Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 04:48, February 8, 2013 by Simsilikesims (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Deletion Policy
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion


Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.

How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):

Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd Archive tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

HowTo:Cheat on RuneScape

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 28422 hours
Keep (1)
Delete (0)

#Unfunny, ugly, and poorly written. Needs to go to Heaven now. --Snippy 08:26, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol neutral vote Stain on my lower torso. Cut it to shreds to remove the worst of it an added bits and bobs to give it a loose concept. Not brilliant by a long shot, and I won't cry about it's deletion if that's the way it goes, but it's passable IMFAO.                               Puppy's talk page10:41 06 Feb
  • Hey, that's no so bad anymore. I'll Symbol neutral vote abstain for now. --Snippy 21:19, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

The Botanist

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 28487 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --Mn-z 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. Spıke Ѧ 02:08 5-Feb-13

Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 28539 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. Spıke Ѧ 11:52 1-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --Mn-z 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)


Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 28552 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)
  1. Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish.                               Puppy's talk page11:04 31 Jan
  • German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. Spıke Ѧ 12:09 1-Feb-13

Smoky Harry

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 28558 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the Folk Force. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --Mn-z 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. Spıke Ѧ 12:15 1-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Moses Purple

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 28559 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the Folk Force to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at Uncle Tom that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --Mn-z 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. Spıke Ѧ 15:41 31-Jan-13
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --Mn-z 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Polytechnic University of Bucharest

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 28625 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Abandon all hope, ye who enter here! Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. Spıke Ѧ 21:36 28-Jan-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --Mn-z 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft.                               Puppy's talk page11:16 05 Feb

Harriet Tubman

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 28665 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --Mn-z 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. May not be the funniest but there is a lot of content here and a lot to build off of. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:20 Feb 8 2013
Delete (0)

No delete votes.


Archived VFD Discussions


Personal tools