Uncyclopedia talk:Citing Uncyclopedia

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:::[http://www.chronarion.org/chirpy/index.cgi?id=565 Here] --{{User:AAA!/sig}} 10:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 
:::[http://www.chronarion.org/chirpy/index.cgi?id=565 Here] --{{User:AAA!/sig}} 10:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 
::Ouch. {{User:VGDictator/sig}} 22:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 
::Ouch. {{User:VGDictator/sig}} 22:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
+
Why cite this site
 
== Namespace? ==
 
== Namespace? ==
   

Latest revision as of 22:05, October 27, 2010

Wouldn't it be nice if there was a button you could click to give you the MLA citing information for you?!? Neoliminal 18:48, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Can someone tell me if that conversation log is truly true? 200.112.49.116 07:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it really happened. --—rc (t) 07:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Oh wow, that poor bastard. Goes to show, you can't trust everything (anything?) you read on the internet. I'd feel sorry for him except that it serves him right for not knowing enough about his subject to be able to perform even a cursory fact check. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I'm guessing he was being (at least a little) facetious. I mean, the topic was George W. Bush, right? Surely the Uncyclopedia piece on that is rather low on Google's list. Unlike, say, Vietnam War Hoax.—Lenoxus 00:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Come on. We all know If it is on the Internet it must be true. Besides, I think that Google had blocked Uncyclopedia from its results. -- D'oh, just checked. It looks like they've unblocked it. Samwaltz 13:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Er...actually, Bush was a random example someone gave. The subject was Jim Anderton. If you abandon any faith you may have had in humanity, which you really ought to do anyway just for your own sake, you'll see that it's possible he read a couple lines and thought they were true. It's a fairly short article which reads more as a bunch of random insults and fictitious factoids than a parody encyclopedia article.
Though I really hope he was just messing with you, or quoting it for some humor in a dry essay or something. --67.110.209.218 07:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Here --AAA! (AAAA) 10:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Ouch. VGD >=3 22:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Why cite this site

edit Namespace?

This page doesn't really appear to be intended as an article. Shouldn't it be moved to the project (Uncyclopedia:) namespace? --Pentium5dot1 t~^_^~c 00:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects