< User:Cajek
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Pele to blow up Kilauea over political concerns by Joe9320. Better Joe, much better. --Chiefjustice PS3 17:06, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bugs Bunny by Snippy. Excellent work. --Chiefjustice PS3 16:56, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Read a book by ChromaNebula. Could use more detail, but for a first review it's okay. --Chiefjustice PS3 16:51, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sunday by Oliphaunte. Yes. --Chiefjustice PS3 16:44, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Freezer by Ferric AlFerrous Errr...while I agree the article is good, I don't feel it isn't without fault and need for critique. Borderline no. --Oli Omni Ombudsman 21:50, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:The Case for Infinite Copyright by Woodburninator Yes, pretty good review. --Oli Omni Ombudsman 21:50, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Some guy's at a payphone by Joe9320 Yes. Lot of bold font by the way. --Oli Omni Ombudsman 03:12, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Iwillkillyou333/Selena Gomez by Qzekrom Yes, but I feel that you could have added a bit more help and suggestions. Ok enough though. --Oli Omni Ombudsman 03:12, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia is bad for your kids by Chief. Self-Yes. --Chiefjustice PS3 13:49, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Seconded! --Oli Omni Ombudsman 03:12, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Mattsnow/Quebec City by Chief. Self-yes. --Chiefjustice PS3 17:54, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Seconded! Mattsnow 18:45, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/General Joseph Brady Colton by Saberwolf. Borderline yes, more criticism would be desirable for the lower scores. --Chiefjustice PS3 17:48, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Lucifer's userpage by Saberwolf. Yup. --Chiefjustice PS3 17:48, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Swaziland by Saberwolf. Yes, good to see you back. --Chiefjustice PS3 08:52, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Make your own LHC by Xamralco Borderline yes. There could be more in terms of suggestions and so on, but it's getting the point across nicely so it's fine. --Chiefjustice PS3 08:46, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fan fiction by Mattsnow Yeah. --Chiefjustice PS3 08:34, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Guru Nanak Dev by Scofield Good, articulate, helpful review. Yes. Saberwolf116 (talk ) 02:56, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Oscar Calme by Qzekrom No way, this is awful. Please suggest ways to improve it, being condescending won't help. Mattsnow 03:32, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ming Dynasty by Oliphaunte Yep Mattsnow 03:20, July 4, 2012 (UTC)