Uncyclopedia talk:Ban Patrol/Archive 1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Firithfenion (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) vandalized MagibonArguecat3 00:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Firithfenion, the person who is using This IP address(I ran a WHOIS search on the IP listed in the article's history, and its from Berlin Germany, same as Firithfenion/author of wikipedia Magibon article) and this clone of Hetellies user name to vandalize Uncyclopedia's Magibon article and talkpage, my userpage, and the real Hetellies' userpage. |His IP should be banned, and the fake Hetellies sock should be banned as well. Thank you. Arguecat3 00:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


This Ip: User: is constantly vandalising the Canoepolio article and turning it into mindless drivel. Is there any chance in banning him please as I'm sick of undoing his edits.

Also this IP:User: which has also been vandalising the page, and as of a few hours ago has put pornography on it too. Canoepolio 10:27, 26 Mar 2007 (UTC)

Listen, the place to put those complaints is the ban patrol itself, not its talk page. I've banned the first one, I'll take a look at the second. ~Jewriken.GIF 16:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Suspected Copyright Violation

The recent article 50 facts you dont need to know seems suspiciously like a copy and paste, considering there is only one edit, and although I didn't find anything on a Google search I thought someone might want to check it out. 19:59, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I just did some searching myself. If it's copied from elsewhere on the internet it's had extensive restructuring, and if it's copied from a book or something we'll probably never know. The format does look suspiciously cut and paste-esque, but I certainly can't confirm it. I'll ask the contributor for an explanation on his talk page. --—rc (t) 20:15, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • It certainly looks like something out of Maddox's website. 04:59, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Well, we could just VFD it and get it over with. Copyrite or not, it sucks. --Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 23:04, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I agree, too much conspiracty theory and not enough funny. I would bet it's not cut and paste though. Just a compliation of ideas from other sources at beast best. Although, I do think Revelations 23 would be a great candidate for a uncyclopedia page.

I put the copyvio tag on the article. --AAA! (AAAA) 19:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Possible Vandalism ? (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) has rewritten large parts of George Lucas. Not sure if its vandalism, although much of the original content has been removed. 22:35, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • The article has now been completely rewritten. 20:02, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Best to put this stuff on the main Ban Patrol page, even if you're not sure it's a violation. An admin will check it out and decide whether it's banworthy. The BP talk page doesn't get as much traffic so no one might see your post. --—rc (t) 20:21, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Multi year/month bans

I'm considering unblocking some of the IP's with massive bans (Special:Ipblocklist) as they probably serve no purpose as they spammer/vandal almost certainly has a new IP by now and we are probably just blocking newbs, any objections? --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:53, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

OMG! Blasphemy! 24 year ban for Elvis!!!!exclamation!!11!!!.... No objections from me. --Splaka 22:28, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Warning possible incoming spam wave

[1], and me off to work now, oh well, have fun! --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 06:52, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Must have been a problem with my spidey sense, oh well --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:53, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Fiat panda

This page seems like a legitimate article. I'd thought it might be spam but as a User has created it I thought I'd report it here. 04:31, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Seems to be a cut/paste from here with the name changed. *shrug* --Splaka 04:37, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I thought it was quite funny [2] --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 05:47, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • I put a factual template on the article, however the author User:Pipsette3000 has since removed it without any significant changes. It seems to be a copyright violation at least. 21:48, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Neopoprealism (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) recently changed some facts from the original version by Elvis and, while its not a clear case of vandalism, I assumed from the "Back" message in the history that it is the author of the original spam page. While I personally liked Elvis's version better, I decided against reverting it until someone could take a look at it. 06:57, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Blanking by Author

The article Academic Resource Center was recently blanked by UtarEmpire and, while I would normaly post this on the main listing, it appears said user is the author of the article. As I saw no notices in the talk page or otherwise, I reverted it instead of putting a blank template. 22:48, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Couple of admins have left notices on his talk page. We're drawing straws to see who gets to ban him. --Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 23:51, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Possible vandalism ?

I'm not sure where to put this, as I'm not completely sure this is vandalism, but it appears (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) has been deleting sections from various templates since September 9. It could be just usual maintenance however I thought the Administrators might want to look into it. 08:32, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

RC's opinion is it was just someone doing helpful maintenence. See this (Yah, I reported him too, heh, GMTA) --Splaka 08:38, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Yep Agree--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 09:43, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • Well it's reassuring to know I'm not totally parinoid yet. ;-) 04:47, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I feel like such a snitch

Is no-one else using this page anymore? I'm starting to feel embarrased being the only one here. Kind of like the snotty kid in junior school: "Sir! Sir! Wilkins wrote a rude word on the wall!". Course, if anyone wanted to nominate me for SysOpping, I wouldn't have to be such a snitch. Oh god, now I'm a snitch and a whore. -- Codeine 11:24, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I like whores. --IMBJR 13:12, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I dunno...they make me all rashy... --Famine 13:27, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)

That'd be my stubble. Sorry about that, but what do you expect at these prices? -- Codeine 13:29, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Recent Stuff

Massive vandalism like we just saw from can be hidden from recent changes by appending &bot=1 to their user contributions list before clicking the rollback links. They'll be visible if you select "show bots" while keeping the default recent changes clean for normal edit patrolling. See Wikipedia:Revert#Bot rollback. Angela 09:30, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Is it just me, or is anyone else trying to hold back the urge to ban the entire part of the world which falls under 85.206.X.X.... There was some talk on wikipedia about blocking this range back in April. That IP block falls under Lietuvos Telekomas. We have 6 bans from this block this week. I don't know of a way to list edits grouped by IP, or I'd try and see what percentage of this block is making an ass of themselves. --Famine 21:11, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I'm all for banning that IP range for a week or so to at least calm things down. after that, we can see what happens. --PantsMacKenzie 22:33, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Ok, according to some user on the Main Ban patrol page, the dynamic IP is between 85.206.0.X and 85.206.10.X. So, we can block each of those 10 individual ranges if we have to. --PantsMacKenzie 02:51, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Holy dumptruck of data batman! How about a graph next time, eh? Based on my skimming, I see that we have a couple of trouble-spots:
194.102.56.X (also a Romanian block, it seems)
While 85.206.0-10.x seems to be the main block (9 bans), there are three other bans from IPs above the 85.206.10.X range.

Can we set up "you must log in to edit" for only some pages? That would be another way to help spare those pages which are really getting hammered. --Famine 12:35, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Those two blocks are:
85.206.X.X is telecom.lt, the Lithuanian telephone company's ISP
194.102.56.X is dtedu.net Romanian Education Network - Asociatia Studenteasca a Retelelor din Drumul Taberei - Bucharest (from http://www.ripe.net/whois?form_type=simple&full_query_string=&searchtext= )
At the moment, (or 85.206.0-15.*) is blocked for 24hrs after more than a dozen attempts to block vandalism from 85.206.* to Lithuania and Uncyclopedia:Protected page by lesser means (including a page protect) had already been tried. {{Number of Bans|4095}} Maybe blocking the first 1023 addresses in this range (85.206.0-3.*) would have addressed most of this (at least eight bans of the dozen in 85.206.*, including the worst of the vandalism, are in that range).
All I've been able to find on requiring login to edit is a setting which would block anon-IP edits for the entire wiki [3], $wgWhitelistEdit, which would need to be in one of the config files and which would affect *everything*... IOW massive overkill. Doesn't look promising so far... --Carlb 00:34, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Well, I'm guessing that the 4th of July is less important in the rest of the world (canada) than it is in the US, which means the lack of blanks/vandals/bans for the last day must be related to the above massive bannage, and not due to the holiday. So huzzah for massive bannage! --Famine 13:14, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)

All activity from 85.206.* in the past week

These are based on a 'grep' search of the recent changes page for last seven days:

  • (Block log); 09:34 . . Elvis (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 week: blanked talk:Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 09:55 . . Elvis (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 week: Blanked Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 15:44 . . Rcmurphy (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 month: blanked Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 17:10 . . Rcmurphy (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 month: blanked several sections of Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 17:15 . . Rcmurphy (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 month: thoroughly vandalized Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 17:18 . . PantsMacKenzie (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 week: soliciting)
  • (Block log); 18:19 . . Rcmurphy (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 month: vandalized Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 18:42 . . Rcmurphy (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 month: same as
  • (Block log); 19:35 . . PantsMacKenzie (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 24 years: Badmouthing an op. I hope you die. kthxbi)
  • (Block log); 19:50 . . PantsMacKenzie (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 24 years: Libel.)
  • (Block log); 20:18 . . EvilZak (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 30 days: blanked Lithuania)
  • (Block log); 21:52 . . Rcmurphy (blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 1 month: vandalized Uncyclopedia:Protected page)
  • Geography of Lithuania; 15:50 . . (?Vilnius)
  • Gezai; 18:09 . . (?Guolis)
  • Image:Famous politicians.jpg; 15:52 . .
  • Image:Famous politicians.jpg; 15:52 . .
  • Image:Lithuania.JPG; 15:50 . .
  • Image:Lithuania.JPG; 15:50 . .
  • Kaunas; 10:35 . .
  • Lithuania; 11:19 . . (?Good guys)
  • Lithuania; 11:29 . . (?Good guys)
  • Lithuania; 11:31 . . (?Good guys)
  • Lithuania; 12:30 . .
  • Lithuania; 12:30 . .
  • Lithuania; 15:42 . .
  • Lithuania; 15:44 . .
  • Lithuania; 15:54 . . (?Culture)
  • Lithuania; 17:08 . . (?Major Cities)
  • Lithuania; 17:08 . . (?Travel and leisure)
  • Lithuania; 17:09 . . (?Famous Lithuanians)
  • Lithuania; 17:09 . . (?Sexual liberties)
  • Lithuania; 17:10 . . (?Political system)
  • Lithuania; 17:13 . .
  • Lithuania; 17:32 . .
  • Lithuania; 17:36 . .
  • Lithuania; 17:59 . .
  • Lithuania; 18:01 . .
  • Lithuania; 18:03 . .
  • Lithuania; 18:05 . .
  • Lithuania; 18:06 . .
  • Lithuania; 18:07 . .
  • Lithuania; 18:22 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:05 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:06 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:11 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:28 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:29 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:32 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:44 . .
  • Lithuania; 19:48 . .
  • Talk:Estonia; 11:28 . . (LT)
  • Talk:Lithuania; 17:25 . . (?Neturi ka parašyt - nerašyk)
  • Uncyclopedia:Protected page; 21:16 . .
  • Uncyclopedia:Protected page; 21:49 . .
  • User talk:; 12:06 . . Seeker
  • User:; 18:03 . . Mirage
  • Image:Lithuania.JPG; 15:52 . . Rcmurphy (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by Abonentas)
  • Lithuania; 09:53 . . Elvis (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by Dogus maximus)
  • Lithuania; 17:10 . . Rcmurphy (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by Partizanas)
  • Lithuania; 17:15 . . Rcmurphy (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by Rcmurphy)
  • Lithuania; 19:49 . . PantsMacKenzie (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by Carlb)
  • Talk:Lithuania; 19:41 . . Rcmurphy (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by
  • Uncyclopedia:Protected page; 21:51 . . Rcmurphy (Reverted edit of, changed back to last version by Mirage)

Current bans - by IP

Tried taking Special:Ipblocklist, removing names, then sort /+25 and get this - one dozen bans in the Lietuvos Tel IP range:

Making Ban Patrol only accessable to registered users

Kinda goes against the spirit of Our Lord Wiki, but some pages maybe need that extra protection from lamers who try to cover their tracks. Though of course this would stop the helpful anon users from reporting stuff. --IMBJR 11:38, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

While it would prevent anon users from reporting stuff, I'm not all that happy with anon users at the moment. I don't see a huge reason not to be logged in to edit - it defines your personality and gives you a history. In the wikis I run, I disallow anon edits. Granted they are much more closed groups that what we're trying for here, but it gives a better sense of community, and I have had 0, zip, none, nada vandalizm.
With that as my disclamer, I'm all for closing off the Ban Patrol to anon users. It will help with blanking/modifying, as I don't always check to see who edited what first - I go by what's on the page. And we have plenty of registered users who can spot vandals and go post there. --Famine 13:45, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)
As my first act as sysop I would like to protect this page. Admin please pipe up if there are any objections. --IMBJR 19:22, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Mmm, looks like the protect tab protects the page from everyone - or at least that's my interpretation of it. --IMBJR 19:25, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
That is indeed what it does. :/ Hey, Learning is good too! --PantsMacKenzie 19:27, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Jest call me noob admin! At least it wasn't a tab that said "Destroy Planet". Though that would have been a learning experience too. --IMBJR 19:38, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I was under the impression that we could have registered edits only but it's a sitewide thing. --Elvis 20:21, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Damn - how long has he been an admin? And *already* screwing stuff up? Man, I waited at least 28 hours before messing stuff up. Damn youngsters, always jumping the gun... --Famine 19:45, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)

--Elvis 20:21, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Older Stuff

I banned a user for a month a few days ago for messing with the VfDs. Are there any guidelines to how much time a user is banned for? --Darkdan 23:11, 14 Mar 2005 (EST)

I generally do 24 days. A month is just fine. Generally we just want them to get bored and not come back, so yeah, that time span is fine. --Chronarion 12:19, 15 Mar 2005 (EST)

Now that the list is getting bigger, I think it would be a good idea to switch to using headers similar to in VFD or chronological headers like in QuickVFD. It is still very usable right now, but once it gets to be two or three times as big it will be a problem. Any thoughts? --Paulgb Talk 22:22, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

Simply archive or delete the old ban patrol history. The bans auto expire anyway. --Chronarion 01:13, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

So I was given the option mark an article as "patroled" earlier today. It was one I found both distasteful and unfunny (Divine Lord of Germany), but what does it mean to "patrol" an article and when is it appropriate to do so? --Keebler 11:04, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Marking an edit as patrolled means that you have looked at the edit and that you have seen it is not vandalism. It is more useful with with larger wikis where more than one person is looking at recent changes, and they can easily see what changes havn't been patroled yet. Once an edit is patroled, it looses its red ! by it. I agree that that page isn't very funny or appropriate, so I deleted it. You can use QuickVFD for reporting articles like that in the future. --Paulgb Talk 11:14, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I added WP Edits to the IP template, because I discovered that people who are jackasses on Uncyclopedia are usually jackasses on wikipedia too. --Paulgb Talk 14:58, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I made everything sorted by week. Makes it a bit more organized and easier to archive. --Paulgb Talk 14:24, 29 May 2005 (EDT)


Can someone creat the above so that all the nuisances can be sent there to annoy each other and leave the rest of us alone?

Jackiespeel 21:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

  • We did create the Vandalopedia, but users kept on coming in and creating sensible, insightful and humorous articles. Pricks. Modusoperandi 17:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Dynamic IP Address

About 90% of internet users will have what's called a dynamic IP address, which means that every time they connect to the internet, they will be assigned a random IP address, so it will be different each time. This makes blocking IP addresses pretty useless and means that other innocent people will end up being blocked. You normally have to pay a subscription if you want a fixed IP address, a sort of "IP rental" to the ISP, usually about £2 a month.

Chris The Chav 21:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah... we need a Ban Patrol logo. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


Please somebody try to put 1st paragraph near wilde's quote. -- Walter Humala - Emperor of West WikipediaCrystal Clear app korganizerwanna Talk? 02:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Front Page vandalism

The front page has been vandalized and it Thompkins who did it, as seen in "Recent Changes" Thompkins was the last one on it.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rouge2 (talk • contribs)

That's not vandalism, that's Fisher Price.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Also, I doubt it. Thompkins doesn't exist. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
He does now. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I got the real culprit. —Braydie at 22:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

"Banned" template needed

Or at least some kind of an Uncyclopedian equivalent. Seriously, how am I supposed to know whether a user has already been banned, if their talk page doesn't say so? P.S. This is only a problem because The Party's punishing hand is so swift and accurate ; ). --Medvedev (scream)Grue_Jammy.gif 19:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Use the logs. Special:Log allows you to type "User:[insertusernamehere]" (no quotes, and with a valid username), and find out about their bans. For instance, my bans. There is also a banned template, but I feel no need for it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Or look up their contributions, click the link marked "block log". Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02/6 01:48
I see. Alright, then. --Medvedev (scream)Grue_Jammy.gif 08:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

You can also use: template:warning, which is quite nifty...~Jewriken.GIF 12:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Ban Patrol Vandalism, may-5-2007

Sorry, but I can revert this addition. Wait until I actually vandalise something illegitimately. --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 21:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Sauce for the goose! RabbiEasyListening 21:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
O RLY? --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 21:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
See below. --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 21:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
See below. --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 21:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
You call that goatse? You've led a sheltered life! 21:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
User:RabbiTechno just asked me "Who the hell's RT?" 21:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

BP Question

Is spamming unfunny crap around the site worthy of a block? It's pretty small add-ons and it's not vandalism, but it's unfunny and Kanye West-related. Perhaps I should just undo the edits...? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Meme-flooding is a bannable offense. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

k, thanks. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I got an idea

Change the famine thing under the image to template admin I'd do it myself but I think that Simsilikesims would ban me. User:Yellow 130/sig 14:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I thought you were infinibanned...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Spang freed him. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Edit buttons

Shouldn't there be an edit button for reporting users as well as IP addresses? --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUNCapt.) 03:24, August 25, 2007

What? It's {{User|Userman}} for users and {{IP|}} for IPs. Different edit buttons for each? Madness! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


Why is there a large blank space between the Oscar Wilde quote and the starting paragraph? I think it needs to be fixed, because the page looks aesthetically unpleasing with it. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 16:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

The tale of NXWave

    • He also nominated UnBooks:The Winkler impersonator who cried GAY GAY GAY (once today) for deletion twice, and it's on Pee Review for god's sake. I think he needs one year off, he's been given way too many second chances. --Æ 22:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
      • I already promised Mordillo that he could do the big ban on him, so I'll let him do the honors. However, I hereby declare that a Ban Warrant is issued for NXWave (3 months minimum penalty) --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
        • Ohhh. That means I can do other things outside of Uncyclopedia. --NXWave 06:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
        • And if you do anything. I will do something drastic. --NXWave 08:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
          • The NXWave saga is officially over. ~ Mordillo where is my DAMN? 08:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
          • Oh noes! Teh Drastic! "UnNews:NXWave declares Jihad on Uncyc" anyone? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
            • I volunteer too write that --Æ 23:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
“Note to other users: anyone gloating on NXWave's ban will be banned immediately, THIS DRAMA STOPS HERE.”

Thought I should remind you, even though it ain't my job. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

  • I'm not going to write it anymore, now that you mentioned that (even though I already knew that reading NXWave's talk page)--Æ 01:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Alan Liefting

My name is Alan Liefting and I use my own name on WP. User:Alan Liefting on Uncyclopedia is not me. Can this user be blocked indefinitely since the person is doing edits under my name? I do not want to be associated with these edits. 01:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about, my name is Alan Liefting. I edit wikipedia using a nickname and not my real name. It must be some kind of coincidence. I like using my real name and I give permission for all others to use this name on any other project. There is no copyright on names especially when you are using your own. Aaaaalllllllllaaaaannnnnnn Liefting 02:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I seriously doubt that your name is Alan Liefting. I edit Wikipedia using my own name. I am aware that there is no copyright on names and I am quite certain you created the Uncyclopedia username in order to discredit me. 05:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you the only person named Alan and are you the only person with the family name Liefting. I don't think I need to prove anything I am who I am.

  • About discrediting

No this is not the case, my edits would not discredit me or you, they may get reverted or deleted. I think some of the content that I have added probably should be removed but hasn't. None of the stupid things that I have done have been reverted. I actually hope that it doesn't get removed, it is stupid but I kind of like what I add. Aaaaalllllllllaaaaannnnnnn Liefting 06:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know who's real and who's not, so I handled it the fairest way possible. Please talk to me or any other admin over IRC if you're the real Slim Shady. —Hinoa talk.kun 06:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC) (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits)

I don't know what the drama is here. It's my userpage and I can do whatever I want with it. MrN9000 removed the quote mentioning NXWave but Mordillo (who blocked NXWave mentioning not to gloat) reverted him with the edit summary "Leave AEs page to him please". So this user should be on the grounds of vandalizing other userpages regardless of being correct or not.--Æ 23:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Well the grounds are that NXWave is much worse than anyone thought. He's an agressive guy who we should all ignore even in refrence. First of all, he insults AE and also threatens AE's death in a now-deleted forum topic that NXWave created that said that he was JohnB from TalkShoe or somewhere. He also threatened to kill Mordillo in a forum topic where he played an anonymous IP. Now who has grudges on Mordillo and AE. I think NXWave. In fact if NXWave were to "edit" your user page. He would actually gloat more about the ban by adding a secondary quote that you made. In fact, I have reasons to belive that it is Taylor Karras that is behind NXWave (you ever listen to the audio files he made, that's his actual voice right there). The proof, if you go to http://www.talkshoe.com and search for JohnB: You'll find his show which is aroung 11:00PM ET (note his show name is JohnB's Digital Graffiti Talkcast) . Join his show and ask about Taylor Karras, you'll get all the answers you'll need. (one note, Taylor has a really bad grudge against JohnB.) How do I know this, well let's just say I've been browsing TalkShoe since March 2007 and damn did that guy yell his head off in anger. --Uncognito 23:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Meh, he's that bad a guy. </sarcasm> -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 23:52, Feb. 11, 2008
Nice sarcasm joke Kep. And adding to that, he's also the "Don't taze me bro, bro". In fact, if you listen to this. A few minutes into the file, you'll hear NXWave's voice. Confirming my suspicions. --Uncognito 23:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeesh, so much drama. I think the IP should have a warning ban, personally, because it is AE's userpage, which he may do what he wants with. Whatever death threats NX may have made, I am very nearly 100% sure that they are devoid of any substance. Frankly, NXWave seems, to me, like just another Drama-maker, with an annoying flair for starting pointless arguments about nothing, namely with AE. If AE wants the quote, I think he should have it--I don't think it's doing any harm, just look at the quotes on Mordillo's page. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:03, Feb 12
Hole. Lee. Crap. That's NXWave! -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 00:06, Feb. 12, 2008

Hey guys, you know what? Next person to mention that guy gets a one month ban, no questions asked. I'm tempted to do a blanket ban anyway, but I'll use my better judgment this time. Seriously, this is just stupid, even for Uncyc. Go read Rule One and shut the hell up, in that approximate order. —Hinoa talk.kun 00:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The bell curve blames the baby's DNA. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Is it wrong to edit articles in good faith? Is it wrong to be satirical and not to be stupid? Is it also wrong to support the real creator of the article not the wannabe creator? Some parts in that article is NOT FUNNY!

Read this first before editing: Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Thanks! -- 07:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I would suggest a better solution than insulting me! -- 08:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding my possible ban

OK, I'm not sure what a sock is, but I would like to know why everyone thinks I'm "skater girl." I looked her up; she's a bitch. I want example of why you think I would be a bitch. As far as I know, I haven't done anything wrong. And if saying all this gets me banned, then you're all a bunch of cocksuckers and I don't wanna be here. If it doesn't, then I love you guys. LuvMuffin 18:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

The fact that what you said sounds similar to her style of trolling notwithstanding, it's just a little strange that one of the first places to which you hark is some random user-run establishment that was just started a few days to a week ago. You're probably not going to be banned for being a sock, but if you keep acting like this, it's possible you will be banned for simply trolling. If you don't know what that means, it means that you're being unnecessarily rude and wording your posts in ways that are meant to elicit altercations. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Thanks, Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
And let me emphasize what he said in plain English (for god's sakes LJ my Hebrew is...etc etc): improve your manners swiftly or you're out. ~Jewriken.GIF 19:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I just found it strange that a new user would go straight for my talk page right off. I firmly believe that this is her, however whatever action you guys decide to take is fine with me so long as the stalking of my talk page stops. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 22:04 Mar 17
I thought that this site was built for foul language. . . And my friends in real life realize that when I'm "rude" I'm trying to be funny, not start a fight. And I'm not stalking, I saw the grammar nazi thing on your user page a few days ago when I was just looking around before I signed up. I figured you'd be able to help me get started on proofreading sh-- oops, evidently can't cuss-- "stuff." :) btw, does putting smileys make it a joke? --LuvMuffin 23:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Virus afflicted honeymoon

It seems the honeymoon advert with a virus threat was posted, here on 9th April by [4] Proxima Centauri 13:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I couldn't find anything wrong with the web site other than it being something that didn't add anything to the article's value. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

"Cajek academy for the criminally insane"

I came when I read that. Sorry to offend you, but I did. What're you gonna do, admins? HUH??   Le Cejak <13:48, 05 Oct 2008>

It's a sorry state of affairs when Cajek has to ask for a Ban on BP... Maybe we are screwed. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:57, Oct 5
I could blank some pages instead... I need to figure out a way to do it without being fingered (as the culprit) by the admins.   Le Cejak <13:58, 05 Oct 2008>
That was me! That was me! You never visit me anymore, so I left a Cajek shaped beacon! ~Jewriken.GIF 22:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

What does the {{Range|<Username>}} thing do?

Can I use it, or am I not advanced enough yet? O_o -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - 00:56, 16 Mar

Modusoperandi: BlockUnblockList blocksBlock history. That, apparently. I'm glad that I could help you promptly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:46, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
Oh thanks. So I don't have a high enough level in wiki-fu to understand such things yet? O_o -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 23:54, 6 Nov
Apparently. Putting a username in where it says "username" takes a deep, deep mind. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:00, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
"Man, how do they get the Honda inside that building?" "Schweet! There's a CAR inside A HOUSE, DUDE!" -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 00:06, 7 Nov

Personal Insults

{{<Lilmayankrck>}} When editing the from the pavilion page, breaching the rules of unclyopedia. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Asterius (talk • contribs)

Um, what? - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 07:50, Mar 22
"{{<Lilmayankrck>}} When editing the from the pavilion page, breaching the rules of unclyopedia." Obviously. I've got a room temperature IQ, and even I understood that. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


I'm not sure who, but someone for apparently no reason deleted the Team Fortress 2 article. --Idiotic idiot 03:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

A casual search through the past shows that Team Fortress 2 consisted of the text "dicks spys thats is", which is ample reason for deletion. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Uploading is a user privilege?

I thought is was autoconfirmed, like editing certain pages such as VFD. If you look at the logs of this guy, you'll see that he uploaded an image the minute he signed up. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:10, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it's a user privilege and not an auto-confirmed privilege. You want that changed? If so, make a forum about it, and we'll have a vote on it. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:32, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) is currently vandalising a number of articles, including My Star Trek: The Next Generation article and my projects in Userspace. All reverts by myself are being changed back to some "Michael Landon" fetishism.

SuperBario 16:51, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Madmax got him. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:54, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Stop it

Core policy of Uncyclopedia: Be stupid and not just funny. 00:00, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

And you're being stupid and not funny by removing content from pages without making it funnier. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:06, 17 June 2010
I think the IP forgot to read a couple things. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:09, June 17, 2010 (UTC)


Alright you know what... GET ME OUT OF [5] "The name 'Tan Thongtan' and gay lover 'Fynn' is an excellent example of a Romeo and Juliet story." BECAUSE IF I WERE HOMOSEXUAL THIS WORLD AS YOU KNOW IT WILL BE CONSUMED IN FLAME...SO TAKE THAT PHRASE OUT OF THE [6]

I removed things, and I think I fixed the things you complained about. If you'll excuse me the resident 'bitch boy' on here needs to take a slash...--Sycamore (Talk) 13:01, August 30, 2010 (UTC)


Instead of banning some of these guys, let's take the best of the vandals and put them on Team Vandals. With their permission of course, if they don't get banned first. Yeah... I really want Apostle of Christ and his socks on Team Vandals. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) ENLIST MUN 17:20, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Ummmm... sounds fun, but no. That would be a waste of time, and plus vandals do not have the right to have fun if they are going to cause trouble on this site--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:14, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools