Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 12:46, February 16, 2013 by Aleister in Chains (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd Archive tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


Suicidal Tendencies

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 13261 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't know who this band is, but I'm going to wager R.J. Herrera did not loose his penis in a house fire in 1776, and the band wasn't founded in 666 AD. --Mn-z 12:13, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I remember the band from back in the day. But this article is as enticing as a bucket of peelings from a man with leprosy.                               Puppy's talk page12:22 16 Feb
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What Puppy would call a "fanboy rant" with horrible typography. Also perhaps the website's longest red-link referencing masturbation. Spıke ¬ 12:23 16-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:41, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

JC-bashers

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 13262 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --Mn-z 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. Spıke ¬ 12:12 16-Feb-13
  3. I like Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers, but I also like An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either.                               Puppy's talk page12:28 16 Feb
Comments

Robotic ghost pirates

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 13262 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
Picard-wtf

Picard doesn't like this article.

  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. very short and random article. Although it has been edited several times recently, it seems to consist of the 2006 formula "find a funny title, add funny pics, and fill out the text with randumbo". --Mn-z 11:27, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. All of the quotes are filler. Nonsense year number. Mere naming of Dick Cheney assumed to be a joke. (Who knew it would get to be 2013?) Documented like, yawn, a Pokémon card. And everything nominator sets out. Spıke ¬ 11:39 16-Feb-13
  3. I agree with Picard completely.                               Puppy's talk page11:49 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 13283 hours
Keep (1)
  1. A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. Aleister 14:20 15-2-'13
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. and redirect to Glenn Beck. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --Mn-z 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Delete. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article.                               Puppy's talk page11:43 16 Feb
Comments
  • As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny. Some funny stuff remains and I would like to see it merged into Glenn Beck, as "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. Spıke ¬ 14:31 15-Feb-13
    Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...Aleister minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
    I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. Spıke ¬ 14:41 15-Feb-13
    I strike part of my earlier reply. Glenn Beck was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. Spıke ¬ 16:06 15-Feb-13
    I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! Aleister 12:45 16-2-'13

2012 (Video Game)

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 13285 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. The game was deleted. This was just another advertisement for a crappy text adventure from a now banned user.                               Puppy's talk page12:46 15 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:28, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. Spıke ¬ 14:34 15-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Terms of Use

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 13303 hours
Keep (2)
  1. I believe I am the Admin to whom Mnbvcxz refers. The cases where I didn't realize something was a joke are numerous and legend. In the case I was thinking about, I patrolled an edit to this page and reported it in passing to Sannse without viewing the page as a whole. Although it does air grievances with Wikia and risks attracting trolling by resentful users and perhaps from the Fork, it is seriously funny. We ought to have room for a page imitating legalism, but with a litany not to "publish, copy, display, distribute, [or] put mayonnaise on"--especially when it already has a disclaimer at the start that it's not the real thing. Spıke ¬ 19:04 14-Feb-13
    Actually, Wikia is not mentioned in here at all.                               Puppy's talk page07:55 15 Feb
    No, not by name; but some of the material seems to be motivated by real-world gripes. Spıke ¬ 16:07 15-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Too funny to let die. Besides, if you actually read it, or even scan it, you will realize it isn't the real thing, besides there's a disclaimer at the top pointing to the real thing. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 07:05, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. and soft redirect to Wikia's real terms of use. This fake page has confused even an admin, and isn't that funny. --Mn-z 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Glasses H T D Survivor Oldvfd Archive

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 13313 hours
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro has glimpses of brilliance; Section 1, despite its HowTo: tone, might be rescued; and the lists obviously have to go. 12:10 Symbol keep vote Saved. Spıke ¬ 12:42 14-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. We've seen worse. Admit it. It only needs to be improved just a little... --RockoRocks (talk) 17:54, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. per above. --Mn-z 18:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Picked this one up on ICU, however it has existed since before 2009 so is too old for ICU. It is mostly made up of lists and not particularly amusing lists at that. --ChiefjusticePSX 08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol for vote Kept via rewrite; Sv--me. Spıke ¬ 14:44 15-Feb-13

The Gay Team

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 13327 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smallish, typographically ugly article presses two chronic Spike hot-buttons: (1) The title is a pun, and the reader has to already know the pun to enjoy the article; (2) The page is an Anon magnet, inviting grade-school humor from Anons who cannot do better than gay-bashing and puns. I have nothing against gay-bashing, if done with cleverness, but this is not it; and then again, if you were to write it, why would you misplace it here? Spıke ¬ 18:41 13-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. really doesn't do anything the title-pun. --Mn-z 13:47, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Take an outdated meme. Mash it together with another outdated meme. Add homophobic humour. Then delete the ugly thing.                               Puppy's talk page11:51 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:37, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Folk Force

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 13425 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. category has been mostly emptied due to VFD. It is almost, but not quite, small enough to QVFD. --Mn-z 16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Again, this arc of Uncyclopedia pages is mostly untouched in 7 years, and Wikipedia has not heard of the Folk Force nor of the several members for which I searched. Spıke ¬ 16:38 9-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Old vanity. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:39, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

The Botanist

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 13570 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --Mn-z 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. Spıke ¬ 02:08 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Old unfunny vanity. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:39, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
projects