User:Cajek/Archive21

• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Godwin's Law's Law by Why? Yeah. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:52, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mothers Against Noise (2nd review) by Chief. Self-yes. (Override)--ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/That Fidgety Weird Kid Who Sits Behind You In Third Period by UU. But of course. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:55, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kreator by POTR Yes, all things considered there is plenty there. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:50, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Polish language by Hiatus Hernia. Yes! --ChiefjusticeDS 22:46, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hanna Barbera's "Gangs of New York" by Matfen815. Yes, could do with more on humour though. One more like that and I go asking. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:42, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Be a Good Catholic by Rogpyvbc. Absolutely, good work. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:36, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?: Not fly Air Zimbabwe? by Ptok-Bentoniczny. Nope. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:28, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Caboose (Red vs. Blue) by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No, a word has been had. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Monitor by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Worst Article Ever (2nd Review) by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pittsburg Penguins by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No.--ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Zombie Reagan by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Inverted Godwin's Law by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rwanda by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Chicago Bears by Ptok-Bentoniczny. No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Giant panda by Chief. Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 21:54, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Red vs. Blue by Iwillkillyou333. Almost, a similar commitment to that seen in humour would get you to Yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:59, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Sandbox by Matfen815. Yes indeed. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:53, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight by POTR. Yup. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:46, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Forest Whitaker's Lazy Eye (second review) by Chief. Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 23:47, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Girl, 10, who recieved hippopotamus for Christmas, stomped to death by Iwillkillyou333. No. I realise the difficulty in reviewing an article that you personally really enjoy, but try to be critical and give some suggestions back to the writer along with the praise. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:43, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Angry Dude by Iwillkillyou333. Borderline yes, you make some good points, a bit more depth would be desirable though. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:43, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/dicks lol by POTR & The Woodburninator. Yes to both of you, considering what you had to work with those were OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:36, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Classical Satire by POTR. No Yes. Though I would rather not see too many more in this vein. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Idiocracy by Killer 3.14. No, read and learn this. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:50, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Surgeon General's Warning by Chief. Self-yes. (Override)--ChiefjusticeDS 00:16, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Covenant (Halo) by Matfen815. Yes, good work. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ed Gein by Hiatus Hernia. Ja. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:11, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/History of the papyrus containing the spell to. . . . by Necropaxx. Yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:01, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Michael Biehn by Why? Yes, unsurprisingly. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:05, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/powerthirst by Matfen815. Borderline yes, again, quite harsh, but for a third review it is OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Phil Hartman by Matfen815. Yes, a bit harsh, but some good points too. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans/FACT CHECK: Birthday Card not as Accurate as Hoped by Chief. Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 23:18, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Martin Luther King Jr. (rw) by Hiatus Hernia. Yes. A couple more like that and I go asking. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:13, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mermaids by Rogpyvbc. Definitely, much better. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:07, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bob the sperm by Chief. Self-yes. (Override)--ChiefjusticeDS 23:49, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics (2nd review) by Why? Yarp. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:43, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:Officers and Espionage by Why? Yup. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:30, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/4chan (exposed) by Hiatus Hernia. Yes, try to be a bit more diplomatic with the criticism though. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks: My unusual relationship with a volley ball by the name of Wilson (2) by Chief. Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 13:13, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:FACT CHECK: Birthday Card not as Accurate as Hoped by Count of Monkey Crisco. Nope, not enough there. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:07, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Holocaust film by Multiliteralist. Close one, but for a first it's OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:03, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Next Year's Australian Grand Prix by RGC. Afraid not, give advice not just criticism. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:58, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Matter by Chief. Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 21:38, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rock and roll by Why? Aye. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:30, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Staircase/Running a Red Light by Chief. Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 22:28, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/I will never forget by Chief. Self-yup. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 11:17, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Night by POTR. Yes indeed. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:35, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Los Angeles Kings NHL by Rogpyvbc. Nope, Why? has already had a word on that.
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Star Trek: The Next Generation (2nd Review) by Why? Wow, definitely. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:21, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Thinking outside the box by SuperBario. Borderline Yes. A harsh score in my opinion, but you try to help, and it's an improvement on your first review. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Various Fatal Syndromes by Chief. Self-Yeah. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 22:18, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Statutory rape by Why? Ja. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:48, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Marty McFly by Chief. I'd say so. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 21:51, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Boston Bruins by GlobalTourniquet. Yah. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:35, December 1, 2009 (UTC)