User:HELPME/Pee Reviews

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User:HELPME
Revision as of 16:57, July 21, 2010 by HELPME (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
First one-
In-depth? No.
Comments: My first review, did badly. I was a noob, so yeah...
Second
In-depth? Barely. Chief was nice that time.
Comments: Still bad, but better than the last one.
Third
In-depth? Again, barely.
Comments: I was too nice and it was short. I learned a lesson after this one.
Fourth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: This was much, much better. I won a golden shower for this one. My first really good review.
FEATURED!!!!
Fifth
In-depth? No.
Comments: Far too short. My last not so good one.
Sixth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: Still a little short. Meh.
Seventh
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: This is really short, but considering the article, there was good reason.
Eighth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: Short, but I thought the article was really strong.
Ninth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: Smallish, but full of advice.
Tenth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: Wow, that P+F section is big.
Eleventh
In-depth? Uh-huh
Comments: I tried to be nice. Did it work?
Twelfth
In-depth: Yes
Comments: Not my best, oh well. 10 indepth reviews! Yay!
Thirteenth
In-depth? Yeah
Comments: I don't think I understood half of the stuff in there =/
Fourteenth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: That was a tough one, but I just felt like doing it.
Fifteenth
In-depth? Yep.
Comments: Reviewed on request. FEATURED!!!
Sixteenth
In-depth? Yeah.
Comments: It was so British. I hope I understood it.
Seventeenth
In-depth? Yup.
Comments: This review was over 22 kilobytes long. Wow.
Eighteenth
In-depth? Yeah.
Comments: UnTunes are hard. I did this to get it out the queue.
Nineteenth
In-depth? Yes.
Comments: I did a Nachlader-type review. Yay?
Twentieth
In-depth? Sure.
Comments: Twenty reviews now.
Twenty-first
In-depth? Ja.
Comments: Somebody stole my review, but I did it anyway.
Twenty-second
In-depth? Yep.
Comments: 20 indepth reviews! Woohoo or something.

edit Related

The fourth article I reviewed, HowTo:Survive A Premature Burial, was featured on March 27, 2010. The fifth one I reviewed, iPad, was featured on February 15, 2010. Spider was featured on May 25, 2010. Go me!

  • Statistics:
  • 22 reviews
  • 20 indepth reviews
  • 2 golden showers
  • 3 reviewed articles featured
  • Became a fresh stain on February 12, 2010
  • First nominated for ROTM in May 2010
  • Won ROTM and became a steel kidney in June 2010

edit My review template:

HELPME

This tag means that I am here to HELP YOU by giving your article a review.

If this takes more than 24 hours, whack me with a large metal pole.

edit Also, one for ROTM thanks:

Piss

Thanks!

I, HELPME, thank you for voting me to be ROTM for June 2010. Your support is appreciated. Now that I have ROTM, I have an excuse to do nothing, so I'm even happier!

My master procrastination plan is working! YES!!!

Personal tools
projects