User:Cajek/Archive8

• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Game:Death Row (Scene B: Take 2) by UU. Checking own, blah blah. --UU - natter 18:09, Nov 30
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/My visit with Aunt Myfanwy by Vader1941. Not really. No advice to speak of. Close, but... Nah. --UU - natter 18:09, Nov 30
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cleveland Steamers by Mnbvcxz. Thereabouts. --UU - natter 09:14, Nov 29
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles by A.Z?123. No. --UU - natter 09:14, Nov 29
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Fail an Exam by Nachlader. Yup. --UU - natter 09:14, Nov 29
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cloud V.S. Sephiroth by IronLung. Thereabouts. --UU - natter 09:14, Nov 29
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Researchers make breakthrough in UFO research by Necropaxx. Checking my own. You disagree, you change. :) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:35, Nov 26
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Heat Magazine by Nachlader. Very very in-depth. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:35, Nov 26
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Helaba by UU. Checking own etc. Yes. --UU - natter 21:57, Nov 24
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/vortex by Necropaxx. A fine job. --UU - natter 21:57, Nov 24
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Middler Bowling by UU. Yes, checking own, disagree = change, etc etc. --UU - natter 21:57, Nov 24
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Latios and Latias by JamesM123. Tough call. I'm going to say no, although for a first review it does at least try to say more than just "make it funnier". Really don't agree with it, but that's an opinion thing. Borderline. --UU - natter 12:27, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Vanilla Ice by UU. Checked my own again. You disagree, you change. --UU - natter 12:27, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/China's Retard Extermination Policy (a little (quick)ly, if you would please.) by Joe9320. No. --UU - natter 09:45, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Double Butter Theory by Asahatter. Yup. --UU - natter 09:45, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ned Flan-Diddily Flanders by Nachlader. Can't argue that it's not in-depth, so yes, and I agree with the score and the points raised. But it's a little brutal, could be more friendly. --UU - natter 09:45, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Wikipedia Chase! (resubmit) by Mnbvcxz. Yes, a more encouraging effort than Epitheton too. --UU - natter 09:18, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Spore Numero Due by Mnbvcxz. Thereabouts. --UU - natter 09:18, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fred Reich by Mnbvcxz. Yup. --UU - natter 09:18, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/black metal (re-submission) by Fag. Yep. Good to see you back, Fag! --UU - natter 13:33, Nov 21
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Epitheton epitheta by Mnbvcxz. Can't really give it - the only constructive help was for formatting, while the humour and concept were one liners about being random. Needs moar encouragement. --UU - natter 09:18, Nov 22
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/slow motion by MrN. Let me thi... sure. --UU - natter 13:33, Nov 21
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Movie Of Lady Whose Ankle Is Showing by Harsh Noise. Can't give it - the bulk of the advice consisted of "add more humour". Would have been fine for a quick, but it's not a quick. --UU - natter 13:24, Nov 21
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Racial Draft by Mnbvcxz. Also yep. --UU - natter 10:11, Nov 19
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Limp Dick by Mnbvcxz. Yep. --UU - natter 10:11, Nov 19
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/ Why?:Do I Like Tango and Cash? by Necropaxx. As the reviewee, I'd say so. --UU - natter 10:11, Nov 19
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/YourKidDies.net by Guybles. First instinct is to say no, but on viewing the article in question, I'm not sure what else there is to say about it, so yes. --UU - natter 11:43, Nov 18
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Be Emo by Nachlader. Yup. --UU - natter 11:43, Nov 18
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Tom DeLonge (Cyberman) by MrN9000. Yep. --UU - natter 10:56, Nov 16
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Win a Darwin Award by BlueYonder. Yep. --UU - natter 10:56, Nov 16
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Man Harasses Woman at Drive-Thru by Nachlader. Yep. --UU - natter 10:56, Nov 16
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Golf War (Rewrite) by AhhDiddums. One line per box. No. --UU - natter 12:00, Nov 13
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia Transit Authority by Nachlader. Plenty of advice. --UU - natter 12:00, Nov 13
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Consett by I like cheese. I'd say. Enough advice given. --UU - natter 12:00, Nov 13
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/How To:Spark a Rebellion by Nachlader. Yes, although a bit insulting. Let's keep this friendly, huh? --UU - natter 12:49, Nov 12
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Madagascar (film) by Guybles. Yes. Wasn't going to be, but then he added more stuff. --UU - natter 12:49, Nov 12
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/No Country for Old Men (film) by SysRq. Uh huh. --UU - natter 22:21, Nov 11
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Horton Hears a Who! (film) by UU. Yup. (You disagree etc). --UU - natter 22:21, Nov 11
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ray Stevens by UU. Yup. (You disagree, you change). --UU - natter 22:21, Nov 11
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pulitzer Prize by Nachlader. Yep. --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Tails the Straight by MrN. But of course. --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Barack Obama accused of being too left-handed by BlueYonder. Yep. --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Manwithnoname/Naruto by Mnbvcxz. No. Too short, and no advice beyond "don't bother". --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Potatohead (second draft) by Mnbvcxz. Just about. --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Poo futures by Mnbvcxz. Yeh. --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dirty Harry (quick) by MrN. A MrN review! I'd forgotten what they looked like! (Yup). --UU - natter 11:17, Nov 10
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Yad by PaddyAtkinson. Wrong side of borderline - as he says himself, not that helpful. --UU - natter 08:43, Nov 8
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/concerned signmakers by Nachlader. Most certainly. --UU - natter 08:43, Nov 8
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Did I just read Twilight? (resubmit for SysRq) by SysRq. Aye. --UU - natter 08:43, Nov 8
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/10,000 B.C. by Asahatter. At first, it looked borderline, but for stub with not much more than one line, this is in-depth. --UU - natter 08:43, Nov 8
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/No country for old men by BlueYonder. Yup. --UU - natter 08:43, Nov 8
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Economic Crisis going to plan by Nachlader. Yes. --UU - natter 08:43, Nov 8
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Buddha Article Revamp by UU. Yup. Though to be honest it looked just like a template... SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 21:52 5 November 2008
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks: An 82 Year Old Woman Wants My Body! by the returning SysRq! Welcome back bud. --UU - natter 16:55, Nov 5
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Is There a Moose On This Plane? by Nachlader. Yepper. --UU - natter 16:55, Nov 5
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/50 Cent by Mnbvcxz. Yep. --UU - natter 16:55, Nov 5
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Paul Freeman's acting career dead at 41 by Mnbvcxz. I'd say so. --UU - natter 16:55, Nov 5
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/A Tinge of Minge (redux) by UU. Checking my own again. Change it if you disagree. --UU - natter 16:55, Nov 5
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Regulation by Necropaxx. Yep. --UU - natter 16:55, Nov 5
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Those Necrophiliacs Are At It Again! by Mnbvcxz. Yup again. Promising start. --UU - natter 09:43, Nov 4
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Insurance Policy Fetish by Mnbvcxz. Yup. --UU - natter 09:43, Nov 4
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/(quick)Daron Malakian by UU. Yes, I checked my own again. You disagree, you change, yes? --UU - natter 09:43, Nov 4
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Loopy de loop by Knucmo2. Yup. --UU - natter 22:12, Nov 3
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Wurzels by Nachlader. Yup. --UU - natter 22:12, Nov 3
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Adam Sandler expresses concerns that his next film ‘might not be shitty enough’ by Padddy5. One line per box? Nope. --UU - natter 22:12, Nov 3