids are funny on the front page. They are not funny in articles like Hell and Penis. Deleting this template won't affect the {{DYK}} template. pillow talk 20:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Random "Did you know" factoids are funny on the front page. They are not funny in articles like Hell and Penis. Deleting this template won't affect the {{DYK}} template. pillow talk 20:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Ummm... is this funny in kind of a Winkleresque way? Or is it just crap? I'm leaning toward the latter. pillow talk 18:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - This one is a tough call. On one hand, it's a direct parody of a Wikipedia template. On the other hand, almost *all* our articles are non-factual, and therefore this template could be put on anything and everything, and I don't think it would make anything funnier. Let's see what everybody thinks. pillow talk 18:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - This template is not very funny or useful, and on most of the pages that transclude it, it's obviously worthless clutter. pillow talk 18:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)