Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd Archive tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


2005cruft

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 7028 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't get it. It's seems a little bit too childish. --2nd Chance for me (because I was banned.) (Say) 21:42, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject of the article, "2005cruft," is our term for crufty articles that have been on the site since its start, in 2005. This is archetypal bad writing that is not saved by being "a page in the style of the thing it's about." Namely, unattributable quotations, memes from Chuck Norris to Hitler, swastikas painted on anuses, lists of junk entries, and nonsense numbers. It is the typical page that offers the author the glee of having finished an Uncyclopedia page without having to spray-paint a bridge abutment, and offers the reader nothing. Spıke ¬ 21:52 3-Oct-13
  3. Derpy face Revenge Of The Bronies - "It seem's a little bit too childish." - A guy who watches a cartoon for little girls on Mr-ex777's writing. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 08:07, Oct. 4, 2013
  4. Symbol delete vote My anus already has too many swastikas ...I'd rather not alk about it... --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 13:52, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Red Teacup

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 7033 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The concept is great, as nominator says, and the execution could be repaired. On the talk page, departed Admin Andorin Kato explains why he did not take the page to VFD in 2009 despite its awful second half. This is ready-made instructions to anyone wishing to earn a VFD Save. (I voted Symbol delete vote Delete in 2010, saying I didn't see a point to the page.) Spıke ¬ 22:08 3-Oct-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfunny, random, nonsense. I think the concept of a British naval officer being a drug lord is great but this article poorly executes it with a made-up name. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:09, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Other War of 1812

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 7033 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Nope (Ruining Scott's nomination) The George Bush quote us very good! I especially liked the last parts of the article, but even the first ones can work. Scott, the fact that you were new, does not mean it is bad. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:01, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
    It's random, unfunny nonsense. The title refers to a made up war. A better version can be found at War of 1812. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:14, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
    If you really want to, then I will take back my vote. But don't be so critical to yourself: the article may need a slight rewrite but it is good. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:45, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
    Not on the strength of yet another observation that Bush was an inept speaker. Spıke ¬ 18:26 3-Oct-13
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Self-nom and Delete Vote for my article please! Yes well what can I say I was a noob. Utter random, incoherent nonsense with minimal funny parts. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. In case Puppy again objects to having to review for deletion a page with only one contributor, I disclaim my brief involvement with it. Spıke ¬ 16:47 3-Oct-13
Comments

Water Gun Drive-Bys

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 7051 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful article from 2007, and we're nothing but picking up steam for newer qualities. Delete. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:20, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It almost reads like an UnNews — or that bikers from Devon are writing about themselves. Spıke ¬ 23:24 2-Oct-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

12 year olds invading the Internet

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 7054 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. This actually is a well-read and well-known page here. It was saved in the past with a large plurality of votes, and that alone should render it untouchable. A popular page, even though it isn't hilarious (although most 12 year olds are, the young women at least, who I pry away from their mothers with candy apples and folding money). Aleister Gandhi's Birthday, '13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. What Al said. Except the bit about stealing children - my parole officer may be reading. Pup What's good for the goose is good for the Ghandi, '13
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not that funny. Un-encyclopedic. Use of second person. Random images. It would be funnier if it was an article written as though it resembled a 12 year old writing it. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:30, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. There is humor to be had on this subject. But as it goes on and on with actual dialogue of 12-year-olds, it becomes clearer that author thinks they are so stupid as to be funny, and author is cataloguing their humor rather than writing humor. Spıke ¬ 20:38 2-Oct-13
Comments
  • I abstained in 2010 when this was kept, 6-1; I was not here in 2007 when it survived, 4-5. Spıke ¬ 20:38 2-Oct-13

127.0.0.1 (Uncensored)

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 7054 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Strong keep. Follow the link to Wikipedia. 127.0.0.1 is one of the IP addresses that are designed to loop back to the sender. The joke is that every criticism the author makes of 127.0.0.1's bad behavior is done without realizing that it is his own behavior. Spıke ¬ 20:45 2-Oct-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. (Formerly DELETE) I see the humour now. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:49, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)

#Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. Talks about IP address. Not encyclopedic and random. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:25, October 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • In fact, this article should replace "127.0.0.1" (the censored one). See below. Spıke ¬ 20:45 2-Oct-13

127.0.0.1

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 7053 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Overuse of censored. See above. Spıke ¬ 20:45 2-Oct-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed.Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:49, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Redundant if the other one is kept. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:40, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

)

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 7054 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Three lines of writing. Not funny. Written backwards (I don't get that joke) Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:11, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. "Author" took a screenshot of the navigation template, reversed it, and made it the article. Funny? Why? Spıke ¬ 20:31 2-Oct-13
Comments

'N Sync

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 7055 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listcruft. Not funny and devoid of content once lists removed. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:09, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's Pantera all over again. Starts gay, ends listy. Spıke ¬ 19:13 2-Oct-13
Comments

Ellipses

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 7068 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. You guessed it another keyboard alphabet filler! Not funny, lacking content and un-encyclopedic. Completely random. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:12, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article tries to survive by hiding in the category of "pages in the style of the thing they're about." It has no other humor. Spıke ¬ 13:43 2-Oct-13
Comments

(Slash character)

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 7068 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The slash character has a storied history in computing, and I've now provided some of it. Spıke ¬ 13:25 2-Oct-13
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Devoid of content. Lacking humour. Utter randomness. It is only there as a filler for the keyboard alphabet template. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:08, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not that funny. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:56, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

For some reason the link doesn't work on VFD so here is the page [1].Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:09, October 2, 2013 (UTC)

100 reasons to ban Lyrithya

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 7079 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listcruft. Random nonsense that isn't funny. Meme/in-joke about a user who is no longer here that only a few people will ever get. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:56, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. First-person vanity with a description of the joy of writing first-person vanity. If anyone wants to preserve the past, simply move this to BHOP where it belonged. Spıke ¬ 19:12 1-Oct-13
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. It's one of Frosty's articles. Could park it there if we don't want it on mainspace. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:15, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
    • You or I could retrieve it from the mag-tapes if he protests. Or he could, come to think of it. Spıke ¬ 22:13 3-Oct-13

Area C4M3R00N

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 7087 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't even.                               Puppy's talk page11:31 01 Oct 2013
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Leet in the title ensures readers will never select it. It has only one concept, government conspiracy, on which it breaks no ground. It has no humor. I considered moving this article, to double down and ask voters if you would delete it if it were our only article on the nation, but Cameroon is comparatively complete. Spıke ¬ 12:11 1-Oct-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:56, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is downright painful to my viewing, and agreed with everyone above. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:21, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 7137 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. My main criteria, while judging the article, is, when everything that ought to be cut out would be cut out, if there would still be anything good in the article. In this case, I think that there will. There are many jokes, but they are not phrased well: that's why the article should be rephrased. There is some absolutely useless first and second persona, but that too can be changed. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:48, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
  2. A save by Anton. Aleister 3-10-'13
    Spike did the second half. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 05:57, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, full of memes. Use of 2nd person and Un-encyclopedic writing. Rambles on about made-up nonsense. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:25, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. ??? --Sog1970 (talk) 19:37, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. As a semi-response to Anton, I'd like to point out my rationale. I look for the humour in an article, but also how accessible that humour is. If the humour is buried in incomprehensibility, I'll consider how much effort it would take to remove the chaff and leave the pearls. I then consider the time it would take me to do it, and if I'd get value for the effort. In this instance I'd have to remove 80-90% of the existing content, and rewrite the remainder to legibility. That would leave me with a two paragraph stub, which isn't sufficient to support it's survival as a stand-alone article. Then I'd have to build a concept around that stub, and expand fivefold in order to get an article oreasinable length with only a small amount of value behind it.
    If I was to instead leave it to be deleted, it opens up an avenue for another writer to come along and create a new article from scratch, without being bogged down by the existing junk. It removes a poor article from existence, which discourages the croon of similar dross.
    In short, it shouldn't survive as is, and I'm not going to fix it, so better for it to be deleted, and make room for new creative input.                               Puppy's talk page10:03 01 Oct 2013
    You did not notice that I have rewritten half of the article. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 06:02, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. All of the above, and also a poor imitation of English. It needs a theme. 10:13 29-Sep-13 Rescinded. Spıke ¬ 10:12 3-Oct-13
Comments

Half

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 7200 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. A fine vessel for the photos. I hate spoof mathematical formulas, but this one works. It would fit perfectly in UnDictionary. Spıke ¬ 18:44 26-Sep-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. A joke might be to leave all the words half spelled, but that would get really annoying. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 19:04, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, lack of content. Un-encyclopedic. Uses 2nd person narrative. The only part worth saving is the spoof mathematical formula. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:14, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Fuck Me

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7469 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. ALeIsTeR 15-9-'13
    You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. Spıke ¬ 23:59 15-Sep-13
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. Spıke ¬ 12:48 15-Sep-13
  3. Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small EXTERMINATE!  Awful. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • The article is poorly named, but as we already have an article named Fuck the author was limited in what he could do. Having said that we need a good article on Fuck, but there's a huge challenge - it ha been done before many, many times. Every attempt to create a new article on Fuck - or any of it's derivative forms - that I have seen over the time I've been active has been a copy of something I have read off-site. This is not a bad article, but what's good about it has been done too many times before to be classed as "original humour".                               Puppy's talk page07:54 28 Sep 2013

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
projects