User:Cajek/Archive45

• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnTunes:German Techno Music by Phrank Psinatra Borderline yes, but you really need to provide concrete examples in your suggestions. When it comes to full length articles, you have to get used to providing exact examples like a specific type of image you want to see added rather than just saying something like "more images needed." --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:14, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews: Studies reveal that weight-loss can be achieved with this one simple trick (quick) by Phrank Psinatra Borderline no. It is an UnNews, but you definitely could have provided more detail into what could have improved the article. You already had some things going but stopped short of actually providing concrete examples of what you want to see more of. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:14, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/David Brubeck by Phrank Psinatra No. Definitely needs more analysis and explanation for your scoring. Also, try to provide more suggestions rather than simply telling the writer what is wrong with the article. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:14, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Charles Mingus by Phrank Psinatra No. Sorry, but looking at the article you definitely could have provided more analysis and suggestions to make it better. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:14, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo: Travel to and Through the Southern United States by Black flamingo. Borderline no. Some more practice and you MIGHT become a fantastic reviewer like me. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:14, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Shanty town by Black flamingo. Yet another pee review done fantastically by the black bird. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:14, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Become an Assassin (second) by Iwritewhatiwant. Yes. --Black Flamingo 00:59, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Malaysia (Re-review) by Iwritewhatiwant. Fuck yes. --Black Flamingo 21:43, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Data Protection Act by Hankjones. Borderline no. You don't really make any suggestions, although your criticisms are fair. You're off to a good start, just try to give more advice. --Black Flamingo 21:43, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Satan by Pudong. For a first, yes. --Black Flamingo 21:43, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Xamralco/Xenon by Frosty. Yes. --Black Flamingo 21:43, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Neptune by Xamralco. Yes. --Black Flamingo 21:43, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/DeviantART (2nd nom) by Mattsnow. Yes. --Black Flamingo 21:43, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Patrick Stump by Black flamingo. Yes and where the bloody hell did this one come from? Hiding within the lines I see... --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   05:04, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Gollum by Ferric AlFerrous. For a newbie I'd say that's fine. --Black Flamingo 22:29, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hipster by Leoispotter. Afraid not old bean, you don't really offer any suggestions. Granted it's a great article but I can't really count it as in-depth. Thanks for helping though! --Black Flamingo 22:29, December 5, 2011 (UTC)