Inspired by Edit Counting Templates at Wikipedia. (This was a quick modification of the Meat template, as it's getting late in the night. It could be gussied up a bit.)
Lovely. I would use it. Can you make ones for prophets, saints, and general Discordian paratheo-anametamystichood paraphernalia? --Verithrax 10:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't know if there are any "official" Uncyclopedia religions but here is my take...
Could also include FSMism as above. --theRealSheep 15:35, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I like these (nice design, too). We need one for FSM as well. Also, as the atheist doesn't care it should probably be Apatheism. Doug 14:42, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
This user is strange. AGH! GOUGE ME EYES OUT WITH A SPORK!
Why the hell not?! :P
I guess I can put my vote For the BFI template, just because the joke is an Uncyclopedia classic. The other two, weren't so amusing, and I don't think anybody will be especially eager to use them. Though do like how the Fucking Random one looks, but I'm Against it because needs a better joke to get my vote. Against on the 1984 one too, on the same grounds. (Nice looking template that needs a better joke.) -- neoEva88MUNF@HPSCMNS (talk.to-do)
This user does not sin and is definitely not going to Hell.
sin-1
This user only sins on the weekend and will most likely be forgiven by God.
sin-2
This user frequently sins and quite possibly might go to Hell.
sin-3
This user is a heavy sinner and has a good chance of going to Hell.
sin-4
This user sins constantly and will definitely be sent to Hell without hesitation.
sin-5
This user sins without mercy and is going to Hell where he/she will be raped and eaten by Satan himself.
I just hatched the idea out of nowhere and thought to make it a Userbox Template. I originally wanted it to be in the same colors as the Babel templates, but I'm new at this so I only got one color. That can be changed, though, I just want opinions on the idea and the content itself. SeñorDiZtheGreatCUNAOTM( Worship me!)(Praise me!)(Join me!)AMEN! 00:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
This user does not speak Arabic and furthermore believes Arabic to be an embarassment to language. This user desires genocide of all speakers of Arabic.
New languages are easy to create, levels are not. Suggest/comment here. When a decision is made on which new levels to add, they can all be added at in a batch, rather than one at a time (much easier).
I User refuses to admit that this language exists and anyone with the misguide beleif that it exists (or worse speak it) are quite simply WRONG! -Elvis
This User thinks they can speak this language because they can say "Hello" and "Thank you". SeñorDiZtheGreatCUNAOTM( Worship me!)(Praise me!)(Join me!)AMEN! 00:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I know it's a bit like Level ¼, but there's a difference. I don't care if anyone changes the phrases, though, long as it's funny.
This User speaks this language because they are getting good money from it and/or without it would fall into immediate bankruptcy.
Proposed by User:Uncyclopediclo 24-04-08
This user doesn't understand this language at all, but can copy / paste phrases to pretend that they do.
Quite relevant as this is pretty much how I learned what I know of mediawiki and html ;P
--Jonjammin 01:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Add an American English for balance, you just need to edit this project page and create one template (see Uncyclopedia:Language_Templates). We please to aim. --Splaka 13:51, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I would've thought something that was to parody Wikipedia:Babel would have to be known as Uncyclopedia:Babble. --theRealSheep 14:01, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I've changed the caption for the Wikipedia tower image that I had added in the article page to now read "Tower of Babble". I had been planning to do that a long time ago, so I figured that I may as well do it now. --Ogopogo 14:18, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
BBL
This user has too many Babel boxes on their user page.
I managed to babble on far too much on my own user page... --theRealSheep 17:16, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I like this idea! Someone do it, I'm too lazy. Redirect Uncyclopedia:Babel to it, though. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 10:48, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Heh, it might be a bit annoying to change the links though. Probably be better to keep it at the correct name (like we do with provinces, names of presidents, and cheeses) and make the redirect Uncyclopedia:Babble point to it. --Splaka 10:53, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
un
This user does not speak fluent Uncyclopedian and requires some clarification.
What is your definition of large majority!? as only 13 of those 31 categories use Template:Langlevels, the rest must be changed manually. --Splaka 21:23, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Hmmm... So I guess it is just my back luck that the seven languages that I randomly selected - only one did not use the template? Besides, more than half of the 50-something links use the two templates mentioned above. Anyway. Surely, it's not that hard to edit two words on the remaining 19 pages manually - I would even consider volunteering myself to do the task. I guess the question is, "Is there enough users support to move U:Babel to U:Babble?" --theRealSheep 14:40, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Or Uncyclopedia:Babble could be made a redirect, and {{title-left|Uncyclopedia:Babble}} could be added to the babel page. Then it looks like it's called Uncyclopedia:Babble but without all the hassle of having to change all of the links. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I think that Uncyclopedia:Babel has become a bit of a mess and needs a thorough cleaning up. I think that we should remove all of the absurd joke languages (Pie?), some of the redundancy (how many Englishes do we really need?) and generally purge things a bit. While I'm at it, is it really necessary to have the exact same bulletted list for every single language listing; could we get by listing it once? --Sirgwax (talk) 02:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I made a Swedish language template, but I am still a poor speaker of it. Could anyone who speaks Svenska please translate the sentences on Category:user sv? Would be very much appreciated. Tack! Thank you!--DiZ 17:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
They were all right until after the Discordian one. After that they got a bit less funny and a bit more offensive. But I would use the Evolutionist one if it was made. By the way, what's Fatwah? SeñorDiZtheGreatCUNAOTM( Worship me!)(Praise me!)(Join me!)AMEN! 00:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
When you write or do something which makes Muslim(s) cry they come after you with guns and bombs and burn images of you and conduct a general campaign of hate against you... - 05:19 8 April (Wow bringing back something from 2006 June! - I wasn't even born then!)SirFSt. (QotFBFFNotM)YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
Maybe category:user ca wasn't such a bright idea, as a language code for Catalan conflicts with it. The abbreviation for the Canadian language should be eh?
I have a feeling I'd be almost the only one using these, but how about a series of templates for Welsh? It annoys me that there aren't any since it's one of the three languages I list on Babel things. I suppose the templates would look the same as those for other languages, if anyone made them.
For that matter, there are a lot of languages we don't have probably just because they're minorities. To be fair I would have to raise a fuss about all of them. I'm not doing that because it would be too much work and maybe not necessary.
On a separate note, it's 'embarrassment', not 'embarassment'. I'm going to go in and fix that. Llwy (scold|hover) 18:46, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Why is the section header showing up in such a weird place? Llwy (scold|hover) 18:48, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
I'd like Scottish languages/dilects please, that's Scots, Scots (Gaelic), English with a Scottish accent and Frisian (spoken on the Shetland Isles I believe). Oh, and Manx, Cornish dilect, Yorkshire accent, Liverpool, Saaf London: blad and posh English. Thanks. Sir ScottPatUnSCUNVFH (talk) 19:49, April 27, 2013 (UTC)