Why is this here? This should be exclusively for This page does not exist. That is the only page that is required to be redlinked for the inside joke. The others can just be sent to CVP if they keep getting recreated. JediBobThings I've saidThings I've done 23:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This is a replacement for CVP. •Spang•☃•talk• 04:53, 02 Oct 2007
I like this format better. What's the point of having a blue link if it links to CVP?. You're not going to check every link in an article, and if there is a red link, (which stand out), you know you need to remove it, if it's blue, you are going to keep the link in. Just look at Barney for example--SirManforman 21:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Too true, but much of what's on CVP likely should be removed. Who's to say there never will be a valid page on fireworks? For that matter, many could have be redirected to valid existing pages such as diarrhoea to Poop Cuisine, buttsecks to anal sex, or Fucking Retarded to George Dubya Bush. And then there are so many that were placed there during a brief incident or vandalism spree, then never removed once the whole thing was long over and done with. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by205.150.76.42 (talk • contribs)
Several of the articles you mentioned were redirects to featured articles, though Fucking Retarded linked to CVP. Also, if anything from CVP should be switched to UN:PT, it should be Barney the Dinosaur. There's wayto many links, and it would be easier to remove them if it was red (as it stands out)--SirManforman 22:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Probably because I fixed a lot of CVP'd pages after reading that message. Some are redirected to similar subjects, some others just deleted so they can be created again. •Spang•☃•talk• 23:46, 05 Oct 2007
Makes sense. I agree that pages that currently redirect to CVP should be redirected to similar topics instead of CVP. --SirManforman 01:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Depends how similar they are. I have no idea why South Dakota is a redirect, but some 'bot will take that nice little blue link and spam it across half of Scandinavia claiming that West Dakota and United States of America are indeed one and the same concept. Then again, Georgia (U.S. State) as CVP makes no sense either. I thought this was a quality encyclopædia, accurate enough to reflect that there are ten provinces and fifty states in North America. After all, if I were looking for mere nonsense, I would go to Wikipedia.
Can somebody explain why that talk page is DPP'd? Why can't we just protect it with a note directing people to some other place to discuss the templates? Just curious... Pentium5dot1 02:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
You should contact Hinoa, who protected the page, for info--SirManforman 20:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Although this title has only one deletion so far, it seems like something that should be made into a protected title. Could the admins consider whether to protect this title? Thank you. Pentium5dot1 00:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Except for This page does not exist, redirecting all of the others to CVP would be a good idea.
Please see the discussion above. AFAIK, CVP is used mainly when multiple incidents of vandalism have already occurred, while this page is used primarily as a preemptive measure. For further comments or complaints, please go to the Village Dump. Pentium5dot1 04:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Copypaste from section above: AFAIK, CVP is used mainly when multiple incidents of vandalism have already occurred, while this page is used primarily as a preemptive measure. To clarify this: I don't think we can convert most of these PTs to CVP or CRP, but I strongly favor converting as many as possible of the PTs (and CVPs for that matter) to protected redirects to articles.
I just checked some of the other languages and it looks like it's MediaWiki 1.12 that's required to get the special:protectedtitles functionality. MW1.11 doesn't support it, unless the functionality is back-ported. Pity, as it would allow an expiry date to be set on a page protect. WP also uses a title blacklist extension, but that seems to be for pattern-matching index.php/ and the like in spambot pagetitles?
CVP is obsolete. It and no:ikkepedia:OVS should be deleted outright, along with anything that redirects there. If the pages get vandalised again, they should be relisted at that point... but relisted here, not in CVP. That way, they don't appear as blue links and don't get used as targets for inbound links.
Even with nonexistent categories, you could click on the red link and see what pages were in it. Now that Category:This category does not exist is on here, we can't do that. That kinda ruins it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:38, Jan. 4, 2008
Philippines is on CVP? We might end up running out of Manila envelopes if this continues. For that matter, Malay should redirect to Malaysia instead of to CVP. Avoid the trap of heart!
Using CVP as an alternative to this page seems to be causing problems like this edit. Ikkepedia:OVS is the equivalent to CVP. Basically, user creates page, page falls helplessly to the mighty swords of Ïkkëpëdïä's Vïkïng ädmïnïsträtör hördës, page gets redirected to some form of CVP and pretty blue links to a non-existent page remain in place. Evil robots of death and destruction find link, add it to the "in other language" box and spam it across the various other Uncyclopedias - even though it goes nowhere useful. Better to dump something on special:protectedtitles so that links to deleted articles are red and don't get mistaken for links to content.
And yes, Ikkepedia:OVS is useless as they're on MediaWiki 1.13 already. Go figure. --66.102.80.212 00:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Yah, CVP redirects should probably all be cleared out sometime. Sometime when I can be more bothered, but sometime. •Spang•☃•talk• 02:30, 26 Feb 2008
All CVP links or just the ones listed in the archives? --Kurgan 10:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
As the unsigned comment above (not by me) was meant to imply, I was talking about protecting nonexistent pages from creation. (See for example wikipedia:Special:Protectedtitles.) If I had meant to talk about ordinary page protection, I wouldn't have posted here. --Pentium5dot1 00:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
As far as I know, we're a slave to what extentions Wikia installs. We have some freedom of it, but in the end we're just a Wikia colony. They have opted out of installing the Protected titles page, presumably, and thus we are left without it. This is a fine alternative to it, for me. Plus, if we got it now, we'd have to convert frickin' everything to it; this and CVP.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 01:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
I think Special:Protectedtitles would be a bad thing because this, CVP, CRP, and VPV will all have to be re-formatted to it or whatever else Ljlego said. --Kurgan 01:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Special:Protectedtitles allows an expiry to be set, so that a page is protected from creation until whatever incident prompted its being locked blows over. The use of cascading protection doesn't allow automatic expiry, and CVP is worse still as it adds the problems of blue links continuing to exist from other, valid pages. I presume we need the real MediaWiki 1.12, not some alpha version which was already outdated when it was deployed?
Javall McDermid has been recreated 5 times as vanityshite. I would have recommended CVP, but since I learned that it is being phased out, I am requesting that it be added here. Also, get CVP itself off of this list. It messes up the formatting. --Kurgan 01:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
It's not really necessary; the page was only ever created by one user and one IP(probably the same person), both of which have been blocked for doing so. If it comes back again, we can just permaban those two creators. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 01:12, Apr 9
Well, it was recreated a few more times, including Mordillo redirecting it to CVP, but the redirect was huffed because of the CVP phase-out. --Kurgan 18:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Can you remove Fish Puns from the list? It was added years ago as a featured article and I have an updated image for it; however can't update it because it's protected.