Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 00:53, February 12, 2013 by SPIKE (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd Archive tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


CANQU

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 13511 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This typographically ugly article about nothing has been abandoned since 2008, and can you blame us? Spıke ¬ 00:50 12-Feb-13
Comments
  • Kept, 6-4, by VFD in 2008. One keeper called it an "obvious parody of a boring wikipedia article" but the 2008 nominator says he found nothing on Google or Wikipedia. Spıke ¬ 00:50 12-Feb-13

Extreme Hide and Seek

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 13511 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. I was going to quoticide and remove Listcruft as well as general QC based removal, but realised I'd be left with about one paragraph. Maybe an Undictonary item, but not enough to sustain an article.                               Puppy's talk page12:47 12 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. There is nothing here but an Anon magnet--as we are seeing today. Spıke ¬ 00:53 12-Feb-13
Comments

🔒 Toast Wars H T D Survivor Oldvfd Archive

Score: -3
Elapsed Time: 13519 hours
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. In contrast to Mecha-Pope, this one starts with a little erudition. (I can add no more of that, but Romartus certainly can.) I'll go in and clean it up. Spıke ¬ 17:15 11-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Quirky. Added a few extra lines. Not a feature but desperately bad either. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:03, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. Aha.. here's the problem! Too many bad jokes! You know what they say.. all toasters... toast toast!--RockoRocks (talk) 21:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)

Symbol delete vote Delete. wacky war. withdrawn per fixing. --Mn-z 17:02, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. its better, but I still don't get it. --Mn-z 17:28, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
    As I see it, an insane attempt to force together elements of the history of Catholicism with the elements of a fine breakfast (converging, of course, on the Earl of Sandwich). Spıke ¬ 17:33 11-Feb-13
    I have put out a call to Romartus, our scholar of the Inanities. Spıke ¬ 17:36 11-Feb-13

  • Symbol for vote Kept per fix. Spıke ¬ 21:04 11-Feb-13

Mecha-Pope

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 13519 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. makes Pope Fuck look good. Untouched since 2006 except for a category removal. --Mn-z 16:58, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Serial meme-cruft for the "pedophiles/fucktards." That both these articles use nonsense year numbers is one facet of acting out against the Catholic Church rather than writing anything seriously amusing (which would involve a basis in reality). Spıke ¬ 17:11 11-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title better than the article that followed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't get it man --RockoRocks (talk) 21:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • It would be fun, especially now, to assemble a set of Popes, comparable to our Jesii and Preggos, but these articles are both crap. Spıke ¬ 17:11 11-Feb-13

Pope Fuck

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 13519 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A grade-school rant sandbox. Spıke ¬ 16:45 11-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. how did survive so long? --Mn-z 16:53, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Papal Bull. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:05, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Folk Force

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 13567 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. category has been mostly emptied due to VFD. It is almost, but not quite, small enough to QVFD. --Mn-z 16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Again, this arc of Uncyclopedia pages is mostly untouched in 7 years, and Wikipedia has not heard of the Folk Force nor of the several members for which I searched. Spıke ¬ 16:38 9-Feb-13
Comments

The Botanist

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 13712 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --Mn-z 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. Spıke ¬ 02:08 5-Feb-13
Comments

Scooter

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 13777 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)
  1. Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish.                               Puppy's talk page11:04 31 Jan
Comments
  • German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. Spıke ¬ 12:09 1-Feb-13

Smoky Harry

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 13784 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the Folk Force. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --Mn-z 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. Spıke ¬ 12:15 1-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Moses Purple

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 13784 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the Folk Force to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at Uncle Tom that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --Mn-z 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. Spıke ¬ 15:41 31-Jan-13
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --Mn-z 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)


Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
projects